I have seen the above quotation used to define negative trends of inflation in economics.
Decreased exposure to dangers present with inflation and other negative economic trends, reduce the human self defense mechanisms necessary to address said trends. The regression can extend so far as to result in degeneration of organisms in nature. The same precedent might also apply to people. We lose many of our social and cultural adaptations when decreased exposure to dangers, causes us to believe them no longer necessary. Its an interesting point to consider.
And it seems we have to go back to an era where food and light must live naturally, I am a person who has always been against organic fertilizers and I am an environmental activist who loves growth in anything that exists on earth, now we are in an era of adaptation that is less sensitive towards social and cultural values, so that the degradation of life is no longer taking care of and helping each other.
The fact is that the source of food is produced from fertile nature, then where is the land used now?
Technology seems to destroy everything, but in function it doesn't?
Culture and social values continue to diminish, because people no longer have sensibilities?
If people are able to maintain food sources, it is certain that inflation can be suppressed, because the one that has the most impact on the recession is only the fulfillment of food, because this sector is a vital tool for the country's travel and also part of its stability, how many countries are short of food and in the end they were attacked by recession and deflation in succession, thus making the economy unstable and on the verge of bankruptcy. I don't want to go into other areas, but for me the source of food is a vital tool that must be maintained.