although you both changed your feedback, I'm still convinced that both of you were forced and that this is some kind of discussion between you. which again, is not the correct use of the trust rating system here.
the only thing that is clear here is your attitude towards Jollygood. The way you see him and his journey through the forum. I still don't see any evidence enough for the red tag.
After the last update, you added a new reference link to your feedback, I read that topic several times and have not seen any misunderstanding, nor any complaint that someone was cheated or not paid. Just usually discussion, certainly not enough for any trust tag even positive. (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3160752)
everything we have in the case starmyc vs Jollygood is an exchange of feedback between the two of them and a message to you via PM. unfortunately, this is not enough for anything, and without presenting clear evidence by any of them.
therefore, you gave a negative rating based on possible unfair behavior in some deals. You have no clear evidence, even if you don't know what was the subject of the agreement, did they agree that the code itself would be part of the delivered work?
it is evident that your negative feedback was given to him (Jollygood), provoked by your attitude and feelings toward him. I believe you know, such cases are more like a neutral tag, not negative or even positive.
His feedback has no reference (he does not have one in fact) to response my negative feedback to him.
it is interesting that he changed the tag to neutral, no matter how harsh and merciless he seemed when giving negative tags, however, he is ready to admit his mistake.
More reasons,
I did not leave red or neutral to bitlucy scam.
Only 8 users (including me) leave the neutral or red tag on Royse's account. Here are 100 DT1 members, I didn't follow if he tagged the other 90+. isn't this too much drama?
..
I am confused the topic is losing it's merit because
you are thinking it's between me and JollyGood.
It does not matter if JollyGood change the feedback to neutral or remove everything. It's a matter of who we should keep or tilde in our trust setting. To help I even pointed out 4 inspirations that obviously goes well with the examples.
In my OP do you see I talked about JollyGood?
you didn't mention him, but all your screenshots were taken via his profile. from the discussion on this topic, I would say that everyone saw it that way.
The coder also claims he gave over the source code, JG claims he didn't get it. Someone's not telling the truth. If the coder could prove the source code was sent it could help answer that question I think.
I understood differently, that the coder did not want to send the code but was asking for more money.
however, we do not know what the initial agreement looked like, so we cannot know which side did not comply with the agreement.