According to a quick search I did yesterday, there is not enough evidence to prove that both platforms belong to the same operator. Despite this, everyone is firmly convinced that 1xbet is just another interface for 1xbet. Do you have evidence that the two platforms are interconnected? This will facilitate the conviction process, in my opinion.
Yes, we do. There is ample of evidence that these two platforms are interconnected. Even by their own admission. This topic has already been covered extensively. References:
here,
here,
here, and
here.
The problem is, when it comes to things like this, we are never going to have rock-solid evidence. It all depends on what you are going to accept as enough compelling evidence to draw a conclusion.
Just think about it - any two websites can be managed by one guy sitting at a desk in his mom's basement, and insist they are unrelated. How can anyone prove irrefutably that this is not true, unless he admits it? The same thing applies here. It is impossible to definitively prove that they are one and the same company, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that they are. On the other hand, is there any evidence that 1xbit is not part of 1XBET, apart from their claim? If we could identify the actual company or legal entity behind the 1xbit platform, it would be helpful. But there isn't one, is there?
I would like to thank you for the great effort you put into collecting all these proofs. What I found leaves no doubt that a particular party runs a group of gambling sites with different domain names.
I can understand that this evidence may not be strong enough to form an indictment file, but when I am trying to display advertisements on my website or on stadium screens, should I not take all this data into account?
These sites will continue to operate as long as there is someone who accepts money in exchange for displaying advertisements, without taking into account all cases of proven theft.
