Know who ignores who

[uchegod-21]

Trust list is made public as you can know who trusts you and who distrusts you. We can agree that there are so much drama in the trust system which is why I have not started using it yet.
If ignore list is made public, there would be a bigger drama as everyone will end up being in one another's ignore lost.

Lately I've been wondering if we can find out who ignored us.
Is there any way to find out who ignored us? 

As hilariousandco said, anyone who ignored you will let you know at any slight opportunity given.

[Mpamaegbu]

I don't think I care to know who ignores me, it's their decision and so be it. For anyone to ignore me he might have a personal reason and I don't care asking why except maybe it affects me negatively somehow.

...But I think it's useful as a way to avoid certain users you feel the need to.

That's just me too! People should feel free to use the ignore button where they believe it can make them avoid altercations. It's better to ignore trolls or vexatious users than perpetually have to read their posts. This is why I'm of the opinion that no user should care about who ignores them or doesn't. Don't even bother to find out why they ignored you in the first place (if you ever find out) act like you don't know. That's the way I like to put it. Whether I'm ignoring any user or they're ignoring me, that's the way I treat it – Indifference.

[LoyceV]

You can't beat a persistent troll, and responding to them only feeds them.

Yes... ignoring is the best solution. But that doesn't mean I stop reading what he writes.

Let me put it this way: I'm not on the internet to torture myself

[Mpamaegbu]

~snipped~

Yes... ignoring is the best solution. But that doesn't mean I stop reading what he writes.

I find that ambivalence amusing. How do you still want to read from someone you've ignored? That means they're a good read and you can't resist them 🤷

[joker_josue]

You can't beat a persistent troll, and responding to them only feeds them.

Yes... ignoring is the best solution. But that doesn't mean I stop reading what he writes.

Let me put it this way: I'm not on the internet to torture myself

I totally agree!

I rarely get offended offline, so it's hard to get offended online. Hence, I always take things very lightly. 

[LoyceV]

I find that ambivalence amusing. How do you get to or still want to read from someone you've ignored? That means they're a good read and you can't resist them 🤷

Please fix your quote.

One of the reasons I sometimes check posts from ignored users, is to know everything that's already been said in the topic. And in rare occasions, I might even unignore them.

[Mpamaegbu]

I find that ambivalence amusing. How do you get to or still want to read from someone you've ignored? That means they're a good read and you can't resist them 🤷

Please fix your quote.

Thanks. I think it's ok now.

[Lida93]

~

Yes... ignoring is the best solution. But that doesn't mean I stop reading what he writes.

I find that ambivalence amusing. How do you still want to read from someone you've ignored? That means they're a good read and you can't resist them 🤷

Or, just maybe he doesn't know why he had to click the ignore option in the first place and that tickles him at times whenever he comes across the very user, LoL. Like a necessary evil he just can't do away with. Ignoring the container but can't resist the content. 

[Mpamaegbu]

Try again, I'm not the one who said that.

Oh, my bad! 🙆‍♀️. Spotted now. I already feel a bit dizzy from the discombobulation. Fixed now. Thanks.

[Shamm]

I don't think I care to know who ignores me, it's their decision and so be it. For anyone to ignore me he might have a personal reason and I don't care asking why except maybe it affects me negatively somehow.

...But I think it's useful as a way to avoid certain users you feel the need to.

That's just me too! People should feel free to use the ignore button where they believe it can make them avoid altercations. It's better to ignore trolls or vexatious users than perpetually have to read their posts. This is why I'm of the opinion that no user should care about who ignores them or doesn't. Don't even bother to find out why they ignored you in the first place (if you ever find out) act like you don't know. That's the way I like to put it. Whether I'm ignoring any user or they're ignoring me, that's the way I treat it – Indifference.

Everyone of us have a the ability to ignore someone if we don't like the other people, but is someone will ignore you the it's up to them just focus on your goal and don't stop what you are doing if it's is good. Then those people will ignore you someday they will realize that the people they ignored are those people will go further and further, which means they gave much better life.

[348Judah]

I don't think I care to know who ignores me, it's their decision and so be it. For anyone to ignore me he might have a personal reason and I don't care asking why except maybe it affects me negatively somehow.

...But I think it's useful as a way to avoid certain users you feel the need to.

That's just me too! People should feel free to use the ignore button where they believe it can make them avoid altercations. It's better to ignore trolls or vexatious users than perpetually have to read their posts. This is why I'm of the opinion that no user should care about who ignores them or doesn't. Don't even bother to find out why they ignored you in the first place (if you ever find out) act like you don't know. That's the way I like to put it. Whether I'm ignoring any user or they're ignoring me, that's the way I treat it – Indifference.

Everyone of us have a the ability to ignore someone if we don't like the other people, but is someone will ignore you the it's up to them just focus on your goal and don't stop what you are doing if it's is good. Then those people will ignore you someday they will realize that the people they ignored are those people will go further and further, which means they gave much better life.

If you ignore someone, you're doing so to ensure that you avoid seing anything that has to come from that user end, but now allowing him to see or know who ignored him will try to bring a kind of sentiment he may developed on that person because he will definitely developed a biased mind towards him, this will also keep the user always thinking of the possible offense he might have done to a particular person to have deserved being on his ignore list, i know some of us today will ever be happy if we turn out to see that one of the charming forum member that we secretly admires put us on his ignore list, that could actually make one get upset and revoke his take on same person as vise versa to his action for putting him on ignore, before you know it everyone will be having person disputs with each other as long as they are not their fan by putting them on ignore list.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

There is one way, although it is not 100% reliable. It happened to me several times that I wrote a post in a topic that gave a direct answer to the question, it also received merits, and then a member who is not a classic shitposter appears and writes a post that is 80% identical in terms of what I wrote. This is a more than good indicator that that member has you on ignore, because if by any chance he had read your post, he would not have repeated everything you said.

Also, if you are considered an average poster with somewhat high-quality content and you have never received an answer or merit from a certain member, there is also a high probability that you are on his ignore list.

Yeah, that's it. I quit agreeing that this pattern can work 50% of the time. There is a case when some users made  wrong comments and two different users quoting the same replies, which possibly makes me assume that the user has ignored the other user.
But for me, I don't think putting any user on ignore is a very cool thing to do. If the user whom you want to ignore is a shitposter, then the best thing to do is just report the comment, as you have contributed to keeping the community clear of shitposts. But if I don't want to do it that way, I can just skip the post and go to the next one.



Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

[lovesmayfamilis]

There is one way, although it is not 100% reliable. It happened to me several times that I wrote a post in a topic that gave a direct answer to the question, it also received merits, and then a member who is not a classic shitposter appears and writes a post that is 80% identical in terms of what I wrote. This is a more than good indicator that that member has you on ignore, because if by any chance he had read your post, he would not have repeated everything you said.

Also, if you are considered an average poster with somewhat high-quality content and you have never received an answer or merit from a certain member, there is also a high probability that you are on his ignore list.

Yeah, that's it. I quit agreeing that this pattern can work 50% of the time. There is a case when some users made  wrong comments and two different users quoting the same replies, which possibly makes me assume that the user has ignored the other user.
But for me, I don't think putting any user on ignore is a very cool thing to do. If the user whom you want to ignore is a shitposter, then the best thing to do is just report the comment, as you have contributed to keeping the community clear of shitposts. But if I don't want to do it that way, I can just skip the post and go to the next one.



Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

Funny situation. You just replied to a post written on January 18, 2023. Based on your logic, then all subsequent users who answered in this thread were simply ignored by you.
I understand that the need to meet the quota for a subscription company obliges discussion, but in this case, sheer hypocrisy.