Is this allowed?

[Zalima Zohair]

I'm very impressed with the post quantity this week keep it up guys and don't forget to visit Betplay's ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ to engage in discussion over there.

Guys don't forget to visit Betplay to try out the casinos then drop your review on the ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ also don't forget to engage in regular discussion over there.

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

[hosseinimr93]

It's not allowed to force users to post in a specific thread or give them any bonus for doing that.
The campaign manager isn't doing so and I don't think there's any problem.

[Timelord2067]

Did one of your alts get bumped from a campaign so now you're lashing out at the CM?

Is that what's happening here?


Every CM does the same thing (why wouldn't they promote their campaign they are managing?), but you haven't convinced me that anything is wrong.

[BITCOIN4X]

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

I don't think it's a paid bumps because apparently the campaign manager didn't explicitly mention giving bonuses or paying more to participants for posting in the ann thread. Managers will pay participants if they meet the required conditions, but when they overpay for whoever bumps ann's thread then it looks like it's going to be a problem.

CryptopreneurBrainboss probably didn't mean it that way, but you have every right to ask.

[logfiles]

It's not a must that the participants must post there. If the campaign rules were saying "you must post in thread x and X or else you won't be paid" then that would be considered a push to make participants bump the thread.

I don't see any problem with CryptopreneurBrainboss' request

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

It seems you find it hard to deal with campaign managers. Are you a bounty cheater who get kicked out for cheating in bounty campaigns? It seems your first target was Royse777 and now you are targeting CryptopreneurBrainboss. Who will be your next target?

Stop doing things out of jealousy.

[shasan]

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

It cant be considered as paid bump as the campaign manager has not offered any payment for posting on the announcement thread. Everyone can say to visit his website or something if they like. If the campaign manager told you must have to post on the announcement thread or the campaign manager told there will be no payment if not posted on the announcement thread then we could say paid bump and the campaign manager could be accused.

[mindrust]

I'm very impressed with the post quantity this week keep it up guys and don't forget to visit Betplay's ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ to engage in discussion over there.

Guys don't forget to visit Betplay to try out the casinos then drop your review on the ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ also don't forget to engage in regular discussion over there.

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

Is the campaign manager paying for these posts in the ANN thread? If not, there shouldn’t be any problems. Even if he does, he doesn’t request it. He is just telling people if they have anything to discuss about the casino, they can do it in the ANN. It is simply a reminder and nothing else.

Aware or or not, I don’t think anything wrong is happening here and nobody will get banned for this.

[yahoo62278]

I personally feel that users in a campaign should respect the company that hired them and make a post here and there in a company thread, but as multiple others have said, you cannot force or ask that of the users. Think of it as job protection, the more exposure a company feels they are getting, the more likely they are to keep a campaign going.

Regardless, the manager isn't doing anything wrong here.

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

Uh huh, that's why you are hiding behind an alt like a pussy.

[Eternad]

I think you miss the word “try” because the campaign manager is not requiring participants to post on the ANN thread but just reminding them about the possible post engagement on the Casino ANN thread that paying them. I usually post on the casino ANN thread that I’m currently employed for signature campaign to show support and help to give good result for the campaign for a possible long term job.

Posting discussion is different on shilling which the mods care about on creating that rules.

[Poker Player]

Is this allowed?

Of course it is allowed. If I were you I would lock the thread if you don't want to have dozens more replies saying yes it is allowed and telling you that you are a coward for posting with your alt.

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager.

Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta.

[rozak]

what the campaign manager does is very normal. they are working on a project and any suggestion from the manager is not pushy. it's no error.
would be different if the bounty manager included it in the campaign rules. ask participants to make at least 2-3 posts in the ANN thread. it will make the manager Guilty.
So far what the campaign manager does is still in the rules.

[JollyGood]

It's not a must that the participants must post there. If the campaign rules were saying "you must post in thread x and X or else you won't be paid" then that would be considered a push to make participants bump the thread.

I don't see any problem with CryptopreneurBrainboss' request

I have to agree. That is a simply summary and explanation regarding the situation.

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

It cant be considered as paid bump as the campaign manager has not offered any payment for posting on the announcement thread. Everyone can say to visit his website or something if they like. If the campaign manager told you must have to post on the announcement thread or the campaign manager told there will be no payment if not posted on the announcement thread then we could say paid bump and the campaign manager could be accused.

For campaign managers it can be on occasion a difficult line between promoting the brand and posting in the thread that promotes the brand. In any campaign by any campaign manager if there was a quota to bump any thread or something like that then issues of paid bumps could be discussed but as you rightly said there is nothing like that going on here.

[Yawa2020]

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager.

You just voice out your aim in disguise. Judging from your point of view, it seems you're involved in some kinda cheat and got caught by CM hence, you're trying to retaliate by all means. The CM is not new to the forum and I doubt if you know more about forum rules than him. This frame up is just dead on arrival.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

If you were so concerned then you should have inquired from him about the issue through PM rather than use an alt account to "accuse" from here. Obviously it's an accuse. If it wasn't, you would be using your main account.

I see no big deal in the quotes you presented.

[The Cryptovator]

Yea, this is allowed. The manager isn't forcing nor paying for comment there. I have seen often participants don't engage on the official announcement thread of the company that is paying for signature. But if they expect a review or constructive discussion from you then nothing is wrong. It's not just about bump thread. The company can bump itself every 24 hours. But review or constructive discussion helps them to reach more potential customers. Nothing wrong if it's not paid review or bump.

[Stalker22]

I personally feel that users in a campaign should respect the company that hired them and make a post here and there in a company thread, but as multiple others have said, you cannot force or ask that of the users. Think of it as job protection, the more exposure a company feels they are getting, the more likely they are to keep a campaign going.

^^ Exactly this! The company pays all the participants in the campaign, and the company wants to keep their thread active and visible. Anyone with half a brain cell should put two and two together.
I think it is at least polite to write something in their main topic from time to time, regardless of the fact that you are not required to do so.

Uh huh, that's why you are hiding behind an alt like a pussy.

Good point there.

[suzanne5223]

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

According to the evidence you provided in the OP? No.
Since the CM didn't set up a rule that's mandatory for the campaign participants to post in the casino ANN thread wish is against the forum rules. But technically, every campaign participant ought to post in the ANN thread the company they represent as proof of their commitment and concern to the casino.

[Doan9269]

I'm very impressed with the post quantity this week keep it up guys and don't forget to visit Betplay's ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ to engage in discussion over there.

Guys don't forget to visit Betplay to try out the casinos then drop your review on the ANN thread; ⚡️⚡️Betplay.io - Lightning Network Casino - INSTANT & ZERO FEE Payments ⚡️⚡️ also don't forget to engage in regular discussion over there.

Can this be considered as "Paid Bumps"?

Paid Bump is not allowed by the forum policy. It may result to permanently ban all users engaged including the campaign manager responsible.

I see this as something not worth giving much concentration on because if you give it a closer look yourself OP, you will discover that participants were not paid for that, instead they were strictly paid on their signature campaign enrollment and the manager does not specifically stated it that if you don't post on their ANN thread you won't get paid, the whole situation here is clear enough to justifies itself as purely inline with the rules, no one is above a mistake but i think the manager is also experienced enough in this field as well.

[aioc]

This topic is to clarify the matter and not to accuse the campaign manager. He may not be aware of it either, and in order not to cause this to ban accounts that may not be aware that this may be a violation of one of the rules on the forum.

If you were so concerned then you should have inquired from him about the issue through PM rather than use an alt account to "accuse" from here. Obviously it's an accuse. If it wasn't, you would be using your main account.

I see no big deal in the quotes you presented.

That's the right thing to do if he is concerned about the action of a CM, not putting him in the spotlight, so those who hate the CM for declining their application in the past will voice their displeasure against the bounty manager, in the case of Brainboss he is so easy to deal with, his telegram is open for communication, I know this he is once my manager in one of the campaign he managed in the past.