I see it as the same as me getting a letter from a brokerage that I pulled my IRA from. As others have said, no funds means no trading, no trading means they are not making any money from you. Don't use a credit card for a while and get a 'use the card get this promo deal'. Pull all your moeny from a bank and get an offer to come back and get this kind of deal.
Nothing surprising about this, if you have had funds in there for a while and did some trades it's a normal business practice. Now that a lot of people are pulling funds out of exchanges I can see them being a bit more aggressive / proactive about sending the emails since yes, fewer people with funds on the exchange means less trades which means less revenue.
And lets face it, it costs $0.00 to send an auto generated email. Not like my bank that printed and mailed a credit card promo.
-Dave
How about we look at the other side of it? While they are indeed trying to make money and clients withdrawing funds means lesser income and they should do something about it, the context is obvious with what's happening to a number of centralized platforms. While they are a business, they are a business built on foundations laid by Bitcoin. While they are now doing things contrary to the spirit of Bitcoin, I suppose they are still believers of what Bitcoin means. I suppose they still believe in decentralization,
'not your key, not your coins',
'don't trust, verify', and other Bitcoin-related principles.
And while it is understandable that Bitstamp did this for the sake of the business, there was actually Kraken's Powell who advised to get funds out of exchanges. And while Kraken was a centralized exchange, Powell actually encouraged people to trade through peer to peer only.
And recently, there was also Paxful's Youssef who, despite having a custodial business, encouraged people to self-custody and keep funds out of exchanges including his own.
https://twitter.com/raypaxful/status/1601934200893997057I'm simply saying, centralized platforms could be honest and call a spade a spade. Rather than making people believe that they are a safe platform, that their clients' money are guaranteed
safu, that they have 1:1 reserve, that they are regularly audited, that they are keeping anybody's information private, and so forth, why don't they just set it straight that they are a risky platform and that everybody shouldn't be keeping funds in them except those they are willing to trade and lose?