I do agree with you that POW is better in the circulation supply management but I am discussing a point which is that one both models there is a controlled environment such as on the POW side the compute resources owners control the blockchain and on the POS side the Money holders control the market. A middleman like me who doesn't have many resources and Money can't contribute to blockchain decentralization because of these models.
Also, POW is directly targeted for its power consumption which is a big issue for the Bitcoin community, But we always neglect it. Some experts who support centralization and traditional markets target this point to prove Bitcoin is unworthy. The community is sticking to its ideology and continuously supporting good Bitcoin. This a sign for a big reform but what if we consider a solution for Bitcoin power consumption?
Maybe it doesn't have to be like that? Maybe you do not have to join in the blockchain part of it. Just because it is decentralized, doesn't mean that we need to be the ones who are in charge for it, and we can just watch afar while supporting it and buying it.
Basically I have zero miners, never owned any, and I know that I don't have 32 eth to start helping with the PoS there for example, but I know that they are both decentralized and that's good enough for me. I do not need it to be something that I participate in order to make sure that it's decentralized, I can accept it the way it is right now and that's good enough for me, I just buy and vote with my money by holding the coins.