About My Red Trust (Remove Request)

[LoyceV]

Have you tried to contact the person who has left the negative trust in you eg: Lauda

That's futile, Lauda is gone:

After this post, "Lauda" will cease to exist.
~
Hereby I want to emphasize that it will never again be possible to contact "Lauda"

Lauda can't create or remove any feedback:

I will request that theymos ban the "Lauda" account (u=101872)

Done. Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore.

[1715312546]

1715312546

[1715312546]

1715312546

[1715312546]

1715312546

[1715312546]

1715312546

[1715312546]

1715312546

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Hi BitcoinTurk, Have you tried to contact the person who has left the negative trust in you eg: Lauda as well as JollyGood who has given you negative trust? If yes, then if they do not want to remove then nothing to do. But if you have not yet contacted them then try to convince them about the reality.

I added BitcoinTurk to my IGNORE list and recommend you all do the same

I am not sure but reading the responses, at least from BitMaxz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5417940.msg61161848#msg61161848) it seems one can not receive PM if the other one put them in their ignore list.

You made it look as if, JG cannot see this post or it must only be via pm that requests of tag removal would be granted.I really think it is absolutely unnecessary to create a new account in order to reach JG.

JG likes everyone to give him attention. On the other hand he knows he has very little to say in defense of his trust abuse on this one, not just this one but most of the feedback he left for others. But still it's weird to see a lot of the users think he is a good scam buster and have him in their trust list.

Maybe from now, when we are building our trust list, we need to start considering who are picking a good feedback leaver. If a user can not see a controversial scam hunter who turned out to be a ghost hunter and using feedback system to hostage others with his red tag then they should be distrusted from others list too.

Against JollyGood this is not the first complaint but not going to the last one too.

[JollyGood]

@OP

My apologies for not replying earlier, I had you on my ignore list and skipped past the thread. When I did read it I decided to not comment straight away until I had ample time.

First of all, I am highly sceptical when it comes to anything you write but having said that if what you wrote about going bankrupt is true then I offer my sincere condolences and sympathies because of the predicament you find yourself in. If what you wrote is true I hope you manage to turn things around fast and hope you get back on to a solid or at least decent financial standing.

Second, I will not be using this thread for running commentary therefore this will be probably be my first and only post here.

You have to accept and understand that having a negative or neutral tag does not mean campaign managers will refuse applications by default. You should apply for as many campaigns as you would like without hesitation, it will most probably be accepted or declined on merit according to the campaign manager.

I will return back to this issue within 8-12 months from today and will gladly revise or edit or remove the feedback depending on your contributions within the forum.

My advise is for you to lock this thread until at least July 2023 because there is nothing else for either of us to add here but a couple of low-level attention seekers with grudges against me will continue to use this thread as a platform to spout their useless comments and it will only distract and divert from the issue.

[examplens]

Do you think the red feedback left by JollyGood, Lauda are actually justified?

Lauda has done a lot in terms of suppressing spam (and scam) on this forum, it certainly cannot be ignored. as far as I remember, for some time I removed her from my trust list almost on a monthly basis, only to add her again after a while. in the end, she took tagging on the forum too personally, so she cast a shadow over all the previous good she had done.
About Jollygood, it reminds me a lot of Lauda's behaviour if we talk about regularity and too easy giving a red tag. (the mystery is why they are afraid to leave neutral feedback)
all experienced members already know that his feedback can be harsh, so I believe that most of them take them with a grain of salt. Although it is opposed to the trust system, because it should facilitate user recognition, and if the additional experience is needed to understand it then its power decreases.

Against JollyGood this is not the first complaint but not going to the last one too.

It seems to me that I have seen JG change his feedback more often after a complaint than Lauda did.

My apologies for not replying earlier, I had you on my ignore list and skipped past the thread. When I did read it I decided to not comment straight away until I had ample time.
..

I'm glad you've come here, I guess the mentions helped you hear this discussion in spite of your ignoring OP. I would suggest that you consider the possibility of using neutral tags, not everything can be either black or white.
maybe you can use something like [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes. That way you will have additional information about users, and you will not burden others with it. To be honest, nobody cares who is on your (or anyone's) ignore list, there is no need to inform us about it on the user's trust page.

[examplens]

where can i find who give me redtrust sir help me.

On your trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3437384 and click Untrusted feedback > Show ratings.
There you will find one red tag from Little Mouse

Little Mouse

2022-10-26

Reference

Dishonest. Copied other people's work and submitted it as their own work to get bounty reward.

but this is a thread about a completely different user, we are going off-topic now. maybe you should open your own topic and be interested in your trust rating.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I also guess that open a topic will not solve my problem but I want to try my luck with this way. I'll try to contact with JollyGood but I'm not sure if he reply me back or not. Also, if I open a new account maybe it's going to be another problem when I had multiple accounts in here. That's why I created this topic and want to find some other ways to solve this problem.

It's pointless to have created a thread like this one in the first place--you've been here long enough that surely you must know how the trust system works and that red trust is there to stay unless the giver of it decides to have mercy on you (which doesn't look like it's going to happen in JollyGood's case, and Lauda is effectively gone forever as far as any of us know).

Since you weren't banned, you fortunately have the luxury of making a new account in good faith, and nobody's going to give you shit about that unless it's discovered and it gets new negs from JollyGood or whoever else.  I think you're just going to be beating your head against a rock, hoping for something that's never going to arrive.  

I'd also point out that your account isn't ruined because of the feedback.  You might not be able to get into a signature campaign, but you can do everything else with it.

Edit: 

I will return back to this issue within 8-12 months from today and will gladly revise or edit or remove the feedback depending on your contributions within the forum.

Ah, I take that back about JG.  But even if he removes his neg, I don't think you're going to be satisfied with a neg from Lauda (is he/she on DT still?), nor is that one going anywhere.

[BitcoinTurk]

@JollyGood;

First of all, thank you for replying back for my topic. I also hope that I'll control my financial status to recover my loss and financial situation as soon as possible. Yes, having a red trust don't mean that I'll not accepted for any signature campaign but it's a very big problem while I apply some of them. But no worries, I'll try my luck at few campaigns.
8-12 months is not a short term timing, but I'm going to wait your response back in time. And lastly, I'm going to lock this topic upon request of you.