The world continues dumping US dollar (Gold, New World Order, World War III)

[Pejoh Asu]

The threat of an economic crisis in the future is of course very worrying, a war in the market will certainly make the political situation continue to escalate, now we can see that many countries are looking for friends who are certainly in line with expectations and have the same vision to protect their interests.

[1714870023]

1714870023

[1714870023]

1714870023

[jasonjm]

With the global economic recession on the cards, GOLD is the only option left for the countries to safeguard their assets. USD also faces drawbacks and challenges. Governments are decreasing their dependence on USD and looking to trade in their currencies. This will have an impact on the dollar's monopoly. Looking at USA's recent banking crisis, which is far from over, one thing is self-evident, US rule is coming to an end in the near future.

BRICS is about to launch its currency for trading and Arabs are doing trade agreements in Yuan along with India and Russia, things are looking ugly for USD, especially "petrodollars".  A few countries started to increase their reserves of Yuan and are dumping dollars. Global power dynamics are about to change. A new world order is approaching, and I think China will be at the center of this.

[SyndicateLabs]

With the global economic recession on the cards, GOLD is the only option left for the countries to safeguard their assets. USD also faces drawbacks and challenges. Governments are decreasing their dependence on USD and looking to trade in their currencies. This will have an impact on the dollar's monopoly. Looking at USA's recent banking crisis, which is far from over, one thing is self-evident, US rule is coming to an end in the near future.

BRICS is about to launch its currency for trading and Arabs are doing trade agreements in Yuan along with India and Russia, things are looking ugly for USD, especially "petrodollars".  A few countries started to increase their reserves of Yuan and are dumping dollars. Global power dynamics are about to change. A new world order is approaching, and I think China will be at the center of this.

I have a picture of the story being extreme but actually what's going on is not strong enough for us to see a new order, actually the story of war is something that no one wants but it's also hard to understand. avoid. Hopefully it won't lead to major disasters. There are views that I have heard about countries that are introducing measures to reduce their dependence on the USD and seeking to diversify their national financial systems. Replacing the USD as an international currency is a complex process and requires stability, reliability, and the support of many stakeholders. Therefore, when assessing global financial trends, it is important to understand and monitor international economic, political and financial situations to gain insight and make informed investment decisions bright.

[nara1892]

With the global economic recession on the cards, GOLD is the only option left for the countries to safeguard their assets. USD also faces drawbacks and challenges. Governments are decreasing their dependence on USD and looking to trade in their currencies. This will have an impact on the dollar's monopoly. Looking at USA's recent banking crisis, which is far from over, one thing is self-evident, US rule is coming to an end in the near future.

BRICS is about to launch its currency for trading and Arabs are doing trade agreements in Yuan along with India and Russia, things are looking ugly for USD, especially "petrodollars".  A few countries started to increase their reserves of Yuan and are dumping dollars. Global power dynamics are about to change. A new world order is approaching, and I think China will be at the center of this.

Gradually the value of the dollar will continue to decline, keeping in mind the financial system of the dollar anyone can see its expiration date, we just have to watch a little longer. Especially when the US issued a money printing law at that time which was no longer backed by gold. Meanwhile, the US is demanding that other countries implement rules they can control. The saturation point of China, Middle Eastern countries, India, Brazil and Russia is moving in a more reasonable direction. Subvert the dollar system by launching a new payment system. Even though it is profitable for China, at least the countries are satisfied and able to maintain bilateral trade results between each other with the system that has been implemented, rather than relying on the US financial system.

[Argoo]

The threat of an economic crisis in the future is of course very worrying, a war in the market will certainly make the political situation continue to escalate, now we can see that many countries are looking for friends who are certainly in line with expectations and have the same vision to protect their interests.

On July 17, 2023, Russia officially abandoned the "grain agreement" and officially notified Turkey and Ukraine, as well as the UN secretariat, of its objection to the extension of the "grain deal" for the removal of grain and other agricultural products from the ports of Ukraine for export. In addition, Russia withdrew security guarantees for the grain corridor. In other words, Russia says it can sink civilian ships flying any flag if they take grain out of Ukraine. Sinking civilian ships with non-military goods in neutral waters can be regarded as piracy.

What then will Russia do if, for example, Turkey organizes an escort and escorts these civilian vessels? Will it also shoot at the warships of Turkey, which is a member of NATO? And if such convoys are organized by the UN or at least NATO countries? Will Russia, already very weakened by the war, go into conflict with NATO members, thereby unleashing an even bigger war than in Ukraine? After all, then it will already look like the Third World War.

[DrBeer]

With the global economic recession on the cards, GOLD is the only option left for the countries to safeguard their assets. USD also faces drawbacks and challenges. Governments are decreasing their dependence on USD and looking to trade in their currencies. This will have an impact on the dollar's monopoly. Looking at USA's recent banking crisis, which is far from over, one thing is self-evident, US rule is coming to an end in the near future.

BRICS is about to launch its currency for trading and Arabs are doing trade agreements in Yuan along with India and Russia, things are looking ugly for USD, especially "petrodollars".  A few countries started to increase their reserves of Yuan and are dumping dollars. Global power dynamics are about to change. A new world order is approaching, and I think China will be at the center of this.

"No matter how much you say baklava, it won't get sweet in your mouth!"
Perfect answer to your post

See the point - the BRICS will not create their own currency. China wants to make BRICS into a "reserve of idiots" who will abandon the international economy (read - the dollar), and become slaves of the National Bank of China (read - the yuan), and slaves who will take all the problems (inflation, rising prices, ....) into their own economies, saving China.

And the Dollar will remain an international currency, not a surrogate like the Yuan in settlements.... I recommend, to understand what will happen to BRICS after BRICS will lie down on its shoulder before the yuan, to read how Russia settles accounts with India in rupees and with China in yuan - more funny financial and economic history can not be found

[Ozero]

Now the world on our planet has once again come close to a world war due to Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and threats of attacks on other European countries. In addition, Russia deliberately creates man-made and environmental disasters in Ukraine, blackmails the world with nuclear weapons and catastrophes at seized nuclear facilities in Ukraine.

Recently, the eyes of the world community have been turned to the provocative actions of the Russian PMC "Wagner", whose representatives, being on the territory of Belarus, threaten to attack the NATO countries - Poland and Lithuania. Their actions, directed from the Kremlin, may well cause a war with NATO countries.

Not having the desired success in military operations against Ukraine, the Putin regime, in order to divert the attention of its citizens from failures on the Ukrainian front, seeks to expand the geography of hostilities and the number of warring countries, since the Kremlin is uncomfortable admitting that Russia is being defeated by the Ukrainians.

[Marvell1]

Now the world on our planet has once again come close to a world war due to Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and threats of attacks on other European countries. In addition, Russia deliberately creates man-made and environmental disasters in Ukraine, blackmails the world with nuclear weapons and catastrophes at seized nuclear facilities in Ukraine.

Recently, the eyes of the world community have been turned to the provocative actions of the Russian PMC "Wagner", whose representatives, being on the territory of Belarus, threaten to attack the NATO countries - Poland and Lithuania. Their actions, directed from the Kremlin, may well cause a war with NATO countries.

Not having the desired success in military operations against Ukraine, the Putin regime, in order to divert the attention of its citizens from failures on the Ukrainian front, seeks to expand the geography of hostilities and the number of warring countries, since the Kremlin is uncomfortable admitting that Russia is being defeated by the Ukrainians.

78 years (August 6, 1945 - August 6, 2023), the US imperialists dropped the first atomic bomb named "Little BOY" on the city of HIROSHIMA, Japan. The bomb instantly killed 80,000 Japanese people in a short time. These things, how come I never heard anyone complain or criticize. Dropping atomic bombs to kill millions of civilians is called "peaceful messengers". Is this nuclear bomb on a mission to bring peace to the world or is it deliberately erasing a country's name from the world map?

[Ozero]

Now the world on our planet has once again come close to a world war due to Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and threats of attacks on other European countries. In addition, Russia deliberately creates man-made and environmental disasters in Ukraine, blackmails the world with nuclear weapons and catastrophes at seized nuclear facilities in Ukraine.

Recently, the eyes of the world community have been turned to the provocative actions of the Russian PMC "Wagner", whose representatives, being on the territory of Belarus, threaten to attack the NATO countries - Poland and Lithuania. Their actions, directed from the Kremlin, may well cause a war with NATO countries.

Not having the desired success in military operations against Ukraine, the Putin regime, in order to divert the attention of its citizens from failures on the Ukrainian front, seeks to expand the geography of hostilities and the number of warring countries, since the Kremlin is uncomfortable admitting that Russia is being defeated by the Ukrainians.

78 years (August 6, 1945 - August 6, 2023), the US imperialists dropped the first atomic bomb named "Little BOY" on the city of HIROSHIMA, Japan. The bomb instantly killed 80,000 Japanese people in a short time. These things, how come I never heard anyone complain or criticize. Dropping atomic bombs to kill millions of civilians is called "peaceful messengers". Is this nuclear bomb on a mission to bring peace to the world or is it deliberately erasing a country's name from the world map?

And how to regard these words of yours? Russia intends to repeat such a nuclear experiment? Why did she then transfer part of her nuclear potential to Belarus? After all, unpredictable "Wagnerites" can "accidentally" take advantage of them, after which the Kremlin will claim that this is not their unit and they have nothing to do with it?

[DrBeer]

Now the world on our planet has once again come close to a world war due to Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and threats of attacks on other European countries. In addition, Russia deliberately creates man-made and environmental disasters in Ukraine, blackmails the world with nuclear weapons and catastrophes at seized nuclear facilities in Ukraine.

Recently, the eyes of the world community have been turned to the provocative actions of the Russian PMC "Wagner", whose representatives, being on the territory of Belarus, threaten to attack the NATO countries - Poland and Lithuania. Their actions, directed from the Kremlin, may well cause a war with NATO countries.

Not having the desired success in military operations against Ukraine, the Putin regime, in order to divert the attention of its citizens from failures on the Ukrainian front, seeks to expand the geography of hostilities and the number of warring countries, since the Kremlin is uncomfortable admitting that Russia is being defeated by the Ukrainians.

78 years (August 6, 1945 - August 6, 2023), the US imperialists dropped the first atomic bomb named "Little BOY" on the city of HIROSHIMA, Japan. The bomb instantly killed 80,000 Japanese people in a short time. These things, how come I never heard anyone complain or criticize. Dropping atomic bombs to kill millions of civilians is called "peaceful messengers". Is this nuclear bomb on a mission to bring peace to the world or is it deliberately erasing a country's name from the world map?

So far, only the aggressor country is trying to rumble with "nuclear muds", promising to destroy Poland, Britain, Germany and other countries with a nuclear strike ... Moreover, the slogan there is absolutely Nazi "If Russia loses, why do we need this world !?".
In a word, the example is not very correct and rather "far-fetched".
PS I recommend - look at the affected cities of Japan - what they have become in 20 years. And look at Kamchatka, which belongs to the country that has "the largest natural resources in the world." I have been there - to be honest - I have a feeling that Kamchatka is bombed with nuclear bombs every 5-10 years until now ...
Just look not at brochures with mountain views, but at real photos of real cities

[PytagoraZ]

...
Although economy is not the only battlefield (we have energy, food and actual armed conflict between proxies) but it is affecting us the most
...

Global conspiracies are endless, but it's always interesting to talk about. I believe that world war 3 will happen sooner or later. I think America will also not remain silent if the world's currency is replaced, and does not use USD anymore. I think that's reason enough for America to start World War 3

In my opinion, there is no more logical reason to start a war than economic reasons.

[DrBeer]

...
Although economy is not the only battlefield (we have energy, food and actual armed conflict between proxies) but it is affecting us the most
...

Global conspiracies are endless, but it's always interesting to talk about. I believe that world war 3 will happen sooner or later. I think America will also not remain silent if the world's currency is replaced, and does not use USD anymore. I think that's reason enough for America to start World War 3

In my opinion, there is no more logical reason to start a war than economic reasons.

If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.
Theoretically it is possible to imagine a picture of the USA in such a status, but it is from the realm of fiction, and not even scientific.
Now, for more than a year, ALL the world is threatened with nuclear war by the new world "offended", loser and pariah - Russia. Or can you give an example where the USA, NATO countries, EU countries, China or India threatened the world and many neighbors with a nuclear strike? The only place where you can find such references is again in the corrupt Kremlin media, but they make up "news", "statements" - putting their fantasies in the mouths of other people and passing it off as "truth". Therefore, the only author of a new world war can only be Russia.

PS Yes, there is also Iran with its manic craving for nuclear weapons, and the clown from North Korea - but it will not be difficult to "buy" the world community.

[PytagoraZ]

If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.

Theoretically it is possible to imagine a picture of the USA in such a status, but it is from the realm of fiction, and not even scientific.
Now, for more than a year, ALL the world is threatened with nuclear war by the new world "offended", loser and pariah - Russia. Or can you give an example where the USA, NATO countries, EU countries, China or India threatened the world and many neighbors with a nuclear strike? The only place where you can find such references is again in the corrupt Kremlin media, but they make up "news", "statements" - putting their fantasies in the mouths of other people and passing it off as "truth". Therefore, the only author of a new world war can only be Russia.

PS Yes, there is also Iran with its manic craving for nuclear weapons, and the clown from North Korea - but it will not be difficult to "buy" the world community.

When talking about Iran and Iraq, America accuses them of having nuclear weapons so it is necessary to carry out an invasion of these Middle Eastern countries, but is Iraq proven to have nuclear weapons? it turns out that after sadam husein was hanged, there are no nuclear weapons in iraq, just bullshit taking over oil refineries, yes, iraq has huge oil reserves. So, it's an economic problem with the scapegoat of nuclear weapons

Let's talk about having nuclear weapons, America has the most nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers, followed by Russia. On the one hand, America and Russia are opposites. Both are competing for interests, hegemony, and influence. Neither America nor Russia dared to attack each other, the victim was Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to have a border between NATO countries and Russia, NATO wants Ukraine to be closer to Russia and to make Ukraine a NATO base so that it can easily spy on Russia.

Currently, there are two major ideologies seeking influence and hegemony. America with EU/NATO countries with democratic ideology, Russia with China and North Korea with communism ideology. I'm sure that sooner or later America and Russia will go to war, and what I'm afraid of is the location of their war not in Russia and America but in the EU, just like the 2nd world war, and it must be bad for the EU

[pooya87]

Global conspiracies are endless, but it's always interesting to talk about. I believe that world war 3 will happen sooner or later. I think America will also not remain silent if the world's currency is replaced, and does not use USD anymore. I think that's reason enough for America to start World War 3

In my opinion, there is no more logical reason to start a war than economic reasons.

Next word war is already taking place as we speak but this time because the world powers own nuclear weapons that can vaporize the human race the shape of the war is different. It is taking place through proxies like US-Russia fighting through the proxy of Ukraine, US-China fighting through the proxy of Taiwan, US-Iran fighting through the proxy of ISIS.

As I said before, it is in multiple types of battle fields. For example the one that is currently "hot" in the media is the food war and everyone is participating in it too. From Russia with grain deals to Turkey with the sea blockade and Europe stealing shipments to other countries stopping exports and disrupting supply chains.

Currently, there are two major ideologies seeking influence and hegemony. America with EU/NATO countries with democratic ideology, Russia with China and North Korea with communism ideology. I'm sure that sooner or later America and Russia will go to war, and what I'm afraid of is the location of their war not in Russia and America but in the EU, just like the 2nd world war, and it must be bad for the EU

There are more than just the two but that's another discussion. I want to point out that the war you mentioned is already happening in Europe with the armed conflict in the westernmost part of Europe and energy, economic and food wars in the rest of it. We see that in the ongoing deindustrialization of Europe.
P.S. This is not WWII because WWII was Europeans fighting amongst themselves then bringing that war to the rest of the world.

Or can you give an example where the USA, NATO countries, EU countries, China or India threatened the world and many neighbors with a nuclear strike?

They don't threaten anybody with nukes, they just drop their nukes on cities without warning. Like US nuking Japan or the nuclear munitions that they used in Iraq which was worse than the two bombs they dropped in Japan or the MOAB they dropped on poor people of Afghanistan and a lot more!!

[PytagoraZ]

Next word war is already taking place as we speak but this time because the world powers own nuclear weapons that can vaporize the human race the shape of the war is different. It is taking place through proxies like US-Russia fighting through the proxy of Ukraine, US-China fighting through the proxy of Taiwan, US-Iran fighting through the proxy of ISIS.

Yeah right, to be honest it was in the early stages of the war now. This is the way to come to the gun war. Both America and Russia still don't want to be open and use weapons, because in my opinion they are still considering the risks. Although I also don't believe that World War 3 will happen, it is likely that nukes will not be used, because it is useless to be victorious in a war if the world has been destroyed by nukes. No economic benefits

As I said before, it is in multiple types of battle fields. For example the one that is currently "hot" in the media is the food war and everyone is participating in it too. From Russia with grain deals to Turkey with the sea blockade and Europe stealing shipments to other countries stopping exports and disrupting supply chains.

When it comes to food, my country has a terrible deal with the EU. It looks like the EU will be the first continent to be hit by food shortages.

There are more than just the two but that's another discussion. I want to point out that the war you mentioned is already happening in Europe with the armed conflict in the westernmost part of Europe and energy, economic and food wars in the rest of it. We see that in the ongoing deindustrialization of Europe.
 
P.S. This is not WWII because WWII was Europeans fighting amongst themselves then bringing that war to the rest of the world.  

Yes, I know. But now these two ideologies are at odds. Countries with Islamic ideology seem to have been a bit forgotten by America because they are no longer too dangerous after the collapse of Iraq and Iran, and Arab countries are friendly enough to America so they are not considered a threat.

Yes, indeed the second world war took place in the European Union and spread to Japan, Russia and America. And it seems that America succeeded in taking advantage of this situation, because America was the last country to join the second world war, so that when other countries had run out of ammunition and logistical supplies, America came with new troops and logistical supplies so that they were able to win the war quite easily.

The food crisis in the EU and the tension between America and Russia could make the 3rd world war happen again in the EU. Or do you have other thoughts?

If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.

Maybe that's what the history books write, but the reality is not like that. The colonial system carried out by the British, Portuguese and Dutch empires was for the economy. Columbus sailed around the world and discovered the Americas not for research and mapmaking, but for logistical and economic resources.

Maybe if there was a war that was started not for economic reasons, maybe Germany under Hitler's leadership could be like that. Hitler went to war because he considered the German race superior because of the blood of the Aryan race and Hitler's hatred of the Jews. Honestly I have not found any economic interest in the war waged by Hitler

[pooya87]

When it comes to food, my country has a terrible deal with the EU. It looks like the EU will be the first continent to be hit by food shortages.

Food issues over the past year have been present in every single country around the world, the type and degree of the issues are different per country bug generally so far it has been small enough for the governments to manage it. For example in EU we had the fertilizer crisis followed by decreased output followed by higher food prices and in some cases small shortages like the cooking oil shortage over a year ago in Europe.
Things are changing a lot and sometimes very fast so we can't make long term predictions but unless something major changes I don't think we are about to see any major food shortage in Europe. Specially since every country has found a way to handle the crisis to some extent for example IIRC it was UK that started changing its import policies to handle the shortage by no longer enforcing certain "standards" for stuff they import like the pesticides used in those products; so that they can avert the crisis in short term despite the health health problems it'll cause in long run.

Yes, I know. But now these two ideologies are at odds. Countries with Islamic ideology seem to have been a bit forgotten by America

To be fair the beef US has in West Asia is not about ideology it is about resources. They haven't forgotten anything either, one of the biggest US presences is still in West Asia (ie. their CENTCOM). They recently sent more troops to the region too which many are predicting an upcoming war. I summarized it in the last part of this comment and this with the effects it can have on energy prices.

because they are no longer too dangerous after the collapse of {...} Iran

I'm not sure what you mean by "collapse" when it comes to Iran but you should read the US The National Security Strategy documents released every year. For the past 4 decades Iran is on top of that list basically ever since Iranians put a boot up US ass kicking them and their dictator out, they have wanted back in but Iran is too strong for them to colonize

Yes, indeed the second world war took place in the European Union and spread to Japan, Russia and America. And it seems that America succeeded in taking advantage of this situation, because America was the last country to join the second world war, so that when other countries had run out of ammunition and logistical supplies, America came with new troops and logistical supplies so that they were able to win the war quite easily.

Exactly. Also because US was too far away and very hard to reach, the infrastructure was intact whereas Europe and Russia (and pretty much everywhere else) were destroyed which got US its unipolar power ever since the war ended.
This also proves another reason why there won't be a direct arms conflict between US and anybody else because unlike 80 years ago, US mainland is no longer "hard to reach"...

The food crisis in the EU and the tension between America and Russia could make the 3rd world war happen again in the EU. Or do you have other thoughts?

If you mean armed conflict I believe the chances of a large scale armed conflict is low at this point specially in more of Europe (unless something major changes, like I said above). However, it will remain in Ukraine and Russia may start advancing more to completely cut Ukraine off from the sea. Worst case scenario is for Russia to go through Belarus to take the tiny part of Lithuania that links it to the part of Russia (ie. Kaliningrad) that is separated from mainland to gain better and direct access to Baltic sea.

But it will continue happening in different forms effects of which we will see in food, energy and economy.

The problem is United States and what the regime sees as a "threat". Basically if you are familiar with USA and read their national security documents like the NSS I mentioned above, they see any country that is growing in any way as a threat. That's absurd, isn't it? But that's US!
For example they see China as a threat only because the Chinese economy has been growing and getting stronger lol.

This is why United States sees 3 major threats, ie. 3 growing countries as it is also outlined in NSS: Russia, China and Iran.
Now the issue is that US military can not face any of them since it is nowhere near strong enough. So instead their strategy is the Nixon Doctrine which is basically to create proxies to fight their so called "threats".
These proxies are commonly known as the 3 NATOs:
- The regular NATO we all know as the one including Europe to counter Russia.
- The Arabic NATO that consists of Arabic countries in West Asia and small to medium militia and terrorist groups to counter Iran
- The Asian NATO that consists of Taiwan, Japan, Australia and a couple of other Asian countries to counter China

This has been the state of "word war 3" for many years now. Sometimes it escalates like Russia invading one of these proxies or China threatening to invade Taiwan or Iran bombing the shit out of US bases across West Asia. Sometimes it subsides by US escaping Afghanistan and Arab countries getting out of military contracts with US and replace it with Iran, US admitting Taiwan is part of China and they won't arm it, stuff like that.
So depending on how things go, the effects on different regions like EU can be vastly different. For example if the war they're predicting with Lebanon (that will affect Iran) actually happens as predicted, it will grow quickly and become extremely violent across West Asia (ie. in at least a dozen countries) which will affect the oil price which will then severely affect Europe and the world economy. This can even lead to more Russian advances in Europe (as I said Russia is already eyeing Lithuania and even Latvia) so things could escalate more in that front specially because US will be caught in a severe crossfire that sucks all its resources leaving nothing to be sent to Ukraine anymore.

[PytagoraZ]

Food issues over the past year have been present in every single country around the world, the type and degree of the issues are different per country bug generally so far it has been small enough for the governments to manage it. For example in EU we had the fertilizer crisis followed by decreased output followed by higher food prices and in some cases small shortages like the cooking oil shortage over a year ago in Europe.

Our country is prohibited from exporting CPO to Europe, even though our country is the biggest CPO exporter in the world. In addition, Europe also banned the export of coffee, cocoa and soybeans. I don't know why the EU is doing this, even though they are in a food crisis.

Things are changing a lot and sometimes very fast so we can't make long term predictions but unless something major changes I don't think we are about to see any major food shortage in Europe. Specially since every country has found a way to handle the crisis to some extent for example IIRC it was UK that started changing its import policies to handle the shortage by no longer enforcing certain "standards" for stuff they import like the pesticides used in those products; so that they can avert the crisis in short term despite the health health problems it'll cause in long run.

It seems that the UK was quite responsive to the food crisis in Europe, and after the UK left the EU it was easier for them to make global trade decisions.

They recently sent more troops to the region too which many are predicting an upcoming war. I summarized it in the last part of this comment and this with the effects it can have on energy prices.

Is America on the verge of invading Syria? looks like i missed the news. I'm going to study first and I can't comment on this

The problem is United States and what the regime sees as a "threat". Basically if you are familiar with USA and read their national security documents like the NSS I mentioned above, they see any country that is growing in any way as a threat. That's absurd, isn't it? But that's US!
For example they see China as a threat only because the Chinese economy has been growing and getting stronger lol.

I have never read American security documents, to be honest I have poor English skills so knowledge of reading English literacy is not good. But can you give me the links for these documents?

This is why United States sees 3 major threats, ie. 3 growing countries as it is also outlined in NSS: Russia, China and Iran.
Now the issue is that US military can not face any of them since it is nowhere near strong enough. So instead their strategy is the Nixon Doctrine which is basically to create proxies to fight their so called "threats".
These proxies are commonly known as the 3 NATOs:
- The regular NATO we all know as the one including Europe to counter Russia.
- The Arabic NATO that consists of Arabic countries in West Asia and small to medium militia and terrorist groups to counter Iran
- The Asian NATO that consists of Taiwan, Japan, Australia and a couple of other Asian countries to counter China

Nice analysis. I agree with you on this. You managed to make it look simple. But do you think America is capable of handling so many wars? We have seen the history of Germany, where in the past Germany had good military strength and almost won the second world war if Germany was not arrogant. Germany was too ambitious with the Dunkrick tragedy and the Barbosa operation being carried out simultaneously. But America has an accurate strategy because those 3 wars used NATO power, America always has a way not to be directly involved in the war, even though everyone knows that America is behind it.

[pooya87]

Is America on the verge of invading Syria? looks like i missed the news. I'm going to study first and I can't comment on this

USA invaded Syria about a decade ago to support ISIS and has been illegally occupying the country ever since, specifically the oil rich regions to steal the oil every day.

I have never read American security documents, to be honest I have poor English skills so knowledge of reading English literacy is not good. But can you give me the links for these documents?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
It contains some US propaganda alongside parts of the overall plans that are not classified.

But do you think America is capable of handling so many wars?

Not at all, the entire NATO hasn't even been able to handle the one war they started. Based on the official stats and the news in mainstream media weapon storages are mostly empty. Specially the "strategic weapons" like guided missiles. Worst of all is that the production has not been able to keep up with the consumption speed to even refill a small portion of what was used already.

Here is a better question: what is the alternative for US?
Nothing! The only remaining path in front of US regime is either to start wars to weaken everyone else or accept no longer being the solo world power.
For example if US doesn't start a war with China where China fights Taiwan and exhausts itself there, China will continue growing bigger and bigger and will easily replace US and specifically the dollar which will be the end of USA as a hegemony.
This is also why these days US is acting more and more like a dictatorship domestically too. Like the case with BlackRock where US government as a "democracy" with "liberal economy" is dictating where the investors can and cannot go. If BlackRock alone leaves US for China, that is $13 trillion leaving US economy in a blinking of an eye. And BlackRock is not alone...

[PytagoraZ]

Not at all, the entire NATO hasn't even been able to handle the one war they started. Based on the official stats and the news in mainstream media weapon storages are mostly empty. Specially the "strategic weapons" like guided missiles. Worst of all is that the production has not been able to keep up with the consumption speed to even refill a small portion of what was used already.

But in my opinion, even though America hasn't won anything, America and NATO are still considered a great power and capable of intimidating other countries. America's strong military power and the large number of nuclear weapons it possesses is enough to frighten small and developing countries and will keep American interests running smoothly. Although such threats do not work for China and Russia.

The only remaining path in front of US regime is either to start wars to weaken everyone else or accept no longer being the solo world power.

If the choice is like that, I'm sure America will prefer to go to war and will not be willing if the dollar is no longer the world's currency. If the dollar ceases to be the world's currency, at least the countries that disagree with it will have to seize dominance of the dollar through war.

If BlackRock alone leaves US for China, that is $13 trillion leaving US economy in a blinking of an eye. And BlackRock is not alone...

I never thought this far. But according to the global conspiracy, America is overshadowed by a greater power, they are the owners of capital (maybe there is blackrock in it). Maybe if America doesn't support them anymore and doesn't have good power, the global capitalist elite will leave America and move to China, because China has good power. But I'm not sure because China adheres to the ideology of communism and is against the interests of global elites.

What about the illuminati? do you have analysis up to them?

[DrBeer]

If you study history, you will discover an amazing fact. All world wars have been started by outcast countries or countries with a grudge against the whole world.

Theoretically it is possible to imagine a picture of the USA in such a status, but it is from the realm of fiction, and not even scientific.
Now, for more than a year, ALL the world is threatened with nuclear war by the new world "offended", loser and pariah - Russia. Or can you give an example where the USA, NATO countries, EU countries, China or India threatened the world and many neighbors with a nuclear strike? The only place where you can find such references is again in the corrupt Kremlin media, but they make up "news", "statements" - putting their fantasies in the mouths of other people and passing it off as "truth". Therefore, the only author of a new world war can only be Russia.

PS Yes, there is also Iran with its manic craving for nuclear weapons, and the clown from North Korea - but it will not be difficult to "buy" the world community.

When talking about Iran and Iraq, America accuses them of having nuclear weapons so it is necessary to carry out an invasion of these Middle Eastern countries, but is Iraq proven to have nuclear weapons? it turns out that after sadam husein was hanged, there are no nuclear weapons in iraq, just bullshit taking over oil refineries, yes, iraq has huge oil reserves. So, it's an economic problem with the scapegoat of nuclear weapons

Let's talk about having nuclear weapons, America has the most nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers, followed by Russia. On the one hand, America and Russia are opposites. Both are competing for interests, hegemony, and influence. Neither America nor Russia dared to attack each other, the victim was Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to have a border between NATO countries and Russia, NATO wants Ukraine to be closer to Russia and to make Ukraine a NATO base so that it can easily spy on Russia.

Currently, there are two major ideologies seeking influence and hegemony. America with EU/NATO countries with democratic ideology, Russia with China and North Korea with communism ideology. I'm sure that sooner or later America and Russia will go to war, and what I'm afraid of is the location of their war not in Russia and America but in the EU, just like the 2nd world war, and it must be bad for the EU

Unfortunately, I have to say that the arguments you cited do not correspond to reality.
1. The US invaded Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of the presence of weapons of mass destruction in the country and the threat to global security from the regime of Saddam Hussein. The issue was not nuclear weapons, but chemical and other weapons with which Iraq was going to "bring Iranian peace" to the nearest countries. there have already been attempts - Kuwait, Iran.....

2. The attack on Ukraine has absolutely unrelated reasons to Ukraine's membership in NATO. This is a fact. The first OFFICIAL document about plans to eventually become a NATO member appeared only at the end of 2018, which you can easily check. Russia's terrorist attack on Ukraine started in 2014, under the completely idiotic pretext of "protecting the Russian-speaking population".  When Ukrainians overthrew pro-Kremlin President Yanukovych, who broke his election promises and built an aligarchy of his cronies. For Russia, this was an unacceptable example that could shake Putin's monopoly on power in Russia. You can easily check this too, and easily see for yourself.... As a Russian-speaking citizen of Ukraine, I can confidently say - there were and are NO claims and pressure on Russian-speakers in Ukraine.. 40% of the AFU are ethnic Russians and Russian speakers. Kiev, my hometown, was 70% Russian-speaking until 2014. Since 2014, the majority of the population started to switch to Ukrainian on their own as a protest against the idea of "protecting Russian-speaking residents of Ukraine". I recommend you to read about 300 years of persecution and destruction of Ukrainian culture, language, history by Muscovy - it is a real fact.