[CPBS] WasabiWallet.io Signature Campaign | Up to $120/W

[Fiatless]

Username: Fiatless
Segwit Bitcoin address: bc1q2gyx8djznd0yenhy9jfrkufp7hh3322j48uscy

[mandown]

Username: mandown
Segwit Bitcoin address: bc1qqcdjy9amjyjygcdflj4szdwkee3qs02afvsysm

[icopress]

Code:

DrBeer
Julien_Olynpic
Chikito

Welcome / Payments for 6 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 48,000]}

There is something else I would like to discuss.

As you know, a signature campaign is a type of advertising that is shown under a member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without explicit indication. And I have never forced anyone to mention or recommend an advertised project directly in posts as this should be voluntary.

But today, as a manager, I was extremely outraged because I observed a situation where a user wears a Wasabi signature, and recommended other open source wallets.

After advertising for mixers was banned here on the forum, payout rates began to decline due to lack of competition, but Wasabi decided to be understanding and respectful of the contributions of quality posters while maintaining a high level of rates. At the very least this deserves respect.

I don’t mind at all if you recommend this or that wallet as long as you list the list of available options. But if you recommend open source wallets without mentioning the one whose advertisement you are wearing, then you have no place on my team, since I see this as a disparaging attitude towards my work and the advertised project.

I will respond to similar incidents in the future.

[willi9974]

btw. Wallet was linked since 2020 :-) on our german new member page and mayby also some good links for all of us but in german :-)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5299615.0

Best regards,
Willi

[examplens]

There is something else I would like to discuss.

As you know, a signature campaign is a type of advertising that is shown under a member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without explicit indication. And I have never forced anyone to mention or recommend an advertised project directly in posts as this should be voluntary.

But today, as a manager, I was extremely outraged because I observed a situation where a user wears a Wasabi signature, and recommended other open source wallets.

After advertising for mixers was banned here on the forum, payout rates began to decline due to lack of competition, but Wasabi decided to be understanding and respectful of the contributions of quality posters while maintaining a high level of rates. At the very least this deserves respect.

I don’t mind at all if you recommend this or that wallet as long as you list the list of available options. But if you recommend open source wallets without mentioning the one whose advertisement you are wearing, then you have no place on my team, since I see this as a disparaging attitude towards my work and the advertised project.

I will respond to similar incidents in the future.

It is clear what you are pointing to, I support this position.
At the same time, it is certainly complicated to include Wasabi in a discussion without the self-invitation of a couple of trolls who will derail the discussion by repeating the same mantra.
ANN thread, preferably self-moderated, is still necessary. I hope that you will find a model that will make it functional.

[ABCbits]

I don’t mind at all if you recommend this or that wallet as long as you list the list of available options. But if you recommend open source wallets without mentioning the one whose advertisement you are wearing, then you have no place on my team, since I see this as a disparaging attitude towards my work and the advertised project.

Is it right to assume it's limited when someone recommend open source wallet for desktop with certain CPU architecture (x86 or x86_64 for all OS and ARM for Mac OS)?

[icopress]

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 7 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 52,200]}

[...]

We're only talking about cases like this

Bob ^{[participates in campaign X]}: Alice, I recommend using wallet A, B, C - Not ethical
Bob ^{[participates in campaign X]}: Alice, I recommend using wallet A, B, C, X - Ethical

Of course, this does not apply to cases where, for example, wallet X does not have any specification that Alice is asking about. Then recommendation A, B, C is ok.

In general, no one should even think about this, since what I am talking about implies that good ethics should be at the level of instincts among campaigners. Just look at the names on the spreadsheet next to you and you'll see what I mean.

[icopress]

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 8 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 51,450]}

[Ale88]

^{[Exchange rate: 51,450]}

Thanks for the quick payment, Icopress, just in time before the little pump

[hugeblack]

Week 9 has ended so I decided to remove my signature. Thanks for 9 weeks, everything went smoothly and professionally.

[icopress]

Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 9 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 65,000]}

Wasabi has released a new update: https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/wasabi-latest-release-2-0-6-is-out/

I will be very grateful if you take a look and express your constructive opinion in the discussion thread.

[icopress]

The campaign is currently paused / Payments for 10 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 72,500]}

At the moment there are several open campaigns under my management so I look forward to your applications.