Affiliate signature campaign

[aioc]

But there is no minimum post requirement and there is no limit to where participants want to promote their link. If so, I think participants can certainly go elsewhere where spam isn't moderated as long as participant's name is written in the spreadsheet and wear signatures.

Requiring their participant to post would be a bad move since they don't pay per post or weekly like your usual campaign. There is no guarantee that they will get paid either so it is best to let them post anywhere and whenever they want. The income comes from affiliates anyway. I doubt anyone interested in the campaign would just spam every day just because there are no rules about posting.

If you're a participant and you're not getting anything after three weeks you will change your signature, all the other promoters of online casinos here are getting paid and why I am not, if you're good at something why not get paid for it, this is for our comrades who are good in CPA, they can target the right people who can take action on what they are offering, but if you're relying on your post here in Bitcointalk you are 50/50 to get money but the positive side of it is, you just need one whale to make huge referrals rewards.

[1714826713]

1714826713

[Darker45]

This does look interesting. It's a new approach. I think I haven't seen something like this before. I'm a little excited how this eventually pans out.

I'm thinking this is highly advantageous to the brand. The brand could actually get free marketing in the end. Participants are making the brand visible but it's not necessarily paying for it. Name recall is a good effect of this without shelling out money for promoters. Whenever somebody wants to try blackjack, Blackjack.fun could be the first platform to come to mind. That doesn't necessarily mean an affiliate link is used, though.

However, this is a bit disadvantageous to the participants. Yes, they could earn big from this, but how many would actually register using their link? How many would actually make a deposit? How many would bet at least $300? This last condition is particularly the biggest challenge. I guess it would help if your account here is popular and that you're making a lot of posts. If you're a low-rank member, not influential, not making lots of posts, not very visible in other words, you'll only wish somebody would stumble upon your signature and use the link.

[Findingnemo]

Its s really good strategy by the casino to get more visibility and only have to pay if there is any benefits from the campaigners to the company so it make sense but people who used to the pay per post or fixed weekly payment will not be interested in this campaign unless they have lot of influence here and can make people to use their signature space and get paid but people with such amount of influence will not be really interested in $50 so this is kind of experimental signature campaign and we have to wait and see how it works.

[Pmalek]

If so, I think participants can certainly go elsewhere where spam isn't moderated as long as participant's name is written in the spreadsheet and wear signatures.

There is no benefit in that for the participant. You only get paid if someone signs up using your referral link, deposits a significant amount of money, and losses it while gambling. Posting in sub-boards, which are the playground for spammers isn't going to get you any referrals simply because the people there don't care about it, they don't have any money, and maybe don't even understand English to know what it is that you want from them.

I don't get the

40% lifetime revenue from your referrals means if your referral lost 100 USD you will get 40 USD

This is tricky, it's a commission on how much a referral has lost and not the entire deposited sum, then if your referral hits a jackpot and goes on a positive balance with a few hundred thosuands you're done for as the other must lose the same thousands just to ket your balance positive.

It's not that tricky. You only get paid if the casino makes money from the players you referred. If the referred player wins a jackpot, like in your example, and walks away with more money than what they came with, the casino hasn't made any profit. Hence, you don't get paid. If your referral deposits and losses, the casino makes money and you get your share of the pie. 

[fortunecrypto]

This does look interesting. It's a new approach. I think I haven't seen something like this before. I'm a little excited how this eventually pans out.

I used to do this CPA thing when I was just starting out in money-making ventures on the internet

The term ‘cost per action” (CPA) is an online advertising digital marketing strategy that allows an advertiser to pay for a particular action from a potential customer. Carrying out a CPA campaign is relatively low risk for the advertiser. This is because payment only has to be made when a specific action takes place. CPA campaigns are most commonly associated with affiliate marketing. another name for ‘cost per action’ is ‘cost per acquisition’

https://digitalschoolofmarketing.co.za/digital-marketing-blog/what-is-cpa-in-digital-marketing/

I even gave out free e-books and then commission sharing just to have my sign-ups do what is required for me to get payment

I'm thinking this is highly advantageous to the brand. The brand could actually get free marketing in the end. Participants are making the brand visible but it's not necessarily paying for it. Name recall is a good effect of this without shelling out money for promoters. Whenever somebody wants to try blackjack, Blackjack.fun could be the first platform to come to mind. That doesn't necessarily mean an affiliate link is used, though.

It is free marketing indeed because it's not the signup but the action of your referrals that matter there is no guarantee of sign up you have to choose the best place to employ the best marketing and target the right people, and of course since this a gambling site your referrals needs to lose.

However, this is a bit disadvantageous to the participants. Yes, they could earn big from this, but how many would actually register using their link? How many would actually make a deposit? How many would bet at least $300? This last condition is particularly the biggest challenge. I guess it would help if your account here is popular and that you're making a lot of posts. If you're a low-rank member, not influential, not making lots of posts, not very visible in other words, you'll only wish somebody would stumble upon your signature and use the link.

Bloggers and video influencers are the ones who are good at this because they can get the message across because they have their own platform where they are the ones setting the rules, gamblers will likely sign up for a guy giving instructions or tips on the video than a link which tells nothing but to land in the site.
Those who are experienced in internet and affiliate marketing have an edge on this kind of campaign

[judeafante]

You'll not only have to post to get referrals Blackjack fun is already a brand name here in Bitcointalk you're not going to get many referrals here because they have done 55 weeks of the campaign in the past unless some people decided to sign up again using different credentials, but you also have to promote it outside of this forum, this is a CPA campaign even those who are not in the campaign can participate in the affiliate program when you sign up on their affiliate program there's nothing there that says that you have to be a Bitcointalk forum member, I think the rewards are just the same.

https://partnersofblackjack.fun/

[coin-investor]

So far out of 11 on the spreadsheet, only 7 remain, and the other 4 take out their signature, we'll see in a few days who got referrals and made money from their referrals, I notice that majority of those who are still wearing signature are not the active poster and they have applications on other campaigns, they wear it temporary while looking for another campaign to join.

If they will not change it and no participants made money from this campaign, there'll be no participants in the spreadsheet, 

[Don Pedro Dinero]

So far out of 11 on the spreadsheet, only 7 remain, and the other 4 take out their signature, we'll see in a few days who got referrals and made money from their referrals, I notice that majority of those who are still wearing signature are not the active poster and they have applications on other campaigns, they wear it temporary while looking for another campaign to join.

If they will not change it and no participants made money from this campaign, there'll be no participants in the spreadsheet, 

Chances are that they will spend months and not get any referrals to bet the set amount. Besides, it can happen like in other sites, that people create another account to refer themselves.

That site was even in the 2nd highest paying house after CM, along with Best Change, $100 a week plus bonus if I remember correctly. They wanted to have advertising without spending, and it doesn't seem like a good idea. The campaigns on the forum show that they are profitable, if you pay a dollar you will get more than that dollar.

I hope this experiment ends up failing and that the other sites are not willing to try it out

[coin-investor]

So far out of 11 on the spreadsheet, only 7 remain, and the other 4 take out their signature, we'll see in a few days who got referrals and made money from their referrals, I notice that majority of those who are still wearing signature are not the active poster and they have applications on other campaigns, they wear it temporary while looking for another campaign to join.

If they will not change it and no participants made money from this campaign, there'll be no participants in the spreadsheet, 

Chances are that they will spend months and not get any referrals to bet the set amount. Besides, it can happen like in other sites, that people create another account to refer themselves.

It's very rampant in any niche referring to yourself so you get recurring profit but of course, you need to use different IP and computer

That site was even in the 2nd highest paying house after CM, along with Best Change, $100 a week plus bonus if I remember correctly. They wanted to have advertising without spending, and it doesn't seem like a good idea. The campaigns on the forum show that they are profitable, if you pay a dollar you will get more than that dollar.

I used to be a part of the campaign, and its one of my best and longest campaigns but all good things will have an end it's just sad for all participants that they prefer a different direction when they relaunch the campaign.

I hope this experiment ends up failing and that the other sites are not willing to try it out

I don't want to say I wish it too, but I hope they brand themselves in a different way, they can do affiliate marketing and at the same time signature campaign and all signature campaigns will automatically become affiliate marketers by having their affiliate link in their campaign.

[Saisher]

I hope this experiment ends up failing and that the other sites are not willing to try it out

It probably will I hardly see Blackjack.fun signature in the gambling section there are only a few participants and since there is no minimum post required they are not motivated to post, let's see on the first-week result they cannot keep doing this if no participants made money they can do both affiliate and signature campaign if they implement this many will join and participate.

[LTU_btc]

40% lifetime affiliate commission looks like generous offer, but actually it's very cheap way for advertiser to promote their business. I don't think it's very likely that someone will sign up through the link on your signature and will wager significant amount of money. Especially if you're average poster and your posts don't get that much attention. Most likely that you will end promoting them for free.
Answer yourself, have you ever done such thing yourself? Clicked on signature, signed up, deposited money and started to gamble? Personally, I use some services which were promoted here, so advertising works, but I can't remember that I signed up there by clicking link on signature.
I remember that some campaigns in past (and maybe now) allowed to put your referral link in signature to get extra earnings additionally to regular campaign payments. But I doubt that this Blackjack.fun model will work.

[GxSTxV]

I don't think anyone will be interested in joining this campaign with 0 guarantee of getting any profit because it won't matter if you post quality posts or topics or whether you are a member or a hero member it won't defer that much. And the conditions of getting 50$ are so hard, if you get some chance that someone register using your link you need also a deposit and a 300$ wager in order to get paid.
It's going to be a good promotion and get more people's attention if they just add it and beside getting a weekly payout

[Ararbermas]

it's very impossible to earn on that campaign even the name it self is already known for how many years and have another successful campaign here in the forum. Because its too hard to imagine tbh that there are some people will put efforts to deposit using your links on the signature, i believe your lucky enough it wiill happen.   

[coin-investor]

In their first week out of 11 participants, only 3 remains, as there are many signature campaigns opened up not only in the service that pays Bitcoin but also in the altcoin section where there are some campaigns that pays with already tradeable tokens like TRC USDT

I have huge respect for Sujonali I'm sure he is aware of the condition of the campaign and he will do the right thing to maximize Blackjack.fun promotion, this is my old campaign where I stay the longest they should continue branding they have a good manager in Sujonali I'm sure they can come up with better compensation, hoping to see changes in the campaign and I wish Blackjack.fun longevity in their industry.

[fortunecrypto]

it's very impossible to earn on that campaign even the name it self is already known for how many years and have another successful campaign here in the forum. Because its too hard to imagine tbh that there are some people will put efforts to deposit using your links on the signature, i believe your lucky enough it wiill happen.  

So far out of 11 participants in the campaign, only three are still wearing the Blackjack.fun signature and two of them are not active posters one of them has active applications in the other gambling campaign, and only one is an active poster maybe that one got referrals for him to remain active poster while wearing the signature I hardly see any Blackjack.fun signature in gambling boards, I guess the manager is the only one who got paid in the first week of the campaign.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I remember that some campaigns in past (and maybe now) allowed to put your referral link in signature to get extra earnings additionally to regular campaign payments. But I doubt that this Blackjack.fun model will work.

When I saw this campaign, at first I thought it was going to be a paid per post campaign and that you could also put the referral link. I think the same thing happened to a lot of the people who applied and then withdrew the application.

As far as I remember, when campaigns let you do that back in the day, practically nobody got money for referrals.

[robelneo]

I remember that some campaigns in past (and maybe now) allowed to put your referral link in signature to get extra earnings additionally to regular campaign payments. But I doubt that this Blackjack.fun model will work.

When I saw this campaign, at first I thought it was going to be a paid per post campaign and that you could also put the referral link. I think the same thing happened to a lot of the people who applied and then withdrew the application.

As far as I remember, when campaigns let you do that back in the day, practically nobody got money for referrals.

So far there's no update on the campaign thread Sujon bumped it and there's one applicant coming from the 1XBIT former participants with a lot of bad feedback and flag, one of the disadvantages of this thread is you cannot get good posters for your banner visibility, they will either come from 1XBIT or from altcoins participants that are obviously spammers.
If they are serious about launching another campaign they should do away with this affiliate campaign and just give it to those real affiliate marketers.

[coin-investor]

I remember that some campaigns in past (and maybe now) allowed to put your referral link in signature to get extra earnings additionally to regular campaign payments. But I doubt that this Blackjack.fun model will work.

When I saw this campaign, at first I thought it was going to be a paid per post campaign and that you could also put the referral link. I think the same thing happened to a lot of the people who applied and then withdrew the application.

As far as I remember, when campaigns let you do that back in the day, practically nobody got money for referrals.

OP I guess this kind of campaign is a failure this will be a reference for another similar campaign, they could have good success if they are not an old casino promoting their site here, they can do what other casinos are doing just brand themselves, Coke management knows that people are drinking their beverage, but they keep coming up with commercials and still doing a lot of marketing to remind people to keep drinking Coke, the gambling community already knows about Blackjack.fun just remind them to continue playing through a signature campaign.

[sheenshane]

How is this new experiment of affiliate signature campaign going on?
I would like to ask the participants if they've earned from affiliation since they joined that signature campaign.

Code:

Rigon
electronicash
karabiber
impulese709
avp2306
Ararbermas
Freeveto
Subbir
Dubaian

Just wondering if that campaign successfully working or just a win-win situation for the casino but zero benefits for the participants.

[Saisher]

How is this new experiment of affiliate signature campaign going on?
I would like to ask the participants if they've earned from affiliation since they joined that signature campaign.

Code:

Rigon
electronicash
karabiber
impulese709
avp2306
Ararbermas
Freeveto
Subbir
Dubaian

Just wondering if that campaign successfully working or just a win-win situation for the casino but zero benefits for the participants.

Your bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=303259
Your bitcointalk rank : Legendary
Your blackjack.fun username: kotwica66
Add affiliate link in the signature : Y

Your bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2434463
Your bitcointalk rank : Full Member
Your blackjack.fun username: 645ur123
Add affiliate link in the signature : Y

Accepted

These are two additional participants but out of 11 participants on the current spreadsheet only three are still wearing the signature code but they are not active posters I haven't seen the Blackjack.fun signature on the gambling board, and there's no update on who got paid so so far it Blackjack.fun has free advertisers while participants have zero earning we don't know yet in the coming weeks, or there will be zero participants