Admins, ban jollygood and scamvirus

[DireWolfM14]

So, it's now okay to tag people for exaggerating on the internet?

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof. 

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

So, it's now okay to tag people for exaggerating on the internet?

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof. 

It's now okay to do anything on the internet. There are no rules, nothing can stop them. All you need is a plan, a good plan to put yourself in a safe place and role the rest. Unfortunately we always forget once we all had a start from somewhere and if the whole thing was on us the way it is now before even we had a start then we were too gone long ago.

You are close.. She must have the deepest space 😉

[John Abraham]

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof. 

You are close.. She must have the deepest space 😉

Well, I was here to read the posts, and I got the best entertainment for the day. You don't have to prove everything on the internet. But, If someone accuses you and shows some proof for his claims, You can prove them wrong if they are wrong.  . LOL. Direwolf, Who shares that information on the internet? I never knew Wolf's Penis could be bigger than an average human's.

[MrBrightside1]

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof. 

You are close.. She must have the deepest space 😉

Well, I was here to read the posts, and I got the best entertainment for the day. You don't have to prove everything on the internet. But, If someone accuses you and shows some proof for his claims, You can prove them wrong if they are wrong.  . LOL. Direwolf, Who shares that information on the internet? I never knew Wolf's Penis could be bigger than an average human's.

I agree, but in this case I got accused (jollygood made a nice negative feedback about it, being called a sock puppet, scamvirus saying the same that I am part of them, must be shilling whatever, without the negative feedback in his case) of something while there is no proof of me being part of their company or whatever (and I know that proof for that claim doesn't exist, because I am not part of them). And that is something that goes against my principles.

[Eternad]

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof.  

You are close.. She must have the deepest space 😉

Well, I was here to read the posts, and I got the best entertainment for the day. You don't have to prove everything on the internet. But, If someone accuses you and shows some proof for his claims, You can prove them wrong if they are wrong.   . LOL. Direwolf, Who shares that information on the internet? I never knew Wolf's Penis could be bigger than an average human's.

I agree, but in this case I got accused (jollygood made a nice negative feedback about it, being called a sock puppet, scamvirus saying the same that I am part of them, must be shilling whatever, without the negative feedback in his case) of something while there is no proof of me being part of their company or whatever (and I know that proof for that claim doesn't exist, because I am not part of them). And that is something that goes against my principles.

You are just making your problem worst by creating this kind of drama about your trust. Your red trust received from Jollygood is clearly not right because you don’t have any obligation to prove your claim. I believe he just assume that time that you are 1xbit shiller since there’s a lot of paid shiller that time doing some vouch about 1xbit that we all know as scam.

Right now, You already prove that you are a real whale since you play huge amount on other Casino here and you can have support by proving it. You can fixed it in easy way if you just talk to Jollygood properly without any vendetta feelings for the previous conflict between you 2.

No one here is a sock puppet. They are just trying to help but you can’t accept the suggestion and criticism they made.

[MrBrightside1]

Well, I have a 12-inch penis and no, you're not getting proof.  

You are close.. She must have the deepest space 😉

Well, I was here to read the posts, and I got the best entertainment for the day. You don't have to prove everything on the internet. But, If someone accuses you and shows some proof for his claims, You can prove them wrong if they are wrong.   . LOL. Direwolf, Who shares that information on the internet? I never knew Wolf's Penis could be bigger than an average human's.

I agree, but in this case I got accused (jollygood made a nice negative feedback about it, being called a sock puppet, scamvirus saying the same that I am part of them, must be shilling whatever, without the negative feedback in his case) of something while there is no proof of me being part of their company or whatever (and I know that proof for that claim doesn't exist, because I am not part of them). And that is something that goes against my principles.

You are just making your problem worst by creating this kind of drama about your trust. Your red trust received from Jollygood is clearly not right because you don’t have any obligation to prove your claim. I believe he just assume that time that you are 1xbit shiller since there’s a lot of paid shiller that time doing some vouch about 1xbit that we all know as scam.

Right now, You already prove that you are a real whale since you play huge amount on other Casino here and you can have support by proving it. You can fixed it in easy way if you just talk to Jollygood properly without any vendetta feelings for the previous conflict between you 2.

No one here is a sock puppet. They are just trying to help but you can’t accept the suggestion and criticism they made.

+100 (although they also can't accept the fact that they fall for a fallacy and have confirmation bias and in that way I care more for the general good, than my own reputation here/the drama, because it was because other people commented about it and I don't want to put them in a bad daylight)

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

+100

Lock the topic and move on. You don't have to take everything guaranteed on the internet.

[MrBrightside1]

+100

Lock the topic and move on. You don't have to take everything guaranteed on the internet.

aint that also a bit the easy way? I mean, there have to be people who fight for the right thing no? And one of those right things is pointing people out for their stupid remarks/accusations.

[Ludmilla_rose1995]

In regards of my other thread, which ain't completely the same (you can find all the info over there) these people make false accusations and therefore don't belong here or does bitcointalk approve of sending out fake news?

jollygood and scamvirus have done nothing wrong, then the chances both of them of being banned are very small, I am not sure if the claims you made in your thread are true but you have to be honest with what jollygood marks, you have to prove you are a good person if you want to get your reputation back.

[MrBrightside1]

In regards of my other thread, which ain't completely the same (you can find all the info over there) these people make false accusations and therefore don't belong here or does bitcointalk approve of sending out fake news?

jollygood and scamvirus have done nothing wrong, then the chances both of them of being banned are very small, I am not sure if the claims you made in your thread are true but you have to be honest with what jollygood marks, you have to prove you are a good person if you want to get your reputation back.

They made false accusations without proof, aint that something wrong? Clearly it ain't something wrong here (because that is the ideology of the forum), but man, the fact that you as a human being don't see this as wrong?

Overall I am not here to be your friend, I am here for justice. So that's why I am not mister nice guy, but I know I speak the truth.

[DireWolfM14]

jollygood and scamvirus have done nothing wrong

I don't mean to pick on JollyGood or scamvirus, but whether they have done something wrong or not is subjective.  Personally, if I came here and claimed I made a million dollars in tulip bulb futures, and one of them asked for proof I'd tell them to pound sand.  Who the hell are they to demand proof of any claim I make here?  And I certainly wouldn't expose an address to a bunch of busybodies where I received 10BTC.  

Was the claim damaging to anyone on this forum?  Did anyone with half a brain believe that the claim was anything but an exaggeration?  If the claim wasn't made in thread regarding 1xbit would have the OP been tagged?  Let's not forget that the OP made the outlandish claim in a post which was intended to complain about not receiving a withdrawal.  So instead of helping him resolve a potential scam we harass him for an exaggerated claim?

I also don't mean to defend the OP because this thread is nothing but a temper tantrum, and the OP is engaging in the same misuse of the trust system that he claims JollyGood and scamvirus are engaging in.

@MrBrightside1
Grow a thicker skin, read LoyceV's guide on how to use the trust system, and then exclude those who's use of the trust system you find objectionable.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Snipped

First of it all OP we dont have admins, we only have one which is Theymos, while concerning the ban, you're presenting it with a command tone which shouldn't be, you need yo present a clear evidence why they both needed to be banned, quite alright they tagged you but have you considered thousands of accounts or even millions on this forum that never experience any form of being tagged, i will advise you to rather consider your ways a d recheck yourself if you have been doing it the wrong way and expects a right result.

[MrBrightside1]

Snipped

First of it all OP we dont have admins, we only have one which is Theymos, while concerning the ban, you're presenting it with a command tone which shouldn't be, you need yo present a clear evidence why they both needed to be banned, quite alright they tagged you but have you considered thousands of accounts or even millions on this forum that never experience any form of being tagged, i will advise you to rather consider your ways a d recheck yourself if you have been doing it the wrong way and expects a right result.

Well, I personally would like to see making false accusations a bannable offence, I can't proof it (the could still be preparing their evidence for all I know), but neither can they proof the initial claim (so they should just refrain from accusing people until they have their evidence), it STARTS with them. However I realized in the meantime that ain't a possibility on this forum, although then I also see no reason for red flags etc, wrongly accusing people is really bad, same category as just scamming. Because of that strange ruling here it should be: give them as much negative trust for the idiots they are, in the hope that people actually understand the points I made. But even that is a big issue seeing how a lot of people don't see what is wrong with what they did. (but I guess that is an overall humanity problem)
I made more than enough the point that they can't just throw out accusations, but I can't help it if they (and a lot of other people) don't get that, so what else can I do? I also advice you to just look at what I did and what the conclusion of jollygood and scamvirus are, one not only tagging but also leaving negative feedback in the case of jollygood.

[The Cryptovator]

You must provide further details as to why you think their account should be banned from the forum. Leaving you feedback does not necessarily result in a ban, whether the feedback is accurate or not. If a person is subject to forum bans, you must read the guidelines. Instead, when making irrational claims on a forum, you should provide sufficient proof to support them. If you verbally say something that forum users find offensive, you would be tagged.

[MrBrightside1]

You must provide further details as to why you think their account should be banned from the forum. Leaving you feedback does not necessarily result in a ban, whether the feedback is accurate or not. If a person is subject to forum bans, you must read the guidelines. Instead, when making irrational claims on a forum, you should provide sufficient proof to support them. If you verbally say something that forum users find offensive, you would be tagged.

Thank you for the first part. of your Post, regarding the second half, you should have stayed away.
The details I provided: they make false accusations, there you go. The evidence I can provide is the lack of evidence for their accusation. So if they have no proof they should stfu, if they are working on it, feel free to announce here and we will all wait longer for them to provide it.
Seems it is not against the forum guidelines to ban people for false accusations, thank you for pointing that out, that I learned from some of your colleagues too. I also learned therefore this whole forum is a muppet show, seeing that false accusations are allowed, while still putting red flags on sites and users (not saying they don't deserve it, read my words carefully)?
So maybe see it as a suggestion, to improve the quality of this forum even if it is not in your guidelines? I said things that proved the point I was making and changed to an accurate one (regarding rikafip), but if I call someone an idiot for being an idiot, man then you all need to grow up and become smarter and accept the truth (but that is very difficult).

[Fivestar4everMVP]

If bitcointalk moderators just goes ahead to ban a user or users when another user asked for their ban, I believe that all the high ranked members of this forum would have all be banned permanently or will keep serving temporarily ban from one to another ..
This is because high ranked users are easily attacked by the lower ranks for whatever reason which I can't really understand or explain..

To OP, if you are angry with this users that maybe the tagged you, what you should do is correct your mistake(s), that is the reason for the tag, then contact them and plead to them to remove or change the negative tag to neutral, asking for their ban is a waste of time because they won't be banned, obviously.

[MrBrightside1]

If bitcointalk moderators just goes ahead to ban a user or users when another user asked for their ban, I believe that all the high ranked members of this forum would have all be banned permanently or will keep serving temporarily ban from one to another ..
This is because high ranked users are easily attacked by the lower ranks for whatever reason which I can't really understand or explain..

To OP, if you are angry with this users that maybe the tagged you, what you should do is correct your mistake(s), that is the reason for the tag, then contact them and plead to them to remove or change the negative tag to neutral, asking for their ban is a waste of time because they won't be banned, obviously.

I did not make any mistake, you are victim blaming and I will tag you for that! If you understand that what you do is wrong, I will remove it.

[John Abraham]

I did not make any mistake, you are victim blaming and I will tag you for that! If you understand that what you do is wrong, I will remove it.

I don't see any negative tag on your profile at this moment. Both JollyGood and Scamvirus revised their tag into neutral. Neutral tag doesn't matter. You should know how the feedback system works. You also left some negative feedback to take revenge which is unethical. Review your given feedback and lock this thread and go on. It would be better for you and the community as well.

[MrBrightside1]

I did not make any mistake, you are victim blaming and I will tag you for that! If you understand that what you do is wrong, I will remove it.

I don't see any negative tag on your profile at this moment. Both JollyGood and Scamvirus revised their tag into neutral. Neutral tag doesn't matter. You should know how the feedback system works. You also left some negative feedback to take revenge which is unethical. Review your given feedback and lock this thread and go on. It would be better for you and the community as well.

Man, I have been doing that now, go look at it. Its also neutral. The current feedback is accurate however and until they realize that they should not blame out of the blue, it also stays like that until they realized what they did wrong (like mentioned in the other thread). It became more than just jollygood acting hasty (while his current feedback is still inaccurate), people defending him and having no clue about right/wrong and blaming me.

But yes I will lock both.