I find way to win on dice

[Oasisman]

It works if you are that rich.

Stop it man, it will never work. If you're rich and follow martingale, might as well record yourself a tutorial how to get broke real quick.
The chances of lossing are always greater than winning. Though it has been thoroughly explained in the first page of this thread by some of the members here, but I'd also like to reiterate the most basic and obvious reason why martingale will never work. Because, if it works, most of the gamblers could've been using this strategy for a long time.  

[1715364809]

1715364809

[1715364809]

1715364809

[1715364809]

1715364809

[1715364809]

1715364809

[1715364809]

1715364809

[Mauser]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

What the heck is that approach mate. Are you seriously running that strategy? How long have you been using it and what is your profits?  I don't think this is a very profitable strategy long run and it will lead to you losing all your bankroll eventually. You seem to be a using a martingale approach, where every win will make you a profit and cover all the previous losses you had. The problem I see here is that you are increasing your bets too fast. Why jump from 20 to 60 USD so quickly, and already after 6 times losing you are at 2300 USD. If you lose that are you going to bet 7000 USD? In the end you need more than 10,000 USD bankroll to only cover 7 losses. And getting 7 losses in a row with 50% chances is not so uncommon.

[acroman08]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

the method is called martingale and it won't work and you'll just end-up losing your money. I also want to remind you that casinos(may it be online or land-based) have put a limit on how much you can bet per roll. so, using the martingale strategy won't work. I for you to not use this method as it will ultimately fail.

[GigaBit]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

This idea of ​​yours is certainly logical but may not make as much sense to everyone. Suppose I lost 20 dollars then I spent 40 and lost that too then 80 this way after I lose a thousand dollars if I don't win I will lost all. Isn't it more risky? Those who have enough money may follow this method. Another thing is that for those who have enough money, the bet amount will be high and definitely it can also be a risk for them. I think it is not possible. Because gamblers can never survive this way.

[fortunecrypto]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

You need a huge bankroll as there is no guarantee that the losing streak at the number you expected

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

You're wrong on this, there is no specific number that the losing bet will stop obviously you haven't tried it as you have not posted winning from your so-called guide, this is misleading and you know nothing about betting in dice

what you think on my method?

99% of us here think that its the worst advice that you can follow, you did not do your own research and you just rely on your hunch which is totally incorrect.

[Adbitco]

But if I may ask you, what if the bettor has no enough funds to keep increasing his bet amount as you may say it does it mean he should keep increasing without fund?
Well this principle might not be encouraging to players who has limited fund and I m sure by the time they got the highest and possibly win do you think they could be able to payout players.
Lastly what is the probability that increasing in percentage to $2300 might get a straight winning?

[madnessteat]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

What the heck is that approach mate. Are you seriously running that strategy? How long have you been using it and what is your profits?  I don't think this is a very profitable strategy long run and it will lead to you losing all your bankroll eventually. You seem to be a using a martingale approach, where every win will make you a profit and cover all the previous losses you had. The problem I see here is that you are increasing your bets too fast. Why jump from 20 to 60 USD so quickly, and already after 6 times losing you are at 2300 USD. If you lose that are you going to bet 7000 USD? In the end you need more than 10,000 USD bankroll to only cover 7 losses. And getting 7 losses in a row with 50% chances is not so uncommon.

If I'm not mistaken, the Martingale strategy requires at least 13 losses in a row, but I'm sure that's not enough. That's why I would advise everyone who decided to try this strategy to think twice before trying it out. I used it on very small bets and it worked, but when I switched to bigger bets I just didn't have enough bankroll for the next bet and had to accept a loss. I think that sooner or later this outcome awaits everyone who plays this strategy.  

[Cryptmuster]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

Apparently you have not tried to play the martingale strategy yet, otherwise you would not be interested in the opinions of other players. You would be surprised how long streaks can be, bad streaks that will deplete your deposit very quickly. When you get to the point where you need to double your bet again and it will be in the thousands, then a psychological moment kicks in that tells you that it's time to stop because further losses will be catastrophic losses for you. I don’t think that with the help of this strategy you can get a stable profit.

[traderethereum]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

You can do that strategy only if you have a lot of money because when you do that, you need to have more than you can imagine.
It could be you need $1000 in your account but I do not know for sure because I do not place a bet for $20 for each bet.
I do not think about "there is no way you will fail 7 times" as that will depend on your luck and if you are not lucky, you can lose more money.
But I wonder whether you try your method on your own. What is the result?

[rahmad2nd]

what you think on my method?

To be honest I rarely play dice, but in betting it's basically the same, all the strategies we do are aimed at creating a win.
as for what the OP said, this strategy will be effective, when you are in lucky mode.
but keep in mind, the statement you say is not always true, it is impossible to fail 7 times in a row is a false statement.
the fact is that before you get to the next multiple, your balance will most likely run out, or maybe you won't be able to increase the number of multiples of the bet because almost most casinos have betting limits.

IMO, this is the problem if you use the martingale strategy. no different when I play at gambling Baccarat, in fact, I have experienced failure in 10 rounds of the game.

[Taskford]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

There's no way also that there is accurate way to gain always especially on playing dice. Maybe you are lucky enough at that time that's why your thoughts always hit up but in the game of chance all are random and for sure next time what strategy you called will not work out . But still its good you try some since meaning you are observant on every bets you made.

[cryptomaniac_xxx]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

Yes, it is good as long as you have the money because in martingale, you have to have a deep pocket to continue with this method to at least break even. But the question is, what if you don't have that capital to begin with? Specially you said that you have to like 12 games in succession to at least double up just to get back your capital. And with that said, there is no sure fire way to win in dice game, as it is still base on luck.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

.
This strategy can only be possible to someone who has much money and not to someone who has already budgeted a certain amount of money for either weekly, or monthly for gambling, because this strategy just reminds  me of a 2015 Hollywood romance/crime movie acted by Will Smith, who also gambled uising this same strategy to gamble and lost everything, he doubled it and lost again and again, not untill he finally won. So at times this Dice strategy works with luck, as there is no probability that if you may have lost this time, next will be a winning

[Doell]

This method has been implemented by many dice gamblers, but the problem is that OP possibility has not found many lose streak up to 20 times, so this method works very well for him. I personally often do similar strategies, but the problem that I often find is lose, an increase in betting can be better if it only determines on odds 2x or 3x but not with odds 100x or more than that.

[virasisog]

That will definitely test your luck as well as your capital. Your strategy will work but it will be too risky. How will you continue to run the said strategy if you'll have a losing streak for the 10th time for example? It will be an easy strategy if you have lots of funds but will definitely put you at risk of losing a lot and might end up chasing all of it. If it worked for you for the first time, there's no guarantee that it will work in the long run. You might only be noticing in the end that you're losing most of your assets if you'll continue this strategy. Many have tried it and failed in the end.

[xSkylarx]

what you think on my method?

I'm pretty sure most of the members here in this forum is already familiar in your strategy. Your method is very common among newbies in dice gambling and I don't recomment it to anyone to try especially if they have huge bankroll.

It's very possible to have a lose streak of 7 times or even greater. I tried experimenting that strategy before by betting 1 satoshi as the initial bet, to my surprise I hit more than 15 lose streak before i get a win. Imagine if someone uses that strategy like using 20$ as the initial bet. He would take a huge loss or worst lose his whole capital before he manages to win.

[Cling18]

what you think on my method?

I'm pretty sure most of the members here in this forum is already familiar in your strategy. Your method is very common among newbies in dice gambling and I don't recomment it to anyone to try especially if they have huge bankroll.

It's very possible to have a lose streak of 7 times or even greater. I tried experimenting that strategy before by betting 1 satoshi as the initial bet, and to my surprise I hit more than 15 loose streaks before I get a win. Imagine if someone uses that strategy like using 20$ as the initial bet. He would take a huge loss or worst lose his whole capital before he manages to win.

A continuous loss streak is possible in gambling so despite having a big bankroll, the goal profit is unreachable using this strategy. It will be hard to regain losses if you will increase your bet every time you lose. It will be better to apply the basic strategy of betting than aiming for higher profit using a very risky technique.

[samuraijin]

this is an ancient method but there are still many people who use it, you may still be lucky to get your winnings when you make the 7th bet you win multiples of your bet, but you forget that not all gambling sites will let gamblers take money from their sites in the same way. it's easy like this, if you are a new user it will usually be easy to win but try to do it every day you will see when you make more than 20 bets you will lose and run out of funds, that's the gambling site system, sometimes you need additional techniques to win and get money from that gambling site

[rhomelmabini]

what you think on my method?

The same method I used during my naive years when started my online gambling, it's doesn't fascinates me if the next time you do the same strat you'll end up losing your money. It's a cash grab strategy and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone especially to those who has small bankroll, martingale strat may take longer lose streak and would end up burning your balance.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Heyyo! You really think this is going work as you said? Have you considered the fact that every casino needs to make personal profits and also for thier expenditures and security? The whole fuckin' thing is programmed and made to curtail loses (company loses only not bettors) so when you keep stacking, in these order as you claimed, you're just gonna get yourself fucked. They're not gonna allow you loose throughout so you won't feel like a nut-sack looser but they'll always make you recover but, in bits after the whole process dude.
This shit doesn't work. Most god-damn bettors gamble just for the sake of getting addicted cus you'll realize that you keep loosing each time you try.