Tables of users with the most merits earned (more than 1500 merits)

[Rikafip]

I've got you covered, here's the raw data that you can use to create the complete table. Every user who has earned over 1000 merit up to 12000 merit more is on the list below. I took it from merit dashboard again. It will be great for your work.

You might have misunderstood @joker_josue as his problem was not getting that data, but how to put all that in one table, without it being too big and clunky (and without using code tag]. Adding several more categories would do exactly that since there are hundreds of those that earned more than let's say 500 merits.

Imho, if goal is to keep it somewhat clean there is no point including any of the below 1000 merit earned categories.

[1714897393]

1714897393

[1714897393]

1714897393

[1714897393]

1714897393

[indah rezqi]

But I hope the data is still incomplete, I have reached 1041 merit, but there are still 1036.

Yes, merit dashboard data will be updated every Friday (if I'm not mistaken) and all data displayed in the list above is based on the latest updates. I think DdmrDdmr as the owner of the merit dashboard can answer it clearly for you.

You might have misunderstood @joker_josue as his problem was not getting that data, but how to put all that in one table, without it being too big and clunky (and without using code tag]. Adding several more categories would do exactly that since there are hundreds of those that earned more than let's say 500 merits.

Imho, if goal is to keep it somewhat clean there is no point including any of the below 1000 merit earned categories.

Maybe you are right, it must be a mistake on my part for having misunderstood it. But then I can think of something for grouping as some of the users above suggested. Maybe the result will be like this.

List of users with 1001 - 1500 merit

Code:

1,500		Bitcasino.io Support
1,500		bitebits
1,490		coinlocket$
1,489		asche
1,489		bct_ail
1,467		MoparMiningLLC
1,459		actmyname
1,455		JSRAW
1,444		Poker Player
1,444		DooMAD
1,440		FatFork
1,437		skarais
1,421		webtricks
1,410		Halab
1,407		masulum
1,401		hatshepsut93
1,390		KTChampions
1,386		laszlo
1,382		Elwar
1,376		paxmao
1,365		Maus0728
1,358		Tytanowy Janusz
1,347		marcus_of_augustus
1,326		Cyrus
1,324		johhnyUA
1,313		wwzsocki
1,306		TMAN
1,299		BitMaxz
1,298		HeRetiK
1,296		gospodin
1,285		igor72
1,280		Quickseller
1,277		Artemis3
1,277		Bitcoin_Arena
1,255		ibminer
1,254		Best_Change
1,242		TwitchySeal
1,240		efialtis
1,239		mindrust
1,233		PHI1618
1,231		Heisenberg_Hunter
1,231		hilariousandco
1,231		logfiles
1,230		safar1980
1,228		Phil_S
1,227		20kevin20
1,220		RickDeckard
1,219		cryptoaddictchie
1,218		Baofeng
1,218		Kalemder
1,202		BitcoinBunny
1,189		jokers10
1,187		-doubleU-
1,186		Snork1979
1,185		yhiaali3
1,181		Ale88
1,176		BitcoinGirl.Club
1,171		bitcoinPsycho
1,168		GreatArkansas
1,166		Piggy
1,165		cabalism13
1,163		Mbitr
1,154		xenon131
1,153		SaltySpitoon
1,152		lightfoot
1,146		aundroid
1,145		Cnut237
1,130		Bttzed03
1,125		anonymousminer
1,125		MinoRaiola
1,121		klarki
1,120		Arriemoller
1,119		JollyGood
1,115		rdbase
1,113		Csmiami
1,113		Vispilio
1,112		GrosWesh
1,106		Soonandwaite
1,101		garlonicon
1,100		ImThour
1,100		Little Mouse
1,100		nullCoiner
1,098		sabotag3x
1,098		trendcoin
1,093		bitserve
1,091		600watt
1,089		Corrosive
1,083		Coyster
1,077		NotFuzzyWarm
1,074		BITCOIN4X
1,067		seoincorporation
1,063		goldkingcoiner
1,047		ryzaadit
1,041		Blacknavy
1,040	        serveria.com
1,039		amishmanish
1,036		_BlackStar
1,035		TopTort777
1,030	        imhoneer
1,029		Globb0
1,027		igehhh
1,027		sheenshane
1,022		kawetsriyanto
1,019		gbianchi
1,018		exstasie
1,017		theyoungmillionaire
1,012		PawGo
1,004		Smartvirus
1,003		lossnet
1,002		Hispo
1,002		examplens

List of users with 1501 - 2000 merit

Code:

1,999		duesoldi
1,972		OgNasty
1,964		Lakai01
1,950		Bthd
1,939		franky1
1,934		Vod
1,932		Lauda
1,924		d_eddie
1,924		HairyMaclairy
1,924		Steamtyme
1,916		ivomm
1,907		OutOfMemory
1,853		Carlton Banks
1,849		Royse777
1,840		Upgrade00
1,838		morvillz7z
1,819		SFR10
1,791		PrimeNumber7
1,782		minerjones
1,775		xtraelv
1,773		Lafu
1,768		shahzadafzal
1,765		marlboroza
1,760		xandry
1,754		mu_enrico
1,734		Paolo.Demidov
1,732		roycilik
1,727		jackg
1,708		Coin-1
1,692		Jet Cash
1,690		Goran_
1,688		eddie13
1,687		sportsbet.io
1,686		ChiBitCTy
1,674		famososMuertos
1,664		aysg76
1,656		odolvlobo
1,603		Xal0lex
1,602		LUCKMCFLY
1,585		taikuri13
1,584		Julien_Olynpic
1,584		vapourminer
1,573		madnessteat
1,564		Trofo
1,563		infofront
1,561		sirazimuth
1,560		DroomieChikito
1,560		Saint-loup
1,559		Biodom
1,553		bitbollo
1,553		YOSHIE
1,552		joniboini
1,550		Veleor
1,547		dragonvslinux
1,536		tyKiwanuka
1,520		tvplus006
1,506		Foxpup
1,504		mprep

List of users with 2001 - 5000 merit

Code:

4,901		dkbit98
4,664		The Pharmacist
4,564		nutildah
4,561		satoshi
4,530		mikeywith
4,500		1miau
4,440		xhomerx10
4,430		BlackHatCoiner
4,287		Pmalek
4,120		TryNinja
4,093		achow101
3,965		ETFbitcoin
3,957		NeuroticFish
3,901		Hhampuz
3,892		Last of the V8s
3,837		NotATether
3,830		Rikafip
3,767		n0nce
3,745		HCP
3,700		bitmover
3,686		DaveF
3,677		philipma1957
3,660		nc50lc
3,652		stompix
3,631		cAPSLOCK
3,547		BobLawblaw
3,438		DireWolfM14
3,387		zasad@
3,316		icopress
3,283		witcher_sense
3,262		mocacinno
3,211		tranthidung
3,135		OmegaStarScream
3,129		Lucius
3,122		Toxic2040
3,095		lovesmayfamilis
3,057		CryptopreneurBrainboss
3,042		Torque
2,973		Rath_
2,952		TheBeardedBaby
2,927		Charles-Tim
2,923		mk4
2,917		Plutosky
2,884		d5000
2,764		GazetaBitcoin
2,699		bullrun2020bro
2,698		LeGaulois
2,682		AlcoHoDL
2,611		jojo69
2,609		Welsh
2,575		cygan
2,569		nullius
2,554		hosseinimr93
2,550		Hueristic
2,516		DannyHamilton
2,493		VB1001
2,490		Paashaas
2,419		hugeblack
2,412		Hal
2,355		ranochigo
2,350		qwk
2,313		Coding Enthusiast
2,271		mole0815
2,240		khaled0111
2,225		jeremypwr
2,206		bob123
2,196		hilariousetc
2,144		babo
2,135		JimboToronto
2,130		buwaytress
2,120		yahoo62278
2,099		krogothmanhattan
2,082		abhiseshakana
2,079		DarkStar_
2,068		yogg
2,016		The Cryptovator
2,007		gentlemand
2,005		Husna QA

List of users with 5001 - 10.000 merit

Code:

9,208		El duderino_
9,013		theymos
8,339		Ratimov
8,274		DdmrDdmr
7,178		suchmoon
6,391		pooya87
6,243		LFC_Bitcoin
6,117		JayJuanGee
5,791		gmaxwell

List of users with 10001 - 15.000 merit

Code:

12,141		o_e_l_e_o
11,057		LoyceV
10,698		fillippone

[tranthidung]

Note: I haven't found any similar tables, so I believe this one. If there is already something, I apologize in advance, and I will close this topic.

I have [CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs but I decided to stop updating it since 2 years ago.

• Don't want to spam Meta with statistics topic (some members complained about it)
• Forum members nowadays less pay attention on earned merit and merit exchange

For years in forum, I realized a fact that your contribution, your posts decide who you are. Earned merit does not decide who you are as well as your contributions (it's not a decisive or the only factor)

[joker_josue]

I do not agree if lower than 1500 merit because it does not match with the title, if other members want to adjust and add below that 1500, better to create more threads with the title: "Tables of users with the most merits earned (lower than 1500 merits)". This is a thread for up 1500 merit, don't show up if the post belongs with lower than that. or overaction list the table because his alt is not listed on the OP

Why don't you think the title can still be changed to make all the same ideas in one thread instead of having multiple thread?

My original idea was to include the +1000, but then I thought it would be too big. Therefore, in the next update I will adjust the topic name and include the +1000.

I agree with your sentiment. Your post also got me thinking about what statistics I would be interested in seeing. It would be cool to know how much BTC people have transacted, but I imagine that would require a revamp to the feedback system where people link feedbacks to actual transactions to a user’s staked address. Would be cool to see. I can’t imagine too many other statistics that would actually matter.

Could you explain your idea better? Maybe I could study this case. If you anticipate you can send DM.

Good work and I don't think you will need to update it that frequently I guess once a month would be enough.

I want to save the current snapshot as an image for my future reference

Yes, I'm thinking of updates every month or so. 

Imho, if goal is to keep it somewhat clean there is no point including any of the below 1000 merit earned categories.

Maybe you are right, it must be a mistake on my part for having misunderstood it. But then I can think of something for grouping as some of the users above suggested. Maybe the result will be like this.
[/quote]

I appreciate all the tips and suggestions, help to improve. I think this method would not be practical for a visual reading. Now I could create several posts, to include lower layers.
But I also wanted to understand the feedback from the community, so that this analysis could evolve later.

Note: I haven't found any similar tables, so I believe this one. If there is already something, I apologize in advance, and I will close this topic.

I have [CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs but I decided to stop updating it since 2 years ago.

I hadn't really noticed your topic, maybe because it was a few years old. I apologize.
Congratulations, because your analysis is much more complete than mine.

If you intend to resume analysis, I won't go any further. If you're not thinking about it, and don't worry, I can continue.

[LoyceV]

Personally, I don't see any benefit from such statistics, especially if there is a project that most of the users of this forum have heard about, and by clicking on one link you get Most earned merit (after initial merit). That link also lists up to 1000 users, so most of them will be happy to see their name on that list. And best of all, the whole thing is automated.

I can top that: Here's the list of all 44,258 users who earned at least 1 Merit (bonus points if you know why the last one on the list has 0 Merit). This list is updated up until 10 days ago (the newer version will be published in my topic soon).

Update: last Friday's data dump finished processing. That adds 39 users.

[Lucius]

(bonus points if you know why the last one on the list has 0 Merit)

I assume that it is a question of de-meriting, because the name of that member is mentioned in several threads, like this one for example. Although it is unclear to me why only that one user is on your list, because he is not the only one whose merits were taken away - but I am sure that there is an explanation for that.

[LoyceV]

I assume that it is a question of de-meriting

Correct.

it is unclear to me why only that one user is on your list

I list all users who have received Merit. BPIP shows who sent it, and that user was abusing Merit at the time "for political reasons".

I list all Merit transactions that came from "userID 0" here. They're both positive and negative.

because he is not the only one whose merits were taken away

He's the only one who ended up at 0 Merit after that, but indeed, they should all be in my list.

[Sarah Azhari]

I do not agree if lower than 1500 merit because it does not match with the title, if other members want to adjust and add below that 1500, better to create more threads with the title: "Tables of users with the most merits earned (lower than 1500 merits)". This is a thread for up 1500 merit, don't show up if the post belongs with lower than that. or overaction list the table because his alt is not listed on the OP

Why don't you think the title can still be changed to make all the same ideas in one thread instead of having multiple thread?

My original idea was to include the +1000, but then I thought it would be too big. Therefore, in the next update I will adjust the topic name and include the +1000.

1500 is enough, I don't know why someone overacting to bother post below than that, maybe:

1. because his alt is not on the 1500s list
2. farming the merits.

[indah rezqi]

I appreciate all the tips and suggestions, help to improve. I think this method would not be practical for a visual reading. Now I could create several posts, to include lower layers.
But I also wanted to understand the feedback from the community, so that this analysis could evolve later.

Let's create some other clubs with lower merit gain (maybe more than just 4 clubs), this won't take much time considering we can access tools and data easily.

While I have an idea to make your goal in this thread achievable, it's just an idea not a coercion because I don't think you're a stickler for sticking to the basics while you don't want to consider good ideas. Here are a few categories that I have in mind. But, I'm not going to force the OP to have to agree to it as this is just a suggestion.

• 100 - 249
• 250 - 499
• 500 - 999
• 1000 - 2499
• 2500 - 4999
• 5000 - 9999
• 10000 - up above it.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Including a link might have made it easier for users to check out members they are not familiar with, but it would have been a bit more work to include.

Yeah, it would have been nice but would have made OP's job a lot more tedious.  I appreciate the data dump, by the way, and though I still have a bunch of post histories to review and only about 8 sMerits to my name, I'm going to give most of those to you, OP.

Speaking of not being familiar with members....wow.  There are a lot of them in the 2500+ earned list that I rarely see anymore or just plain aren't familiar with at all.  I'll have to check out what sections they're posting in--and it'd be so nice if it turned out to be a local board, wouldn't it?  I'm still getting the feeling that merit sources are badly needed in all of the non-English sections.

[KingsDen]

Speaking of not being familiar with members....wow.  There are a lot of them in the 2500+ earned list that I rarely see anymore or just plain aren't familiar with at all. 

I was wondering and amazed that I don't see some of these users anywhere in the forum and yet they have large amount of merits to their names. Where did they earn the merits. Is this forum too large that I can tour for one year and yet some usernames appear totally unfamiliar to me.

But when I saw a much older user say same thing, I now believe that by 2025 if I'll be here, I would still encounter
 2000+ merits user that I haven't seen before.

I am not aware that o_e_l_e_o has overtaken LoyceV in the highest earned merits.  12k+ is a very high number for you both, who knows if it's your merit counts that is dragging btc to 12k.

Please who can write a script that will enable me transfer 1000merits each from o_e_l_e_o and LoyceV and add to mine in order to appear in 2000+ category?

[joker_josue]

Including a link might have made it easier for users to check out members they are not familiar with, but it would have been a bit more work to include.

Yeah, it would have been nice but would have made OP's job a lot more tedious.  I appreciate the data dump, by the way, and though I still have a bunch of post histories to review and only about 8 sMerits to my name, I'm going to give most of those to you, OP.

Speaking of not being familiar with members....wow.  There are a lot of them in the 2500+ earned list that I rarely see anymore or just plain aren't familiar with at all.  I'll have to check out what sections they're posting in--and it'd be so nice if it turned out to be a local board, wouldn't it?  I'm still getting the feeling that merit sources are badly needed in all of the non-English sections.

I will try, in the next update to include the users link. I believe this will help everyone to be able to explore a little more than other users and get to know us better.

Sometimes I think that there is a lot of knowledge in this forum, which goes unnoticed by several factors, and one of them is the fact that we can't get to know all the users who are minimally active.

[Poker Player]

I didn't remember exactly how many merits I have (they are all earned) and I had a hard time looking it up because I thought I might make it into the ranking. Too bad I'm missing a few. I guess I'll get in the next update.

It is clear to me that I will never be in the first table but I hope to gradually improve my contribution.

Nice job joker_josue,

[fillippone]

I'm still getting the feeling that merit sources are badly needed in all of the non-English sections.

Here you have a little bit of data, thanks to @ddmrddmr Bitcoin Merit Dashboard, regarding merits distribution on local boards.

Fig. 9. Merit ratio for local boards

The percentage of merits in the local boards is above the percentage of posts in the local boards. Either the quality of posts in the local boards is above average, which I think is unlikely, or the merit sources already cover local boards are well covered.

Check also this thread from @rikafip:
[CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity

[Little Mouse]

theymos on 10k club.

[skarais]

theymos on 10k club.

True, but this is an accumulation of merit airdrop and merit earned. So far theymos has only earned 9068 merit, so I don't think theymos is in the 10K merit club at the moment. There are only 3 users in the 10K+ merit club (excluding merit airdrop) at this time and they are o_e_l_e_o, LoyceV and fillippone.

For theymos, I don't think he will think about the merit rank, but he cares more about his system being useful to forum users. But good, now the profile has shown 10K merit more.

[LoyceV]

theymos on 10k club.

True, but this is an accumulation of merit airdrop and merit earned.

It gets even better when you realize theymos is the only one who airdropped 1000 Merit on himself

[Welsh]

I was wondering and amazed that I don't see some of these users anywhere in the forum and yet they have large amount of merits to their names. Where did they earn the merits. Is this forum too large that I can tour for one year and yet some usernames appear totally unfamiliar to me.

But when I saw a much older user say same thing, I now believe that by 2025 if I'll be here, I would still encounter
 2000+ merits user that I haven't seen before.

There's tons of mini little communities in the forum which sort of recycle merit quite often (for a lack of a better term). This is usually because they're regulars within either a certain section (think local sections) or part of a ongoing thread like the Wall Observer thread. Development, and Technical discussion also has a certain type of demographic, and due to its technical nature it doesn't get a lot of new users, compared to other sections.

The Collectibles section is another mini community which seem to be pretty tightly knitted. I quite like that we have these sort of sub sections of the community though.

[fillippone]

I was wondering and amazed that I don't see some of these users anywhere in the forum and yet they have large amount of merits to their names. Where did they earn the merits. Is this forum too large that I can tour for one year and yet some usernames appear totally unfamiliar to me.

But when I saw a much older user say same thing, I now believe that by 2025 if I'll be here, I would still encounter
 2000+ merits user that I haven't seen before.

There's tons of mini little communities in the forum which sort of recycle merit quite often (for a lack of a better term). This is usually because they're regulars within either a certain section (think local sections) or part of a ongoing thread like the Wall Observer thread. Development, and Technical discussion also has a certain type of demographic, and due to its technical nature it doesn't get a lot of new users, compared to other sections.

The Collectibles section is another mini community which seem to be pretty tightly knitted. I quite like that we have these sort of sub sections of the community though.

I think it’s part of the human nature: you tend to gather with the people you like the most. Of course, as a merit source, I try to spread my merit network as much as I can, but in the end, everyone of us has their own “inner circle”.

[joker_josue]

I think it’s part of the human nature: you tend to gather with the people you like the most. Of course, as a merit source, I try to spread my merit network as much as I can, but in the end, everyone of us has their own “inner circle”.

In my other review, Merit Tree, this is very noticeable.
Although several users try to give merits to different users, we notice that there is always a set of merits directed to the same users on a regular basis.

But that also happens, because usually the same users present topics relevant to the whole community.