Paths through bitcoin success

[348Judah]

source

The long era of stories behind digital currency evolution and how bitcoin has emerged the successful research work from among them all by Satoshi Nakamoto in year 2009 and not 2008 as mentioned from the diagram above, there's no doubt about many people who have in one way or the other even contributed to the success of bitcoin by Satoshi and others who had worked tremendously in the blockchain technology development before time and other areas that widens the prospect of digital currency even though their research was not felt  as Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcoin, but their role in research and support for a digital decentralized currency to the entire world which is freedom to financial economy and is well requoned with, bitcoin being the spearhead of cryptocurrencies and the only most acceptable digital currency has a lot paths it has been through and Satoshi Nakamoto remains a legend for it success.

[Agbe]

_ 2009 and not 2008 as mentioned from the diagram above, there's no doubt about many people who have in one way or the other even contributed to the success of bitcoin by Satoshi and others who had worked tremendously in the blockchain technology development before time and other areas that widens the prospect of digital currency even though their research was not felt  as Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcoin, but their role in research and support for a digital decentralized currency to the entire world which is freedom to financial economy and is well requoned with, bitcoin being the spearhead of cryptocurrencies and the only most acceptable digital currency has a lot paths it has been through and Satoshi Nakamoto remains a legend for it success.

Bitcoin was created in 2008 and launched in 2009.And after the launched bitcoin has passed different stages and has faced difficulties and neglected but it does not gave up upon all the challenges faced by it. Yes many people have contributed to the development of bitcoin plus you. All those people that are in this forum and outside that are using bitcoin to do transaction from one way to the other are all in the developmental process of bitcoin. Bitcoin is a freedom to financial economy? I really do not get this part of the article. How bitcoin becomes the financial freedom in one's life. As for me I took bitcoin as a normal Currency but it is free from central authorities control. One can use bitcoin to make a transaction online freely without the fee of third party cutting rate and unnecessary debit from bankers. Remember bitcoin is not 24 hours high for one to be saying financial freedom. There was something bear market  and bull marketas well. Just as national Currency but the different is the decentralization and Centralization.

[Flexystar]

This is really amazing flow chart I have seen related to blockchain and it’s development. I am not sure how true is the flow chart and it’s connection amongst each other but it could be merely separate inventions whose reference has been taken by next generation or team of researchers to create something new. However there are few years which seems to be referred by modern world Satoshi to invent the protocol that we enjoying today. Like research from 1976, 1980, 1988, and 1985. Everything related to crypto and it’s inner protocol. Anyways, gladly this is amazing historical chart which helped us to get bitcoin working.

[bitcampaign]

Bitcoin was said to have died hundreds of times and even always successfully got a lot of adoption and new society every day, that is why Satoshi successfully made Bitcoin become great and famous in the eyes of everyone and even the world knows Bitcoin, the success of Bitcoin comes from a sincere community and that proven until now the Bitcoin trip is quite successful

[KennyR]

Even before the existence of bitcoin there were more attempts to create something similar to bitcoin. Based on the fact, more years of prehistory is being added. Satoshi might've taken those research as a key for further development of bitcoin. During the initial days it experienced and at some point it gained the importance. Bitcoin have grown high crossing more hurdles and support from people at all market conditions.

[Viscore]

Even before the existence of bitcoin there were more attempts to create something similar to bitcoin. Based on the fact, more years of prehistory is being added. Satoshi might've taken those research as a key for further development of bitcoin. During the initial days it experienced and at some point it gained the importance. Bitcoin have grown high crossing more hurdles and support from people at all market conditions.

Satoshi has a more brilliant mind so he end up successfully invented bitcoin and gained huge significance from its community. And maybe Satoshi’s faceless identity even added more interest on part of the community as they keep on becoming thrilled about it. But what is more significant about bitcoin that made it more successful is that because of its decentralized nature that made its unique from other cryptocurrencies invented.

[franky1]

i wouldnt say paths..

i would say strings of thread that satoshi weaved together into the tapestry known as bitcoin

[sunsilk]

Bitcoin was said to have died hundreds of times and even always successfully got a lot of adoption and new society every day, that is why Satoshi successfully made Bitcoin become great and famous in the eyes of everyone and even the world knows Bitcoin, the success of Bitcoin comes from a sincere community and that proven until now the Bitcoin trip is quite successful

It'll never be gone when there's always the call out for bitcoin that it has died. Well, that only proven how strong bitcoin is and how it's resistant for so many years.

The opposite of what they're calling out seems to be the outcome of where bitcoin is right now and to those butt hurts, it's hard to accept that this piece of great technology and invention by satoshi has already been a threat to the current and long banking and financial system.

It's even becoming bigger and soon, it'll be par with those big tech companies from its market cap.

[sheenshane]

I can't imagine 40 years of research in Bitcoin before it launched.
I was also thinking about this before, how many years of research before Bitcoin becomes successfully launched?  And now here's an informative chart before Bitcoin becomes Bitcoin.

We should be thankful always the brilliant idea of Satoshi, even now Bitcoin still exists and becomes a successful alternative decentralized currency as the creator's goal.

[Gallar]

bitcoin became what it is today because all digital aspects support the development of digital money

who initially did not support it, over time they became supportive of bitcoin, because they themselves felt the advantages of this bitcoin digital money,

and the rules or systems applied to bitcoin by Satoshi Nakamoto are indeed very accurate and very effective at making many people interested in their financial freedom,

THE QUALITY WILL STAY ABOVE.

[pooya87]

And yet the altcoin scammers want to convince everyone that the bitcoin's success is only because it was the "first" one! The reality is that many tried creating similar systems and failed. Bitcoin is successful because it is useful and it uses existing technologies in the right way.
Altcoins are failures because they are useless and have nothing new to offer.

[glendall]

And yet the altcoin scammers want to convince everyone that the bitcoin's success is only because it was the "first" one! The reality is that many tried creating similar systems and failed. Bitcoin is successful because it is useful and it uses existing technologies in the right way.
Altcoins are failures because they are useless and have nothing new to offer.

and too many innovations but not done thoroughly, if the altcoin is focused on the goal maybe it can accompany bitcoin, it will be successful and useful like bitcoin
Most altcoin owners see big money forgetting their original purpose. This is what makes altcoins worse in the eyes of investors

[Bitstar_coin]

And yet the altcoin scammers want to convince everyone that the bitcoin's success is only because it was the "first" one! The reality is that many tried creating similar systems and failed. Bitcoin is successful because it is useful and it uses existing technologies in the right way.
Altcoins are failures because they are useless and have nothing new to offer.

and too many innovations but not done thoroughly, if the altcoin is focused on the goal maybe it can accompany bitcoin, it will be successful and useful like bitcoin
Most altcoin owners see big money forgetting their original purpose. This is what makes altcoins worse in the eyes of investors

I think the real problem with altcoins or majority of them is their short term goal view, not only that, even investors of alts also have this view which automatically either put pressure on some of the genuine alts devs or motivate some of them to want to take the easy route.
For instance, an alts project that is launched under 3 months and haven't achieve a x10,  x100 or so is considered not performing even while trying to achieve their goal through development.
Btc has passes through stages of development and improvement in years but alts wants to achieve this within a short period.

[aoluain]

And yet the altcoin scammers want to convince everyone that the bitcoin's success is only because it was the "first" one! The reality is that many tried creating similar systems and failed. Bitcoin is successful because it is useful and it uses existing technologies in the right way.
Altcoins are failures because they are useless and have nothing new to offer.

Yes, because the primary tech behind Bitcoin is cryptography which was in development
for many years. The Cypherpunks lead the way or created the foundations with their various
projects like:

1997 – HASHCASH is created by Adam Back and is formally referred to as “"Hashcash - A Denial of Service Counter-Measure"
1998 – BITGOLD is created by Nick Szabo. This was a decentralised digital currency which was never launched.
1998 – B MONEY essay is created by Wei Dai and referenced a type of “proof of work” system to create an anonymous and distributed digital currency.
The next notable leap towards Bitcoins launch came in 2004 when Hal Finney created the first Reusable Proof of Work [RPOW],
an early version of what Bitcoin is based on, Proof of Work [POW].

And all those people had a direct role to play in Bitcoins development

[tbct_mt2]

I think the real problem with altcoins or majority of them is their short term goal view, not only that, even investors of alts also have this view which automatically either put pressure on some of the genuine alts devs or motivate some of them to want to take the easy route.

Decentralized network, anonymous (but not scam and genius) founder are one of strongest support for Bitcoin growth after many years. Altcoins can not have that especially decentralized network.

I see Ethereum has very long term vision and it has built up a very big ecosystem that is biggest amongst altcoins. Very little altcoin projects can have something similar to Ethereum about vision and success.

Btc has passes through stages of development and improvement in years but alts wants to achieve this within a short period.

Bitcoin is not the first cryptocurrency but it is the first one that makes lot of noise and achieves great success. After more than 13 years, Bitcoin now is a biggest pillar of cryptocurrency market and blockchain industry. It plays a role like a gold standard, I suggest to call it as Bitcoin standard for other cryptocurrencies (alternate altcoins) to rely on.

Even altcoins tend to rely on or don't tend to rely on Bitcoin, they are still affected a lot by Bitcoin.

[Fundamentals Of]

There are a number of people behind the creation of Bitcoin. Before Satoshi came up with Bitcoin, he's already familiar with the previous works of other people like Wei Dei, Adam Back, etc. He made use of it all and contributed his own ideas and the result is the Bitcoin that is now very popular. So although Bitcoin seemed quickly made, it actually is made up of a long history of innovators and visionaries. Satoshi became instrumental in gathering all their different ideas into one.

[348Judah]

There are a number of people behind the creation of Bitcoin. Before Satoshi came up with Bitcoin, he's already familiar with the previous works of other people like Wei Dei, Adam Back, etc.

Many on several attempts have come along with their works to bring up something like this but i think Satoshi Nakamoto remain outstanding among them all to have succeded in bringing in something new that others failed to discover whifh eventually serves the solution to the aspired digital currency network, the journey has come a long way to all work in favour of Satoshi Nakamoto ceaseless efforts.

Satoshi became instrumental in gathering all their different ideas into one.

Let's not forget that the ultimate success behind Satoshi Nakamoto is the new discoveries made upon what others could conclude their research works on.

[KingsDen]

There are a number of people behind the creation of Bitcoin. Before Satoshi came up with Bitcoin, he's already familiar with the previous works of other people like Wei Dei, Adam Back, etc. He made use of it all and contributed his own ideas and the result is the Bitcoin that is now very popular. So although Bitcoin seemed quickly made, it actually is made up of a long history of innovators and visionaries. Satoshi became instrumental in gathering all their different ideas into one.

There are not numbers of people behind the creation of bitcoin. Bitcoin creation is done by Satoshi and maybe his friends, colleagues or co-developers behind the scene. There is nothing like bitcoin before Satoshi came up with the innovation.
You can rightly say that he wants the first person that worked on cryptography. The technology is dated back and far. The cryptography is the bases of the blockchain. Even in the whitepaper of bitcoin, there are bibliography and references but bitcoin particularly can't be attributed to any other person(s).

[pooya87]

~
I think the real problem with altcoins or majority of them is their short term goal view, not only that, even investors of alts also have this view which automatically either put pressure on some of the genuine alts devs or motivate some of them to want to take the easy route.
For instance, an alts project that is launched under 3 months and haven't achieve a x10,  x100 or so is considered not performing even while trying to achieve their goal through development.
Btc has passes through stages of development and improvement in years but alts wants to achieve this within a short period.

One of the reasons why Tokens were introduced was exactly to answer this demand. People (both investors and developers) no longer care about the technology but care about making money and as fast as possible. Creating a token is very easy, quick and costs nothing. So they can release something to make quick large profit as people would buy it!

[Fundamentals Of]

There are a number of people behind the creation of Bitcoin. Before Satoshi came up with Bitcoin, he's already familiar with the previous works of other people like Wei Dei, Adam Back, etc. He made use of it all and contributed his own ideas and the result is the Bitcoin that is now very popular. So although Bitcoin seemed quickly made, it actually is made up of a long history of innovators and visionaries. Satoshi became instrumental in gathering all their different ideas into one.

There are not numbers of people behind the creation of bitcoin. Bitcoin creation is done by Satoshi and maybe his friends, colleagues or co-developers behind the scene. There is nothing like bitcoin before Satoshi came up with the innovation.
You can rightly say that he wants the first person that worked on cryptography. The technology is dated back and far. The cryptography is the bases of the blockchain. Even in the whitepaper of bitcoin, there are bibliography and references but bitcoin particularly can't be attributed to any other person(s).

Of course, Bitcoin is Satoshi Nakamoto's. But even Satoshi himself is aware that he is making use of previous works of other people. Of course Satoshi was able to solve the Byzantine general problem, but Satoshi himself admitted that Bitcoin was made out of innovations that are already there. So even if Satoshi had original contributions, I don't agree that Bitcoin is Satoshi's alone. And if even Satoshi attributes the possibility of Bitcoin also to his predecessors, who are we to say that it shouldn't be the case?