goodluck with the liquidity bottlenecks..
The bigger problem i see is the increase of newbies just being introduced to custodial lightning without ever touching the chain, holding keys and running nodes. Getting thrown into custodian hands without proper education. It’s indeed like having never used Bitcoin. Not offering on-chain transactions seems odd too, idk how this could still be counted as adoption.
yes user experience of custodial LN is nothing like the experience of actual bitcoin. it has none of the features or functions of bitcoin in any way
as for having a co partner even thats not bitcoin. having to ensure your partner is awake, has value and also his partners can bounce the payment along.. not what bitcoin was invented for..
then there is the lock/pegs.. LN wallets can be abused to show iffy msat values that do not correspond to the hidden commitments and close session amounts users dont see underneath the GUI
sending msats is a vocal, visual and unit measure thats not even in the bitcoin language
and then thre are the flaws and bug and many methods co partners can steal value from you..
but hey. i shouldnt say more or the usual group will chime in to defend lightning like its better then bitcoin
i feel sorry for anyone that is falsely being told they are using bitcoin when they are handed a wallet that uses a different network brand stealing bitcoin
i do not mind people using other networks if it pleasures them. but just be honest about it.. if people want to play with subnetworks like ln and liquid or other sidechains that are bridged to bitcoin network value, so be it. just be clear about the differences and the risks.
el salvador learned the hard way...
.. though they are using a bitcoin custodian exchange as their backbone of the chivo wallet THIS YEAR. they too were over promised features of LN last year which ended up causing liquidity bottlenecks within days of launch when they first tried LN last year