CSW have people who can prove that he created Bitcoin and he is Satoshi but ?

[BitcoinMoses]

CSW have people who can prove that he created Bitcoin and he is Satoshi but ?

An Extra ordinary Claim requires an Extra Ordinary evidence.

Recently a news is published by CG - Title : Craig Wright is Satoshi Counter Argument.
In the article it is said that  Satoshi's Private has been stolen. Unless, Craig is making a
fake story the writer cannot write this statement.

Where was the private key ?
Who stolen it ?
When did he lost the private key ?

There are many questions arises.

can you read the article published by CG and make your comment about it.

I think, Craig himself has written the article and published it in some one else' name.

What is the truth ?

[sunsilk]

It's obvious that he's a fake. These authors of the articles should give him up and stop giving him the attention that he wants.

What is the truth ?

It's long overdue that the truth is he's not Satoshi. Whether he tell it to the world nonstoply, we knew it that he's just trying to pretend that he's Satoshi.

See, no private keys to prove that he owns those million of bitcoins? What a reason, stolen.

[un_rank]

What is the truth ?

"The Truth" seems pretty obvious.
CSW is falsely claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto and has provided no evidence whatsoever to support that claim. For there to be any other truth, there has to be evidence to support it.
If I began claiming to be Satoshi with no evidence, that is just me being delusional.

The Difference between me making such a claim, and CSW, is he has enough financial support to try and force his delusion on people.

- Jay -

[DigitalMonk]

May be the real Satoshi is playing a puppet show, by  putting  , Craig Wright and James Belal Can to make noise around the world to create news about  bitcoin awareness. May be another group has hired them to do this drama. Who knows what is the truth ?  Except Satoshi.

I just a Monk, Digital Monk. I know only how create news digits computationally and value it as digital gold.

[Bttzed03]

May be the real Satoshi is playing a puppet show, by  putting  , Craig Wright and James Belal Can to make noise around the world to create news about  bitcoin awareness. May be another group has hired them to do this drama. Who knows what is the truth ?  Except Satoshi.

Nah, I doubt that. CSW has been harassing bitcoin developers with lawsuits and demanded the whitepaper be removed from different websites. That doesn't help in the awareness one bit. Why would the real Satoshi even allow another version of his creation?

[348Judah]

CSW have people who can prove that he created Bitcoin and he is Satoshi but ?

But enough threads had been created relating to the Craig display about his claim being Satoshi, he's just using all this to make fame and claim right the wrong way, there's an extent to which money can go and by then, good name, reputation, pedigree will have alot to do in determining justice.

An Extra ordinary Claim requires an Extra Ordinary evidence.

But none of the terms he was able to fulfill, despite the claims without proof

What is the truth ?

The truth is that Craig will soon lay off the claims and everything to calm down at last, because now the movie show is still ongoing.

[bitcampaign]

I don't know what made CSW interested in becoming a Satoshi Nakamoto, is it because of popularity or for some other purpose? I'm still confused by his statement while what we know is that the real satoshi won't reveal his identity to the public

[Bitstar_coin]

I don't know what made CSW interested in becoming a Satoshi Nakamoto, is it because of popularity or for some other purpose? I'm still confused by his statement while what we know is that the real satoshi won't reveal his identity to the public

Obviously because of the spotlight associated with being known as satoshi, if btc where to be some failed project, csw won't be so hell bent on claiming the identity of the creator of a failed project. He crave for the popularity and respect, he is so ambitious and ready to go any length to show it to the world. He claimed to have signed message using one of satoshi private key "only for key witness and partners" , i thought his aim was to prove to the whole world he is satoshi! why secretly signing message multiple times when you can easily do it so the whole btc community will realize it and finally accept it. 

[NotATether]

I think, Craig himself has written the article and published it in some one else' name.

What is the truth ?

To put it bluntly, you wrote a very foolish post, as somebody who is proudly wearing on their personal text I am Satoshi Nakamoto, so how can you of all people believe something like that to be logical and true? (Unless you happen to also be Craig Wright, which is highly doubtful -  you haven't argued with gmaxwell and other former devs enough, if at all - mudslinging is Faketoshi's favorite pastime).

[avikz]

Lol! We are really tired of this CSW shit. I honestly believe that CSW is a setup by FBI or some other government authority whi tried to lure out Satoshi. The verdict given by Court was also a part of the entire conspiracy.

It's quite obvious that CSW is fake and that's why he can't simply access the main wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto. We will readily accept him as Satoshi if he is able to access the wallet and transfer funds out of it. That's simple for the original Satoshi!

[franky1]

coingeek is not an independent media

its paid for by the tribe supporting CSW.
anything every said in coingeek is always going to side with CSW. as its literally his media outlet.

never be surprised by coingeek articles adoring CSW. supporting CSW.  its his media outlet. thus treat ALL articles in coingeek as misrepresenting the facts

[DeathAngel]

All he’d have to do is prove cryptographically that he is Satoshi by signing a message from a well known Satoshi address or even an uber early block. He can’t do this because simply, he is not Satoshi. He’s a fraud being bankrolled by an alleged pedophile. 

[JayTrain]

this type is famous for many harsh and often untruthful statements, I don't know why he does it all, maybe he wants to hype on this, but clearly he should not be trusted and check the information behind him.

[BitcoinPanther]

The question of signature has always ranked at the top in the inquiry of Satoshi identity. That is, if Wright is Satoshi, he could easily prove that by publicly signing a message using the private key of one of the bitcoin addresses known to be Satoshi’s.

I took the signature matter seriously, and investigated into it deeply, not only from a factual viewpoint, but also from a legal and a strategy viewpoint. I had previously written on this issue: Why doesn’t he just sign?, emphasizing the fact that he did sign it, multiple times, but only privately for key witnesses and partners, but not publicly.

I was like... WTH.. when I read that bolded line.  These guys are making fool of the people.  As if there is harm when they sign the message in public.  Definitely, I would also stop reading the article if ever I stumbled that kind of reasoning.  That is pure mind setting and manipulation making CW a legit Satoshi which we know that it is impossible.  I wonder when will they stop embarrassing themselves.

[dezoel]

Honestly, this ain't that wrong, if he can sign from genesis saying he is satoshi, then people believe him, if he can't then nobody will, end of story. Do not really have any type of situation that requires me to have a faith in one person. On top of that, satoshi doesn't even need to "say" anything, that's the funny bit, he has been talking about how he is satoshi for so long and I guess it does help him a bit with fame and wealth, which is why I believe he still does it.

Doesn't matter if you believe him or not, all he cares about is the fact that he can do whatever he wants and that's fine for him, if there are even a thousand people that believes in him, that's enough.

[franky1]

CSW is pretending to be rich by having a list of public addresses (anyone can copy) that collectively show as alot of value.. but no proof he actualy has control of those funds

he no longer/well never has properly used the real satoshis known addresses (the block extranonce sequence analysis list that shows a sequence satoshi mined)

he instead grabbed lots of random addresses with significant values of early adopters

when CSW published his list, those early adopters signed transactions and messages to say that those funds were not CSW's

thus proving CSW does not have a huge stash he can control
he has never paid any of his loyal puppet pals any value from his supposed wealth.

..
what has occured is that his loyal subjects have paid HIM.. and they are  now soo neck deep in debt/crap. that they are now living under a new promise. that if they promote CSW to fame (even via lies) he will pay them back with the riches he earns via the fame (convention speaker money, booked deals, movies deals, court lawsuit wins)

so yes CSW can find a few "people" that will say he is an inventor.. even if they never knew him before 2014
all because they are financially incentivised to say he is an inventor

oh. the funny thing is. CSW is not a coder. he cant really read code. its why he pays devs at nchain to do things for him, and even they mostly just copy and paste things from other coins and then do minimalist tweaks to fit CSW's need of the day

take calvyn ayres
he believes CSW story because of "proof of mom"
yep calvyn invested millions into CSW and is now in debt and toeing the CSW line to hope for ROI because he believed CSW's mother

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1464801434826772489

is testimonials from those around Craig proof or just evidence in your mind...is there a number of testimonials that become proof to you as I know three folks personally that knew him when he invented Bitcoin and discussed it with him as he invented it. One is his mother.

the other (out of 3) is CSW wife.