What is the motive behind the shooting of the Japanese PM?

[naira]

On Friday morning, Japan's prime minister officially died after the shooting in the city of Nara. Tetsuya Yamagami is the name of the suspect who made 2/3 of the shots right in the chest which made the prime minister rushed to the hospital and died there. Based on the article I read, the motive behind this shooting was due to dissatisfaction with Shinzo Abe's leadership during his tenure. The weapon used is confirmed to be a homemade shoutgun.

In your opinion, apart from the embedded revenge motive, could there be a policy that is truly unacceptable to the suspect, because based on Tetsuya Yamagami background is a former Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force, is it just a personal grudge?

source :

• https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-62089486 (including shooting seconds video)
• https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/08/asia/japan-shinzo-abe-dies-shooting-intl-hnk/index.html
• https://apnews.com/article/japan-shinzo-abe-shooting-22ec2248d92304deb9cc46b2142402d2

[montaga]

His fatal error was to speak the truth about the Ukraine war and blaming Zelensky for it.
https://see.news/former-japanese-pm-zelenskys-decisions-led-to-outbreak-of-war-in-ukraine/

[TheNineClub]

The shooter told the investigators that a grudge against a religious sect that (to his belief) had ties to Abe. It seems really strange that he would target someone like Abe and not religius leaders themselves...I mean, it's still a motive that could verry well be the truth, but an odd choice. As for it being connected to Ukraine...sure, it's also connected to the Nazis who live on the dark side of the moon FFS.

[Gyfts]

Crazy person does crazy thing is possible, but unlikely.

Was surprised to see such little security surrounding Shinzo Abe which even allowed the assailant to get so close with whatever homemade device he had.

Japan has a death penalty and their system will only allow for the condemned to be informed of their death the morning of. So the prisoner is just waiting around and has no knowledge of when they'll actually be killed. Guess there would have to be larger motive if hanging by death was worth it. Abe was was a nationalist and on the right, is that enough?

[PrimeNumber7]

Was surprised to see such little security surrounding Shinzo Abe which even allowed the assailant to get so close with whatever homemade device he had.

Japan has very strict gun laws, so security is accordingly relaxed. Their gun laws really makes everyone more vulnerable to the one person who decides to break the law.

In your opinion, apart from the embedded revenge motive, could there be a policy that is truly unacceptable to the suspect, because based on Tetsuya Yamagami background is a former Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force, is it just a personal grudge?

As TheNineClub mentioned, it appears the shooter believed Abe to be associated with a religious group. It may be possible that the shooter believed that his mother donated excess money to this group.

[tvbcof]

My first thought was that the Japanese actually tested some of the genetic so-callled 'vaccines' which were to be injected into Japanese citizens, and rejected them due to 'contamination'.

Japan also, unlike any other government, actually asked to see the biodistribution data and found out that the LNP's ferry the genetic payloads straight to the reproductive organs.  (Gee, who could have guessed that that would be the case?)

How much Abe may have had to do with any of the above is unknown (to me at this time) but certainly interfering with the depop shot program in even the limited ways outlined above would be grounds for assassination.  Several African leaders learned that the hard way, and many others around the world certainly took note.  That's probably one of the reasons why almost no 'leader' of or within any government will even touch the 'great reset' depopulation agenda.  Hopefully one day the tide will turn and Abe's fate will meet all of the leaders who DID go along with the project at the expense of their native populations.

[Cnut237]

Was surprised to see such little security surrounding Shinzo Abe which even allowed the assailant to get so close with whatever homemade device he had.

Japan has very strict gun laws, so security is accordingly relaxed. Their gun laws really makes everyone more vulnerable to the one person who decides to break the law.

I agree on the point that Japan has relaxed security due in part to tight gun control laws.

But the argument that "their gun laws really makes everyone more vulnerable to the one person who decides to break the law" doesn't make any sense at all. If you want to use a gun to murder someone, then it is far more difficult for you to do so in Japan than it is in, say, the US. Deciding to break the law doesn't mean you are able to do so, if you can't get hold of a gun. Letting everyone have access to guns causes more gun deaths. Restricting access to guns prevents gun deaths.


https://www.healthdata.org/acting-data/gun-violence-united-states-outlier



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_civilian_guns_per_capita_by_country

[PrimeNumber7]

Was surprised to see such little security surrounding Shinzo Abe which even allowed the assailant to get so close with whatever homemade device he had.

Japan has very strict gun laws, so security is accordingly relaxed. Their gun laws really makes everyone more vulnerable to the one person who decides to break the law.

I agree on the point that Japan has relaxed security due in part to tight gun control laws.

But the argument that "their gun laws really makes everyone more vulnerable to the one person who decides to break the law" doesn't make any sense at all. If you want to use a gun to murder someone, then it is far more difficult for you to do so in Japan than it is in, say, the US. Deciding to break the law doesn't mean you are able to do so, if you can't get hold of a gun. Letting everyone have access to guns causes more gun deaths. Restricting access to guns prevents gun deaths.

If there is a bad person who has the intent of doing bad things, if they do not have access to a gun, they can just as easily use other weapons, that in many cases are more difficult to defend against, such as a car or a truck, or a knife.

[tvbcof]

If there is a bad person who has the intent of doing bad things, if they do not have access to a gun, they can just as easily use other weapons, that in many cases are more difficult to defend against, such as a car or a truck, or a knife.

Like this? : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_subway_sarin_attack

Honestly, I have to go back and re-evaluate most of this kind of crap that I 'understood' as 'fact' from public consensus and media reports, but there is to much of it and so many hours in a day.

It's fair to say that it's kind of lucky when a 'homicidal crackpot' uses a firearm or two in their blaze of glory.  There are FAR better ways to do vastly more damage than using small arms.  I think that the WEF's 'great reset' is a pretty good example of this and there probably are a relatively few full-on psychopaths who are fully read-in on the program and largely responsible for the carnage which is only just getting started.

[PrimeNumber7]

If there is a bad person who has the intent of doing bad things, if they do not have access to a gun, they can just as easily use other weapons, that in many cases are more difficult to defend against, such as a car or a truck, or a knife.

Like this? : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_subway_sarin_attack

Honestly, I have to go back and re-evaluate most of this kind of crap that I 'understood' as 'fact' from public consensus and media reports, but there is to much of it and so many hours in a day.

It's fair to say that it's kind of lucky when a 'homicidal crackpot' uses a firearm or two in their blaze of glory.  There are FAR better ways to do vastly more damage than using small arms.  I think that the WEF's 'great reset' is a pretty good example of this and there probably are a relatively few full-on psychopaths who are fully read-in on the program and largely responsible for the carnage which is only just getting started.

Yes, that is one extreme example of someone causing much more harm to the public than someone with a gun could reasonably do.

It is more common for a bad person to use a truck to crash through a crowd, or to use a knife against innocent people in public. Someone who is determined to harm the public is going to find a way based on what they have available to them. If there are innocent people with guns in public, and a bad person decides to use a gun to try to harm the public, a good samaritan can quickly intervene.

[montaga]

Car carrying Shinzo Abe’s wife rear-ended by police vehicle
https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14678951