In my opinion, that's the reason why the project is based of recognition. Copies can be ruled out of the blockchain.
However, the initial rights on 3D object might still be arguable.
Initial rights for anything as a permissionless token holder are shaky at best. You would need whole new approach.
It doesn't seem like that. The asset is defined by a bunch of properties of the object including oner's biometric data. So it's not a classic NFT, it's rather a multi-object identity providing zero knowledge proof. So, the asset contains all the data you can make a deal with even offline. Blockchain is just a storage capable to protect the identity from copying in digital (1 pixel problem solves this way).
The only question i see is the initial origin of the object. It' seems to be solvable, though.