Bitcoin Forum
October 04, 2024, 03:25:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 1  (Read 113 times)
ecdsa123 (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 105


View Profile
December 29, 2022, 11:24:19 AM
Last edit: August 31, 2024, 02:55:32 PM by ecdsa123
 #1

1
NotATether
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 7304


In memory of o_e_l_e_o


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2022, 06:37:30 PM
 #2

I never thought about modulo this way, to be honest.

I think this will work for huge numbers as well, because Bignum libraries have reasonably fast subtraction and division times. These are the inverse operations after you move n and +r to the LHS of the equation.

NotATether
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 7304


In memory of o_e_l_e_o


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2022, 06:49:45 AM
 #3

what more it implict reduct "safety curve" below 128 bit.

Mind explaining this part for us?

NotATether
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 7304


In memory of o_e_l_e_o


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2022, 11:46:30 AM
 #4

on by hand for small group my idea is working. (on the paper).

when I will implement in code , will try explain "what is in my mind".
difficult to explain without code. this is just abstact idea. but sometimes abstract idea is working.

It's just that I've never heard of a "safety curve" before, let alone a reduced one. Are you referring to the strength of the elliptic curve in bits i.e. the point coordinate size in memory?

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!