maybe he is asking people to review it. like how development should work
.. not be chastised and told to delete post.. like how this subcategory is turning into yet again*lets deal with the actual flaws of the context
(skipping the finer details of all the aspects of 'blockchain' and just dealing with the bits mentioned in the slide)
Fundamental of Blockchain...
1. users create their own transactions,
2. they send the transaction to other users(peers) who send it out to other peers (called peer to peer (p2p)) via their software
3. nodes[software that performs certain functions to offer utility/services] have code/algorithms that perform validation checks as well as relay/store data.
4. specialist nodes [dependant on which network structure] perform extra tasks of collating transactions into a block, including the previous block ID, aswell as secure the contents using special algorithms/devices that meet certain rules/conditions/complexity[dependant on which network ruleset agreed]
5. the secured block is sent out p2p to everyone and if they validate the secured block meets all the set rules of validity and security. the block is confirmed as the next block of the blockchain each node stores, which if all done correctly by all following the rules, every node stores the same chain of blocks and all see the same list of confirmed transactions within those blocks.
6. these specialist nodes creating the secured blocks get a reward for their extra task (if their block is declared the most valid block added to the blockchain), via their block containing the reward, which is then part of the valid value seen by all, to be spent by the block creator later on
this topic was in the Development & Technical Discussion section
elitism seems rampant this month(yet again).. is it the heat?
i see many issues with his slides. but it seems anyone trying to correct anyone or offer suggestions is not tolerated these days
very very weird mindset that has grown over the years.
telling a guy to "go away your wrong" has become the development community mantra and motto.
which begins with hostile hate and then just then turns to ignorance of personal vendetta.
i know i come across as brash and full on in my method of mentioning flaws and issues. but maybe devs and this elitist community should chill out on the 'delete post we dont want it' mindset, to instead be a little more hmm whats the word. OPEN minded
ignoring the guys grammar and spelling mistakes(the usual silly things this development community want to attack first as their excuse to ignore content and chest beat their elitism)
