Two parallel questions to get community feedback.
- Maximum 50 posts per week is good enough or 40 per week is better?
- Would you like to have $250 or $200 per week?
I am not considering opinion from average quality posters but posters who do not chase weekly maximum limits, who posts because they shares valuable insights and guidance. I would like to have opinion from current Green Zone, Legendary and many other prominent bitcointalk members.
Please share your thoughts.
Cheers,
I have always had the attitude of 'I'm going to be here posting anyway, if someone wants to pay me for it great, if not.....just as great'
So 50 or 40 or 25 or whatever. I post what I post. Although when in a campaign I DO try to make some kind of minimum number, due to work sometimes that just does not happen.
I know I reached out to you at least once when I was going to have a very low post count over a couple of weeks. But, being honest hitting higher number of posts is not going to happen for me.
And, I feel this is important, if others that have busy lives outside of this forum try to make higher numbers of posts, post quality may suffer.
If it's someone who is retired, or only working part time, then getting a larger number of higher quality posts is not difficult. But for those of us working 40+ hours a week it's not that easy.
As for the $250 vs $200, well duh, more money = better. BUT, if it means that you have to then go though more posts to verify quality, then there is always the possibility that some things will get paid that perhaps should not have since it's that many more you have to go thought.
-Dave
