government hampers the country's economy

[Invester]

This is about corruption which is common not only in developed and developing countries but gone uncontrolled in poor countries. Education is the key but it will take time even multiple generations to put an end to corruption or put it in the lowest form.

For hundreds of years, humans came up with many forms of government testing their effectiveness when it comes to power, economy, and populace and nothing came up perfect. Democracy came up as the nearest to perfection but it has its flaws too. But democracy in a fully educated country bound by a population enriched with deep social awareness and responsibility might work.

[xSkylarx]

is there a way to handle it?

As long as there is a corruption in the government, economic growth on a country will be difficult to achieve. Like here in our country, there are many organizations proposing a solution to reduce imports and combat the inflation. Many of the government officials are against those solutions since they won't get any kickback from it. Local farmers are not properly subsidized and being taken advantage where their agricultural products are being bought for a very cheap price but sold expensive when it reaches the market.

[Findingnemo]

Even though humans are evolved and living as a society still we are one of the fewest living species who want to survive first than others and that is also the rule of nature which is also evolved and who is having the powers making it more beneficial for themselves and there is only way to handle is to become one of them, possible but highly unlikely to make it happen by a common man.

Because until now, even though the method may have been modern, the law of the jungle still continues because when we are strong we eat and those who are not strong it is clear that they are eaten.
This is something that is indeed the simplest that often happens, the problem is that the government is always one unit because when one of them does make a mistake, no one will be able to pay attention because they will also be affected. When the government is too greedy with power and wealth, it is certain that civilians will eat it, although in this case not all governments are like that, but on average they are like that.

We can point out few countries with very less corruption because the past leaders made the policies stricter and unchangeable so current people who are in the power has no choice than to follow what it has been followed by them. While in general speaking about the nature we belong to that species as I said in the previous post because we know strong one will survive.

[Darker45]

I say it's one thing for the state to have sound economic policies and it's quite another to have them properly implemented. So, to a certain extent, it's not just about economic policies. My country is a proof of that. We have very poor policy implementation here. I'm not saying we have the best of policies, but it certainly doesn't help that policy implementers are either not serious in doing their jobs or are simply rotten to the core that they are more than willing to accept bribes in favor of certain powerful personalities or companies.

We actually have a double whammy here. We have bad policies which are crafted by a handful of clueless and assuming policymakers up in their ivory towers. We also have worse implementers whose goal is never to advance the economic welfare of the state but to acquire as much ill-gotten money as possible.

[Dickiy]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.
not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

Sounds very familiar as this is one reason why our country is not that progressing, - corruption. Every government official is just looking for their own interest and no one is sent to jail and punished because they have the power and influence. And even if we have a good President, if everyone under him is corrupt then there is nothing we can do. Maybe in the next election we should be careful on who the people is going to place in Congress or who will they vote for their Senators and President. At least carefully filter each and everyone because those who are going to take the seat next will be the one that will stir our country towards growth or downfall.

what I know is corruption (budget misuse) into two, the first is to meet the needs of the personal stomach and the second group is for other developments, I mean by other developments, for example, which was for the construction of public facilities such as road access and then used for the construction of educational institutions or MSMEs whose goal is for the progress of the community in their area, even though number two cannot be justified by law, it is at least much better than the first one I mentioned.
after I see and examine the people who reply to this topic, it turns out that there are certain steps to deal with this. Then I formulated it to deal with the corruption that hampers the economy in a country.
The first is to socialize to the whole community that corruption or misuse of the state budget hinders the state's goal of prospering its people. 2 establish an independent and transparent press institution, 3 make punishments for perpetrators of corruption that are firm and deterrent, 4 create an independent corruption eradication commission with legal protection, 5 government accountability reports every period must be transparent to the public so that the public can assess and supervise.

Yes, I don't think this will be easy in terms of technical implementation and it will take a lot of time, but if it is implemented properly and correctly, what we hope is that it will probably happen.

[virasisog]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.
not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

This is the struggle of most developing countries including our country. Our government officials focus on projects that aren't necessary or helpful for the growth of our economy but would rather fulfill their selfish desires for their own benefit.
One of the examples is our education department, instead of allocating enough funds for educational buildings and educational equipment and infrastructures, they kept a huge fund and labeled it as confidential funds for government officials.
They are allocating funds for their own benefit which makes lots of citizens here suffer.
Corruption always hinders the growth of a country and our mistake is, we are always electing corrupt officials.

[Eternad]

This is about corruption which is common not only in developed and developing countries but gone uncontrolled in poor countries. Education is the key but it will take time even multiple generations to put an end to corruption or put it in the lowest form.

For hundreds of years, humans came up with many forms of government testing their effectiveness when it comes to power, economy, and populace and nothing came up perfect. Democracy came up as the nearest to perfection but it has its flaws too. But democracy in a fully educated country bound by a population enriched with deep social awareness and responsibility might work.

Some governments overused democracy that its hard for governments to implement rules that are good for the country since there’s always anti in every decision. It’s part of the government’s now as people have their own decision whether to support or not since they were eyeing for other officials to seat in government. If only there will be a better government that can let people choose whether to stay or leave one country or divide a country to pro and always non to have unity in what ever projects that is voted or approved by people then it can be a better place. But we all know we governments are politics and they are their for their mostly since they can benefit from it.

[vv181]

What do you specifically mean by "handle", I think the word are having multiple interpretations thus it doesn't really get to the substance.

what I know is corruption (budget misuse) into two, the first is to meet the needs of the personal stomach and the second group is for other developments, I mean by other developments, for example, which was for the construction of public facilities such as road access and then used for the construction of educational institutions or MSMEs whose goal is for the progress of the community in their area, even though number two cannot be justified by law, it is at least much better than the first one I mentioned.

It is also likely that the first may get widen due to their peers that are the main actor, the perpetrator is only the puppet. The second, surely there is a lot of bureaucracy process, thus every single step is prone to be corrupt. There isn't any better between those two, the act is mainly executed by a hidden motive which is for self-utilization benefit, not for the people.

The first is to socialize to the whole community that corruption or misuse of the state budget hinders the state's goal of prospering its people. 2 establish an independent and transparent press institution, 3 make punishments for perpetrators of corruption that are firm and deterrent, 4 create an independent corruption eradication commission with legal protection, 5 government accountability reports every period must be transparent to the public so that the public can assess and supervise.

Some governments are already doing those five things, the problem is, does it work and reduce the corruption percentage or not? Corruption is a complex topic and concept, it differs between any country so does the reason why some people are corrupt. So a single set of solutions is not going to solve corruption as it is.

[kryptqnick]

Different countries face different central challenges and come from different traditions of economic policy-making. For example, while corruption is a global issue, the level of it and how big of a problem it is varies a lot from one country to another. In some medical challenges are crucial, in others there is a big hunger issue, and in some there's a big risk of a military coup which is almost nonexistent in many other countries. So how corrupt the government is and how much is affects society can vary a lot. Also, if history of economy has shown anything, it's that there's no universal solutions. Both governmental planning and free market can sometimes be saviors and other times be very harmful. So handling challenges depends on what's already in place, since it's impossible to design a viable solution while being withdrawn from the actual situation. I will lead to big unforeseen consequences even if it sounded very good on paper.

[Raflesia]

Even though humans are evolved and living as a society still we are one of the fewest living species who want to survive first than others and that is also the rule of nature which is also evolved and who is having the powers making it more beneficial for themselves and there is only way to handle is to become one of them, possible but highly unlikely to make it happen by a common man.

Because until now, even though the method may have been modern, the law of the jungle still continues because when we are strong we eat and those who are not strong it is clear that they are eaten.
This is something that is indeed the simplest that often happens, the problem is that the government is always one unit because when one of them does make a mistake, no one will be able to pay attention because they will also be affected. When the government is too greedy with power and wealth, it is certain that civilians will eat it, although in this case not all governments are like that, but on average they are like that.

We can point out few countries with very less corruption because the past leaders made the policies stricter and unchangeable so current people who are in the power has no choice than to follow what it has been followed by them. While in general speaking about the nature we belong to that species as I said in the previous post because we know strong one will survive.

Indeed, in this case there are some countries that can be said to be quite good at managing so that things like this do not happen and make the government's image look good, but this is only a small part of the number of corrupt countries.
although indeed we can still call this person a person because surely not all of them do that but still this has definitely tarnished the government which makes it difficult for many of us to trust the government.

[Smartvirus]

It's actually difficult to get the best out of governance when some of the political seats are by appointments. It provides the avenue to circulate wealth amongst a group of persons and most times, repeats the same thing over again until it becomes a tradition. This already takes the trust out of the people and makes the of little importance and as such, there is little the government would want to do for them.
Most of all, the agencies put in place doesn't work against them but for them so, how would they not do as they like when they could always get away with almost everything. Until we have an accountable government, development is always going to be hampered by the existing systems.

[South Park]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.
not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

I do not really think there is much that can be done about this even if you are right, humans by nature look after themselves and those they care about, supposedly public servants should put the interest of the citizens of the country above their own interests but this is almost impossible to do for the majority of the people, and those who can are often people which do not work as part of the government, like scientists or artists, I really think the only way to change this was if at some point an AI in the future was the one managing the country and not people.

[samcrypto]

not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

There's always a way if they want it but since I'm living in a corrupt country, and our people is not trusting the government anymore there's actually no unity and the law only applies to poor people. If the government make a strict implementation of the law and punish those who are corrupt, I think many country will start to recover and probably discover their true potential. I admire countries who are so strict and their citizen still follows it, look at them now they are rich just like Singapore. Government should do their best to solve the economic problem, I believe investors are always there waiting for the opportunity to come.

[Swordsoffreedom]

~~~

what I know is corruption (budget misuse) into two, the first is to meet the needs of the personal stomach and the second group is for other developments, I mean by other developments, for example, which was for the construction of public facilities such as road access and then used for the construction of educational institutions or MSMEs whose goal is for the progress of the community in their area, even though number two cannot be justified by law, it is at least much better than the first one I mentioned.
after I see and examine the people who reply to this topic, it turns out that there are certain steps to deal with this. Then I formulated it to deal with the corruption that hampers the economy in a country.
The first is to socialize to the whole community that corruption or misuse of the state budget hinders the state's goal of prospering its people. 2 establish an independent and transparent press institution, 3 make punishments for perpetrators of corruption that are firm and deterrent, 4 create an independent corruption eradication commission with legal protection, 5 government accountability reports every period must be transparent to the public so that the public can assess and supervise.

Yes, I don't think this will be easy in terms of technical implementation and it will take a lot of time, but if it is implemented properly and correctly, what we hope is that it will probably happen.

According to my thoughts. We will never find any effective solution to stop corruption, you should know that greed is part of being human and measures will not work if we can't get rid of greed but this is really impossible neither you nor I can kill our greed. All 5 solutions you suggest are great and nothing new, but the bottom line is that these organizations are also run by humans. And how can you ensure that they are the ones who won't get caught up in corruption, unless these organizations are run by robots.

[Fara Chan]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.

It is called a government that is corrupt and unable to control its policies, on the one hand, many interests are accommodated, making them unable to carry out economic growth programs, so that the repercussions that arise on the citizens they lead.

not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

It is very difficult to control state policies, regulations will always clash with interests, so there are many reasons that cause economic development to be delayed.
The way is by preparing Human Resources, the government provides as much space as possible for the people and ensures that domestic production runs according to the wishes achieved. If the people start to be strong in the economic field, then the government's task will be lighter to realize the country's economic growth

[rokok lokal]

is there a way to handle it?

I think my question is quite basic, What are the state losses from economic domination?

People's poverty and unemployment. As a result, there is an increase in the national debt, so let's apply how to encourage economic growth by increasing economic policies that involve corruption.

If we all here want our government to have good economic development, then we must choose our head of state accurately, not choosing rulers but leaders.

Prosperity comes when the dreamer has knowledge and is able to read ahead. In my opinion, this is the key because it is considered capable of managing the country's economy by embracing a certain group of experts and analysts to handle the stability of the country's economy and finances.

[dothebeats]

I think the only way to curb this plague in governance is to install actual public servants - those who do not put their interests forward and leave the interest of the public behind. Easier said than done, and in this day and age, how many people are there that remains to be pure in intentions anyway? Probably a handful, and a lot of them would surely pass on the opportunity to be in the government or will have the requirements to handle a public post.

Politicians will always have ulterior motives that will benefit themselves. Only thing that needs to be done is to choose which of them are the lesser of the evils.

[davis196]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.
not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

You are using way too many words to describe something, which is very simple-political corruption.
How to deal with political corruption? Having a functioning democracy with "checks and balances", an independent and efficient judicial system,  good prosecutors, having an active society in general. The list goes on and on and the battle against corruption will continue forever.
I don't really think that government programs are so crucial for a country's economical development.
We don't live in a command economy, like back in the communist block between 1945-1990. The government doesn't rule over the economy.
The private sector is what creates economical growth, new jobs and pay the taxes. The government is responsible for the fair redistribution of the tax revenue.

[panganib999]

Economic growth depends on the state's economic policies, where the government has the right to regulate and finance a program for the development of the country's economic development, but the policy is actually used by the government who uses it for personal interests and even policymakers. self. This event is very common in both developed and developing countries.
not a few policymakers who ask and even cut the budget from funding the program for the benefit of themselves and their groups, citing administrative and accommodation costs. that is why a country's economic development program is difficult to achieve and bankrupt the country.
is there a way to handle it?

Point taken, some policies in my home country aren't Microbusiness-Friendly, and ever since inflation came crashing earlier this year, businesses left and right closed down because of the unfair practices from the government whether legal or under the table, as well as out of scope economic crises like the aforementioned inflation. At the end of the day, the Government is the one that wins and we are at the mercy of those from the top, the legislators, the authorities, etc.

[Tallupooh]

The main thing in my opinion is to reduce corruption. The country will not progress if there is corruption in the government. To manage a country to become a developed and prosperous country, starting from the way of government.

The main way of management is to always pay attention to people. Many people often criticize the government simply because the government does not provide assistance to people in need, which they say will be given at a certain time, and in fact they do not provide it. Or they offer help, but somehow they give it to the rich.