Can Elon musk listen to bitcoiners not to delete Hal Finney's account

[kryptqnick]

I completely support the plea not to delete Finney's account, as it is of historical significance. The first tweet about Bitcoin, as well as Hal's legacy, are important and should stay. If Elon doesn't want deceased to have their accounts kept on the platform, he should come up with a sensible alternative, something like Twitter archives, as this matter goes beyond Hal Finney. Many people die, and some leave a legacy that should not be forgotten. Twitter deleting history, not preserving the past, is an unfair thing to do.

[1714233269]

1714233269

[1714233269]

1714233269

[dunfida]

Given enough publicity to get his attention, I think it's highly likely that he'll consider not deleting Twitter accounts that have been owned by (confirmed) deceased users. As far as I know he's taken a good amount of opinions from Twitter users.

For sure he would really be making out exemptions because if he do continue or decided on including Hal Finneys account then it would really be just giving that negative impression and lots of criticism
out from Bitcoin community.He wont really be that dumb on not to know about history which it is really just right that he wont really be including it on the wipe out.
He wont really be that numb for preserving it since it is really been part of history which is something or that really needs to be saved up.
Elon would likely be listening on what has been requested.

[Furious 7]

With this condition I think this will be another consideration. But on the other hand, it now depends on Elon because indeed he is the one in power and if he really doesn't want it, it is likely that his policy will continue regardless of the many requests.
But I think if this is really talking about business then maybe he will withhold it and let this account continue because if it is not there will definitely be more sideways gossip about it even though it actually doesn't really have much effect on Elon either.