India as a developed country by 2047

[Vaskiy]

India can easily achieve that goal within the speculated timeline however there is one problem with the Indian infrastructure and the way things work in there. For example, lately I have seen so many news about corrupt politicians and how multi millions of dollars in cash form were ceased from their houses! Imagine if those politicians would have used it for the work which they were intended the development could keep forwarding on success path all the time.

I think they are already on to it so it’s good that some good digging is actually happening.

The thing that slows a country from developing to developed is corruption...

India is one of the countries with the largest population in the world and its citizens are spread in almost all countries but human resources in India are still low because corruption is still high (just like my country), developed countries have clean governments and are far from corruption, that clearly distinguishes that developed countries have luck because their leaders are not greedy.

Indian Government is already supporting people with all the help they could do.
I have read in the other forum that the government of india is giving 50% discount on the installation of solar panels - Once they will all be producing their own electricity they will be at a more comfortable level disregard to electricity bills.

The hard truth, the government will announce such schemes and later if they feel the scheme is profiting people they'll make changes to the scheme. I don't know how far this is true, but it had a good connect. Recently the usage of electric vehicles increased, but India got an opportunity to buy oil at a much lower price. To profit out of it, there were more and more electric vehicles getting into firing problems. The buying of electric vehicles decreased and the fuel usage increased. So, someway government wants money and for the same they'll do all cheap tactics.

[1715535659]

1715535659

[1715535659]

1715535659

[bestcoins1]

My opinion First with assumptions about the population. India's population is increasing. The population is twice that of China. Therefore, its need for earth's resources will increase in the coming years. So obviously India is not as developed as it is now keeping these factors in mind. It may take almost 80-100 years to reach developed countries seeing its current development.

The increase in population, such as in India, must also be considered by the government because if it escapes the attention of the government, then the development and the factors needed will be very difficult to build and achieve in conditions like now. India is not so far behind the developing countries or the newly developed countries that it is still easier for India to see other countries that are already developed and also start a better development at this time

Yes. India needs more foreign businesses to set up in India to save the country's economy and more foreign investment to raise money for their infrastructure.

From a business and economic point of view, India has that and is still doing very well at the moment so the development will probably be there and it won't take too long for India to make it happen if all businesses and sectors of the economy are always alive.

[gunhell16]

Maybe for the country of India to be prosperous, the majority of the politicians in your government should care about your country. Your politicians should have a good program not only for the economy but also for the constituents that your government governs there.

And when that happens, I'm sure your economy will gradually rise and there will be a change in your country. As long as your government leaders are not corrupt, your country is not far from being like Japan, Singapore, and others.

Anyway, happy independence to your country.

[Getmon]

Every leader has an ambition to its country but Narendra Modi is different, he is very very ambitious and aggressive for India's development. I remember when he just started office, he was setting goals after goals and one of them that caught me by surprise was his plan to send a satellite in space and later a mission to the moon. Modi served long enough that means that many Indians like him. But I am also surprised by the post that Bangladesh until now has higher per capita than India.

[DrBeer]

Hmm... And what's wrong with the changes that lead to progress?
...

The bourgeois revolution carried out by the happy few in Iran did not give the Iranian people anything. On the contrary, the wealth belonging to the Iranian people was given to others by the collaborationist bourgeois revolutionaries. Please try typing TP-AJAX into Google.

...
The ideal in the USSR was Lenin and the Communist Party - as a result, tens of millions of their citizens were killed, the destinies of hundreds of millions were crippled, the degradation of countries affected by this bastard ideology and ideals.
...

I read Animal Farm by George Orwell when I was 8 years old. I am not a socialist (I believe in a free market economy) but if I am forced to choose between fascists and socialists, I will choose socialists. The problem is not capitalism, we do not have a second option other than capitalism, the problem is that the resources belonging to the people are collected in "a snobbish group that thinks they are elite".

...
Although ... I do not deny that you like it so much, for example Afghanistan - took and chose the path: "forward to the Stone Age!" and they are so good
...

You're accusing me of something I didn't say. I think our talk should end here because I don't want to act like you. Thank you. Also, I have to add that the probability of improvement of the Taliban is higher than that of the colonialists. The lesser evil...



Back on the topic, the number of people living on $2 a day or less during the pandemic has increased by 75 million.

Meanwhile, the number of people who are poor in India (with incomes of $2 or less a day) is estimated to have increased by 75 million because of the COVID-19 recession. This, too, accounts for nearly 60% of the global increase in poverty.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/18/in-the-pandemic-indias-middle-class-shrinks-and-poverty-spreads-while-china-sees-smaller-changes/

Modi raises the morale of the people of India by creating promising projections for the years when many Indian citizens will not be alive. I think he is doing the right thing because the peoples of the east have the appropriate social ground for these policies. Greetings to the people of India.

1. Regarding the revolution, nothing gave Iran - it's just your statement, not supported by anything. Let's connect argems, backed up by facts and verifiable figures? I believe that the indicators of improvements were, and it's easy to check:
- economic development
- attraction of investments
- opening markets
- getting the opportunity to receive a quality education in Western educational institutions
- The status of a country with an actively developing economy
- increase in the standard of living of the population
- freedom
- the absence of strict legislation restricting the rights and freedoms of a person, based on radical Islamism

It seems to me that this is much more attractive than what happened in Iran later ...


2. "I read George Orwell's Animal Farm when I was 8 years old. I'm not a socialist (I believe in a free market economy), but if they make me choose between fascists and socialists, I will choose socialists."
There was no socialism in the USSR, there was red terror, which subsided a little over time, but the repressive system remained at the heart of the state. This was not socialism. It's kind of like war communism. And having made the wrong choice, you are trying to give an example where the choice will be absolutely logical. It's like saying "if I'm offered shit or cheesecake, I'll heroically choose cheesecake." The question can be formulated as follows 6 that you choose fascism or rashism?
I will answer - a normal person with such a choice (fascism or rashism) will not choose either one or the other. Choosing from two evils, you will choose EVIL anyway!


3. "You accuse me of something I didn't say. I think our conversation should end here because I don't want to act like you. Thank you. I should also add that the Taliban are more likely to improve than the colonialists. Lesser evil...
"- no need to twist I'm not saying that you said it, I made the example of your choice more contrasting. You consider the change of the totalitarian regime an evil! "The bourgeois revolution carried out by a few lucky ones in Iran did not give anything to the Iranian people. On the contrary, the wealth belonging to the Iranian people was transferred to other collaborationist bourgeois revolutionaries" - are these your words or am I saying something for you?
Well, about the lesser evil - see p.p. 2, there is already an answer to this question

[Sithara007]

There is some good news finally:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/fertility-rate-declined-by-20-in-india-in-10-years-srs-data/articleshow/94464169.cms

The fertility rate across India now stands at 2.0, compared to 3.6 in 1991. Overpopulation still remains a big issue in India, and there is large variation across different states. And the birth rate (19.5 per 1,000) is almost twice that of western nations.

This fall in birth rate will probably translate to greater economic growth and more accessibility to resources.

[Zlantann]

My opinion First with assumptions about the population. India's population is increasing. The population is twice that of China. Therefore, its need for earth's resources will increase in the coming years. So obviously India is not as developed as it is now keeping these factors in mind. It may take almost 80-100 years to reach developed countries seeing its current development.

Based on current statistics I don't India is more populated than China. Maybe you are talking about current population growth based on the birth rate. Just like China, the population of India can be used as an economic advantage. Cheap labor is one of the cardinal factors that attract investors to China and India can equally achieve the same feat. India's population can become an advantage if they are educated and empowered with appropriate skills. India has a high number of out-of-school children and most schools face so many infrastructural challenges. 

Compared to so many countries, India is not doing badly economically and that country has the potential to become a developed country by 2047 if its population becomes more educated and skillful.     

[Bitcoin2009]

I think it is natural that in 2047 or 25 years from now India will become a developed country, they are supported by many things to become a developed country, many students are studying in many European and American countries and the education budget will continue to be increased so it is appropriate that when they are 100 years independent they will become developed countries.