After all I miss this board

[AB de Royse777]

Royse777 is trying to rebuild his reputation, and as a result I think there is a part of my previous feedback that is not valid, "I do not trust Royse777 for deals or $0.01" but I still don't trust him for significant amounts, because of what was explained in the referenced thread.

@Poker Player, are you sure about of saying rebuilding reputation?
Of course when holding $7,400 $8,950  (do your math) for three four campaigns (and in the near future I am expecting more) your feedback suggesting to others not to me trust with a $0.01, sounds fun to read. It was entertaining sad that it's gone now.

I have been managing campaign from over one and half years. Before Bitlucy saga I managed 21 campaigns. What was you expecting, after an accident I do not continue to what I was at best? You were wrong.
Your new try is nice though, "Royse777 is trying to rebuild his reputation" but again sounds funny and misleading too.

Try something better which will sound reasonable. You are still young in the forum so let me help you, try something like,

Royse777 is trying to rebuild his business, but I still don't trust him for significant amounts (add an amount. how much? $100k, $200k, A million? add whichever you like), because of what was explained in the referenced thread.

@everyone-else, I could PM him but you know what after all I miss this board.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Will this drama never end? I thought everything had been muted and discussed thousand times over. But again, the topic is about Royse777. Knowing your character, I just understand how you feel. This is somewhat like persecution.
Even if it is so that you are trying to restore your reputation, I do not see anything wrong, and I should only be happy for you. People tend to make mistakes; there are no saints anywhere. But I really don't understand why you need another red tag.

[examplens]

Royse777 is this your complaint about Poker Player's negative feedback? I would say that he left that feedback earlier, but as I see that it is fresh. maybe he just wants his comment to be at the top of your trust list.
maybe he should have formulated it better, the fact that someone wants to rebuild trust does not deserve negative feedback.

@everyone-else, I could PM him but you know what after all I miss this board.

after two dramas related to you, you now want to reopen a new one. Why?
In both cases, Bitlucy fail and hides that you are behind the CriptoCritique project, your biggest mistake is that you didn't immediately come out openly and honestly, you did it late and almost forced.
now again with a delay, you want to discuss a topic that has been discussed for a long time. You missed the prime with that and you can't say that there wasn't an opportunity and that everything ended quickly. In the end, you are a victim here of some of your bad decisions and lack of confidence to present all this publicly.

Just my $0.02

[unibitcoinist]

Royse777 is this your complaint about Poker Player's negative feedback?

More like a PM posted in public.

The board was in need of some noises. Royse delivered.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Royse777 is this your complaint about Poker Player's negative feedback? I would say that he left that feedback earlier, but as I see that it is fresh. maybe he just wants his comment to be at the top of your trust list.
maybe he should have formulated it better, the fact that someone wants to rebuild trust does not deserve negative feedback.

@everyone-else, I could PM him but you know what after all I miss this board.

after two dramas related to you, you now want to reopen a new one. Why?
In both cases, Bitlucy fail and hides that you are behind the CriptoCritique project, your biggest mistake is that you didn't immediately come out openly and honestly, you did it late and almost forced.
now again with a delay, you want to discuss a topic that has been discussed for a long time. You missed the prime with that and you can't say that there wasn't an opportunity and that everything ended quickly. In the end, you are a victim here of some of your bad decisions and lack of confidence to present all this publicly.

Just my $0.02

I haven't been trough the whole thing deeply, just read a bit from the links given on the negative trusts and from what I read I kind of agree with examplens here. Some trouble could have been avoided if you didn't wait that much.

Anyway, on the other hand cleaning your reputation is a good thing but I can tell you, it will take more than to clean it than to build it from scratch.

I have been trough almost the situation like yours but with other outcome, with the CatenaX project.
I reported them at the beginning for using bumping services, but they reach me out for help, how properly to deal with the forum rules with some payment for my service. I did consult them regarding the rules and how to advertise, what to do and what not to. 

At first I like the idea of the project, and they Luuk, seemed like a nice, serious guy. They asked me if I want to joint their team to help them grow with for some financial benefits, but my experience in crypto has taught me to never trust anyone (the forum is full with amazing examples like MagicalTux or TF) no matter how good things look like. So I didn't put my reputation on a card for a few buks...

At the end the CatenaX turned out to be a scam, and it was another confirmation of my believes. I manage to report them on Coinmarketcap and Coingecko and they tagged the project.

If we are not responsible, the crypto world will continue to look like the Wild West..

Think about it when you put your reputation on a card. The time you spend here, put an effort and at the end you loose all just for a couple of fake "dollars".

[AB de Royse777]

Royse777 is this your complaint about Poker Player's negative feedback? I would say that he left that feedback earlier, but as I see that it is fresh. maybe he just wants his comment to be at the top of your trust list.

Maybe.

maybe he should have formulated it better

Still there were room so I was actually giving him a better suggestion.

Try something better which will sound reasonable. You are still young in the forum so let me help you, try something like,

Royse777 is trying to rebuild his business, but I still don't trust him for significant amounts (add an amount. how much? $100k, $200k, A million? add whichever you like), because of what was explained in the referenced thread.

I haven't been trough the whole thing deeply, just read a bit from the links given on the negative trusts and from what I read I kind of agree with examplens here. Some trouble could have been avoided if you didn't wait that much.

Anyway, on the other hand cleaning your reputation is a good thing but I can tell you, it will take more than to clean it than to build it from scratch.

I have been trough almost the situation like yours but with other outcome, with the CatenaX project.
I reported them at the beginning for using bumping services, but they reach me out for help, how properly to deal with the forum rules with some payment for my service. I did consult them regarding the rules and how to advertise, what to do and what not to.  

At first I like the idea of the project, and they Luuk, seemed like a nice, serious guy. They asked me if I want to joint their team to help them grow with for some financial benefits, but my experience in crypto has taught me to never trust anyone (the forum is full with amazing examples like MagicalTux or TF) no matter how good things look like. So I didn't put my reputation on a card for a few buks...

At the end the CatenaX turned out to be a scam, and it was another confirmation of my believes. I manage to report them on Coinmarketcap and Coingecko and they tagged the project.

If we are not responsible, the crypto world will continue to look like the Wild West..

Think about it when you put your reputation on a card. The time you spend here, put an effort and at the end you loose all just for a couple of fake "dollars".

I really hope you trust me at least for over $0.01 and if you do then for the sake of that trust I am telling you, trust me - you missed a good bitcointalk forum episode. Someone can consider to create a highlight of the episodes LOL. How it's even missing to get the vote for The Best Fail of the year :-P

Will this drama never end? I thought everything had been muted and discussed thousand times over. But again, the topic is about Royse777. Knowing your character, I just understand how you feel. This is somewhat like persecution.
Even if it is so that you are trying to restore your reputation, I do not see anything wrong, and I should only be happy for you. People tend to make mistakes; there are no saints anywhere. But I really don't understand why you need another red tag.

It's now proven that clients really do not care about what reputation were given from some of the to excited forum members or I would not had any chance to rebuild my business. But honestly speaking it just made my job harder to perform, it's okay though. I am happy that it did not destroy my mental strength.
I still have a lot to do. Actually we (the CC team) to deliver what we promised. Some people need to know when you try to neglect others, when you push them so hard that their back set on the wall - they accept the challenge, finds inspiration from all bad things that is happening with them and give their best to push to revert back. It's not a self-scratching but it's something that I believe in myself.

[dkbit98]

Will this drama never end? I thought everything had been muted and discussed thousand times over. But again, the topic is about Royse777. Knowing your character, I just understand how you feel. This is somewhat like persecution.

I don't think this saga will end any time soon, some members just like putting more salt on old wounds, and Royse doesn't have thick enough skin to ignore them.
Only reason I would understand creation of this topic is if Poker Player ignored Royse and disabled private messages from him, like some other members did.
If you are going to start working as a manager, dealing with money and shady projects, you need to be ready to accept all the risks that comes with that.
That means you can always be accused for being unprofessional or not doing a good job... so deal with it Royse.
 

[meser#]

In my opinion, Royse777 saw an opportunity with bitlucy and he tried to get that business chance. But everything went opposite and it damaged his reputation. I was one of the bitlucy campaign's member and I get what i deserved. After a while I stopped the checking events on bitlucy's problems but Royse777 gave his best to finished with less problem. I appreciates him unless he made some enormous problem. As i can see, he got his lesson from his previous mistake and he won't cause another problem as like as bitlucy.

Everyone can make mistakes. The important thing is to admit their mistakes and make up for them. This situation reminded me of a story about a tribe. Whenever someone from this tribe did something wrong or committed a crime, members of the tribe would take him/her in the middle and form a circle around him. Then they starts to remind him of the good things he had done until that day.

Royse777, you have successfully completed 21 campaigns before the bitlucy campaign. You made a mistake with Bitlucy, but after that incident, manage a more successful campaigns than before so that you take responsibility for the mistake I believe in you. You can do it!

[rhomelmabini]

After all that was a positive verb given (but $0.01 was unlikely tbh), you have the highest chance of redemption whatsoever, and there are lot more room for improvement after what had happened. I spend my time to read that thread reference, more like you're just dragged down by that casino. Hang in there, people just love to judge in any way possible, of course what can you expect in a forum that doesn't trust no one.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Look....
I understand how painful the whole dilemma is. Royce hasn't been thick to look away; he prolly took the whole drama personal... Well, one of the reasons might be that he has a reputation to protect ( for the fact that he renders public services) and any client on his Dm would rather get his feedback scrutinized properly (that's to see if it's about fraudulence, like what they claimed in Royce's case) just so he's satisfied with your personality before starting any contract deal, most especially when it has to do with funds, which is probably the same reason he's distrusted. He really needs to build 'em back as I knew him without tags when I was registered....and the little I knew about his services, gave me some confidence (just like Hhampuz now).
P/s : I'm not here to support Royce if he's fucked up but, he needs to be given a chance to clean up.

Sandra 💇

[yahoo62278]

You couldn't handle the pressure the last time you were in the drama, why do you want to make a new thread basically bragging? I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish here at all. Lock this and let it go.

It's now proven that clients really do not care about what reputation were given from some of the to excited forum members or I would not had any chance to rebuild my business.

Clients may not care so far, but drawing attention to yourself may result in further tags from forum members. Best to just go on about your business under the radar.

[KingsDen]

If iniquities are to be counted in this forum, who will stand? Many of the users here have had their bad days, including you. But what I understood in this matter is that your good days were quite greater than your bad days. I entered the forum to know Royse and one of the reputable managers, which you have proven recent days by being able to manage some couple of campaigns. Now your name is once again flying in the service board.

But, I do not understand why 80% of the dramas started in this board about you are started by yourself. Putting yourself in the timeline of trust issues has +ve and -ve effects and I believe the negative weighs more than the positive.
A simple pm could have been nice. That is the reason we have day and night. A day thing should be done during the day and vice versa.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

your biggest mistake is that you didn't immediately come out openly and honestly, you did it late and almost forced.

I don't know if that was his biggest mistake with Casino Critique or not (since I have no idea how it's going), but I'm going to play devil's advocate here and say that even though he concealed his identity for a while, there was still no scam happening. 

I have been managing campaign from over one and half years. Before Bitlucy saga I managed 21 campaigns.

And that's kind of the reason I'd always respected you as a valued member of the community.  Maybe some members have a better grasp of what happened with Bitlucy, but I did read your thread on it and it definitely didn't sound like you were out to join in on some scam that they were pulling off.  Apparently a lot of people here do, though, which is why you've been getting such harsh treatment since then.

My suggestion is to roll with it, no matter how bitter it makes you feel, because memories can sometimes be short and people can be redeemed with time and the right actions.

[suchmoon]

@Poker Player, are you sure about of saying rebuilding reputation?

So you don't want to rebuild your reputation?

[avp2306]

@Poker Player, are you sure about of saying rebuilding reputation?

So you don't want to rebuild your reputation?

Since he choose to stay here after to many dramas happening to him for sure he want to rebuild his reputation.

[Poker Player]

After all I miss this board

I don't.

Will this drama never end? ... But I really don't understand why you need another red tag.

It is not another red tag. I simply changed the red tag and made it lighter, so I don't know what he is complaining about... well yes, the last time he was crying like he is now, he got yahoo62278 to change the feedback from negative to neutral.

maybe he should have formulated it better,

Maybe.

the fact that someone wants to rebuild trust does not deserve negative feedback.

Of course not.

So you don't want to rebuild your reputation?

Lol

I don't know what he is complaining about. Negative feedback mainly prevents you from joining a signature campaign, and with the decentralized system and the people in DT, campaign managers can let you participate in the campaign if they don't agree with the feedback, as we have seen several times. It can also prevent you from doing deals on the forum, but he has a lot of people with whom he can do deals no matter the feedback.

It doesn't affect him, he can go on with his business, running campaigns. Even the 1xCrap people do business in the forum.

Today when Hhampuz put the campaign I was participating on hold, I even thought of applying to one of Royse777's campaigns like trolling, lol.

I do not trust him because of everything that has happened and I will not repeat it or enter into endless discussions. Now he handles a lot of money in campaigns, well, Madoff also handled a lot of money and there were a lot of people who trusted him.

I am ashamed to have been complicit in the secrecy of who was behind Casino Critique, as potential investors had a right to know, and based on that, make a reasoned decision.

[decodx]

I bet he's just campaigning to win the BCA 🏆 AntiHero of the Year category.

Total results: 36

https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Royse777&topic_id=5422131

It seems to be working. Lol!

[Poker Player]

maybe he just wants his comment to be at the top of your trust list.

No, I didn't. As I explained in my previous comment, I softened the feedback but when I write a new one it appears on top.

I just left one that I think will be clearer, deleting the previous, and as a result it appears on top now, just above another positive that had been left recently.

Funny you should say that about wanting the comments to appear on top, because it was funny how when the Casino Critique was launched, positive comments started to appear on top in Royse777's trust, and coincidentally they were from people who knew who was behind the Casino Critique account, as we learned later. If he is so trustworthy, there should have been no problem leaving positive feedback not to Royse777, but to Casino Critique saying that he was Royse777's alt and therefore very trustworthy.

[AB de Royse777]

If he is so trustworthy, there should have been no problem leaving positive feedback not to Royse777, but to Casino Critique saying that he was Royse777's alt and therefore very trustworthy.

So you are saying you did not know it was me even after sending you PM for the free chip LOL. You even gave me a btc address ah, wasn't that funny?

coincidentally they were from people who knew who was behind the Casino Critique account, as we learned later.

And can you mention the name of these users you are talking about? May be they will give you a reason since you became the Jesus of bitcointalk. Name it! name it!! Let them know that you are accusing them for the feedback they left to me.

After all I miss this board

I don't.

How it's relevant to me? Did I ask you?

Of course when holding $7,400 $8,950  (do your math) for three four campaigns (and in the near future I am expecting more) your feedback suggesting to others not to me trust with a $0.01, sounds fun to read.

Oh yeah, I can update it, right?
And you have not still tell the amount yet.
$100k, $200k, A million? Which one?

Edit:
Nice update

I am looking for the next idea coming from you.

Did you miss a reference?
Come on Poker Player. Make it right.

[PaperWallet]

Oh yeah, I can update it, right?
And you have not still tell the amount yet.
$100k, $200k, A million? Which one?

Lol you can only dream about these, of course you're joking. Correct me Poker Player if I'm wrong, but it's somewhere around 100 to 200 bucks, nothing more, right?