To answer properly, I am dividing your questions into two parts.
How is it you expect to raise funds when you deliberately avoid naming all the names associated with your project? Mostly, investors need to know who they are dealing with before they part with funds.
It raises the questions as to who really is behind this project and what your motives are for hiding their association.
Have you noticed that we have an escrow team to handle the funds? The cosigner of the escrow wallet are aware of the team members. Besides many of our team members listed are well-known too. If an investor doubt this setup then we don't think they are really looking to participate in the project but looking for an excuse not to. We can not satisfy them with anything else.
On the other hand, we are not pushing anyone to join our IBCO. If anyone wants to be a part of us then they are welcome but if they don't then it's fine. The success of the project is NOT
only depending on the funding. Our goal is to be one of the leaders within 2027. With a good funding we are expecting, we can achieve it in time. But that does not mean without a funding we can not achieve the goal. We can. The difference is, it may only require longer time.
It also leaves a void knowing what their role within the project is and how many of the pre-sale tokens will be divided up for their expenses.
Of the 11 members you listed, can you give a breakdown of which member will receive how many chips percentage-wise from the pre/post sale chips as remuneration for their input?
I think you missed or failed to understand our chip metric. You will find it here:
https://ibco.casinocritique.com/#expensemetricChip are not any token or backed by blockchain, although we are thinking out any possible way if we can have it in blockchain but with btc we don't know how it's done.
Consider them just as a unit which helps us to make our calculation easier.
The maximum supply of these unit/Chips we are considering is 9,999
In the IBCO we plan to sell 7,000.
Each Chip unit means 0.001 btc that makes 7 btc for funding.
2,000 Chips out of the remaining 2,999 will be used to give bonus in private and first public sale.
499 chips out of the remaining 999 will be used to share with the community and to use in other promotions if requires.
Finally 500 chips that we are saying team is holding.
By saying team is holding it, we are meaning we may or may not use these chips in the future.
It will be easier if we use numbers to explain.
Consider we were able to sale all 7,000 chips in this IBCO. With bonus and promotion we will use 2,499 chips too. We are working in the project, everything is going well, all are happy but at some point we realized that we need some more funding, we will use those 500 reserved chips. But if we do not need any more funding then after waiting few years we will just burn those chips. In other words, we will declare that we will not use those chips anymore. The used 9,499 chips will be then considered for 10% return pool for the IBCO participants instead of the original 9,999 Chips.
In summary, my answer was supposed to be:
1. No
individual team member is receiving any chip before or after any sale.
2. No
individual team member is handling any funding before or after any sale.
The record of our chips will be found in this spreadhsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FEo0vBAyBOE5ZFDu9Z-LmOtc7iy2UKXETl878Ydj51c/edit?usp=sharing