Hit And Run Gambling - Can The House Be Beaten This way?

[maydna]

This is a completely legitimate way to beat the casino. To some extent, winning such a large sum of money in gambling is extremely unlikely. Gamblers have this feeling that once they win one, they'll want to put all of their money, including the profit, back in and play to win more, but to their greatest surprise, they lose everything. People who have the mindset of winning big and never coming back are always the unlucky ones to hit the jackpot big enough to cash out in a single trial.

What happens is they lose after they put in all their money, which doesn't give them any winnings. The situation reversed rapidly, and it was time for the casino to take all the winnings from that gambler. People who think a hit-and-run strategy will work should realize that they cannot hope to do so because the situation will change instantly. They must also think that the casino will not simply let them withdraw their winnings before fulfilling all the conditions.

According to OP. The scenario he painted was that there is no losing for the person. You played and you also won big. But the OP didn't put into consideration what happens since the gambler started gambling. Was it the first time for the gambler to gamble?
In one way or the other the gambler must have lost in some ways to other casino. You may have beaten the house immediately but no overall.

Indeed, there is no loss for that person. But that person should already know whether his plan worked well or if he failed to get his winnings because the risk that might arise is that the casino might ask him to ask for various conditions before the casino processes the withdrawal of his money. But it's a different matter if they have often played gambling at the casino and maybe have verified it so that the casino will allow gamblers to withdraw their winnings immediately. But if this is the first time the gambler has played at the casino and he is lucky to get a big win, it is not easy for him to withdraw the winning money.

[AicecreaME]

Hi gamblers, it's a simple question I want to ask...

Remember it is said that, in gambling, the house always wins, I Want us to look at this two scenarios and tell if this are not actually a way to win/beat the house..

Imagine yourself as a new gambler who just joined a casino, played a few dollars and with luck on your side, you win money running into thousands of dollars, will withdrawing your money plus winnings from that casino, never to return there to play again, mean you have beaten that casino?

Secondly, imagine that on your first day of gambling, you gambled $200 and in the process, won money running into hundreds of thousands of dollars, you withdraw the money and start up your own business, and never returned to gambling again, isn't this one way to beat the house?

That's one of the possible things people can do to kind of "beat the house". Although it's one of the ways to gamble naturally speaking, you can call this winning over the casino on your perspective because you won over them and utilized your winnings right after getting it instead of betting one more time. But this isn't always the case and isn't always the same for everyone. So basically, the casino house is still winning because players are still spending their money to make and place some bets.

Casino owners wouldn't really make a charity work, so most probably they will still have so much profit every time a player play in their site or their establishment. After all, a collective bet is worth a dime already if it will be totaled.

[bettercrypto]

Hi gamblers, it's a simple question I want to ask...

Remember it is said that, in gambling, the house always wins, I Want us to look at this two scenarios and tell if this are not actually a way to win/beat the house..

Imagine yourself as a new gambler who just joined a casino, played a few dollars and with luck on your side, you win money running into thousands of dollars, will withdrawing your money plus winnings from that casino, never to return there to play again, mean you have beaten that casino?

Secondly, imagine that on your first day of gambling, you gambled $200 and in the process, won money running into hundreds of thousands of dollars, you withdraw the money and start up your own business, and never returned to gambling again, isn't this one way to beat the house?

I don't know if the term you beat the casino is correct in the situation you gave as an example. Maybe from the few dollars that turned into thousands of dollars, I can say that you can withdraw it right away.

   But in 200$ that became 100k$ because of your gambling win, that's quite a large amount, perhaps, I don't think they will just allow you to withdraw it so easily. Because the gambling management has things to do there, they will screening you for sure. So it's a bit like it's too good to be true, this is just my thought friend.

[rahmad2nd]

I don't know if the term you beat the casino is correct in the situation you gave as an example. Maybe from the few dollars that turned into thousands of dollars, I can say that you can withdraw it right away.

This can happen to people who only occasionally gamble, with a few dollars in capital and by chance he gets a few thousand dollars, withdraws them, and never comes back. at least, things like this are still quite reasonable and might happen. only, which casino does he play, does it have to be KYC. but suppose it happened.

But in 200$ that became 100k$ because of your gambling win, that's quite a large amount, perhaps, I don't think they will just allow you to withdraw it so easily. Because the gambling management has things to do there, they will screening you for sure. So it's a bit like it's too good to be true, this is just my thought friend.

It's possible, especially if the casino used is a trusted casino. it's just that, maybe to pull it is not easy. at least, there are some mechanisms or requirements that must be fulfilled by someone who wins a large amount, for example $100k as you mentioned. one example, such as upgrading the account level and doing more specific KYC for example.
but really what it boils down to is, is it possible to beat the house. I mean, the scenario is not as easy as we discussed here. in fact, if a gambler has the mindset of beating the house, it's usually the opposite. in fact, a person can spend a lot of money. because after all, all he was aiming for was beating the house. not to get pleasure from every gambling session, regardless of the type of game.

[dunfida]

Hi gamblers, it's a simple question I want to ask...

Remember it is said that, in gambling, the house always wins, I Want us to look at this two scenarios and tell if this are not actually a way to win/beat the house..

Imagine yourself as a new gambler who just joined a casino, played a few dollars and with luck on your side, you win money running into thousands of dollars, will withdrawing your money plus winnings from that casino, never to return there to play again, mean you have beaten that casino?

Secondly, imagine that on your first day of gambling, you gambled $200 and in the process, won money running into hundreds of thousands of dollars, you withdraw the money and start up your own business, and never returned to gambling again, isn't this one way to beat the house?

I don't know if the term you beat the casino is correct in the situation you gave as an example. Maybe from the few dollars that turned into thousands of dollars, I can say that you can withdraw it right away.

   But in 200$ that became 100k$ because of your gambling win, that's quite a large amount, perhaps, I don't think they will just allow you to withdraw it so easily. Because the gambling management has things to do there, they will screening you for sure. So it's a bit like it's too good to be true, this is just my thought friend.

Depending on which site you are really dealing with but if you do stick into legit ones then you might be paid up right away but its true that with that amount then screening and double checking if there's something wrong

then it would really be that a common behavior among into these houses because making a few hundreds into thousands of dollars is really that very unlikely.If they have seen none then they would really just simply

release it.Hit and run isnt something a right word for this one but it is really that pertaining on completely stopping when you are in big hits which is always been that recommended but only a few could totally be
able to apply this principle because most of the time which gamblers do really losses up their winnings back into the house just because they decided to play even more for more profits.

[Fortify]

Hi gamblers, it's a simple question I want to ask...

Remember it is said that, in gambling, the house always wins, I Want us to look at this two scenarios and tell if this are not actually a way to win/beat the house..

Imagine yourself as a new gambler who just joined a casino, played a few dollars and with luck on your side, you win money running into thousands of dollars, will withdrawing your money plus winnings from that casino, never to return there to play again, mean you have beaten that casino?

Secondly, imagine that on your first day of gambling, you gambled $200 and in the process, won money running into hundreds of thousands of dollars, you withdraw the money and start up your own business, and never returned to gambling again, isn't this one way to beat the house?

Yes, that would be the perfect way to beat the casino and many people do this as part of matched betting. In some countries there can be dozens of sites offering welcome bonuses to entice new players, but you really need to read through the rules of each one and fully understand the process before jumping in to maximize your returns. You're also likely to find that casinos give slightly more favorable odds, although it might be hard to prove, to newer players as they want to draw them in and get them to play for the long term - they'll often spend a fair chunk on advertising to acquire new players after all. The honeymoon period might wear off advert 48 hours, 72 hours, a week or longer.

[Balmain]

It looks like a win on paper and you beat that casino plus you even invest. Even if the gambler stops for the moment, he always continues afterwards and may lose more than he has. So I actually think there is never a chance to beat the house. You can leave more than what you earn today after a few years, so we should not look at things momentarily. Luckily, I had friends who started gambling this way and made money. They still continue to play, they win one day and lose the next, after a while you succumb to your greed. I usually bet on the matches that I will watch the matches that I like, to get excitement. Winning makes me happier then.

[nullama]

It looks like a win on paper and you beat that casino plus you even invest. Even if the gambler stops for the moment, he always continues afterwards and may lose more than he has. So I actually think there is never a chance to beat the house. You can leave more than what you earn today after a few years, so we should not look at things momentarily. Luckily, I had friends who started gambling this way and made money. They still continue to play, they win one day and lose the next, after a while you succumb to your greed. I usually bet on the matches that I will watch the matches that I like, to get excitement. Winning makes me happier then.

The thing is that you need to stop gambling forever after you win, and that means that almost no one will do that, because it's addictive, specially when you're winning.

Some might argue that they gamble for fun, so in that case, then it's just entertainment and the payment to the casinos is just the payment for entertainment.

But if you just want to win money, and you're lucky, you can actually end up in positive net gain. You just have to quit after you earn big, which is unlikely anyway.

[ethereumhunter]

It looks like a win on paper and you beat that casino plus you even invest. Even if the gambler stops for the moment, he always continues afterwards and may lose more than he has. So I actually think there is never a chance to beat the house. You can leave more than what you earn today after a few years, so we should not look at things momentarily. Luckily, I had friends who started gambling this way and made money. They still continue to play, they win one day and lose the next, after a while you succumb to your greed. I usually bet on the matches that I will watch the matches that I like, to get excitement. Winning makes me happier then.

The thing is that you need to stop gambling forever after you win, and that means that almost no one will do that, because it's addictive, specially when you're winning.

Some might argue that they gamble for fun, so in that case, then it's just entertainment and the payment to the casinos is just the payment for entertainment.

But if you just want to win money, and you're lucky, you can actually end up in positive net gain. You just have to quit after you earn big, which is unlikely anyway.

After winning a big win, he should have immediately stopped and withdrawn his winnings to prevent the desire to get another big win. But that didn't make the casino suffer losses because there were still many other gamblers who lost, some of whom lost large amounts of money. This makes the casino have income from the losing casino even if the amount they lose is greater than the amount that person wins. In addition, that person needs to calculate how much money he has spent at the gambling table and how many defeats he has experienced and compare it with the big wins he has won. It could be the number of losses is still greater.