Which one do you think its more healthy for a project

[judeafante]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

The majority of investors are impatient, they can take projects that are fast in setting up their platform but they are impatient on projects where there's too much delay in the implementation of the roadmap and setting up the platform, they want to see action, updates and see if the developers are really capable, projects never get bad feedbacks if they rush things but they deserve a flag for so many delays, I don't trust projects where there are the absence of updates.

[1715319754]

1715319754

[1715319754]

1715319754

[ningrum]

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

The roadmap is indeed very important for a project, especially to attract investors and the trust of the community and the roadmap must run according to the date,
but if a project with good fundamentals fails to carry out several roadmaps, I think there is no problem, because they must have reasons, it doesn't mean their project failed. ,
for example Ethereum, Ethereum had promised a roadmap for ETH 2.0 which was launched last year, but unfortunately there was a problem, and finally did it this year.

[popeye95]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

The majority of investors are impatient, they can take projects that are fast in setting up their platform but they are impatient on projects where there's too much delay in the implementation of the roadmap and setting up the platform, they want to see action, updates and see if the developers are really capable, projects never get bad feedbacks if they rush things but they deserve a flag for so many delays, I don't trust projects where there are the absence of updates.

Yes, the majority of investors want development to speed up and you're right about that. But missing the timeline in the plan roadmap for a young and upstart project show this team can't keep up with what they've promised. Bad planning, missing deadline, ETA for roadmap being a placebo and not accurate at all,... All of those are signs showing this project is not worth and seems too risky.

[el kaka22]

Roadmaps are not that kind of important in the timing of it. What roadmaps tell me is the fact that they are aiming for some things, and I would love to learn what those things are. If you know what they are aiming at then you would be able to see if they have a good plan or not. That's what a roadmap is, it's just a plan that they have and sometimes they have a great idea and sometimes they do not have a great idea.

This is why I personally believe that the best thing to do would be making sure that they know what they are doing. I personally check the roadmap and see if a project is worthy or not by seeing if they actually have any real idea what they are doing.

[goaldigger]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

The majority of investors are impatient, they can take projects that are fast in setting up their platform but they are impatient on projects where there's too much delay in the implementation of the roadmap and setting up the platform, they want to see action, updates and see if the developers are really capable, projects never get bad feedbacks if they rush things but they deserve a flag for so many delays, I don't trust projects where there are the absence of updates.

Investors are always look for the roadmap of the project and if there’s a lot of delays, that is already a red flag for them which can force them to pull out and buy other project instead. Its ok to take slowly as long as the project is working according to their timeline, but honestly delays are already part of the new projects and even the old one, they still have delays. Rushing the project to get live even if its not ready yet is also a bad decision, take time with your work and be more innovative so investors can find the project valuable.

[Shasha80]

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

The roadmap is indeed very important for a project, especially to attract investors and the trust of the community and the roadmap must run according to the date,
but if a project with good fundamentals fails to carry out several roadmaps, I think there is no problem, because they must have reasons, it doesn't mean their project failed. ,
for example Ethereum, Ethereum had promised a roadmap for ETH 2.0 which was launched last year, but unfortunately there was a problem, and finally did it this year.

Good projects will always keep their promises. Moreover, new projects that want to attract the attention of many investors must really ensure that
the roadmap runs according to the scheduled time. Because if new projects run the roadmap there is a delay and it doesn't match the previously
set date, this can reduce investors confidence in these projects. In contrast to what happened to Ethereum they experienced a delay in the launch of
ETH 2.0, many investors can understand it because Ethereum already has a good reputation. While new projects that are still building their reputation,
should be punctual in executing the roadmap to be able to give a good impression to investors. So these new projects can show a professional attitude
and finally many investors are interested in investing in these new projects.

[Jackl87]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

For me a roadmap is a very important piece of information in my decision if i want to invest into a new and upcoming project or not. What i am looking at is, if the goals in the roadmap make sense and if they are achievable in my opinion. I read so many weird and stupid stuff in roadmaps already and this is a red flag for me then. For example if very small projects give the goal of "Q3 2022 listing at Binance or Coinbase". First of all a listing on a exchange is not really a goal of the development team in my opinion and secondly this is a totally unrealistic goal in my opinion too. For me a roadmap needs to make sense.

[DoublerHunter]

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

^ For now, it is a bit tougher to tell which ones are scams or legitimate projects, sometimes that does matter on the roadmap.
Because I saw a project that are good to be true but at the end, they will turn out into scam.
Investing in them seems like gambling for me, the odds of making a profit are very high and it will turn out into a scam if you are not lucky in choosing a legitimate one. I would rather stick to BTC for less risk.

[justdimin]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Many indications that can say a project is good or not, I don't really pay attention to whether they always follow the trips that have been written in the roadmap, in my opinion the easy thing we say whether the project is good is available in many top exchanges and there is a natural request, not with pumps techniques that often outwit.

I agree that being listed on the big exchanges would make a project great. But in order to get there, first it needs to go through the hard parts of it. I have to say a project that starts out with spending a ton of money is a good indicator.

We should look at that because it means that we are making a good profit and that’s fine, if we are seeing that impact, then we will see how great they will start on the release date as well, maybe even be on the radar for a Binance listing after just a month of being released. But, places that barely have any money to spend, will not be able to get heard that much and it would probably not be listed anywhere at all.

[Silberman]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

For me a roadmap is a very important piece of information in my decision if i want to invest into a new and upcoming project or not. What i am looking at is, if the goals in the roadmap make sense and if they are achievable in my opinion. I read so many weird and stupid stuff in roadmaps already and this is a red flag for me then. For example if very small projects give the goal of "Q3 2022 listing at Binance or Coinbase". First of all a listing on a exchange is not really a goal of the development team in my opinion and secondly this is a totally unrealistic goal in my opinion too. For me a roadmap needs to make sense.

Without a doubt the roadmap not only gives us an insight about what the developers want to achieve, it also tell us about how legitimate the project really is, because as you say having a goal of being listed at an exchange should not really be a goal that should be in a roadmap, so if we see anything that doesn't really make a lot of sense then we know that the developers do not really know what they're doing and as such that is a project in which we must never invest any money because the risk of losing it is simply too high.

[Miaallen]

Being slow at attaining some goals based on roadmap isn't a problem like not following at all. Being slow will not be an issue or bring about any complaints if it is still in line with the stated roadmap.

The team working on any projects should take their time to ensure they have iron things out smoothly before dishing a road so as to avoid failure of delivery at the set time as many of the investors take that as lack of seriousness or no good mastery of what and how to offer what is promised as the objectives of the project.

[Untomabur]

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

^ For now, it is a bit tougher to tell which ones are scams or legitimate projects, sometimes that does matter on the roadmap.
Because I saw a project that are good to be true but at the end, they will turn out into scam.
Investing in them seems like gambling for me, the odds of making a profit are very high and it will turn out into a scam if you are not lucky in choosing a legitimate one. I would rather stick to BTC for less risk.

It's true that it's not easy and sometimes when we've done research it doesn't mean it can guarantee that we avoid scam projects,
I think this is the risk of crypto and we can't completely avoid things like that,
besides Bitcoin investing in top altcoins like Ethereum and BNB is also safe

[virasisog]

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

^ For now, it is a bit tougher to tell which ones are scams or legitimate projects, sometimes that does matter on the roadmap.
Because I saw a project that are good to be true but at the end, they will turn out into scam.
Investing in them seems like gambling for me, the odds of making a profit are very high and it will turn out into a scam if you are not lucky in choosing a legitimate one. I would rather stick to BTC for less risk.

It's true that it's not easy and sometimes when we've done research it doesn't mean it can guarantee that we avoid scam projects,
I think this is the risk of crypto and we can't completely avoid things like that,
besides Bitcoin investing in top altcoins like Ethereum and BNB is also safe

Scam projects are good deceivers because no matter how skeptical we are and how we searched so well just to know their potential, it will still take time before their investors would notice that they're really a scam. They could imitate the movements of legit projects just for them to look like legit projects as well so as much as possible, we shouldn't underestimate the power of searching.

[BIT-BENDER]

You need to understand that road map where made even the activities proper of a project began, Road mad is like a vision or expectations of how the team and devs want their project to go and what’s wrong with road made they don’t always consider real time, why many projects don’t leave up to their road map is probably because they didn’t consider the issues they are encountering in real time when preparing the road map even activities in the crypto-currency eco system usually affect many projects road map.

[Jaered]

I prefer a project following its roadmap, no matter how delayed it may be. Many projects just are just lazy or inept, and cannot fulfill their promises of certain milestones to investors. It bespoke of a redundant team and investors like me want no part of it. Investors run any business

[super bako]

not easy either to understand the scam project. what about the luna investors who lost a lot of money stored in luna in a few days lost. the luna project is very clear that there is a team and large collaboration partners. All activities have big or small risks depending on what we choose. it has become destiny in our life

[lalabotax]

If the developer seems like being hurried up in developing the project without considering the roadmap, I don't think that this will be fine enough. Something conducted hurriedly may also influence the result of the development itself. I think that following the roadmap is good enough. Although it is probably done earlier, this will not be really far away and not based on hurries. It is more important to focus on the quality of the project development based on the target and roadmap.
So far, I found new projects that are too slow in developing the projects and then they are falling because failed in development.

[CuriousGeorge]

I prefer a project following its roadmap, no matter how delayed it may be. Many projects just are just lazy or inept, and cannot fulfill their promises of certain milestones to investors. It bespoke of a redundant team and investors like me want no part of it. Investors run any business

Yeah that's right. Some project developers didn't even think to follow the roadmap and they were only doing what they wanna do with the money that being raised even some were gone with all of money. The developers will always put a huge promises on its roadmap. If the project developers can't do that and it will become a disaster for the project itself.

[sumant]

At present time i did that no project can get your believe permanently because so much scamming happening in crypto space even developers is making project to scammed people. No one has their trust on new crypto. There is only one way to believe the project who has retained many year time at Coinmarketcap and which rank comes under 100. only believe on these crypto and investment make from your choice.

[panjay]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

it's more about momentum, you don't want to release a big update when some big exchange got hacked for example, because it will take their spotlight and it's bad for the price of the said token.

And some projects just slowly rug and drain their own fund that said for dev the project, meanwhile the founder just wasting the money on a luxurious way as possible