Zero KYC tolerance gambling platforms

[dezoel]

All gamblers can choose a gambling platform without any requirements related to identity or the casino has followed the requirements of the regulator, but we are talking about data protection and fair play, then if you find a casino that is completely anonymous and meets both criteria then it's your decision, but many top casinos must follow the rules of the regulations but not strictly require KYC for all users but only for high withdrawals, high wins, suspected money laundering and others.

That's true because as gamblers who don't want to do KYC, we have freedom in choosing the casino. If, later on, the casino asks us to do KYC on our way to gamble, we can move to another casino that doesn't ask us to do KYC. Besides that, I'm sure those of us who have been playing gambling for a long time must have had many casino choices that don't require KYC to be made on their users. But if we are fine with doing KYC on the casino site we use, we can do it immediately if the casino asks for it.

But what if you already have a balance on that gambling site and suddenly you are being asked to do a KYC? I think it's hard to decide on this one if we will just leave our funds on that casino and find another non KYC casino or we will swallow our pride and took the challenge. This is usually the case that happens. I think this one is not fair.

A professional casino should warn their costumers before they deposit or play if KYC is needed later on or not so that the people can decide if they will continue or not. Your long term experience in gambling has nothing to do with the casino that ask a KYC or not because their policy can always change.

[AmoreJaz]

All gamblers can choose a gambling platform without any requirements related to identity or the casino has followed the requirements of the regulator, but we are talking about data protection and fair play, then if you find a casino that is completely anonymous and meets both criteria then it's your decision, but many top casinos must follow the rules of the regulations but not strictly require KYC for all users but only for high withdrawals, high wins, suspected money laundering and others.

That's true because as gamblers who don't want to do KYC, we have freedom in choosing the casino. If, later on, the casino asks us to do KYC on our way to gamble, we can move to another casino that doesn't ask us to do KYC. Besides that, I'm sure those of us who have been playing gambling for a long time must have had many casino choices that don't require KYC to be made on their users. But if we are fine with doing KYC on the casino site we use, we can do it immediately if the casino asks for it.

But what if you already have a balance on that gambling site and suddenly you are being asked to do a KYC? I think it's hard to decide on this one if we will just leave our funds on that casino and find another non KYC casino or we will swallow our pride and took the challenge. This is usually the case that happens. I think this one is not fair.

A professional casino should warn their costumers before they deposit or play if KYC is needed later on or not so that the people can decide if they will continue or not. Your long term experience in gambling has nothing to do with the casino that ask a KYC or not because their policy can always change.

better read thoroughly the ToS of the site if you are depositing large funds later on. submission of kyc is needed when you have large winnings or they notice unusual activity in your account. to avoid such problem to happen, stick to the terms of the site and as much as possible don't give reasons to the site to check your account to the point of requiring kyc because you have irregular activity or you have done something that caught their eyes.

[Cookdata]

KYC has become a major part of our life that we can not deviate from, even to operate fairly with cryptocurrency one still need to undergo some form of KYC which makes it impossible to do without.
But then a lot of other privacy-minded users will rather play on only none KYC casinos but we have only a few of such 100% KYC-free casinos since regulations are climbing down on them.

KYC was never part of our life, it was implemented and forced on financial institutions to weed out laundering money but we all know that for every merit, there are one or two demerits, however, in the case of KYC, the Demerits outweighed the merits and if you start from the beginning of this thread, that is what most users has been discussing. We can do without KYC, it shouldn't be forced on people who don't want to, if the regulators fear that there will be some sort of criminalities in crypto casinos, it happens everywhere even with the banks.

KYC shouldn't be compulsory or a prerequisite to playing in Casino, they could at most make some limit to funds and may make it mandatory for players who wants to incase a player deposits money they suspected, if they lift these things, it will not only increase players, it increases revenues for casinos.

[Newlifebtc]

I want to ask don't you think that some of the platforms that does not have a kyc verification do not crash in time or do not have a problem after making a payment because I see again twice irrigations and something that is very meaningful and important to learn every gampola program was having a zero kyc verification I think that counts cause a very big problem and i think will cause a problem in time coming

[Desmong]

I want to ask don't you think that some of the platforms that does not have a kyc verification do not crash in time or do not have a problem after making a payment because I see again twice irrigations and something that is very meaningful and important to learn every gampola program was having a zero kyc verification I think that counts cause a very big problem and i think will cause a problem in time coming

Casino that choose to not have a KYC can have a big problem later with lots of complains. I will rather choose a less required KYC casinos so that in case I have may problem or my account got hacked, I can be able to resolve it without bigger problem which can be very easy for us than casinos that will take serious time to help you solve your problem because of no KYC.

[Ebede]

I want to ask don't you think that some of the platforms that does not have a kyc verification do not crash in time or do not have a problem after making a payment because I see again twice irrigations and something that is very meaningful and important to learn every gampola program was having a zero kyc verification I think that counts cause a very big problem and i think will cause a problem in time coming

Casino that choose to not have a KYC can have a big problem later with lots of complains. I will rather choose a less required KYC casinos so that in case I have may problem or my account got hacked, I can be able to resolve it without bigger problem which can be very easy for us than casinos that will take serious time to help you solve your problem because of no KYC.

Any casino that does not have a kyc verification now casino platform is supposed to be far from because sometimes it is something that makes some people to lose their money or something certain platforms run away with some papers for me because I have no licence of operation so I believe that all this kyc verification is very important

[ethereumhunter]

All gamblers can choose a gambling platform without any requirements related to identity or the casino has followed the requirements of the regulator, but we are talking about data protection and fair play, then if you find a casino that is completely anonymous and meets both criteria then it's your decision, but many top casinos must follow the rules of the regulations but not strictly require KYC for all users but only for high withdrawals, high wins, suspected money laundering and others.

That's true because as gamblers who don't want to do KYC, we have freedom in choosing the casino. If, later on, the casino asks us to do KYC on our way to gamble, we can move to another casino that doesn't ask us to do KYC. Besides that, I'm sure those of us who have been playing gambling for a long time must have had many casino choices that don't require KYC to be made on their users. But if we are fine with doing KYC on the casino site we use, we can do it immediately if the casino asks for it.

But what if you already have a balance on that gambling site and suddenly you are being asked to do a KYC? I think it's hard to decide on this one if we will just leave our funds on that casino and find another non KYC casino or we will swallow our pride and took the challenge. This is usually the case that happens. I think this one is not fair.

A professional casino should warn their costumers before they deposit or play if KYC is needed later on or not so that the people can decide if they will continue or not. Your long term experience in gambling has nothing to do with the casino that ask a KYC or not because their policy can always change.

I will first ask customer service if I can withdraw the balance in my account or do I have to go through the KYC process until I get verification, then I can withdraw the balance. If I am asked to do KYC verification before withdrawing the balance, I may do KYC but I will think about it first.

If the balance is not too big or even just a small balance, I will leave it in that balance but if it is a rather large balance, like it or not, I have to do KYC first. We know that KYC will be needed later so we have to be prepared when it comes and for that, we don't need to keep a balance that is too big so we can leave the casino straight away if we don't want to do KYC.

[Jawhead999]

Any casino that does not have a kyc verification now casino platform is supposed to be far from because sometimes it is something that makes some people to lose their money or something certain platforms run away with some papers for me because I have no licence of operation so I believe that all this kyc verification is very important

Not really, Freebitco.in is zero KYC casino and still exist until now, don't forget they have a promotion to give a lambo to one lucky winner. They're not lying and always do their promise, so even though Freebitco.in doesn't have any license, it's the most trusted zero KYC casino.

Unlike the site you promote that doesn't have any license and zero KYC too, but the activities is just trick the newbies to make deposit and then block their withdrawal, the money is used for the team profit and the signature campaign payment lol.

[LUCKMCFLY]

and if a way to recover your account and funds is through has already done his KYC verification, the platform is forced to help that client who is totally legal with them, with a person who is totally anonymous, it is very difficult because the way to prove what is or is not is very difficult, with the documents is something else, it could be said that you can have a more preferential treatment and with more benefits, and it is not that people with KYC are more than the others, only that it is a way to make it easier.

I will like to assume that KYC should be required only on account recovery purpose, take a look at the forum for instance, you will be required to input a username, email and create your password in which the email will only be verified if there's a need for account verification during lost of login details or hack related issues, the casinos can also make use of this or something close to, they will definitely safe the user's privacy when they only demanded for his email address and of which he should have the password and phone number used in creating the email address before using it.

Well that is also a very valid option, I imagine that when they assume that KYC is requested it is because they think that the user could also have lost that information or if it was hacked, that can happen, if so they would only have to explain the matter and through of the KYC to determine that it is the owner of the account, of course this goes much further, it would be a very special case, but personally I still think that no casino likes the KYC for many of these reasons, but they feel obliged to they have to do it so that they do not lose their licenses or permits that are required of them, if there is a lack of licenses, then some players will not play with confidence and the authenticity of the casino will be put in suspense.

I want to ask don't you think that some of the platforms that does not have a kyc verification do not crash in time or do not have a problem after making a payment because I see again twice irrigations and something that is very meaningful and important to learn every gampola program was having a zero kyc verification I think that counts cause a very big problem and i think will cause a problem in time coming

Casino that choose to not have a KYC can have a big problem later with lots of complains. I will rather choose a less required KYC casinos so that in case I have may problem or my account got hacked, I can be able to resolve it without bigger problem which can be very easy for us than casinos that will take serious time to help you solve your problem because of no KYC.

Any casino that does not have a kyc verification now casino platform is supposed to be far from because sometimes it is something that makes some people to lose their money or something certain platforms run away with some papers for me because I have no licence of operation so I believe that all this kyc verification is very important

Well, this is something really debatable, for example, the case of Freebitco.in is a platform that breaks with certain standards, first, they do not request KYC and they handle large amounts of money in Bitcoin, second, they do not have a problem with their faucet, a person can spend as much time as necessary to be there they don't block you or anything, in fact you can withdraw when you reach the established minimum, and they do it without problems, so this is something that sometimes I don't understand about other sites that do have KYC verification, Sometimes I think that having certain games on the platform must be a requirement, just like slots, that's what I analyze, it's a simple assumption of mine.

[delfastTions]

Well, this is something really debatable, for example, the case of Freebitco.in is a platform that breaks with certain standards, first, they do not request KYC and they handle large amounts of money in Bitcoin, second, they do not have a problem with their faucet, a person can spend as much time as necessary to be there they don't block you or anything, in fact you can withdraw when you reach the established minimum, and they do it without problems, so this is something that sometimes I don't understand about other sites that do have KYC verification, Sometimes I think that having certain games on the platform must be a requirement, just like slots, that's what I analyze, it's a simple assumption of mine.

It is very good that there is no KYC in this casino now, and players can easily withdraw their money. 

However, this does not mean at all that the same casino will suddenly not introduce KYC, when everyone is already used to the fact that it does not exist.  Of course, casinos without KYC attract a lot more players because people always don't like to verify their identity once and for all.  This takes time from the game and in the future in the event of a data leak (and many years of experience show that such leaks of personal data occur all the time, this is inevitable) also does not give anything good to a person, except for possible troubles.  But at the request of the authorities, legislators and regulatory authorities, casino developers can quite urgently and unexpectedly oblige to conduct KYC. 
And you should always be ready for it.

[Casdinyard]

Is KYC verification very important to crypto gambling websites or this has something to do with their regulations rule? Where can one gamble with zero verification requirements?

Employing KYC measures adds a safety layer for players and the gambling site altogether. This weeds out hackers as you would need to provide verification before you could cash the money out. And the gambling site in theory is saved from troubles caused by hackers as they are pushed away from the site. Of course with increasing amounts of complex algorithms and hacking methods hackers could now get a hold of your information as easy as picking their noses, although this isn't the case for everything. I think I went off into a tangent there but bottomline is, adding KYC measures makes you feel more secure about the gambling site, and it altogether helps ensure that no funds are stolen whatsoever on both ends.