[...]
Hello again,
I wrote to you that he asked me to confirm whether it was me in the telegram, I agreed and confirmed it, but I have nothing to do with the transfer of funds specifically. Okay, I accept this challenge, just give me one day to prove to you that anyone can be deceived in this way, it's really absurd, I didn't want to get into it until the last.
Not need to ask theymos that, you can ask it from me I am not hiding and I am convinced that I am right in this situation.
I think you understand things wrongly here, we are not judging and sentencing that you're the wrong one, we are simply looking for the truth behind the story, and only after that we can determine which user told lies and which one is the victim. The red tag given by DireWolfM14 was initialy raised to merely catch your attention toward this thread. It is not impossible that --if adequate evidences are given-- the real story here is the OP lied for whatever reason. But, so far, OP has evidences that incriminate you, so the ball is in your court.
There is no need to prove that you can fabricate evidences to deceive people, no one challenging you to edit photos to work in your favor. What we asked is for you to give counter-evidence that the screenshot given by OP is not correct, but not by editing another image to fabricate evidences, if both of you keep doing this, everything will go downhill.
As you said that you do sent a PM to the OP in the middle of, I assume, a job negotiation, I think it is safe to say that at least that evidence is valid. So, the story so far according to OP, you approached them to offer your service, asked for an upfront full payment --50 dollars, and I'll repeat myself just for thr record, IMO the amount is too small to risk a reputation-- and leave after you got the transfer.
With OP claiming you deleted the entire chat -but it seems, not before they can archive some screenshot-- and blocked them, and you claimed they deleted the chat after you refused the job --unfortunately, before you can archive the convo to work in your favor--, the case turns into a whodunnit.
I'll suggest we can start from whether TG name "Crypto Has" is really you or not, because I can't find your username using the handler you posted months ago, so I can't confirm it myself.
Haпиcaл вaм нo в oтвeт пoлyчил блoк, oбъяcнитe ? мoй tg @ThatsMod
And then, after we established if the name is correct --and thus, the screenshots provided were at least bear some truth in it-- I'll suggest you to point out, according to your version, which part of conversation is true and from which part is fabricated.
I think it is rather futile at this point, but...
keraldk, we are still waiting for the proof that ThatsMod blocked you from TG
DireWolfM14, as ThatsMod is already present here and to give an equal position for both parties, would you mind to retract the negative tag for now --or at least change them into neutral-- until it is proven which side lied and which side told the truth?
