High Roller Tailing

[blockman]

I think I've heard from my bets that they're following high rollers for them to save time and as well as have that bit of confidence in their bets.
But as usual, there are pros and cons to this strategy. It is gambling and we all know that the chances are always there for both boats, winning and losing.
And if this is making you effective right now, there will be a moment in time that it won't be good as what you're experiencing. So, if it's doing good as of the moment then hit the momentum.

[alegotardo]

I know it's not right to bet on a game without knowing about it, I am just curious if someone does this kind of strategy.

Copying is good but only if you know who to copy your bet, there are groups that give tips and bets to follow but copying from high rollers based on the stat on the casino is quite risky.

I rely a lot on statistical data from websites, bets and opinions from other players, but I never use this as a rule to define my bet.

My final bet is always based on the research I do and also my final opinion.

I suggest, however, that no one copy my bets (I don't even publish them), as I rarely make any profit.
Fortunately I play just for fun and not for profit.

I find it very interesting to be part of Telegram groups, for example, for gamblers. In many of them, many valuable tips are published that can really help.
But again I say... place your bet prudently, based on your opinion.

[traderethereum]

I have never copied anyone else's bets at any casino.
That's because I don't know how reputable that guy is when it comes to betting on sports and I just saw him using a very large amount of money to bet.
I just thought, wow, that's a lot of money and he must have a lot of confidence picking his team.
That is very risky, in my opinion, because once he loses, he will all lose and vice versa.
And even though I have plans to try to copy other people's bets in the future, I will make sure not to use big bucks.

Yeah, that's what I did. I didn't make a large amount of bet because it's not my own analysis of the game. The intriguing part is how confident they are in their bets that they will put in a lot of money even though the odds are between 1.90 - 2.30, that's just too risky. I can understand more if it's between 1.10 - 1.30, low-risk high percentage to win as they are favorites.

I also never tried this in my entire career as a gambler because what I do know is that following others bet will only turns into similar effect like them , if they lose then you will lose also? then why not go against their bets so you might experience opposite result?
if they are betting high then the chance for you to win if betting on the other side is higher right?
actually this is what i did in the past when trying to beat the big rollers momentum lol.

There are different points on why it's difficult to go against them. First, they made a huge bet which will make it more confusing if they are betting the right odds or not. You will have doubts. Second, it will take time to find the game they are betting for which means a change in the odds especially if it's ongoing.
Finally, most of their bets are from games with close odds so there will be not enough time for analysis unless you know the game itself.
But on that final point, if you really know the game then you won't be looking out for other bets but instead, use your own picks.
I guess those who copy high rollers are for those who want to pick blindly, or just straight lazy. I did the former.

If we talk about faith, both those who place bets and those who copy bets are equally confident in their abilities.
But we, as people who copy bets from other bettors, will not know how he has achieved so far in betting on sports betting.
And to overcome big losses, we must minimize the amount of bets, even though the temptation to win big will be there.
And whatever the stakes are, whether they are high stakes or low stakes, we must be able to control ourselves.

[Fundamentals Of]

I haven't tried it. But this hardly sounds as a sports betting strategy. This is blindly betting. But for experimentation or curiosity's sake, you could indeed try it but for a small amount only. I myself imitated the bets of friends before without any idea. I also remembered I made bets on recommendations without really knowing the players, the teams, their statistics, and their level of skills, and even without understanding the sports itself. I later found out its boring that way.

[danherbias07]

I think I've heard from my bets that they're following high rollers for them to save time and as well as have that bit of confidence in their bets.
But as usual, there are pros and cons to this strategy. It is gambling and we all know that the chances are always there for both boats, winning and losing.
And if this is making you effective right now, there will be a moment in time that it won't be good as what you're experiencing. So, if it's doing good as of the moment then hit the momentum.

Nah, it actually went bad. Results are mostly losing than winning so that concludes this is not really a good strategy at all.
I changed strategy now, I am trying long parlays with low-amount bets and trying to cash it out if I build a good win. It just takes a lot of effort to monitor it.

I haven't tried it. But this hardly sounds as a sports betting strategy. This is blindly betting. But for experimentation or curiosity's sake, you could indeed try it but for a small amount only. I myself imitated the bets of friends before without any idea. I also remembered I made bets on recommendations without really knowing the players, the teams, their statistics, and their level of skills, and even without understanding the sports itself. I later found out its boring that way.

Correct, blind betting. That's what really happened because I don't really look at what game it is, I just believed the high roller is doing it because he was sure about his bet. But I am wrong, they are not really doing it because they have higher percentages of winning but more like just normal gambling.
Maybe if I could find that one guy that I could follow then this strategy will be better.
Blind betting too because I don't know the game but only follow those who have a history of winning more than losing. Sadly, the privacy options for Stake.com is high as users could keep their names hidden.

[maydna]

I haven't tried it. But this hardly sounds as a sports betting strategy. This is blindly betting. But for experimentation or curiosity's sake, you could indeed try it but for a small amount only. I myself imitated the bets of friends before without any idea. I also remembered I made bets on recommendations without really knowing the players, the teams, their statistics, and their level of skills, and even without understanding the sports itself. I later found out its boring that way.

People will use many ways to win money from gambling and if necessary, they will also use blind bets without analyzing the match. This is probably common among gamblers, especially since many want to have fun placing bets on sports they know nothing about. Indeed, it is not recommended, especially if they immediately use big money to place bets. And I agree with only betting small bucks on sports that we don't know about because a few days ago, I also do that

[Unsoldier]

I have never followed the high rollers and copied their bets. It's a useless activity for me. I don't try to make money from sports events, and I just look at it as fun. Following the high rollers is just trying to make a lot of money, and you're passing the responsibility of losing on to others. Think for yourself, analyze for yourself, that's the only way you can learn how to win.

[AicecreaME]

I've tried betting on sports betting and copying other users' bets. As a result I won but what I regret is that I was not too confident to place high bets hahah.

I just casually place bets on sports betting and just like you, I also don't have any knowledge about sports and the teams that compete. Well, placing such bets is just for fun and if I can win, it's a bonus for me

This has been a thing not only in gambling but also in trading. There are many personalities you can copy a bet to and follow their lead. However, just always be careful because there's nothing certain. Even if those good players and bettors have their unlucky moments too. You should stake that you can't really afford to lose especially you just tailed their decision without researching deeper about why they have made that in the first place.

In addition, some of the users who are known to be winning are anonymous, so you can't really verify if they have the enough background on what they are telling in the internet. They might publish a losing bet and then vanish later just to trick people desperate in winning. SO still, be on your guard and always double-check information before making a bet in sports betting or any other betting games.

[blockman]

I think I've heard from my bets that they're following high rollers for them to save time and as well as have that bit of confidence in their bets.
But as usual, there are pros and cons to this strategy. It is gambling and we all know that the chances are always there for both boats, winning and losing.
And if this is making you effective right now, there will be a moment in time that it won't be good as what you're experiencing. So, if it's doing good as of the moment then hit the momentum.

Nah, it actually went bad. Results are mostly losing than winning so that concludes this is not really a good strategy at all.
I changed strategy now, I am trying long parlays with low-amount bets and trying to cash it out if I build a good win. It just takes a lot of effort to monitor it.

Well, that's bad and likely expected since no strategy really is going to do well in the long run if it's related to gambling.
I just wish that you'll do good with your long parlays and it's more desirable as you're the one who should be responsible for your bets and there will even be no regret since you're the one who bet for it.

[rhomelmabini]

Question: Has anyone been successful in doing this?

Haven't tried it yet before but I think it's wise if you trail high rollers with good percentage of winning and not just some random high roller/s that has an n amount of bet. I think it would be rare if you find yourself a high roller that is good on his/her bets even if it's only one, just minimizing the risk until you prove it's good then slowly increase your wagers.

[Cling18]

Question: Has anyone been successful in doing this?

Haven't tried it yet before but I think it's wise if you trail high rollers with a good percentage of winning and not just some random high roller/s that has an n amount of bet. I think it would be rare if you find yourself a high roller that is good on his/her bets even if it's only one, just minimizing the risk until you prove it's good then slowly increasing your wagers.

I haven't tried it either because it's too risky. After all, we don't know the things that run in high rollers' minds. Some of them are just betting without thinking and just betting for fun while others apply their specific strategy to win.  Well, it's a good thing for those who are curious why they often win because they can copy their strategies and perfect timing. Let's just be mindful of the risks.

[Silberman]

I think I've heard from my bets that they're following high rollers for them to save time and as well as have that bit of confidence in their bets.
But as usual, there are pros and cons to this strategy. It is gambling and we all know that the chances are always there for both boats, winning and losing.
And if this is making you effective right now, there will be a moment in time that it won't be good as what you're experiencing. So, if it's doing good as of the moment then hit the momentum.

Nah, it actually went bad. Results are mostly losing than winning so that concludes this is not really a good strategy at all.
I changed strategy now, I am trying long parlays with low-amount bets and trying to cash it out if I build a good win. It just takes a lot of effort to monitor it.

I know it is disappointing to not get the results that you were expecting but at least you tried and now you know the answer to the question if this is a profitable strategy or not? I just hope you did not lost a lot of money as when someone is testing a new strategy they may get convinced that what they are doing is finally going to work, and they may use way more money than what they should during those experiments and then they have to deal with severe losses.

[tabas]

Haven't tried it yet before but I think it's wise if you trail high rollers with good percentage of winning and not just some random high roller/s that has an n amount of bet. I think it would be rare if you find yourself a high roller that is good on his/her bets even if it's only one, just minimizing the risk until you prove it's good then slowly increase your wagers.

I think that he won't do it anymore as he has stated that it was unsuccessful and didn't do him good. But if he still wants to, your idea is a good pattern to follow and only those with good winning percentage and accuracy should be followed.
Anyway, if it's clear that this won't be good in the long run and he's got some other plans to do aside from tailing the high rollers. Do the strategy that you're more confident and you think will work more than this strategy that's being tested out.

[bitbollo]

...
I know it's not right to bet on a game without knowing about it, I am just curious if someone does this kind of strategy.

I have seen sometimes these "hard" bets on several bookmakers that show bets ... but ... I have been always shocked for such heavy amounts on some multiples.
It's really hard these going to win (likewise x10 ...)
Most of gamblers explain with "people with broad wallet" but by the way I don't know how they can place such games
For sure I will not copy these bets

[rahmad2nd]

I haven't tried it. But this hardly sounds as a sports betting strategy. This is blindly betting. But for experimentation or curiosity's sake, you could indeed try it but for a small amount only. I myself imitated the bets of friends before without any idea. I also remembered I made bets on recommendations without really knowing the players, the teams, their statistics, and their level of skills, and even without understanding the sports itself. I later found out its boring that way.

Not really, it depends on how you react to it. but by the way, the OP is just experimenting and he only bets a limited amount. basically, it doesn't matter if we emulate high roller gamblers. most importantly, must be prepared with the risk. but if you refer to some of the bets that OP shared, especially football. there's honestly nothing wrong with that. in fact, I bet on the Arsenal team, just like the OP did. why, referring to what I know, involving insight, experience and not forgetting research plus analysis. it is only natural for high roller gamblers to bet on the Arsenal team, or over 1.5 goals, with a temporary score of 1-0. high roller gamblers expect Arsenal to equalize at 1-1.

Unfortunately, the result is not what we expected. the point is, in a match, there is no exact count to find out which team will win the match especially based on predictions. that is, it doesn't matter whether we imitate or the results of our own analysis. in the end, the final result will be determined when the match is over. related to winning or losing, isn't that part of the risk.

[Mahanton]

...
I know it's not right to bet on a game without knowing about it, I am just curious if someone does this kind of strategy.

I have seen sometimes these "hard" bets on several bookmakers that show bets ... but ... I have been always shocked for such heavy amounts on some multiples.
It's really hard these going to win (likewise x10 ...)
Most of gamblers explain with "people with broad wallet" but by the way I don't know how they can place such games
For sure I will not copy these bets

You would really be having these questions on mind on how the heck they do really consider out such kind of bet on where it is really obvious that winning chance or odds is way too slim.Yes, we've been able to see upsets but these things doesnt really happen often or everyday which we could really be able to assume out that sticking to moneyline would be always ideal or something that most people would be sticking on because they do know that it would most likely to win.On the time that you do see on how big they are betting on when it comes to those underdogs which it would really be leaving out some questions on mind
on how they do make out those considerations?

[bitbollo]

You would really be having these questions on mind on how the heck they do really consider out such kind of bet on where it is really obvious that winning chance or odds is way too slim.Yes, we've been able to see upsets but these things doesnt really happen often or everyday which we could really be able to assume out that sticking to moneyline would be always ideal or something that most people would be sticking on because they do know that it would most likely to win.On the time that you do see on how big they are betting on when it comes to those underdogs which it would really be leaving out some questions on mind
on how they do make out those considerations?

as far as I could see, these big bets don't happen on underdogs, but very often, but on events with even odds (1.80-2.20). if you get a look on some sites there are hundreds of that bets daily.

it worries me a lot when I see large multiples (for example 5 events in the same bet).
I personally see it as a way to lose money... an experienced gambler would avoid like the plague

[rhomelmabini]

Haven't tried it yet before but I think it's wise if you trail high rollers with good percentage of winning and not just some random high roller/s that has an n amount of bet. I think it would be rare if you find yourself a high roller that is good on his/her bets even if it's only one, just minimizing the risk until you prove it's good then slowly increase your wagers.

I think that he won't do it anymore as he has stated that it was unsuccessful and didn't do him good. But if he still wants to, your idea is a good pattern to follow and only those with good winning percentage and accuracy should be followed.
Anyway, if it's clear that this won't be good in the long run and he's got some other plans to do aside from tailing the high rollers. Do the strategy that you're more confident and you think will work more than this strategy that's being tested out.

I don't think giving up will do any good maybe it was just a coincidence too that the one he trails lost for the day. As I've said, you can try it few times and observe if it will be good. Sometimes it's not bad to rely on others but yes being confident on your bets will just make you gain experience even on lose or winning side.

[Cryptomultiplier]

Haven't tried it yet before but I think it's wise if you trail high rollers with good percentage of winning and not just some random high roller/s that has an n amount of bet. I think it would be rare if you find yourself a high roller that is good on his/her bets even if it's only one, just minimizing the risk until you prove it's good then slowly increase your wagers.

I think that he won't do it anymore as he has stated that it was unsuccessful and didn't do him good. But if he still wants to, your idea is a good pattern to follow and only those with good winning percentage and accuracy should be followed.
Anyway, if it's clear that this won't be good in the long run and he's got some other plans to do aside from tailing the high rollers. Do the strategy that you're more confident and you think will work more than this strategy that's being tested out.

I don't think giving up will do any good maybe it was just a coincidence too that the one he trails lost for the day. As I've said, you can try it few times and observe if it will be good. Sometimes it's not bad to rely on others but yes being confident on your bets will just make you gain experience even on lose or winning side.

Nothing beats the confidence one gets from gaining experience in a certain area, mostly gambling in this context. I say this because, although it is adviced that mentors be tailed or other worthy hands with tesmonial to the effect, be emulated/copied/tailed, the experience after careful study, pays well. One would be able to systematically adopt a style that is unique and rewarding in the long run.

[Hispo]

I have not tried such thing and I don't think I would, even if there were some good results at first, just because some user is a high roller does not mean they are always right. I would rather to be fully in control and have knowledge on where I putting my money.

That is only my personal opinion, of course.