<Bitcoin Creation> Dr. Craig Faketoshi Failed another Satoshi Test Again.

[rby]

I had always thought that Craig was a wise man but nowadays he has continued to prove to me that he isn't a wise man. Someone claiming to be satoshi should have hired someone who will man has social media handles. Someone who has good knowledge of Bitcoin in order to at least make us have a second thoughts before doubting him, instead he decided to present himself, knowing that he has no basic knowledge of Bitcoin. This is not the first time I have read his blunders where he totally contradicted satoshi.

[1714644255]

1714644255

[1714644255]

1714644255

[1714644255]

1714644255

[1714644255]

1714644255

[Wind_FURY]

But franky1, it doesn't matter if Craig Wright held Satoshi's keys or not, because even if he did hold Satoshi's keys, he still WOULDN'T BE THE ACTUAL INVENTOR of Bitcoin. It's not about who is holding the keys, because the keys cannot make someone assume another person's actual identity.

I guess that's true, but he could've at least received a good amount of legitimacy(hence more supporters) if he actually had the Satoshi keys and signed a message. But alas, he's all talk because he actually doesn't have the keys.

"Good amount of legitimacy" will be more subjective. I'm absolutely very sure that the Flat-Earthers in Bitcoin Land would celebrate, and continue the long con, BUT what if Carlos Matos of Bitconnect held the keys and signed a message, "proving" he is Satoshi. Would that also receive a good amount of legitimacy? I doubt that person could code the Alphabet.

[kryptqnick]

This is lovely. To me, it seems highly unlikely that Craig is Satoshi, as there are various ways to convince people of it if not prove the identity once and for all, but he did none of that and is often contradicting himself, making things up and pretending to be a very smart guy when he isn't. I sent the thread to my friend who somehow is very confident that Craig is definitely Satoshi, but that it's Craig's incredible arrogance (not complete lack of evidence, lol) that pushes people away so strongly that they refuse to believe that he is Satoshi.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Lol, i stopped following this man a long time ago, and i stopped reading news about him as well, for it is obvious his is not Satoshi and can never be, he himself knows he is not Satoshi,  he also know that the crypto community will never accept him or assume him to be Satoshi, what he is doing now is just enjoying the spotlight, the more he keeps lying, and people keep giving him audience , the more popular he becomes, this is a simple strategy talentless people use to become popular when they so desire to be but are not musicians, movie actors or politicians.
When they have no legitimate way of becoming popular, and their profession is not one that can push them to that height, they look for ways to play on people's intelligence to get to the spotlight, this is exactly what Dr. Craig write is doing. 

[redsun114]

It is obvious that Craig Wright is not satoshi, and anyone who knows bitcoin would be already aware of it. This doesn't even require all that much information, just tell him to write from one of his old addresses and if he can then he is satoshi if he can't then he is not, simple as that.

This isn't rocket science, just a signed message from an old wallet would fix it all. He could lie as many times as possible on why he can't do that, but that doesn't change the fact that they are all lies and nothing more. We are not going to learn who satoshi was, and that’s that, which is a good thing. If we knew who he was then it would have been a big problem.

[Wind_FURY]

This is lovely. To me, it seems highly unlikely that Craig is Satoshi, as there are various ways to convince people of it if not prove the identity once and for all, but he did none of that and is often contradicting himself, making things up and pretending to be a very smart guy when he isn't. I sent the thread to my friend who somehow is very confident that Craig is definitely Satoshi, but that it's Craig's incredible arrogance (not complete lack of evidence, lol) that pushes people away so strongly that they refuse to believe that he is Satoshi.

It's not just "highly unlikely", Craig Wright is DEFINITELY NOT Satoshi, whether or not he's holding the keys, or if he can sign a message right now, he simply DID NOT invent Bitcoin.

I have another tin-foil-hat-on theory. Satoshi Nakamoto is Gavin Andresen, and destroying his own reputation within the Bitcoin community made him "to be the unlikeliest" to be Satoshi, just how the real Satoshi wants it.

[harapan]

This is lovely. To me, it seems highly unlikely that Craig is Satoshi, as there are various ways to convince people of it if not prove the identity once and for all, but he did none of that and is often contradicting himself, making things up and pretending to be a very smart guy when he isn't. I sent the thread to my friend who somehow is very confident that Craig is definitely Satoshi, but that it's Craig's incredible arrogance (not complete lack of evidence, lol) that pushes people away so strongly that they refuse to believe that he is Satoshi.

This is a very easy to achieve since he claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Can Craig send out just 1 Bitcoin from the Bitcoin holding's Satoshi Nakamoto mined? That is, transfer to a new wallet entirely let's see if he really has the keys as he claims.
A day, time and hour should be fixed for him to do that, then if he does you know what it is right?!

He's not original, trying to get fame and attraction by making claims of being Satoshi, he should shut up, liar!

[Blawpaw]

Dr. Faketoshi fails another Satoshi test, and this time it's the simplest of them all; I'm sure everyone knew Bitcoin is an implementation of the Dai's bi-money proposal, but Dr. Faketoshi said it wasn't, and this time he sounded so confident, but he never realized that the real Satoshi taught us and left us a note on every future question, but Dr. Faketoshi failed yet again to do simple home work. How can you be a creator of something while failing to answer a simple basic question about your own creation? A liar accusing someone else of lying? The fake tales continues...



What Satoshi said....



More read? Check here

This guy simply makes me sick. He is just a fraudster looking to have his name linked to the creation of the project of the century. I seriously dount that he ever made  a contribution to the development of Bitcoin. Craig is nothing but a stooge that is trying to get ahead of the real satoshi. Anyways, the real proof he is still not the real thing is that the NSA could not care less aboit him.

[DaveF]

Faketoshi will continue to exist so long as people are willing to play with his coin and give him money. More and more however people are dropping it.

Today's news: https://decrypt.co/118951/robinhood-delist-bitcoin-sv-market-sell

Sooner or later he will go after someone who he thinks is an easy target legally and they will bury him in lawsuits. Yes, he can keep sliming his way to other places but for the most part you can only run from your debts for so long until they do catch up with you.

-Dave

[BenCodie]

This moment itself should be enough to put the whole thing to bed, aside from the fact that ever essence of his being is so far from being what Satoshi's portrayed himself to be and stand for in the first place. Spam these images everywhere the guy talks, is talked about or presents himself in any way shape or form in the future.