Low quality posts or abuse of trust?

[lovesmayfamilis]

I've seen actmyname have a lot of neutral tags for the same reason, so why do you just think JollyGood does it and leaves you so paranoid about getting hurt in the future?

I think the OP rightly cares about the future. He's already told you about it. After looking at JollyGood's account, one can really understand that this guy is very harsh with his tags.

I actually care because I might be a victim some other day hence  I don't know JollyGood or heard anything about him. I also stated clearly in my post what prompted me to check his profile.

The next step JollyGood can take is to change the tag from neutral to negative. After all, you yourself showed an example of how, over time, he changed his assessment.

2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=955510
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=944497
4. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1153164

 I don't think Jolly will follow them, but there is a warning, and it is advisable not to catch his eye, no matter how funny it is said.

[1714725444]

1714725444

[1714725444]

1714725444

[1714725444]

1714725444

[1714725444]

1714725444

[1714725444]

1714725444

[1714725444]

1714725444

[LoyceV]

It's completely fine to leave a message with neutral tag

So tagging someone's account with neutral seems like a good compliment to you right?

Why would it be a compliment? It's a neutral statement, and that's fine:

Neutral (shown as =1)

• Use Neutral feedback for anything that doesn't mean someone can or can't be trusted. This can be good feedback, for instance when someone helped you out.
• I think Neutral Feedback is currently undervalued on Bitcointalk. It's a great tool to de-escalate without drastic consequences. Please use it when appropriate.

It's not Trust abuse, it's a neutral opinion.

@JollyGood: I know you've read [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes, which I think is a better solution instead of writing "Note to self:" on someone's feedback page.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Why would it be a compliment? It's a neutral statement, and that's fine:

Loyce,
yunno in real life setting, everyone understand things differently; infact that's why alot of scholars in class raise thier hands in the air to a question and ends up answering on the contrary. They ain't denied of thier prerogatives yeah? So maybe,this is his but, it is misconceived.

@JollyGood: I know you've read [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes, which I think is a better solution instead of writing "Note to self:" on someone's feedback page.

Jolly is good. So I'd say he be careful. I mean,in adding references like this one to proving any point on the DT.
_Blackstar had a problem worse than this one. So he simply applied some tenderness and overcame paranoia. He is good now I guess.

Cheers ,
Sandra👩‍🦱

[tomos81]

It is very good that Jollygood is doing its duties diligently in the forum. No one here wants scamming calls in the forum. And other DT members who are doing the duty are very honest and very good hearted. I know they are joining this forum with faith and they are very knowledgeable so they are taking great responsibility of the forum.

[dkbit98]

But complaining and whining about a neutral trust will just get your account into more problems as you are showing no signs of self-reflection.

I wrote neutral feedback before to some members, and believe it or not, I sometimes get a private message from that member asking me to please remove my neutral feedback.
Maybe for some reason members are considering neutral feedback to be slightly more negative than positive.
I personally wouldn't be against canceling neutral feedback, but they can still be useful.

I know you've read [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes, which I think is a better solution instead of writing "Note to self:" on someone's feedback page.

BitcoinTalk User Notes is perfect solution thanks to great work from TryNinja.
I think there is still a need to sometimes write neutral feedback to member when you are not sure if you should give negative feedback or not.

[_BlackStar]

_Blackstar had a problem worse that this one.

You mean?

Is it because I tagged some alt accounts with neutral tags, or because I tagged many 1xbit campaign participants with red tags that you think I'm worse than you think?

I just don't understand what you mean, I hope I can get a little explanation here.

[Sandra_hakeem]

_Blackstar had a problem worse that this one.

You mean?

Is it because I tagged some alt accounts with neutral tags, or because I tagged many 1xbit campaign participants with red tags that you think I'm worse than you think?

I just don't understand what you mean, I hope I can get a little explanation here.

No _blackstar, you're cool.
Atleast for the fact that you have worn some tenderness just after the time you weren't sure wether or not you had abused the merit system; ^{so you made a post on meta for clarity}

The adjectival phrase that has the word 'worse' has made the whole story gleam. Honestly,I didn't mean to taunt you.
I was only trying to make it exemplary; that jollygood could probably be careful when sending tags just as you are now.
Infact, I respect how you go extra miles to confirming any illicit misconduct before passing on judgements.

There's nix to worry about 
Cheers,
Sandra👩‍🦱