Roslinpl scammer

[zazarb]

What happened:I saw that roslinpl is active again, after a few years of silence, I tried to contact him but he ignores me.
I see accusations that the account changed the owner. Even if this is true, the new owner assumes all liabilities.
If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505
Amount Scammed: 0.2 BTC+
Payment Method: BTC transaction
Proof of Payment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg52539394#msg52539394
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:

Edit: corrected account link

[AB de Royse777]

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=535846

Is this a wrong profile link? That's not roslinpl but on other links I see him by the way.

Sorry to hear it buddy. I know exactly how it feels. Not long ago I had an scam accusation thread created against EdenHazard not to repay my 0.3 BTC.

If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

If he ever accepted in my signature campaign then I will ask him for your btc address so that they payment directly goes to your account.

[Lucius]

I see accusations that the account changed the owner. Even if this is true, the new owner assumes all liabilities.
If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

I am not sure that the new owner has obligations to settle the old debts (if we can prove at all that the account changed owner), because there is a precedent on the forum that the owner of the purchased BTT account is not responsible for plagiarism committed by the previous owner. Maybe the comparison is not the best, but considering how the forum works, no one can force the person behind that account to pay the old debt.

It is tragic that such user accounts can participate in any campaigns at all, which means that those who accept them are worse than them.

[janggernaut]

Rosinpl was one of best member i've known on here. Still remember when he made very long thread just for those who wanna learn how to make banner by signature code. Never thought he ended up by selling his btctalk account, damn

If he ever accepted in my signature campaign then I will ask him for your btc address so that they payment directly goes to your account.

I don't think you would accept someone who has negative trust on your campaign, it could affected the company which he advertized too.

[AB de Royse777]

If he ever accepted in my signature campaign then I will ask him for your btc address so that they payment directly goes to your account.

I don't think you would accept someone who has negative trust on your campaign, it could affected the company which he advertized too.

In the past or even currently, I have participants who defaulted loan but wanted to join my campaign, they sent me PM asking if I will accept. I told them to settle the debt and promised to give a try on my campaign. Some worked very well and the lender got his money back.

Coming here, creating a scam accusation thread, leaving a negative tag, supporting flag and not giving a chance to redeem means nothing. Lender do not get his money, loan taker do not pay his debt. One side lose his cash and other side lose the entire account. Isn't it good to give the other side some motivation to settle their debt?

[UserU]

If he ever accepted in my signature campaign then I will ask him for your btc address so that they payment directly goes to your account.

That's like over 3K though. Assuming he gets paid $75 weekly, that'd be around 40 weeks assuming he doesn't mind posting for "free"

[JeromeTash]

What happened:I saw that roslinpl is active again, after a few years of silence, I tried to contact him but he ignores me.

The account is most likely to have been sold or stolen sometime back. Doubt if the new owner even cares about reputation, as they went straight out to advertise scam (1xbit) as soon as they got back in the forum

You check this thread for more details [Investigation] Fighting The Account Mafia

[Awaklara]

If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

I'm not sure the new owner will respond to this, rather than repay the debt.
if the account has indeed changed hands, it means that he bought the account knowing the state of the account. with the existing tag information, I don't think there's any reason the current account owner would take up the debt. unless the account owner now wants to clear the account's reputation.

[examplens]

If he ever accepted in my signature campaign then I will ask him for your btc address so that they payment directly goes to your account.

That's like over 3K though. Assuming he gets paid $75 weekly, that'd be around 40 weeks assuming he doesn't mind posting for "free"

that won't happen for sure. I believe that the reputation of that account is no longer important to the new owner. like all red-marked users, they will probably get involved in disputed flagged campaigns like 1xbit and similar. they have already shown that they do not want to participate much in the improvement of the forum.

unfortunately, nothing should be expected from the return of this loan. if the original owner took out a loan, nothing prevents him from creating a new account and presenting his story with possibilities of repaying the debt (judging by his previous positive ratings).

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

if the original owner took out a loan, nothing prevents him from creating a new account and presenting his story with possibilities of repaying the debt (judging by his previous positive ratings).

If he had the wish to repay then he would not sell (assuming the account is sold) the account to someone else. Creating a new account (which probably he already did and watching) is fine but why would he expose the new account, risk to get red tag and repay $3k? The amount seems a lot of money to him.

Behind the face of reputation, some people are scammer in their heart. I sometimes doubt those scam busters. What is their incentive?
Build an account as they are some authority figure of the community, take loan, do projects, do charity and when they think it's time to disappear, they disappear. There are many high rank users who are loan defaulter. They were active and seemed very caring to the forum members. Always active busting alt accounts, always active to aware users against scam projects. They spend their entire life busting scammers, tagging them and even leaving unnecessary neutral tag. All to achieve some sort of attention and build up reputation.

But eventually the same person scam another member when they find a good opportunity. Not long ago a charity where most of the members were from Philippine scammed around 1 BTC (I can not remember the amount but it was around this amount). The name was bitcointalk charity I guess.

Sorry for your loss zazarb. It's gone and hope for nothing.

[JollyGood]

First of all, I am sorry for your loss. You loaned the BTC in good faith but ended up receiving nothing. It seems from the feedback you left him he repaid previous loans and maybe that was just to win trust before defaulting on a bigger amount. I doubt very much you will have your funds returned otherwise he would have made a deal with you by now.

I have left him negative trust just now for defaulting on the loan to add on to the pervious feedback I left for him in March 2022 when he joined 1xbit signature campaign.

What happened:I saw that roslinpl is active again, after a few years of silence, I tried to contact him but he ignores me.
I see accusations that the account changed the owner. Even if this is true, the new owner assumes all liabilities.
If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505
Amount Scammed: 0.2 BTC+
Payment Method: BTC transaction
Proof of Payment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg52539394#msg52539394
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:

Edit: corrected account link

[examplens]

if the original owner took out a loan, nothing prevents him from creating a new account and presenting his story with possibilities of repaying the debt (judging by his previous positive ratings).

If he had the wish to repay then he would not sell (assuming the account is sold) the account to someone else. Creating a new account (which probably he already did and watching) is fine but why would he expose the new account, risk to get red tag and repay $3k? The amount seems a lot of money to him.

since I don't have any feedback from that side, everything about the reasons for changing the account owner is just speculation. For example, if the original owner sell this account vs. it was hacked the ratio is 50:50. unless it is passed away.

[shasan]

What happened:I saw that roslinpl is active again, after a few years of silence, I tried to contact him but he ignores me.
I see accusations that the account changed the owner. Even if this is true, the new owner assumes all liabilities.
If nowadays, signature campaign accepts neg tagged accounts(I saw he participate or trying it do) , his earnings must be used to cover the debt.

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158505
Amount Scammed: 0.2 BTC+
Payment Method: BTC transaction
Proof of Payment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161170.msg52539394#msg52539394
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:

Edit: corrected account link

Sorry to see that you have lost a huge amount to a reputed member it is very bad for both of you. As the user scammed you would you like to create flag type 3 so that it shows "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

Also on this post as well as the next post if scammed happens would you like to correct the following:
Reference Link: it should be the link where we can see the reference. For this case, it should be this one.
Proof of Payment: it should be the link to the payment. For this case, it can be the transaction id of the payment if more than one transaction then you should post all the transaction id. I think this is one of them. Another one, another one which is the largest one I think. I think this wallet id has been used only to scam you.