Copying Bet From Other Unknown Bettors, Is This a Good Practice?

[goldkingcoiner]

So for you, is copying bets online a good practices?

Imho it's not. You just blindly trust a random person's picks and you don't know if that person knows the game(s) or not. You can as well just play dice.
If you know the games and can take a look if those bets do make sense, maybe - but then you can do without looking what others do.
So no, I think that it's not a good practice.

Well if you were to view this kind of practice from a different perspective, perhaps it would actually be useful in increasing your odds of winning. We know that many people create their own strategies in increasing their odds of winning. Some people become very good at it. The better you become, the more people notice and everyone starts wanting to copy your bets.

I agree that copying the bets from a single person sounds like a bad idea. But two (or more heads) are better than one. So what if you were to "scan" through the best bettors bets and copy the bets that they all agree on? Would this not up your probability of winning?

It might not, or there might not be enough good bettors making correlating bets. Who knows?

[1715241004]

1715241004

[1715241004]

1715241004

[1715241004]

1715241004

[AicecreaME]

Some people prefer doing this , but they mostly place their bets after those famous personalities who are known to win big from betting. Personally, I view this as a risky move especially if you'll just copy a bet rrom an unknown bettor with no reputation and credibility to uphold. They might end up messing up and you'll instantly lose your money.

This way is widely known in trading as well. There are people who like to do copy trading and they mostly follow those people that are really good at trading to make the most out of their trade. But it's still so much better that you personally know how betting works and how much risk you are putting your funds into, so that you won't do the blame game afterwards.

[_act_]

Well if you were to view this kind of practice from a different perspective, perhaps it would actually be useful in increasing your odds of winning. We know that many people create their own strategies in increasing their odds of winning. Some people become very good at it. The better you become, the more people notice and everyone starts wanting to copy your bets.

Copying bet is wrong, if not wrong but it is not a good means to bet. You do not have to bet on what you do not know how it is, it is the simplest way to foolishness because this is what do later result to some people thinking they can pay for someone to help them predict and they are scammed.

[Blawpaw]

So for you, is copying bets online a good practices? have you tried it and won before? would you try it when you really want to bet and have no idea where or what sports to bet on?

LEts discuss.

When betting, if you want to follow someone and copy their bets, you should always look for someone that is known for having good results. It makes no sense following an unknown player that you do not know wjat his winning ratio is. Folllowing someone unknown and that you do not have any information about is the perfect recipe for disater.
if you want to copy someone's bets, at least pick someone that is assertive and has proven sucess

[TopTort777]

I would not copy someone else bets or decisions. Why I should even risk my money, specially with using unknows persons decision? Inst it be better to give that person your money and if he wins, share the prize, but if he looses, bully him and ask for repay? To me, a person copying other persons bets means that person is afraid to take responsibility. Being irresponsible gambler is bad. Such person always blames others for his own bad luck.

[ethereumhunter]

I prefer to choose bets from what I like rather than using the copy batch facility from other people because my analysis with him may be different. But maybe some people prefer to use copy batches because they don't need to analyze to find teams with a chance to win. Win. And if it is to practice placing bets on sports betting, it can be done but the important thing is that we must be able to do our own analysis rather than relying on others to choose the team. But before we use copy bets, we must try not to use big money.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Ok gamblers, i have another testimony, So today, i decided to try the copy thing again  .
but like previously, i decided to stake a very small amount of money, in the amount of just 0.5 USDT
So just like an hour ago, i went to stake and copied a random table tennis bet i picked from the events list, staked 0.5 usdt and placed bet and left, it was a multi bet though.
i just logged back in on stakes now and discovered all the games went through and i won 3.3 usdt from my stake of 0,5 usdt.



 Now i wish i had staked like 100 usdt atleast  

And for the records, i know absolutely nothing about tennis, its a blind bet but it went through luckily.

[btc_angela]

^^ Good for you though, yeah still base on your luck as to who is to copy who and take your chance.

But others might not be as lucky as you in their first bet and lost and then blame themselves for copying others and not betting for themselves. I guess still 50/50, maybe I would say that you practice it like a couple in a week and see how it goes for you. It's really tempting how big other gamblers are betting as if they really knows that they are going to win, but there's no such thing though.

[aioc]

So for you, is copying bets online a good practices? have you tried it and won before? would you try it when you really want to bet and have no idea where or what sports to bet on?

LEts discuss.

Since Stake.com is offering that option I don't see anything wrong with it, it takes it at your own risk or bet at your own risk always, Stake is offering you the option for bet comparison and if you have no idea about the matches then copying another bettors bet is not a bad idea, I also have friends who've been doing this but he does this if he is not sure of the matches and he is doing good, of course, you must admit that there's a good and bad side on it, and it's not a guarantee that you're going to win.

[_act_]

Since Stake.com is offering that option I don't see anything wrong with it, it takes it at your own risk or bet at your own risk always, Stake is offering you the option for bet comparison and if you have no idea about the matches then copying another bettors bet is not a bad idea, I also have friends who've been doing this but he does this if he is not sure of the matches and he is doing good, of course, you must admit that there's a good and bad side on it, and it's not a guarantee that you're going to win.

Stake is a gambling site, it offers copying betting, I know some other betting sites offers that too, even there are some betting sites in my country that is offering copying bet. But could you think of it that betting site can not do what will not help them, they make people to copy one another just for them to just make money. Some betting sites will also give you some predictions, but it is just nothing good than for the betting site to make more money as you bet more. I will just like people to know that copying someone's bet does not mean the bet can not  be lost.  Like I said earlier, copying bet is not making any sense, do your prediction yourself and bet yourself, but before you finalize your prediction, you can use prediction sites to know if what you bet is almost the same as theirs too.

[Zlantann]

I personally don't see any thing bad about but it shouldn't be a habit on depending on people for the odds. But I have seen people win on numerous occasions from people's bets. Infact people even pay for what they call Sure Odds, so if it brings more profit than your own judgement then one could still with it. Although there's no fun in that and some people love to add fun to win.

Gambling sometimes is a game of luck. Copying another person's stake might be one of the easiest means of playing games but it makes you depend solely on luck to win because you don't know if the stake you copied was from a professional or an amateur. I have the opportunity of staking and winning from games I copied from persons that we perceive as very skillful in games. I have won and sometime I also lost.

You might be very fortunate to win using someone's stake sometimes you might also lose. I think this practice would be suitable for newbies in gambling or those that have limited time to analyze games before staking.

[kawetsriyanto]

So for you, is copying bets online a good practices? have you tried it and won before? would you try it when you really want to bet and have no idea where or what sports to bet on?

The feature of copying bets makes people to be lazy and careless bettors.
I think it is always better to bet in our own way, don't instantly follow others. I never tried this way since I disagree with the idea, I don't want to bet because of being influenced by others' bets. When I have no idea to bet, I prefer to not bet on any sports. Following others isn't my style, it is not my effort and I wouldn't be proud even if I can win in that way.

Some people prefer doing this , but they mostly place their bets after those famous personalities who are known to win big from betting.

It is not copying the bets of other bettors but copying the strategies done by others.
I personally won't follow this way since no guarantee to win in the same way.

[BITCOIN4X]

The feature of copying bets makes people to be lazy and careless bettors.
I think it is always better to bet in our own way, don't instantly follow others. I never tried this way since I disagree with the idea, I don't want to bet because of being influenced by others' bets. When I have no idea to bet, I prefer to not bet on any sports. Following others isn't my style, it is not my effort and I wouldn't be proud even if I can win in that way.

I guess it never hurts to try especially with low stakes. $5 - $10 for a parlay doesn't seem too bad financially, it's more like you're buying fun without expecting much to win. But of course, own choice will be more satisfying when we actually win it.

Some people prefer doing this , but they mostly place their bets after those famous personalities who are known to win big from betting.

It is not copying the bets of other bettors but copying the strategies done by others.
I personally won't follow this way since no guarantee to win in the same way.

I agree with you, so I don't think it's the best way to win but it may have been done by people who are lazy to do analysis.

[Quidat]

Since Stake.com is offering that option I don't see anything wrong with it, it takes it at your own risk or bet at your own risk always, Stake is offering you the option for bet comparison and if you have no idea about the matches then copying another bettors bet is not a bad idea, I also have friends who've been doing this but he does this if he is not sure of the matches and he is doing good, of course, you must admit that there's a good and bad side on it, and it's not a guarantee that you're going to win.

Stake is a gambling site, it offers copying betting, I know some other betting sites offers that too, even there are some betting sites in my country that is offering copying bet. But could you think of it that betting site can not do what will not help them, they make people to copy one another just for them to just make money. Some betting sites will also give you some predictions, but it is just nothing good than for the betting site to make more money as you bet more. I will just like people to know that copying someone's bet does not mean the bet can not  be lost.  Like I said earlier, copying bet is not making any sense, do your prediction yourself and bet yourself, but before you finalize your prediction, you can use prediction sites to know if what you bet is almost the same as theirs too.

Totally removing the real essence of gambling on which you cant really be able to enjoy the bets you had made since you had just been copying it on other bettors but if you could able
to bare that thing then its your choice but honestly it does really get the entertainment that you do seek.Nothing beats out if you do really make out bets basing up with your own
analysis and preference which you would really be feeling up the enjoyment and thrill whenever you do see on whats the outcome of the bets that you had made,
Although its not always that bad to copy as long you do enjoy it then thats how it works.

[Viscore]

It's still better if you know the game first. Not a good practice if you are doing it blindly.
It will still pop out in your bet slip and will have time to review it, that means you know what you pick and who are the possible winners of the game.
It's not different with picking it on your own. It just gets the job faster rather than choosing yourself.
Now, there are instances where gamblers do follow people and their bets, in this example if I am right, it is Drake who is mostly sharing his bets to the public and in social media.

Certainly not a good practice because you can never get lucky all all the time from copying bets regardless if you know or not the bettor. You also need to have your own pick based on your good analysis. Although there’s always no assurance in gambling and losing will always be inevitable, but you can always lessen the risk of losing if you bet from your own research and analysis like we always did in sportsbetting.

[livingfree]

Copying a bet isn't just all about copying. If you don't know the game and the bet itself then you're copying on the air without knowing what you're up to.

But if you're aware of the game where you're copying your bet then that's IMO a fine thing to do. I've got friends who are copying each other with certain sports and bets and I find them that they're happily doing it.

No blaming when that bet didn't go what they're expecting. And for me, I don't do this as I prefer to have my own bets.

[KennyR]

Some used to copy bets to know about other gamblers opinion on the same event. Through this it is possible to get a conclusion on selecting the odds. As OP have done few copy bets and won, even without knowing anything about the games is luck or the coincidence to copy the bets from the expert. Maybe he could've selected that particular person's betslip just because he have placed big money on each event.

Whether it is copied bets or our own selection, if we're lucky we'll get the best out of it. According to me copybets can be suggested for gamblers who prefer multi.

[batang_bitcoin]

Certainly not a good practice because you can never get lucky all all the time from copying bets regardless if you know or not the bettor. You also need to have your own pick based on your good analysis. Although there’s always no assurance in gambling and losing will always be inevitable, but you can always lessen the risk of losing if you bet from your own research and analysis like we always did in sportsbetting.

I'm in that side of saying that it's not a good practice for your own sake. But there's nothing wrong if you've seen some good results doing that because we're all for the better result.
Whatever strategy we do, the legal ones, that's what we want to do so that our gambling experiences will be as good as the others who have been sharing success stories to the community. I also understand the thought of defeating the purpose of what actual gambling is but it's like just adding the risk to the copier from where he has copied those bets. Because the reality, is no matter how good or best the person you're copying your bets, time will come that there will losing bets no matter how hard you both try.

[AmoreJaz]

Copying a bet isn't just all about copying. If you don't know the game and the bet itself then you're copying on the air without knowing what you're up to.

But if you're aware of the game where you're copying your bet then that's IMO a fine thing to do. I've got friends who are copying each other with certain sports and bets and I find them that they're happily doing it.

No blaming when that bet didn't go what they're expecting. And for me, I don't do this as I prefer to have my own bets.

it is still best to place your own bets to sports you are really familiar with. it is your money at stake. so whatever happens, they don't care about the outcome. it is always on your prerogative if you want to copy unknown bets. on my part, just bet on sports you think you do know best. you also have no idea if that bettor knows what he's doing or how familiar he is to the sports.

[livingfree]

Copying a bet isn't just all about copying. If you don't know the game and the bet itself then you're copying on the air without knowing what you're up to.

But if you're aware of the game where you're copying your bet then that's IMO a fine thing to do. I've got friends who are copying each other with certain sports and bets and I find them that they're happily doing it.

No blaming when that bet didn't go what they're expecting. And for me, I don't do this as I prefer to have my own bets.

it is still best to place your own bets to sports you are really familiar with. it is your money at stake. so whatever happens, they don't care about the outcome. it is always on your prerogative if you want to copy unknown bets. on my part, just bet on sports you think you do know best. you also have no idea if that bettor knows what he's doing or how familiar he is to the sports.

Yup and that's what I do.

I don't get into sports that I don't know but even if I do that, I still make sure that I have a knowledge to the sport itself and to whom where I'll be placing my bets.

Sometimes it's tempting to copy others bet but there's no integrity to myself by doing that. Especially, when I do not have the background of that person even if it shows good records and numbers for his stat.