Remove negative feedback

[DiMarxist]

Op the negative feedback you have is clearly stated on your trust status,

BEWARE: 1xbit is a gambling website that is selective scamming users that deposit funds, withdraw funds and/or win.

"MrBrightside1" is a newbie claiming 1xbit sent him 10 BTC winnings but failed to provide evidence therefore is treated as a sock-puppet used to spread propaganda to promote the 1xbit scammers.

Op provide your proof link here. 10 BTC oh my God. Op were you just joking or is it real?

[decodx]

calling other members an idiot, a moron along with other insults,

I've seen that many times when someone is out of arguments for their lies.

And I have seen a lot of people like you, who better shut the fuck up instead of opening their mouth. If you cant give a constructive answer then get out idiot.
I can't help it that you are.

He actually offered a constructive suggestion: "sign the address", but you chose to disregard it and belittle those whose opinions you disagree with. This raises questions about your credibility and character. Can you at least try to communicate like an adult?

False accusations are simply refuted with proper evidence. It's not that hard.

[dimonstration]

Hey MrB. Dimon here, You need to calm down. Trust system is not controlled by the admin or mod so no one can help you to remove it unless @Jollygood remove it or other DT will distrust his judgement. You can check the DT list on this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust

I don't know Jollygood personally but his red tag is just an assumption that you are faking the withdraw. Other user here is not your enemy but just helping because this is how things work here due to decentralized trust system.

To make it simple, Be nice and try to convince Jolly that you are not faking withdrawal with proof. Admin and mods can't touch trust system.

I can vouch that this guy is really a whale capable of withdrawing 10BTC at that time based on the personal video of his gambling activity and his bankroll volume on blackjack.fun.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I can vouch that this guy is really a whale capable of withdrawing 10BTC at that time based on the personal video of his gambling activity and his bankroll volume on blackjack.fun.

A whale winning a huge prize who cares about the red tag on the forum? As well as denying any connection to the site that paid him the money.
How many of us would resent such an "injustice" without any personal reason to rate 1xBit in any positive way? What does the OP care about his or her reputation on the forum?
OP, for you, all the idiots here are unworthy of your big attention. What are you doing here in this case? Why did you choose to descend from your majesty to us mere mortals? 

[ScamViruS]

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

Anyway, as members have suggested you verify whether you own this address or not. This will at least make us believe that the withdrawal was real.

[Apocollapse]

A whale winning a huge prize who cares about the red tag on the forum? As well as denying any connection to the site that paid him the money.
How many of us would resent such an "injustice" without any personal reason to rate 1xBit in any positive way? What does the OP care about his or her reputation on the forum?
OP, for you, all the idiots here are unworthy of your big attention. What are you doing here in this case? Why did you choose to descend from your majesty to us mere mortals? 

Well it's true the @OP can just create new account since his current account isn't really valuable. But he have no way to hide his identity if he want to get reputation in this forum through becoming high roller gambler because he need to show/post his casino's username account and anyone will link his alt with this one.

So that's maybe the case why he care with his reputation here.

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

That's what free speech in this forum mean, there's nothing wrong if you use bad words or insult anyone, if you think someone is deserved to get negative feedback because of bad behavior, why you're not giving negative feedback on his account? no need to surprised if you might out from DT network after done that.

[ScamViruS]

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

That's what free speech in this forum mean, there's nothing wrong if you use bad words or insult anyone, if you think someone is deserved to get negative feedback because of bad behavior, why you're not giving negative feedback on his account? no need to surprised if you might out from DT network after done that.

I didn't tag him because of what you're saying is free speech, but not everyone is the same. But everything has a limit, he crossed that limit long ago. He also insulted other members in this thread also. Free speech does not mean that any member will step out of line and insult others for no reason. If his claim is true then everything will be solved if he gives proper proof. Otherwise he may not be able to change this situation by arguing.

[MrBrightside1]

Op the negative feedback you have is clearly stated on your trust status,

BEWARE: 1xbit is a gambling website that is selective scamming users that deposit funds, withdraw funds and/or win.

"MrBrightside1" is a newbie claiming 1xbit sent him 10 BTC winnings but failed to provide evidence therefore is treated as a sock-puppet used to spread propaganda to promote the 1xbit scammers.

Op provide your proof link here. 10 BTC oh my God. Op were you just joking or is it real?

again someone who can't read, I did provide transaction details.

calling other members an idiot, a moron along with other insults,

I've seen that many times when someone is out of arguments for their lies.

And I have seen a lot of people like you, who better shut the fuck up instead of opening their mouth. If you cant give a constructive answer then get out idiot.
I can't help it that you are.

He actually offered a constructive suggestion: "sign the address", but you chose to disregard it and belittle those whose opinions you disagree with. This raises questions about your credibility and character. Can you at least try to communicate like an adult?

False accusations are simply refuted with proper evidence. It's not that hard.

Not providing proof that it is real (lathough read previous comments, I provided details), is also no proof that it ain't and all you idiots need to learn that, but have you got discord or have you even a site account of your signature campaign? I proof you that I am the all time biggest wager wager on your site moron.

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

Anyway, as members have suggested you verify whether you own this address or not. This will at least make us believe that the withdrawal was real.

Only against people who start making false accusations, learn to understand that no proof works both ways, you have no proof I am part of them, you don't have any proof that I ain't. Is that too hard to understand.
But I repeat you have confirmation bias. Has a mod ever heard about that? Or is it too difficult of a term to understand, which wouldn't surprise me.

So I EXPECT to have you banned scamvirus and jollygood, for making false accusations, good enough? How can I get an admin look at this? One with at least an IQ that is higher than 3 digits that is.

its ironic that a post where I thank someone for a constructive feedback is removed, while false accusations are alllowed? Well done bitcointalk lol.

[Little Mouse]

Posting multiple in a row isn't allowed by the forum rules. Quote everyone in a single post.

Regarding the issue here, from one point of view, I can say JollyGood seems reasonable but in general, OP is never liable to prove anything here. Why would OP reveal their private information publicly? This is something JollyGood can't ask of course. Posting OP's address publicly to prove he actually had this withdrawal? Lol.

I would recommend OP to reach JollyGood and instead of being harsh, be the gentleman and I'm pretty sure this issue can be solved easily without leaking any private information.

It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

That's not what Trust system is developed for. That would be a misuse of the trust system of course.

[ScamViruS]

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

Anyway, as members have suggested you verify whether you own this address or not. This will at least make us believe that the withdrawal was real.

So I EXPECT to have you banned scamvirus and jollygood, for making false accusations, good enough? How can I get an admin look at this? One with at least an IQ that is higher than 3 digits that is.

its ironic that a post where I thank someone for a constructive feedback is removed, while false accusations are alllowed? Well done bitcointalk lol.

Oh really! Where were the fake accusations? When someone posts after being cheated on 1xbit, if I support him and ask for more evidence, does it become fake accusations? You blindly support 1xbit, and anyone who has seen your activities will understand that. If you make your intentions clear, you won't treat others so badly. You have not been able to prove your claim so far, and you say we are making fake accusations!

[MrBrightside1]

OP If I am not mistaken, then you are the person who speaks bad language to that member whenever any member says something against 1xbit. And the proper reason for this tag to appear on your profile is bad language arguments. It's important to change your behavior at least to avoid getting more tags. After seeing your activities, I also thought to tag you.

Anyway, as members have suggested you verify whether you own this address or not. This will at least make us believe that the withdrawal was real.

So I EXPECT to have you banned scamvirus and jollygood, for making false accusations, good enough? How can I get an admin look at this? One with at least an IQ that is higher than 3 digits that is.

its ironic that a post where I thank someone for a constructive feedback is removed, while false accusations are alllowed? Well done bitcointalk lol.

Oh really! Where were the fake accusations? When someone posts after being cheated on 1xbit, if I support him and ask for more evidence, does it become fake accusations? You blindly support 1xbit, and anyone who has seen your activities will understand that. If you make your intentions clear, you won't treat others so badly. You have not been able to prove your claim so far, and you say we are making fake accusations!

You guys saying that I shill 1xbit? Aint that a false accusation? You have not been able to prove your claim so far, while I provided more proof than you ever can (with the transaction details). So there you go, thank you for pointing out your own stupidity.
I know it ain't real what you say, so that way I also know you can't prove anything. but its like Donquichote fighting against windmills.

[Rikafip]

I actually wonder, what is bitcointalk these days, some whiny ass bitches who can't read?

The only one whining here is you. Bitcointalk is not like other places where you can just claim something (like 1xbit sending you 10 BTC) without any repercussions. People around here are less naive and will call you out and ask to show some proof for your claim. And no, txid is not a valid proof.

@Cyrus get your ass over here and start doing your job (no idea even how tagging works at this forsaken place)

This bolded part is the problem here. You don't know how things work, yet you cry for admins to help you.

[MrBrightside1]

I actually wonder, what is bitcointalk these days, some whiny ass bitches who can't read?

The only one whining here is you. Bitcointalk is not like other places where you can just claim something (like 1xbit sending you 10 BTC) without any repercussions. People around here are less naive and will call you out and ask to show some proof for your claim. And no, txid is not a valid proof.

@Cyrus get your ass over here and start doing your job (no idea even how tagging works at this forsaken place)

This bolded part is the problem here. You don't know how things work, yet you cry for admins to help you.

Have you ever been to the 1xbit thread and see them whine? Enough rpoof that they are whiny bitches.
You also provided proof that you can't argue. There is no need for me to provide additional proof, I am not here solving the scam accusations by other people. I am here solving the fake accusation against me. I am not going to sign it, no reason to do so, but even if I did, those whiny ass bitches probably argue that I work for 1xbit and therefore I am able to sign it after all, so also proves nothing? Are you able to follow that reasoning?

And sorry if I have no idea how this archaic site works, but I am under the impression that allowing false accusations, because these members "feel so" should not be allowed. I mean I can also start making a bunch of false claims if you want, nothing wrong with that then? I only hope those won't get removed or won't get me banned, I mean it shouldn't if you would allow the false ones against me?

[Rikafip]

Have you ever been to the 1xbit thread and see them whine? Enough rpoof that they are whiny bitches.

I said that you are whining, not them. Or you maybe consider yourself part of 1xbit?

You also provided proof that you can't argue. There is no need for me to provide additional proof, I am not here solving the scam accusations by other people. I am here solving the fake accusation against me. I am not going to sign it, no reason to do so, but even if I did, those whiny ass bitches probably argue that I work for 1xbit and therefore I am able to sign it after all, so also proves nothing? Are you able to follow that reasoning?

That''s your assumption. Why don't you sign the message from that address (its like 2 minutes work) and prove your theory? I would if someone called me out for bullshitting while I had tools to prove him otherwise.

And sorry if I have no idea how this archaic site works, but I am under the impression that allowing false accusations, because these members "feel so" should not be allowed. I mean I can also start making a bunch of false claims if you want, nothing wrong with that then? I only hope those won't get removed or won't get me banned, I mean it shouldn't if you would allow the false ones against me?

Exactly. You can claim whatever you want and leave feedback to anyone and no mod will remove it or ban you (as long as you follow forum rules).

[MrBrightside1]

Have you ever been to the 1xbit thread and see them whine? Enough rpoof that they are whiny bitches.

I said that you are whining, not them. Or you maybe consider yourself part of 1xbit?

Well my intial claim was that they are, you reacted by saying I am, great discussing, proofs a lot. And yeah I am whining against injustice sorry, can't help that, I guess that is a crime? lol

You also provided proof that you can't argue. There is no need for me to provide additional proof, I am not here solving the scam accusations by other people. I am here solving the fake accusation against me. I am not going to sign it, no reason to do so, but even if I did, those whiny ass bitches probably argue that I work for 1xbit and therefore I am able to sign it after all, so also proves nothing? Are you able to follow that reasoning?

That''s your assumption. Why don't you sign the message from that address (its like 2 minutes work) and prove your theory? I would if someone called me out for bullshitting while I had tools to prove him otherwise.

No need to, not what this is about. It's not about me proving, it's about them proving! get your facts straight.

And sorry if I have no idea how this archaic site works, but I am under the impression that allowing false accusations, because these members "feel so" should not be allowed. I mean I can also start making a bunch of false claims if you want, nothing wrong with that then? I only hope those won't get removed or won't get me banned, I mean it shouldn't if you would allow the false ones against me?

Exactly. You can claim whatever you want and leave feedback to anyone and no mod will remove it or ban you (as long as you follow forum rules).

Lol, nice community have here, let's see how it works.

[examplens]

That''s your assumption. Why don't you sign the message from that address (its like 2 minutes work) and prove your theory? I would if someone called me out for bullshitting while I had tools to prove him otherwise.

it is interesting that he persistently avoids any discussion about address verification. It's somehow easier for him to open new threads and regularly respond to every post, but a simple two minutes for verification and the end of the drama are not on his to-do list.
I believe that sending a symbolic amount (the last four digits of his bitcointalk UID for example) to his own address would be sufficient confirmation that he really manages the disputed address.

I will consider him a troll because apart from senseless arguments and insults, I don't see his true desire to solve this.

[MrBrightside1]

That''s your assumption. Why don't you sign the message from that address (its like 2 minutes work) and prove your theory? I would if someone called me out for bullshitting while I had tools to prove him otherwise.

it is interesting that he persistently avoids any discussion about address verification. It's somehow easier for him to open new threads and regularly respond to every post, but a simple two minutes for verification and the end of the drama are not on his to-do list.
I believe that sending a symbolic amount (the last four digits of his bitcointalk UID for example) to his own address would be sufficient confirmation that he really manages the disputed address.

I will consider him a troll because apart from senseless arguments and insults, I don't see his true desire to solve this.

Why should I burn money for you guys? tell me that. Will you refund me the cost after? (I cant even see my userID here lol, please tell me where is it)
Nonetheless, it ain't about me needing to prove anything, it is about people making false accusations that they need to provide proof.
It disturbs me how all of you guys blame the victim (me).

[examplens]

Why should I burn money for you guys? tell me that. Will you refund me the cost after? (I cant even see my userID here lol, please tell me where is it)
Nonetheless, it ain't about me needing to prove anything, it is about people making false accusations that they need to provide proof.
It disturbs me how all of you guys blame the victim (me).

You don't need to burn anything. Send a specific amount to yourself.
This is the URL to your forum account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3363504 So, u=3363504 is your user ID and it can be accepted if you can send 3504 satoshis to your own address. so there is no harm to you.

[MrBrightside1]

Why should I burn money for you guys? tell me that. Will you refund me the cost after? (I cant even see my userID here lol, please tell me where is it)
Nonetheless, it ain't about me needing to prove anything, it is about people making false accusations that they need to provide proof.
It disturbs me how all of you guys blame the victim (me).

You don't need to burn anything. Send a specific amount to yourself.
This is the URL to your forum account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3363504 So, u=3363504 is your user ID and it can be accepted if you can send 3504 satoshis to your own address. so there is no harm to you.

You heard about gas fees? (might be that they do not apply, although for it to be confirmed on the chain it requires gas afaik)
But Ill give in.
Only need to know, this is the address right? bc1q8vyk2v9mremunlt0yjrj2pzmv40zlqjqmfrcwz
I mean the one that received 10 BTC, so then you are happy if I send 3504 sat to that?

[DaveF]

Why should I burn money for you guys? tell me that. Will you refund me the cost after? (I cant even see my userID here lol, please tell me where is it)
Nonetheless, it ain't about me needing to prove anything, it is about people making false accusations that they need to provide proof.
It disturbs me how all of you guys blame the victim (me).

You don't need to burn anything. Send a specific amount to yourself.
This is the URL to your forum account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3363504 So, u=3363504 is your user ID and it can be accepted if you can send 3504 satoshis to your own address. so there is no harm to you.

You heard about gas fees? (might be that they do not apply, although for it to be confirmed on the chain it requires gas afaik)
But Ill give in.
Only need to know, this is the address right? bc1q8vyk2v9mremunlt0yjrj2pzmv40zlqjqmfrcwz
I mean the one that received 10 BTC, so then you are happy if I send 3504 sat to that?

FROM that address, not TO that address. Anyone can send money to an address only the owner can send FROM it.
The mempool is fairly empty at the moment so it would cost you about $0.10 to send something to that address at 1sat / vb and another $0.10 to send it back out.

And it's called the fee not 'gas' gas is for Ethereum not BTC.

-Dave