What I know is that these gambling companies that accept Bitcoin as one of their accepted currencies are registered and licensed from Cyprus and Curacao (an island located in South America and a part of the Netherlands). We all know that there are only two nations that lawfully accept Bitcoin as a legal currency, El Salvador and Central African Republic. So how come that these gambling companies are allowed to put to use Bitcoin as one of their accepted currencies when neither Netherlands and Cyprus aren't legalizing Bitcoin as a currency? Are the authorities of these nations turning a blind eye on the Bitcoin use?
Or is it possible that gambling companies are allowed to accept any forms of tangible or non-tangible objects so long as they deem it valuable to their operations? Take for instance, casino chips and tokens are used to play games in the tables and on slot machines. So is this the case of Bitcoin too?
If the legality is given by the government to Bitcoin or Crypto, then the government can make transactions with Bitcoin or crypto. For example, if Bitcoin is legal, the government can provide assistance to citizens in the form of Bitcoin as a substitute for Fiat.
Illegal does not mean the government forbids it, but illegal in the sense that the government is not responsible for all the risks that are obtained by its users.
In comparison Bitcoin is illegal with illegal drugs to be legal.
In the country of Canada legalized drugs in the form of marijuana in 2018 and they get a profit of 1 billion dollars from the regulations they issued. When the government legalizes marijuana, it does not mean that marijuana will eliminate the effects of drunkenness or the risks that people who use marijuana have.
Actually the government accepts Bitcoin or crypto. If we explore more deeply, some of the investors who buy Bitcoin are also people who work in the government. It's just that they are not ready to take risks in the form of authority.
Back to the gaming platform. We know gambling has risks, and that risk is only ready to be accepted by individuals. So that the use of Bitcoin on gambling platforms also only has an effect on personal, so the government does not need to ban Bitcoin. If the government bans Bitcoin because it is risky, then the government should automatically ban gambling platforms that are more risky.
Maybe that's just my view on legality, and the concept of using Bitcoin in general.