A way to attract new users or a misunderstanding?

[Dunamisx]

Most likely when we hear web3 casinos, for me it sounds like a new era of gambling, until we start to experience that certain casinos and end up being disappointed. It’s still the same with the usuals casinos asking for KYC, nothing is really new. I guess the term web3 is just put and being associated in the names of the casinos just to attract new users and become tempted to play. Yes, this is more of a false advertisement which I think any casino that is doing that should be given a red flag and negative feedback so they can also learn their lesson.

There's nothing new just exactly as you've made mention when it comes to gambling casinos stating they are incorporating a web3 gambling website, it makes no any different from the ones we have in existence before and web3 has nothing to do with stopping them from demanding for KYC at the end, we know it's part of a marketing strategy adopted to captivate gamblers where as some may also come in claiming theirs is 3D or HD graphics casino or betting site which mean thesame thing as a marketing strategy or repackaging.

[1715560494]

1715560494

[1715560494]

1715560494

[1715560494]

1715560494

[Desmong]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

[minime0105]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

But from my own understanding I believe that every gambler knows what it wants, because i think gamblers have to do research to be able to detect exactly what they needs, but in a certain point, some of the claiming what they don't know feels like claiming in different ways of what they  cannot definition or don't know.you are right because some do not investigate to detect or able to know what they want or the easiest way to know what they don't know.

[Yatsan]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

But from my own understanding I believe that every gambler knows what it wants, because i think gamblers have to do research to be able to detect exactly what they needs, but in a certain point, some of the claiming what they don't know feels like claiming in different ways of what they  cannot definition or don't know.you are right because some do not investigate to detect or able to know what they want or the easiest way to know what they don't know.

Maybe because of adjustments. Even before, KYC is not that of a big deal towards gambling site but maybe because of problems which arose such as minors being able to play, identity theft and such, they made such change even if it would  oppose their concept or 'wholeness' of a gambling platform. But indeed that is correct; web 3.0 should not be concerned with such informations from the users. However, gambling platforms' point of view might be more concerned with their players than their 'pride' of being under mentioned category. Some players would appreciate it especially to those who are one with duch feature, but it is not surprising to know that there will be people who won't.

[Plaguedeath]

I see most people pointing out if Web 3.0 casino that require KYC is a red flag and just a marketing purpose since it's not actually decentralized, does it mean this casino is shady and deserved to get negative tag? I think when the casino has a red flag and didn't remove the words that's controversial, DT members will give negative tag to them. There's many web 3.0 casino didn't get negative tag yet, so?

[davis196]

The casinos are required by the law to ask for KYC verification. It doesn't matter how "decentralized" they claim to be.
Of course, they can decide to stay on the dark side and never comply to any rules and regulations. This might hurt their business in the long term. I'm not an expert in the field or web3 and smart contracts, but I think that truly decentralized gambling games must be really slow and they usually don't provide a good experience for the player/gambler. The way online casinos operate will remain centralized in the next few years. Web3 is more like a buzzword, similar to ICOs back in 2017, DeFi, NFTs and all the other "shiny objects" and "innovations" surrounding the crypto world.

[maydna]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

Most gamblers follow what others are doing without doing any research to find the casino they want. That causes many of them to have a bad experience using the wrong casino and only complain. Maybe not many people understand the meaning of web 3.0 or web 3. And this is why there are still misunderstandings among people out there. And we should use the casino that we are used to so that we are fine while playing gambling.

[vanesha]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

[DoublerHunter]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

^ I think there is, https://www.esports.net/news/top-3-blockchain-gaming-platforms/.
Here in the forum if I am not mistaken, Gandom casino is also a web3 casino.
Because once the casino is licensed and regulated it is expected that the casino will ask for KYC from their user and right, this web3 is just marketing ads that mislead new gambler thing web3 is a fully decentralized casino. However, some of them, have dApp that does not really ask for KYC and probably there is but only minor information such as the mobile number and email address.

[lionheart78]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

And that how it should be but still asking out those KYC which does simply means that they arent running that 3.0 in the first place but rather they are really just deceiving out people that they are like that

but we know that community wouldnt really be dumb as fuck on not to be able to make out differentiation in between web3 into those common centralized casinos or platforms that we do have today.
It is really just trying to make use of that word but cant eventually be able to apply since it wasnt really like that in the beginning.If they are really that making in use of those words
or claims just to hook up people and find out later on about the truth then i wont be shocked that they wouldnt really be getting any users far on ahead.

Not because a casino is running in a web3 means it shouldn't be centralized.  web3 is supposed to be decentralized because it was the original plan but just like blockchain technology that has both centralized and decentralized categories, I believe web 3 will have the same.  Please take note, web 3.0 and web3 are two different version.  Web3 is an alternative branch wherein it runs in blockchain technology while web 3.0 as stated in the earlier reply as an upgrade of web 2.0 which have a more advanced function.

I do not think it is an issue if a casino is running in web3 and ask for KYC since the most casino isn't decentralized anyway.  They have a central operation team, and all activities are centralized and governed by the company heads and staff.  It is also isn't a lie when a casino advertises that they are running in web3 but are still centralized in all aspects as long as they don't say they are a decentralized entity.  So I don't ever think a web3 casino asking for KYC is a red tag as long as the casino is licensed by the authority, they are subject to regulation and law.  As a matter of fact, I find it green.

[ultrloa]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

And that how it should be but still asking out those KYC which does simply means that they arent running that 3.0 in the first place but rather they are really just deceiving out people that they are like that

but we know that community wouldnt really be dumb as fuck on not to be able to make out differentiation in between web3 into those common centralized casinos or platforms that we do have today.
It is really just trying to make use of that word but cant eventually be able to apply since it wasnt really like that in the beginning.If they are really that making in use of those words
or claims just to hook up people and find out later on about the truth then i wont be shocked that they wouldnt really be getting any users far on ahead.

Maybe a sort of and some of it maybe also trying to comply with certain regulation.

But for now since this web 3.0 thing is famous word I believe this is just pure marketing strat by casino to attach it on their name so that many people would be curious to know what really into the web 3 especially on casino.

We should try not to get with this and only see those reputable casino implement since if smaller ones will just use it without any changes happen to their casino maybe they are just trying to bait and want to deceive people.

[2double0]

Nothing in this world comes for free.
As the saying goes, it shows that marketers will do anything to market their products and sell it to the targeted audience for some value. When we talk about gambling, I don't think that too many sites ask for KYC verification until and unless deemed necessary.
While some casinos intentionally do it to stop the winner take their huge winnings out, there are also some casinos who really comply with the regulations of the jurisdiction they're holding their businesses at.
The web 3.0 was a nice way to market their services to everyone but when btc isn't decentralised itself, don't expect these cheap scripts (many casinos copy the same script) to provide you with such an important solution.

[mitchr4]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

Owl Games which has been running for almost 1 year and is still running. They use web 3.0 casino and require KYC for specific purposes according to the rules of the casino.

The use of web 3.0 in a casino depends on the casino owner. Although the main function of web 3.0 is not like that. This is just a marketing strategy to attract players' attention, but in reality players still have to provide their identity. I think players should have some understanding of web 3.0.

[btc78]

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

Dunno if there are even one that succeed in this web 3.0 thing about gambling but what I only knew that this is not truly a good thing for gambling public, there are even many that uses this to attract players but the truth is they don't really have.

Are any of those who named them Web 3.0 gambling successful? I think they might need a user identity for something, yes this is just a caution to you. having to be decentralized is more of a thing and it should have no KYC at all.

^ I think there is, https://www.esports.net/news/top-3-blockchain-gaming-platforms/.
Here in the forum if I am not mistaken, Gandom casino is also a web3 casino.
Because once the casino is licensed and regulated it is expected that the casino will ask for KYC from their user and right, this web3 is just marketing ads that mislead new gambler thing web3 is a fully decentralized casino. However, some of them, have dApp that does not really ask for KYC and probably there is but only minor information such as the mobile number and email address.

Yet not successful as what we expect ? because we knew that crypto gamblers Enemy is KYC requirements .

[Docnaster]

Most likely when we hear web3 casinos, for me it sounds like a new era of gambling, until we start to experience that certain casinos and end up being disappointed. It’s still the same with the usuals casinos asking for KYC, nothing is really new. I guess the term web3 is just put and being associated in the names of the casinos just to attract new users and become tempted to play. Yes, this is more of a false advertisement which I think any casino that is doing that should be given a red flag and negative feedback so they can also learn their lesson.

There's nothing new just exactly as you've made mention when it comes to gambling casinos stating they are incorporating a web3 gambling website, it makes no any different from the ones we have in existence before and web3 has nothing to do with stopping them from demanding for KYC at the end, we know it's part of a marketing strategy adopted to captivate gamblers where as some may also come in claiming theirs is 3D or HD graphics casino or betting site which mean thesame thing as a marketing strategy or repackaging.

We might not be seeing much difference based on the system it is implemented. You now it is a new technology and alot of people can be misusing it  until the right way to use it is known. I know some companies who cannot do without kyc are intentionally misusing it to their favour. As time goes on things can change alot and the real usage web3 can been seen in gambling industry

[Crypt0Gore]

Crypto newbies can get confused with the web 3 implementation on gambling platforms , thinking the experience will be different but later they will realize that it's still the same old online gambling ways, nothing new, they will learn their lessons.

There are so many new crypto project that attached Web 3 and Metaverse to their name, it's all for the advertising sake, most won't deliver anything new and some will leave the aim half way.

[mak013]

You are using sometimes Web3 and sometimes Web 3.0. But there are huge difference between Web3 and Web 3.0. So it would be better to decide about what do you talking are?
But the same time if someone wants marketing promotion he can use both Web3 and Web 3.0 and i don`t think that lots of people will think that he is cheating them.

[nasipadang]

The attachment of the word web 3 or Web 3.0, based on the OP for that matter, is rampantly used as a clout chasing approach of marketing in many projects. I am certain that a lot of users here does not really know what such entails and what to be expected about it, and so many cannot attest if such advertisement is practically true or not. Given the case, without the proper understanding of the real essence of web 3 or web 3.0, many fails to become successful in truly administering it to their platforms.

[danadc]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

Most gamblers follow what others are doing without doing any research to find the casino they want. That causes many of them to have a bad experience using the wrong casino and only complain. Maybe not many people understand the meaning of web 3.0 or web 3. And this is why there are still misunderstandings among people out there. And we should use the casino that we are used to so that we are fine while playing gambling.

It all depends on what people want to see and understand, there are many and among them they don't know what Web3 is and I know that this is something that can be technical, but when talking about such technical things it's always good to have a section where they explain what that means, for some players who have a lot of experience and who have been playing for many years they know perfectly well what it is and that despite not being programmers or very knowledgeable, but I have seen that here in the forum many things will depend techniques because the players speak with many technical criteria that sometimes I don't understand and that they make me study to learn.

[Hamphser]

Is web 3 a misunderstanding word for some gambling crypto projects? I've come across few gambling / crypto projects that claimed to be a web 3.0 online casino and other but they still ask for KYC.

The definition of web 3.0 had everything to do with decentralization, block chain technology and token based economics as per what Wikipedia illustrated so why is identity/ verification integrated?

Is this just a misunderstanding of what web 3 actually is? Or it's a way to attract people/users to make them think that their platform is more advanced?.

This happens when the when the gamblers do not understand what they really needs or understand the meaning of web 3.0. I have see many crypto projects that are been claiming to be on web 3.0 and help users to stay decentralized. When we don't understand what we want the problem will continue and this had been the market problem of many users and crypto investors including gamblers.

Most gamblers follow what others are doing without doing any research to find the casino they want. That causes many of them to have a bad experience using the wrong casino and only complain. Maybe not many people understand the meaning of web 3.0 or web 3. And this is why there are still misunderstandings among people out there. And we should use the casino that we are used to so that we are fine while playing gambling.

It all depends on what people want to see and understand, there are many and among them they don't know what Web3 is and I know that this is something that can be technical, but when talking about such technical things it's always good to have a section where they explain what that means, for some players who have a lot of experience and who have been playing for many years they know perfectly well what it is and that despite not being programmers or very knowledgeable, but I have seen that here in the forum many things will depend techniques because the players speak with many technical criteria that sometimes I don't understand and that they make me study to learn.

Yes, this is exactly on point on which people should really be having at least that kind of idea and knowledge on what Web3 is all about because if not then they would be just simply dealing up with things just

because someone had claimed out that theyre a web3 based platform without even knowing on whats web3 and they do just simply go just because of some hype and not totally knowing the
true essence of web3 since they had just been hyped out.Comparing into those people who are really that keeps eyeing on web3 would eventually notice the main differences
and if you are really that knowledgeable on what it is, then you could really easily throw out those comments and feedbacks on what really is.People should really be
aware that web3 isnt really something like this.It is really just there are platforms or projects which do make use of these words just to make themselves look
cool or something that its first on this industry.