I find way to win on dice

[Peanutswar]

This is just one of the strategy of the players if they lose the game they will make a double to make an earning back again and small profit and back to the normal bet this kind of strategy is martingale still theres a lot more but this is the most common people doing.  But this kind of strategy I called as a revenge wage because there's a chance it triple your lose or back your previous bet.

[1715525882]

1715525882

[1715525882]

1715525882

[LUCKMCFLY]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

Martingale strategy? You think people haven't thought of this? Lol, sure they have and this is how they lost everything. In the long run, no matter what strategy you use, the casino will always win.

And for your strategy to work, you will need infinite balance or you won't eventually be able to place bets since you will lose everything. And if you had infinite balance, why would you want to gamble?

Well, it should be noted that yes, it is indeed the Martingale strategy, and if it fails 7 times, in fact one day I did something like this and counted the number of failures and had 18 second losses, this is something that cannot be avoided, sometimes when that happened to me I just went into despair and well sometimes I couldn't continue jugnaod anymore because I was going to compromise all my money balance and that wasn't the idea either. So, in reality, this strategy is not good, because there are also people who do not have a balance of more than $500, so it is very dangerous, I agree that a person who makes this strategy has to have an infinite balance.

[coolcoinz]

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

It's possible to lose many more bets consecutively.
To be successful, you need an unlimited balance which is impossible.  

In reality you don't need infinite balance because there's really no way to lose 30+ bets in a row because your chances of a loss also get exponentially lower with each lost bet. I've seen people with 15 losses in a row but getting 30 is already almost impossible. Of course to be able to bet 30 times you either need a very low starting bet or a lot of money and with some of the last bets like 25+ you're going to be putting thousands of dollars at stake just to go back to 0 and be able to reset the game which is pretty bad.

Well, it should be noted that yes, it is indeed the Martingale strategy, and if it fails 7 times, in fact one day I did something like this and counted the number of failures and had 18 second losses, this is something that cannot be avoided, sometimes when that happened to me I just went into despair and well sometimes I couldn't continue jugnaod anymore because I was going to compromise all my money balance and that wasn't the idea either. So, in reality, this strategy is not good, because there are also people who do not have a balance of more than $500, so it is very dangerous, I agree that a person who makes this strategy has to have an infinite balance.

I also had 16 losses in a row when I tried to do it. Fortunately, that still made it a small loss, but it emptied my wallet and I didn't feel like sending more just to try again.

[BobK71]

This is just one of the strategy of the players if they lose the game they will make a double to make an earning back again and small profit and back to the normal bet this kind of strategy is martingale still theres a lot more but this is the most common people doing.  But this kind of strategy I called as a revenge wage because there's a chance it triple your lose or back your previous bet.

I think this type of strategy is riskier than other strategies. Although it is easy to guess that if someone misses first time, he doubles his second chance to recover his loss. In the same way there is more chance 3rd action. In this way, if you can advance a bit far, how many people are eligible for such a large scale? But one advantage here is that you may not lose over and over again. Once you win in any one, your old loss will be recovered.

[fullhdpixel]

I don't know if it's a good method to try because as far as I know, the dice game is a gambling game that requires luck. So if you believe your method can work to get big wins, you can try it and see how it turns out. Maybe it will work once or twice but there is no guarantee that the method will always work. So it's up to you and I remind you not to spend much money trying it because your losses will get bigger. We will never know whether it will work or fail without trying it.

It is, a game of luck but unlike the other, many people are creating a strategy to be used in dice games and one of it is the strategy proposed by the op. Our luck differs so you can always try it and see if you are more lucky on using this kind of strategy than the strategy that you are using before.

There is no method that works consistently because no gambling sites will survived on that but it does not mean that we should replace our strategy right away because they can still work after some time. It's fine if you have more than one strategy so that you can cycle them once you feel that the other needs a rest. Op already confirm that it's working on him, that is why he is sharing it here but we should test it first with small amounts.

[usekevin]

It’s not a good strategy to keep on increasing your bets since 12 times.Because you should learn the strategy to win a game.This is not seems to be a strategy for me.This will multiple the chance of losing huge dollars instead of small bet.We can bet 20$ for 12 times,instead of doubling and tripling of money you made on first bet.The dice is based on the luck,but it can be repeated with the alternate rolling of dice.So you can find the alternate dice and make some dollars from winning.I had a doubt,why you keep on trying for the next bet.You had loss,So you are emotionally weak now.So it’s best way to hold for short period.The market will reflect on the involvement of gambling.When the bet is more,the money you earn will be more compared to the situation of money you earn at less bet.

[ethereumhunter]

So maybe he could give it a try to see if his strategy would work or not. And if his strategy fails, it seems that he needs to update it by modifying his strategy and maybe replacing it with another component.

Yes, he should do that. At the same time, though, I doubt he will. If he was so sure of this "strategy", he would use it for his personal gain. 

I also felt that he doubted his own strategy so he threw the strategy on this forum to see if his strategy could work or not. It was only by trying his strategy that he could figure it out because not many people used that amount of money to bet in one round.

I can't think of how much money he will spend using his strategy and how much he could lose because there is no certainty in gambling. Hopefully, he can understand the many suggestions from us and not only pursue victory but also think about anticipating the amount of loss he can get later.

The Martingale system of betting is an old gambling tactic and, as has been proven countless times, it can't possibly work unless there's no limit to how much you can bet and if you have unlimited funds at your disposal - and neither is ever true. Any gambler who tries to use it to their advantage is going to be on a swift road to financial ruin sooner or later.

When there is no limit to the money we use, it means we have to be prepared to use very large capital to chase big wins and it is not worth trying for most gamblers. Maybe they can reduce the bet amount for each spin and maybe it can still be tried so they can hope to make a profit. It's better not to try to chase victory because it will cause losses on our part.

I don't know if it's a good method to try because as far as I know, the dice game is a gambling game that requires luck. So if you believe your method can work to get big wins, you can try it and see how it turns out. Maybe it will work once or twice but there is no guarantee that the method will always work. So it's up to you and I remind you not to spend much money trying it because your losses will get bigger. We will never know whether it will work or fail without trying it.

It is, a game of luck but unlike the other, many people are creating a strategy to be used in dice games and one of it is the strategy proposed by the op. Our luck differs so you can always try it and see if you are more lucky on using this kind of strategy than the strategy that you are using before.

There is no method that works consistently because no gambling sites will survived on that but it does not mean that we should replace our strategy right away because they can still work after some time. It's fine if you have more than one strategy so that you can cycle them once you feel that the other needs a rest. Op already confirm that it's working on him, that is why he is sharing it here but we should test it first with small amounts.

The dice game is indeed a gambling game based on luck so by making that strategy, it is hoped that it will work for us and give us the victory we want. But we must remember that in luck-based gambling games, it really requires luck so by making some strategies in playing gambling today it might be possible to win. But don't expect too much from that strategy.

The strategy or method we use in the dice game will not always work for several rounds so if we have several strategies, we can change them after the previous strategy didn't work.

[Bitinity]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

Anyone who thinks that martingale or any of its variants work is usually for a reason like the one you mention. They don't work and are a very bad strategy as I explained some time ago:

Why martingale is PURE SHIT.


What I explained there has also been pointed out by other forum members in this thread, as it is no secret. It has been known for more than 100 years. But as I predicted in that thread, no matter how much we explain it, we will still have people insisting that martingale or its variants work.

[Maestro75]

Your method is martingale. It is not immune to total loss. We have seen such method wreck and destroy people. Doubling or tripling your stakes after each loss will not guarantee you will win the next round. It can only increase your anxiety level and make you take unplanned decisions. Another thing is that the method will make the gambler see gambling as a do or die thing and that can lead to addiction as the gambler will always want to be in the spot to regain what he has lost. That is how addiction starts.

[KennyR]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

Anyone who thinks that martingale or any of its variants work is usually for a reason like the one you mention. They don't work and are a very bad strategy as I explained some time ago:

Why martingale is PURE SHIT.


What I explained there has also been pointed out by other forum members in this thread, as it is no secret. It has been known for more than 100 years. But as I predicted in that thread, no matter how much we explain it, we will still have people insisting that martingale or its variants work.

For some time being the martingale strategy works for them. Soon they'll realise gambling is all dependent over luck, even while following the martingale strategy. As one of the user stated above, OP might've tried with small amounts and experienced the win out of it. Users who are into gambling for long term could've experimented almost everything. From their experience it is true that consecutive loss of 10+ bets will happen very commonly.

[gunhell16]

Do only 50% bet 20$ every time if it fails do 60$ it fails do 150$ if it fails do 350$ if it fails do 900$ if it fails do 2300$

There is no way you will fail 7 times and if you do just increase the bet and you will get it back eventually even if you wait 12 times.

what you think on my method?

I have done that kind of martingale method many times, not only with such a large amount, I have done it almost too many times but in the end, I still failed and lost. But it's a good thing that the dice games I bet on are altcoins and not dollars and I only got them from the faucets of the gambling platform.

I'm using what I got for free from them and I'm trying to grow it through a dice game with that method, I think I've withdrawn twice but it's not a joke because it's also difficult, because, when the house edge notices that you do it next- the house edge will show you as a loser until you are carried away by your emotions to defeat you.

[TheGreatPython]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

The OP started with 20 usd and then it can grow up to 2.3k but he can bet more than that if the results continues to fail. I don't think that was small amount but you are right that we should always start with a small amount if we are playing with this kind of strategy especially if we are using autobet because like I said earlier, our bet amounts can multiply as well as our losses if we don't get a win.

There is no strategy which has a 100% success rate so it's normal for us to experience a loss sometimes. It also depend on the bettor. Maybe the strategy works well in the early run but then they abused it and didn't stop after winning some so all of it have turned into losses later on. They shouldn't blame the strategy for this.

[rahmad2nd]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

Yes, we have the same assumption, most likely Op is a beginner and new to this method. there was nothing wrong with that, if he was really lucky.
sometimes I do the same trick, but with some variations without having to fold the bet amount in each round. however, whatever the strategy or method will not work for a long time.
I mean, dice games, blackjack, baccarat, or whatever if we play for a long time, we can be sure that the table will win in the end.  whatever the technique in the betting method must be based on high patience, sufficient understanding of the type of game and stop if it is enough regardless of winning or losing.

[Peanutswar]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

Anyone who thinks that martingale or any of its variants work is usually for a reason like the one you mention. They don't work and are a very bad strategy as I explained some time ago:

Why martingale is PURE SHIT.


What I explained there has also been pointed out by other forum members in this thread, as it is no secret. It has been known for more than 100 years. But as I predicted in that thread, no matter how much we explain it, we will still have people insisting that martingale or its variants work.

For some time being the martingale strategy works for them. Soon they'll realise gambling is all dependent over luck, even while following the martingale strategy. As one of the user stated above, OP might've tried with small amounts and experienced the win out of it. Users who are into gambling for long term could've experimented almost everything. From their experience it is true that consecutive loss of 10+ bets will happen very commonly.

For me having a martingale strategy only works to a person who has a lot of budgets because we know that we double our losses so there's a chance you get back your lose and make another but or else make another multiplier of losses but mostly in this experience when I'm playing every approximate of five games there's a chance that I earned my lose but again this is gambling there's a possible risk of half chance of winning still the capability of the player to have a lot of bets.

[arwin100]

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

Anyone who thinks that martingale or any of its variants work is usually for a reason like the one you mention. They don't work and are a very bad strategy as I explained some time ago:

Why martingale is PURE SHIT.


What I explained there has also been pointed out by other forum members in this thread, as it is no secret. It has been known for more than 100 years. But as I predicted in that thread, no matter how much we explain it, we will still have people insisting that martingale or its variants work.

For some time being the martingale strategy works for them. Soon they'll realise gambling is all dependent over luck, even while following the martingale strategy. As one of the user stated above, OP might've tried with small amounts and experienced the win out of it. Users who are into gambling for long term could've experimented almost everything. From their experience it is true that consecutive loss of 10+ bets will happen very commonly.

For me having a martingale strategy only works to a person who has a lot of budgets because we know that we double our losses so there's a chance you get back your lose and make another but or else make another multiplier of losses but mostly in this experience when I'm playing every approximate of five games there's a chance that I earned my lose but again this is gambling there's a possible risk of half chance of winning still the capability of the player to have a lot of bets.

This might work for them  but for sure its temporary only because what matter the most on dice games is patience on following the plan or strategy you set on playing dice. But since dice is a luck base game we shouldn't think more far on this and think about enjoying the game since if we became greedy on it for sure we will be eaten by the house for the losses we encounter.

[masulum]

This might work for them  but for sure its temporary only because what matter the most on dice games is patience on following the plan or strategy you set on playing dice. But since dice is a luck base game we shouldn't think more far on this and think about enjoying the game since if we became greedy on it for sure we will be eaten by the house for the losses we encounter.

That's right, I have and experience to use this method very often to prove the truth of some of the articles I read about tips on getting rid of potential losses from playing dice. In fact, when a losing streak comes, the balance will run out faster. even though it uses a 50:50 bet.

[South Park]

For me having a martingale strategy only works to a person who has a lot of budgets because we know that we double our losses so there's a chance you get back your lose and make another but or else make another multiplier of losses but mostly in this experience when I'm playing every approximate of five games there's a chance that I earned my lose but again this is gambling there's a possible risk of half chance of winning still the capability of the player to have a lot of bets.

Casinos have known about the martingale strategy for a very long time, and as such they have a very easy counter for it, in almost any game there is going to be a maximum amount of money you can bet, that limitation is there precisely to stop whales players from abusing the martingale strategy and getting their money back, as at some point they are bound to hit the limit and be unable to keep doubling their bets any further, and at that point their losses will be basically guaranteed.

[TimeTeller]

For me having a martingale strategy only works to a person who has a lot of budgets because we know that we double our losses so there's a chance you get back your lose and make another but or else make another multiplier of losses but mostly in this experience when I'm playing every approximate of five games there's a chance that I earned my lose but again this is gambling there's a possible risk of half chance of winning still the capability of the player to have a lot of bets.

Casinos have known about the martingale strategy for a very long time, and as such they have a very easy counter for it, in almost any game there is going to be a maximum amount of money you can bet, that limitation is there precisely to stop whales players from abusing the martingale strategy and getting their money back, as at some point they are bound to hit the limit and be unable to keep doubling their bets any further, and at that point their losses will be basically guaranteed.

Casino owners know how to handle these strategies as they are not here to bankrupt themselves.
Of course, that's the reason why there is house edge as well as having max bets in place.
Gamblers will always try their own strategies to beat the house, but not very many are fortunate to achieve such feat.
Even if someone found a way to earn from this game, this is still a luck-based game where anyone can't apply it to their own games.

[Sandra_hakeem]

I read on this previously; the whole theory looks easy and it has to be so you'd be given play time and a bunch of hope that you could, prolly by chance, lay your hands in the winning tray to claim your spree hahahaha..... But that's not too simple yunno. It's based on a huge probability and there are no two ways about it.

Everything on the gambling angle happens spontaneously or rather, unevenly. They control the whole system and their bots are activated to stop loss; which means they can never be loosing straight, just as you -- the gambler -- does.
Whatever rule or trick to manoeuvre this process makes the gambler's ambition fucked up.