Bitcoin Forum
November 04, 2024, 03:35:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Sam Bankman-Fried the "savior" and his ideas  (Read 532 times)
Wind_FURY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1929



View Profile
November 11, 2022, 09:27:26 AM
 #41

But this is where you should have learned, perhaps a very long time ago, that in Bitcoin the cabal has, and will always blame the technology. The people, mostly plebs like me, that are empowered through technologies such as Bitcoin will be called/labeled as radicals, or people who want to "break things", the "trouble makers". Why do you think they want to regulate it? To your viewpoint, they should only regulate the business, but leave Bitcoin alone, no?

first of all IN BITCOIN there is no cabals... i think you are again confusing bitcoin with the businesses gated AROUND bitcoin that use bitcoin at the edges
there is no business "inside bitcoin"


First of all I NEVER said Bitcoin had a cabal. I'm talking about the cabal behind the government. If you're going to act like a franky again, then you should first understand the topic at hand.

Plus from our debates from before, you're the person who's accusing Bitcoin of having a cabal, which of course there is NONE. The people behind the New York Agreement, who excluded the Core Developers, tried to be that cabal, but they never won against the community.

██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
.SHUFFLE.COM..███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
.
...Next Generation Crypto Casino...
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3934
Merit: 3190


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
November 11, 2022, 12:45:43 PM
 #42

i am not embarrassed or ashamed to hoard bitcoin.

You would be if you realised how little you understand it, or how utterly toxic and dangerous your ideas are.  As far as I'm concerned, you're no better than this Bankman-Fried clown.  I'd be willing to bet he's as much of a narcissistic sociopath as you are.  Probably believed he was the "good guy" like you do, yet all of his ideas were clearly wrong.  The only difference between you is that people made the mistake of listening to him.  Thankfully no one listens to your drivel. 


bitcoin was created to not be able to be attacked by any one human.

Which is why it continues to resist all the dumb, fascist shit you'd love to implement.  Many of your idiotic proposals would make Bitcoin easier to attack or subvert.  So you continue screaming into the void like you're somehow here to save us.  Only you're too delusional to realise that you are the problem.  You'd do well not to enter into topics discussing those with a saviour complex when yours is so undeniably blatant. 



▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄█████████████████▄▄
▄██
█████████▀██▀████████
████████▀
░░░░▀░░██████████
███████████▌░░▄▄▄░░░▀████████
███████
█████░░░███▌░░░█████████
███
████████░░░░░░░░░░▄█████████
█████████▀░░░▄████░░░░█████████
███
████▄▄░░░░▀▀▀░░░░▄████████
█████
███▌▄█░░▄▄▄▄█████████
▀████
██████▄██
██████████▀
▀▀█████████████████▀▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀
.
.BitcoinCleanUp.com.


















































.
.     Debunking Bitcoin's Energy Use     .
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████▀█████████▀▀▀▀█▀████████
███████▌░▀▀████▀░░░░░░░▄███████
███████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐████████
████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████
████████▄░░░░░░░░░░░▄██████████
███████▀▀▀░░░░░░░▄▄████████████
█████████▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
...#EndTheFUD...
franky1
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4396
Merit: 4755



View Profile
November 11, 2022, 02:03:35 PM
Last edit: November 11, 2022, 02:28:04 PM by franky1
 #43

Plus from our debates from before, you're the person who's accusing Bitcoin of having a cabal, which of course there is NONE. The people behind the New York Agreement, who excluded the Core Developers, tried to be that cabal, but they never won against the community.

1. SBF is a BUSINESS MAN. he is buddies/sister company of the DCG (the same business group whos interests are trying to mess with bitcoin(code/network) for business desires(not individuals preferences)

2. bitcoin(CODE/network) should not have any businesses inside (central point of failure).. it should be just code that runs itself without a business in control/making decisions(as the legacy parts still do)

3. its your buddy group of social protagonists and finger pointers that supports the businesses trying to be IN bitcoin. you want them in and you and your buddies have many times said how core(sponsored devs by business interests) should own and control the code and should be allowed to upgrade it as they please.. because in your girlfriend(doomads) own words. no one should be able to stop core devs(sponsored by blockstream=DCG)

4. the past controversy(YOU BROUGHT UP FIRST IN THIS TOPIC) is where BUSINESSES overstepped the mark, crossed the line and got into the core of the network to implement the changes in a mandatory way... those BUSINESSES wanted,  for their services and subnets to function

5. YOU support those actions but then point the finger at other directions, all directions bar the ones you support
    YOU think the 2017 activation was just a soft non event where it was suppose to activate "due to community". where you are blind to the narrow BUSINESS community that caused the activation(which you pretend is the wide bitcoin community of individuals)

6. i base my bitcoin utility and usage based on the LEGACY aspect of bitcoin not your favoured business activated features that allow the subnets you adore and want people to off ramp into, to remove utility off of bitcoin 'as the solution to scaling';(facepalm)

7. YOUR social protagonist group are the one declaring and trying to falsely convince people segwit and then your subnets are bitcoin and what everyone should use instead of the features(legacy) of 2009-2014.. YOU are the one promoting your favoured side services and subnetworks are bitcoin and the top solution everyone should use instead of the actual bitcoin network as was invented and used 2009-2014(defined as legacy).
im the one correcting you by separating your myths. by informing people your side services and subnetworks are not bitcoin, but things that require people locking up value on the network. to then use things on the edges or outside the network!!
yep into schemes that require atleast another person or group or a succession of people in a route to agree on a payment, just to get a 'payment success. . (facepalm)

8. you and your social club are the one trying to put your subnetwork and services at the center of bitcoin or ontop as if they are the solution and place people should move into.


FTX and DCG and many of your favoured devs want bitcoin to become a commodity because it fulfils the BUSINESS plans of making bitcoin no longer a digital cash for the unbanked and instead a reserve system for elite services where the blockchain space is only used for locked value of subnets and ETF buckets, and exchange reserves, and where people have to deposit value into to then 'mix'
you lot dont care about self control of peoples own value. you want people to lock value into federated smart contracts, hub channels and coinjoin party mixers.

please realise where you sit. and learn the BUSINESS plans of your idols

your motley crew of social protagonists dont care about the integrity of the bitcoin code(the bitcoin network) you only care about the services you think and want to be IN bitcoin.. but then point fingers that detract from what your favoured businesses are upto .. to pretend its  government or no-bitcoiners that are the cabals in bitcoin.. or even pretend anyone calling out on the BUSINESS over reach must be anti-bitcoin. or where scammers outside of bitcoin are causing bitcoin issues

governments are outsiders. but are scratching at the edges.. more and more.
scammers like CSW have nothing to do with bitcoin. he is playing on his own silly little network no one cares about and he has no significance to bitcoin

businesses should be at the edges. no one should have major control to just activate things on bitcoin as a cabal

when you can separate bitcoin the code/network. from the businesses that want to abuse bitcoin. you might learn something..
(i doubt it because you are as ignorant now as you were years ago)
..
it seems you dont know or want to admit to the "idea's" of SBF

he wants bitcoin to become a commodity where its not treated as a currency but as a reserve for money service businesses to use where individuals are offramped to subnetworks

YOU are part of a social group of fangirls that support those ideals.. while pretending you are now and again against it.. but then strangely promote the same ideals they do

its been too long with you pretending to be against those ideals or just dumb(meanwhile simultaneously supporting those ideals).. so now i think you are fully aware or your fanboyism of those ideals. and are now just pretending to be an ignorant pleb

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!