campaign manager post counts behaviors; is this accepted?

[Husires]

When you post because you like to post and not because it is a job, it will not make any difference to you whether one or several posts are not counted. Consider what you post as a bonus to learn more.

If the manager does not pay for many of your posts without a convincing reason, contact him and ask him about the reason. Sometimes you may not read campaign rules like posting in in local boards, altcoin, Gambling or the campaign manager sees that most of his campaign members post in a particular board (Bitcoin Discussion,Economics) so he rejects them, regardless of their quality.

If this does not work, then he withdraws from the campaign and submits your objection here. IF MANY repeated, he may be given a negative trust that makes it difficult for him to run future campaigns.

[fortunecrypto]

Hello all,
I want to know from people's opinion about their reaction towards a signature post.
Like for instance, you join a campaign and you are required to post about 20 or 25, but due to some reasons you decided to add additional  post to about 28 or even 29 post out of 25 required post. At last during weekly update you notice about your 5 to 10 post were disqualified.

Even if its additional 20 posts if those posts are redundant and not within the topic then these posts will be deleted and the manager will not qualify those posts.

What would be your reactions?
Do you think other managers who doesn't disqualify post aren't knowledgeable enough or they are just being friendly or knowing that not all that are fluent with english.
I have joined lot of well known managers campaign but they hardly rejects post.

Don't compare managers they have different rules that they implement, as a participant, you should be the one to adapt to the rules and what is required of you by the managers, remember you apply here, and by applying you agreed to follow what managers laid out in the campaign.

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we call this
Being rude or not being friendly?

I assume that the manager doesn't want to embarrass the participant and just waits for the booted participant to just ask him the reason why he is booted out.

Note very clearly that I don't mention anyone but if you think this post is directly pointing at you then you have to be compassionate with your participants as we all are humans despite you are a manager doesn't mean you should toy with peoples time and efforts.

I don't think there are managers who act like that, you're having this feeling because in the first place you failed to communicate with that manager, so you will be enlightened, don't assume unless you confirmed it.

[_BlackStar]

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we called this
Being rude or not being friendly?

Note very clearly that I don't mention anyone but if you think this post  is directly pointing at you then you have to be compassionate with your participants as we all are humans despite you are a manager doesn't mean you should toy with peoples time and efforts.

Why don't PM your manager or ask him in campaign thread what kept him from counting some of your posts and the posts of other participants?

I think I know which manager you're talking about, but you may not feel comfortable mentioning his name in your thread. Is this true about Royse777 and its campaign management?

I checked the spreadsheet of the campaign you're promoting, and sure enough Royse777 didn't count many of its participants' posts because they didn't qualify ^{[Post Denied]} based on the manager's own interpretation. But if you've tried to comply with all term & conditions campaign, then it's a good idea to ask him why. But if you are unable to comply with the rules and whatever makes you unhappy, then leave the campaign and look for another campaign.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

but due to some reasons you decided to add additional  post to about 28 or even 29 post out of 25 required post.

Great! You should post because this is a forum, not because it's a job.

I agree with your assessment 100%.  There used to be a time when I'd regularly exceed the maximum number of posts allowed for whatever campaign I was in, and although I think I did mention that fact in the context of defending myself against the accusation of being a campaign spammer, I don't think I've ever cared if a manager rejected any of the posts I made.

Even in Chipmixer I usually have at least one or two posts each week that didn't make the cut for whatever reason, but I always assume the thread got moved to a section that Chipmixer doesn't pay for posts in.  In any case I know I'm fortunate so I don't complain about petty issues like that.

And I mean, come on.  There are so many signature campaign participants dropping the most generic, low-effort crap imaginable that it's a very good thing if the campaign manager is refusing to pay because of quality issues.  There are plenty of campaign and bounty managers who just don't give a shit and probably don't review anyone's post in detail, if at all.

[virasog]

Hello all,
I want to know from people's opinion about their reaction towards a signature post.
Like for instance, you join a campaign and you are required to post about 20 or 25, but due to some reasons you decided to add additional  post to about 28 or even 29 post out of 25 required post. At last during weekly update you notice about your 5 to 10 post were disqualified.
What would be your reactions?

First of all, you are doing a good job if you are posting more than the campaign minimum requirements. This means that you are not one of those who only post for campaign and stick to the minimum.  I did not see your posts but if they are as per the campaign requirements, then you may PM the manager and ask him the reason for the rejection of posts.

By the way, the managers are the better judge and in most cases, you (the participants) are doing some mistakes which you yourself do not know  

[indah rezqi]

I did not see your posts but if they are as per the campaign requirements, then you may PM the manager and ask him the reason for the rejection of posts.

If this thread was created just because the OP was talking about @Royse777, then OP shouldn't send me Telegram DM or forum PM. Manager has warned, but OP can discuss it in telegram group or campaign thread.

Anyone have any complain about post count, feel free to discuss on this thread or on telegram group. Please do not send me Telegram DM or forum PM about it.

Code:

mvdheuvel1983
Majestic-milf
Cryptomiles1
Erumo
Crypt0Gore

Please the comments left for you.

After all, OP could immediately notice the note on why @Royse777 didn't count some of his posts if the OP had checked the Spreadsheet.

Code:

Improve post quality please, way below standard

[Bobrox]

I don't know why this topic necessary to create due you are in @Royse777 Bounty Manager Campaign, every time when weekly signature campaign ended he said about any one or participant have complaint about their post not enough or not count fell free to discuss on signature campaign thread or you can ask him at Bounty Telegram Group.

Actually, @Royse777 has different rule with other campaign Bounty Manager, he not allowed make post on altcoin board, maximum 5 local post and have update time or UTC, each manager not has the same UTC rule and better you can ask to @Royse777 about why your post not qualify.

I think has ideas how to make it easy about count post or not check other participants and see abut all their post qualify, you can follow about their topic discussing.

Anyone have any complain about post count, feel free to discuss on this thread or on telegram group. Please do not send me Telegram DM or forum PM about it.

[CryptoPanda]

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we called this
Being rude or not being friendly?

Grow a thick skin. Can’t decide if you are genuinely offended by this or just taking advantage of the ongoing drama on this board.

Note very clearly that I don't mention anyone but if you think this post  is directly pointing at you then you have to be compassionate with your participants as we all are humans despite you are a manager doesn't mean you should toy with peoples time and efforts.

Lol I think we all have a good idea who you are referring to. Not the smartest thing to do btw. As someone who’s been promoting a signature campaign for the same manager as you for over eight weeks. I can boldly say Royse777 likes to maintain a certain level of quality for his campaigns and he demands the best of his participants. He gives feedback on spreedsheet so you know what area to improve. I don’t know why you thought it was a good idea to create a thread about this, you could have aired your feelings in the telegram group as instructed by Royse777

[lizarder]

Note very clearly that I don't mention anyone but if you think this post  is directly pointing at you then you have to be compassionate with your participants as we all are humans despite you are a manager doesn't mean you should toy with peoples time and efforts.

Lets discuss.

To make it easier, make it a habit to first read the rules made by the campaign manager, whether the conditions requested are in accordance with our posting habits. Sometimes the post you make does not meet one of the requirements requested or it could be because the quality of the post does not match the desired specifications. If after reading it and you think it doesn't make sense then leave the campaign, it's the only way you won't be kicked out of the campaign.

What has to be understood is that campaign managers never ask us to join their campaigns and instead it is us who consciously sign up for their campaigns. Sometimes it's too difficult for us to accept other people's decisions, but on the other hand we don't try to follow their rules.

[DarkStar_]

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we called this
Being rude or not being friendly?

You have the ability to communicate. If your campaign manager doesn't reach out to you first, or if you're unsure about why something happened, ask them - it'll be a much better use of your time than making threads complaining about it.

From a quick look at your post history, I don't think your campaign manager is being unreasonable in rejecting that number of posts. A lot of your posts are on spam megathreads with poor English, which results in very very little actual contribution.

[noormcs5]

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we called this
Being rude or not being friendly?

You have the ability to communicate. If your campaign manager doesn't reach out to you first, or if you're unsure about why something happened, ask them - it'll be a much better use of your time than making threads complaining about it.

From a quick look at your post history, I don't think your campaign manager is being unreasonable in rejecting that number of posts. A lot of your posts are on spam megathreads with poor English, which results in very very little actual contribution.

I would say he would have been lucky to be still in the campaign with somewhat low quality posts and yet complaining with the manager. How strange is that from the OP. If he does not like the judgement from the manager, he has always chance to move on to the other campaign.

Since he is still in the campaign, he should improve his post quality and also make 7-8 extra posts, in case few of his posts does not meet the expectation, he still have enough posts to be paid.

[Awaklara]

After all, OP could immediately notice the note on why @Royse777 didn't count some of his posts if the OP had checked the Spreadsheet.

Code:

Improve post quality please, way below standard

I'm sure the OP has also read the description the manager added to the spreadsheet. It seems that what the OP is concerned about is why the quality of the posts he makes is not satisfying the standards of the campaign manager. while based on the experience of the campaign that he had, the quality of the post he had was considered to have met the requirements.

OP just needs to get used to the habits of the manager. and indeed can not equate one manager with another manager. when the OP improves the post quality as expected by the manager, I'm sure all the problems are solved.

[GeorgeJohn]

In this case, posting making most at least have a 50% quality out of the aggregate of your weekly post quota. This issues remind me that some people doesn't make a quality post when they are in signature campaign and every manager have its ethics or rules and regulations that control it's campaign, so during calculation of quality or qualify Post that merits payment in that campaign some irrelevant post or Post's that lacks qualities can be nullify by the manager.

If a manager remove participants in a campaign without notification that means during the rules that bind that signature campaign before started to accept participants, it has being enshrined in the campaign rules, and removal of participants in campaign it's detriment of the campaign manager because what every managers needs is good promotion in any campaign they manage.

But it's unethical from my perception not to at least give one time warning before removal of someone from a campaign, because warning someone will help a participants for immediate correction, and the warning can take place through a pm or the spreadsheet and when it persist you can remove the participants without notification.

[Mpamaegbu]

I am curious to know why only 1 or 2 managers do rejected post and remove participants without any note or comments on their spreadsheet.
What do we called this
Being rude or not being friendly?

Let me give you my take on that straight away. I think managers like that are being unnecessarily strict. When one even goes through these managers own post history too one will discover that these managers aren't fantastic posters themselves. I've observed a few of them. When they run out of managing campaigns and apply in other people's campaigns some of them don't even make it in the selection due to poor posting habit. That one has an opportunity of managing campaigns doesn't mean they're excellent posters. However OP, you ought to have dialogued this with the said manager of your vexation rather than make it an open discussion. Secret rebuke would do a better job than this open confrontation. Going forward, the one I hate with a passion is when CMs deny users their weekly pay because they missed the maximum weekly post count with a whisker, sometimes with just a post or two out of the 25 or so max. That's pure wickedness. Why not penalize the user than deny them pay completely. This is why pay per post is better.

[Cryptomiles1]

Thank you very much for all your suggestions and contributions, anyway I have some of the managers responded here.
I am very happy seeing their feedback towards my complainant therefore, I have to lock this thread because I think seen many reason and suggestion leaving it open will results to more spam flooding in as reply.

I will buy the idea of increasing my post quality.

Thank you all.