Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 02:51:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What is a "paynym"?  (Read 444 times)
Kruw
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 95

assumevalid=0 and mempoolfullrbf=1


View Profile WWW
October 15, 2023, 03:09:54 PM
Last edit: October 15, 2023, 05:56:25 PM by Kruw
 #21

I like the idea behind PayNyms but for some reason they never got very popular with Bitcoin community.

BIP47 Paynyms aren't popular because of the notification transactions/trusted third parties involved, undermining the attempt to accept donations privately.  Silent Payments (BIP352) is the proper standard for stealth addresses that doesn't have these downsides: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1458


Does anyone know which wallets have Silent Payments/BIP-352 already implemented in their UI, or which wallets have it in development?

I believe it could be such a useful tool for groups of people that require more privacy and anonymity just like the Truckers' Protest, to avoid govenment sanctions. Bitcoin would have been the best use case for what they needed because the banks/donations sites disallowed them service.

Although some people considered it a failure, it would have been a success if Silent Payments + layering that with Lightning, and CoinJoin were used?

 🤔

Silent Payments support is being developed for Bitcoin Core, it's on the wishlist: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28599

Here is the tracking issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28536

And as you can expect, that made Samourai extremely pissed since people will actually gain full privacy from their stealth addresses with BIP352 Silent Payments instead of having users' donation info stored and tracked by their BIP47 Paynym server: https://twitter.com/SamouraiWallet/status/1666404283208572933


You can use Bitcoin privately without giving up custody: https://mempool.space/tx/d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2
^ Participate in coinjoin transactions like this with Wasabi Wallet ^
Nostr: npub1pww7030g95nv9ptfpgfu69jpfxj6pm33xxueztsupwekce45wx4sm6en60
1714488667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714488667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714488667
Reply with quote  #2

1714488667
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714488667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714488667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714488667
Reply with quote  #2

1714488667
Report to moderator
1714488667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714488667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714488667
Reply with quote  #2

1714488667
Report to moderator
Wind_FURY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823



View Profile
October 16, 2023, 08:13:18 AM
 #22

I like the idea behind PayNyms but for some reason they never got very popular with Bitcoin community.

BIP47 Paynyms aren't popular because of the notification transactions/trusted third parties involved, undermining the attempt to accept donations privately.  Silent Payments (BIP352) is the proper standard for stealth addresses that doesn't have these downsides: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1458


Does anyone know which wallets have Silent Payments/BIP-352 already implemented in their UI, or which wallets have it in development?

I believe it could be such a useful tool for groups of people that require more privacy and anonymity just like the Truckers' Protest, to avoid govenment sanctions. Bitcoin would have been the best use case for what they needed because the banks/donations sites disallowed them service.

Although some people considered it a failure, it would have been a success if Silent Payments + layering that with Lightning, and CoinJoin were used?

 🤔

Silent Payments support is being developed for Bitcoin Core, it's on the wishlist: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28599

Here is the tracking issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28536

And as you can expect, that made Samourai extremely pissed since people will actually gain full privacy from their stealth addresses with BIP352 Silent Payments instead of having users' donation info stored and tracked by their BIP47 Paynym server: https://twitter.com/SamouraiWallet/status/1666404283208572933


Hopefully the Core Developers hurry it up and have it merged as soon as possible.

I have a hypothetical question for you. If BIP-352/Silent Payments was implemented, and the Trucker's Protest used it to receive donations, then decided to send those outputs to Wasabi CoinJoin for further anonymity, would the blockchain analysis companies working with Wasabi have the ability to detect them, or would BIP-352 actually be good enough to protect users' privacy?

██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
.SHUFFLE.COM..███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
.
...Next Generation Crypto Casino...
Kruw
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 95

assumevalid=0 and mempoolfullrbf=1


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2023, 12:41:21 PM
 #23

Hopefully the Core Developers hurry it up and have it merged as soon as possible.

I have a hypothetical question for you. If BIP-352/Silent Payments was implemented, and the Trucker's Protest used it to receive donations, then decided to send those outputs to Wasabi CoinJoin for further anonymity, would the blockchain analysis companies working with Wasabi have the ability to detect them, or would BIP-352 actually be good enough to protect users' privacy?

If a a blockchain analysis company was previously targeting a static donation address, a BIP352 silent payment address would stop them from being able to determine which coinjoin inputs were donations. This does not guarantee donations are not sourced from already blacklisted entities.

You can use Bitcoin privately without giving up custody: https://mempool.space/tx/d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2
^ Participate in coinjoin transactions like this with Wasabi Wallet ^
Nostr: npub1pww7030g95nv9ptfpgfu69jpfxj6pm33xxueztsupwekce45wx4sm6en60
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 18509


View Profile
October 16, 2023, 03:31:28 PM
 #24

Does anyone know which wallets have Silent Payments/BIP-352 already implemented in their UI
There are none.

I believe it could be such a useful tool for groups of people that require more privacy and anonymity just like the Truckers' Protest, to avoid govenment sanctions.
Absolutely. But BIP47 or hosting a payment server that generated a new address for each deposit would have achieved the same result.

If BIP-352/Silent Payments was implemented, and the Trucker's Protest used it to receive donations, then decided to send those outputs to Wasabi CoinJoin for further anonymity, would the blockchain analysis companies working with Wasabi have the ability to detect them, or would BIP-352 actually be good enough to protect users' privacy?
No one knows. Wasabi will block whatever their government buddies tell them to block, and they won't give any reason for doing so. No point in risking it when you can just use JoinMarket or Whirlpool instead.
NotATether (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 6715


bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2023, 11:57:06 AM
Merited by o_e_l_e_o (4)
 #25

OK guys, I know silent payments and BIP352 are nice and all, but this question (and also the one asked a few days ago) have already been answered, so I'm locking this thread before it turns into another Wasabi and Samourai battleground. You can start another topic to continue the discussion if you guys want to. Thanks!

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!