Who should quit, and why?

[HelliumZ]

Hey house someone need a few clips here, don't know if a post of this exact nature has been discussed though.

In a situation where the both spouse are gamblers. Husband gambles, wife gambles, how can both of them manage the situation in terms of finance and the family affairs especially when children are now involve so that the time both spends on gambling doesn't affect family moments and affairs in general.

Would it help if  one of the couple quit for the other and if that's the case who should quit for who.

It is normal that both husband and wife of a family can be gamblers together but if there are children in that family, it becomes unusual for parents to participate in gambling as guardians. So an ideal guardian should exempt either parent from gambling. Especially the mother is more close to the child so an ideal mother will sometimes ruin the child's future, the mother should first refrain from gambling, then the father will control himself from gambling after understanding the situation. But if that family is dependent on gambling and runs the family from the money earned from gambling then parents should not participate in gambling in front of the child for the time being.

[dezoel]

Naturally , man is the Head of the Family And should Find a means To provide for his Family , And If gambling will make him To Care for his Family the Woman should quit And also Respect the man as the Head . Imagine the shame when you enter casino house And see husband and Wife dragging To bet, ordinarily it is an insult To the man for not caring for his Family And allowing his Wife To gamble . It is also a disgrace To the man therefore the Woman should quit gambling .

Sometimes what he says may or may not be applicable, as a man yes, it is the natural stupidity of responding to all things, I have always said something if we seek the best for our family, there are things that we must stop doing and start doing Other times, we as men and heads of family, if we see that an activity will tempt towards the well-being of our family, we have to suspend it, leave it there, nothing can be done, it is something that has to be done, of course. The rest will be worse if not It does, I can say it from my point of view because that's who I am, but people who don't have that decision-making power, well, everything starts to get complicated, regardless. whether he has a wife who is also in the game and not. If you want to leave, you must leave.

A responsible person will always have their priorities sorted, and since we know how important the family is to us, we need to make sure we are keeping them on the first position when we are making a decision, so our decision should have no direct negative effects for our family which means that if we are about to do something, we should make sure that doing that thing wouldn't harm our family or as you said, their well-being, and if it does, we shouldn't do it.

If a gambler knows that they are getting out of control and losing a lot of money and time in gambling, and that in return is hurting their family and his relationship with them, that is the moment they should decide who is more important because they are going to have to lose one of them and you can't lose your family for anything, gambling is nothing more than an activity.

[Su-asa]

Hey house someone need a few clips here, don't know if a post of this exact nature has been discussed though.

In a situation where the both spouse are gamblers. Husband gambles, wife gambles, how can both of them manage the situation in terms of finance and the family affairs especially when children are now involve so that the time both spends on gambling doesn't affect family moments and affairs in general.

Would it help if  one of the couple quit for the other and if that's the case who should quit for who.

It is normal that both husband and wife of a family can be gamblers together but if there are children in that family, it becomes unusual for parents to participate in gambling as guardians. So an ideal guardian should exempt either parent from gambling. Especially the mother is more close to the child so an ideal mother will sometimes ruin the child's future, the mother should first refrain from gambling, then the father will control himself from gambling after understanding the situation. But if that family is dependent on gambling and runs the family from the money earned from gambling then parents should not participate in gambling in front of the child for the time being.

It's very bad for both husband's and wife's to gamble even when they don't have children, gamble might be a thing of fun to them but don't I think we should all get it right that gamble is a thing one should enjoy, so if a whole family especially husband and wife, they might have problems with their gambling habits. If they gamble and their children is also aware that they gamble it will be very bad for the children because the children will try gambe some day and the children will be worst than their parents, some people are into gamble today because their friends or someone from their family made them to.

[harapan]

Hey house someone need a few clips here, don't know if a post of this exact nature has been discussed though.

In a situation where the both spouse are gamblers. Husband gambles, wife gambles, how can both of them manage the situation in terms of finance and the family affairs especially when children are now involve so that the time both spends on gambling doesn't affect family moments and affairs in general.

Would it help if  one of the couple quit for the other and if that's the case who should quit for who.

  I think it seems like it was just discussed here in the gambling section, like you are talking about here. It is difficult to have both parents addicted to gambling. And it is impossible that their children do not see that. Except that it depends on the age of their child, who has a broad mind about gambling.

  Even if one of them quits, it will be difficult for him to do that 100%, and of course he still sees that his wife will gamble. Maybe it would be better if they both stopped gambling; that would be better so they wouldn't be tempted to gamble.

Mmmm  for me I think the wife should stop gambling because she has a lot task to handle as being focused in moulding the kids, mostly the Man don't have much time to stay at home doing such except when he wants to help out but finding both of them doing same thing isn't going to help the kids grow at balance cause they might grow up doing same thing they have watched their parents do.

The wife should stop,I don't see it as bad for a woman to gamble but in a responsible manner but mind you two wrongs can't make a right,one must advice the other,so it's better either of them stops tho.
But again why will both parents be gambling at the same time,are they going through financial crisis that they feel Gambling will sort it out or what.

[Hirose UK]

Naturally , man is the Head of the Family And should Find a means To provide for his Family , And If gambling will make him To Care for his Family the Woman should quit And also Respect the man as the Head . Imagine the shame when you enter casino house And see husband and Wife dragging To bet, ordinarily it is an insult To the man for not caring for his Family And allowing his Wife To gamble . It is also a disgrace To the man therefore the Woman should quit gambling .

Sometimes what he says may or may not be applicable, as a man yes, it is the natural stupidity of responding to all things, I have always said something if we seek the best for our family, there are things that we must stop doing and start doing Other times, we as men and heads of family, if we see that an activity will tempt towards the well-being of our family, we have to suspend it, leave it there, nothing can be done, it is something that has to be done, of course. The rest will be worse if not It does, I can say it from my point of view because that's who I am, but people who don't have that decision-making power, well, everything starts to get complicated, regardless. whether he has a wife who is also in the game and not. If you want to leave, you must leave.

But if both of them are involved in gambling then it will be much more difficult because man who can be said to be the head of the family must really set good example for his family.
For example, if man wants his wife to leave gambling, the husband must also be able to leave gambling as form of commitment that together they will build much better family in the future.
If it is only done by putting pressure on one party, as in the term, the husband really pressures his wife to stop but he as the husband doesn't stop, then everything will be the same and this will be waste of time.
So the conclusion is that if think about it logically and really prioritize justice then they should both be able to start and stop at the same time, this is much better and will be very effective.

[Jody.Drummer]

Hey house someone need a few clips here, don't know if a post of this exact nature has been discussed though.

In a situation where the both spouse are gamblers. Husband gambles, wife gambles, how can both of them manage the situation in terms of finance and the family affairs especially when children are now involve so that the time both spends on gambling doesn't affect family moments and affairs in general.

Would it help if  one of the couple quit for the other and if that's the case who should quit for who.

It is normal that both husband and wife of a family can be gamblers together but if there are children in that family, it becomes unusual for parents to participate in gambling as guardians. So an ideal guardian should exempt either parent from gambling. Especially the mother is more close to the child so an ideal mother will sometimes ruin the child's future, the mother should first refrain from gambling, then the father will control himself from gambling after understanding the situation. But if that family is dependent on gambling and runs the family from the money earned from gambling then parents should not participate in gambling in front of the child for the time being.

It's very bad for both husband's and wife's to gamble even when they don't have children, gamble might be a thing of fun to them but don't I think we should all get it right that gamble is a thing one should enjoy, so if a whole family especially husband and wife, they might have problems with their gambling habits. If they gamble and their children is also aware that they gamble it will be very bad for the children because the children will try gambe some day and the children will be worst than their parents, some people are into gamble today because their friends or someone from their family made them to.

Right, anyway it's best that both of them don't get involved or stop being involved in gambling, we don't need to look at who should stop between the wife or the husband and it doesn't matter even if you don't have children yet the best option is to stop gambling completely, on the other hand I understand that maybe it's a difficult decision to follow but anyway it's the best. I think it's a fact that there's going to be some money spent on gambling and obviously if they both quit gambling then they can save more money and use it for other more important needs. And on the other hand you also mentioned about the possibility that when they have a child there is a possibility that the child will be infected with the gambling habits of the parents, and that could threaten the future and personality of the child, and honestly I can't imagine what the situation would be if the whole family was involved in gambling, losing the financial balance in the family is a certainty.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If a gambler knows that they are getting out of control and losing a lot of money and time in gambling, and that in return is hurting their family and his relationship with them, that is the moment they should decide who is more important because they are going to have to lose one of them and you can't lose your family for anything, gambling is nothing more than an activity.

That is true, if a person does not decide what his top priority is, then it is a matter of that eprosna, because many of us without hesitation choose the benefit of the family, it is or is something that we are clear about, but there are people who are not Thus, there are people who sometimes prefer other things over their family, I will always choose my family, but sometimes there are people who do not give them the corresponding importance and that is very sad, the truth is that they are people I do not know, That's just what they want, that's why I'm very clear about it, for me that's the first thing, and then other enjoyments come, as long as things can happen that way.