War in Ethiopia, why is everyone silent?

[zasad@]

I don't think it's about racism.
In order to live well in Europe and the USA, there must be a war in Africa. This helps to take the most resources at a very low cost.

This is serious and what can be more racist than this? Is it that the Europe and US depend on the raw material from Africa to the extent that they will be allowed into war so they will be sucked off their resource to persecute the war. The growth being stagnated because of these wars, no country progresses with political instability and economic misdirection. This challenges have bedeviled the continent but the countries there have no proper leadership direction and that is the problem of Africa.

The USA was a British colony until 1776. The US wants to control all the processes in the world and create problems for China. There are a lot of factors here. The situation in Ethiopia weakens China's influence in Africa. The situation in Ukraine weakens Europe and Russia, and Ukraine had the largest army in Europe.

[Invester]

Why most people are always like these?

1. US supporter: Turning a blind eye of its underground activities meddling other countries affairs for its own benefit.
2. Russian supporter: Turn a blind eye on Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia.
3. Chinese supporter: Turn a blind eye on Xinjiang, Tibet and its tiny neighboring Asian neighbors.
4. Western Europe supporter: Turn a blind eye on its exploitations and hypocrisies.

[teosanru]

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-22/ethiopia-s-war-toll-grows-as-the-world-looks-away

"Though the war’s true toll is impossible to know, researchers from Belgium’s Ghent University estimate as many as half a million people have died so far: between 50,000 and 100,000 from the fighting, 150,000 to 200,000 from starvation and more than 100,000 from the lack of medical attention. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has expressed concern about possible ethnic cleansing in Tigray, but the government in Addis Ababa has dismissed this as “spurious.”"

In this country, the interests of 2 countries China and the United States clashed. China was friends with the current government, and the US supported Nobel Peace Prize winner Abiy Ahmed, whose actions led to a civil war with heavy losses.

If you do not want democracy, then you will have a war in your country .. how many times will this story be repeated?

Only reason why this is not being reported is that it's not happening in any first world country, neither a first world country has any direct relation with this war, Also this area is not important to any 1st world country for its geopolitics, so because of all this, no one really is talking about this. If the first world country want these sort of wars can be easily avoided in any country of the world, they have enough resources to supply to the federal government of these countries to supress any such anti-national uprising however they chose to stay away from such small countries in turn letting people die.

You just dished out the raw truth. The first country doesn't try to get involved in something that doesn't favour or add value to her country. Am yet to understand why the news of what is happening in Ethiopia hasn't gone viral for the whole world to know about it.

African countries should unite and stop all this unnecessary waging of war hovering around their territory than waiting for the first country to get involved in all their wars before they put a stop by finding a lasting solution

The main problem is that African countries cannot unite, obviously you are in a region which is least developed in the world and most of you have been under common colonial rule, and as they say if two people are fighting there must have been an European just passed by. This is true for Africa as well. They too have lot of internal disputes, some inter country disputes and some civil war within the countries. And I don't think there is going to be a solution for these for next few decades.

[Gozie51]

I don't think it's about racism.
In order to live well in Europe and the USA, there must be a war in Africa. This helps to take the most resources at a very low cost.

This is serious and what can be more racist than this? Is it that the Europe and US depend on the raw material from Africa to the extent that they will be allowed into war so they will be sucked off their resource to persecute the war. The growth being stagnated because of these wars, no country progresses with political instability and economic misdirection. This challenges have bedeviled the continent but the countries there have no proper leadership direction and that is the problem of Africa.

The USA was a British colony until 1776. The US wants to control all the processes in the world and create problems for China. There are a lot of factors here. The situation in Ethiopia weakens China's influence in Africa. The situation in Ukraine weakens Europe and Russia,

I understand the history of US independence in 1776 yes and the fact that they are trying to hold on to power against the close rivals of Russia and China.

I also understand that during the scramble for Africa era regarding slave trades and more, that Africa was the source of raw material including human labour for Europe, but is China having any connection in the past with Ethiopia ? Except this current economic struggle for Africa trading space. I remember Ethiopia wasn't colonized.

and Ukraine had the largest army in Europe.

Ukrainian army isn't the largest in Europe. I was reading 50 most powerful military in the world , Ukraine was number 25th while Russia was 2nd after USA (1st) and before China (3rd).
I watched this from SnapTube but I don't like warfare, I like the world to be in peace but I know that isn't possible  

[Erumo]

Everyone are silent because Russia, USA and China are not involved in that war directly.

[Majestic-milf]

To answer your question on why the silence, I will put it mildly – Perhaps it's because Ethiopia proved stubborn to Europe in the past as it wasn't colonized by any. It remained the only country in Africa with Liberia that weren't colonized.

If you do not want democracy, then you will have a war in your country .. how many times will this story be repeated?

I see this pattern all the time too and I see the hand of the US in it. It was the same fate Libya suffered under Gaddafi. A country that was well run but the US felt it should be a democracy and ousted the charismatic but stubborn Gaddafi out of office. Till today, Libya has remained in a troubled state. It's the same thing that's likely going to play out in Ethiopia. When will Africans learn?

Come to think of it, the super powers are often the problem of this world and the crisis therein. They like to head to countries they know they can get something compensatory from if they have to intervene in their crisis. There's always a point of interest. Otherwise the stay out. Most times, they're the troublemakers who hide pretentiously to act the good guy. They instigate the problem and then act like they're offering help.

Asides from the fact that they were never colonized by any European country, their prime minister, Abiy Ahmed went ahead to form a political party which was not recognized by the people of Tigray, and as though to revolt, the people accused him of being an illegitimate ruler due to the fact that an election which would have put him in power slated for 29th Aug 2020 was moved to 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.
 
I don't think the US would try to lend a helping hand as they usually do in wars or clashes because since the start of the war, they have donated over $1bn per year towards health, education and humanitarian services.

 Also, with the leader not being able to unite the Ethiopia- Eritrea which the US actually wanted but since the whole thing is not panning, I guess they had to back out.

[yazher]

Don't you see the reason why they're quiet about this? It's simple racism that's making this war go unnoticed, if you read enough news stories check how they overreacted with the war on Ukraine. Wanna know why? That's cause they're mostly white and in political standpoint, helping Ethiopia won't be a big help for US against their tense relationship with the Russian government.

The media push forward the news and put it in every headline until now but in some countries like Ethiopia, has nothing to do with them and only a few of those mainstream media will gonna put it in their headlines on rare occasions, they will rather choose to publish an unknown flying object recorded with blurred cameras than showing us the reality of what's going on with the part of the world right now. Thankfully we have a community such as this one, we can gain some updates on what's going on, imagine if it was in the 70s or 80s.

[merchantofzeny]

I totally forgot about this. Didn't knew it was still on going. I do remember it being covered in the news around the time that Addis Ababba was at risk of falling to the rebel army. It kinda went off the radar after that was averted.

But that is how war is. All the "international community" can do is try to get both sides to do negotiations and (hopefully) get both to abide by human rights rules, otherwise they have to settle these differences themselves.

[Masplanc]

That is what every country that has tasted war has gone through.  War is a terrible event that if it is happening in a country,  no other country will come to end it. Their is nothing worse than war because it takes to put it to an end. War ends until the two parties are tired of it.

[TheCoinGrabber]

It's kinda bound to happen, this is an ethnic conflict that seemed to have come out of a failed power-sharing. IIRC it involved the firing of soldiers from Tigray, which were heavily-represented in the national army, and it went downhill from there.

Hopefully they can finally sort this out sooner and with not more additions to casualties.

[BADecker]

Here is what one family is doing about the war in Ethiopia:

https://missioncentral.us/category/africa/eric-and-johanna-stinnett/

https://www.lcms.org/stinnett

[paxmao]

One well known problem about many wars, particularly in Africa, is the impossibility of covering the conflict without extreme risks to the lives of the journalists. There is a huge interest in not having unwanted nosey journalists around so that they can genocide or starve (like in Ethiopia) without the world knowing. People do have a limited interest, but even less if it is impossible to get news.

It is even worse in quite a few Latin American countries.

[zasad@]

I don't think it's about racism.
In order to live well in Europe and the USA, there must be a war in Africa. This helps to take the most resources at a very low cost.

This is serious and what can be more racist than this? Is it that the Europe and US depend on the raw material from Africa to the extent that they will be allowed into war so they will be sucked off their resource to persecute the war. The growth being stagnated because of these wars, no country progresses with political instability and economic misdirection. This challenges have bedeviled the continent but the countries there have no proper leadership direction and that is the problem of Africa.

The USA was a British colony until 1776. The US wants to control all the processes in the world and create problems for China. There are a lot of factors here. The situation in Ethiopia weakens China's influence in Africa. The situation in Ukraine weakens Europe and Russia,

I understand the history of US independence in 1776 yes and the fact that they are trying to hold on to power against the close rivals of Russia and China.

I also understand that during the scramble for Africa era regarding slave trades and more, that Africa was the source of raw material including human labour for Europe, but is China having any connection in the past with Ethiopia ? Except this current economic struggle for Africa trading space. I remember Ethiopia wasn't colonized.

and Ukraine had the largest army in Europe.

Ukrainian army isn't the largest in Europe. I was reading 50 most powerful military in the world , Ukraine was number 25th while Russia was 2nd after USA (1st) and before China (3rd).
I watched this from SnapTube but I don't like warfare, I like the world to be in peace but I know that isn't possible  

This article uses PowerIndex:
"The finalized Global Firepower ranking below utilizes over 50 individual factors to determine a given nation's PowerIndex ('PwrIndx') score with categories ranging from military might and financials to logistical capability and geography."
https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php

I was talking about quantification. There is a lot of old equipment in Russia from the 1940s to the 1980s, and the same thing happened in many former Soviet republics.
Example. Shooting down a drone that costs several hundred dollars is very expensive with modern air defenses, but very cheap with 1950s anti-aircraft guns.
Sometimes quantity beats quality.