Bitcoineri su dosta tvrdi i nisu spremni na velike promjene pogotovo ako te promjena negativno utiču na fundamentalne karakteristike bitcoina i blockchaina. Možda se sjećate kraja filma The Wolf of Wall Street kad Leonardo kaže "
sell me this pen". Hajde uvjeri me zašto mi treba RSK? Za NFT, za DeFi? Ti meni Defi - ja tebi Celsius pa izvoli.
pooya87 je odlično objasnio razliku između side chain-a kakav je RSK i second layer-a kao Lightning Network. Iako su slični, u pitanju su dvije različite stvari. Bez Bitcoin blockchain ne funkcioniše ni Lightning Mreža. Ali Rootstock-ov RSK djeluje nezavisno od Bitcoin blockchaina. Kod RSK se ne koristi bitcoin nego token koji je vezan za vrijednost bitcoina. Tu onda moramo imati povjerenje u Rootstock da će ta vrijednost ostati ista kada dođe vrijeme da povučemo svoj bitcoin.
You are confusing 3 different concepts with each other: Second layer, Side chains, Tokens
1. Second layer
Second layer is a different network that is built on top of the main network and relies completely on it. For example if mainnet fails the second layer will fail also.
Example: Lightning Network
2. Side chain
Similar to second layer, side chains are also a different network but they are usually only pegged to main network not built on top of it an they don't rely on main net for security,etc. For example if mainnet fails the side chain can still keep going.
This is also why 1 LN bitcoin is 1 bitcoin but 1 sidechain bitcoin doesn't have to be 1 bitcoin. For example 1 bitcoin turns into X RSK, or 1 bitcoin could turn into 1000 wrapped bitcoin on another chain.
Example: Rootstock, all the wrapped bitcoin tokens, Blockstream's Liquid,...
Another difference between 1 and 2 is the trust. In second layer the trust is minimal while it is not true about side chains specially in case of centralized ones. Sometimes they even involve other signers (eg. liquid) so you rely on those parties too.
