gambler has 100% trust in each stake

[goaldigger]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

This is gambling, going all in can’t guarantee anything so if you don’t want to lose everything better to balance your bet and don’t over confident about the player you trust because they can’t always perform the way you expected them to be, there are off days as well. I will not stake 100% to any player even if they are a good player because its too risky for me and I don’t think I can enjoy betting if i go all in.

[1715311952]

1715311952

[Johnyz]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

This is gambling, going all in can’t guarantee anything so if you don’t want to lose everything better to balance your bet and don’t over confident about the player you trust because they can’t always perform the way you expected them to be, there are off days as well. I will not stake 100% to any player even if they are a good player because its too risky for me and I don’t think I can enjoy betting if i go all in.

This is not how betting works supposedly because you have to know first the opponent before making any bets with your favorite player or favorite teams because sometimes your decision will also depend to this one. Even if you are betting with the top players there’s still a risk on that and going all in means you are increasing the risk of your bet and this is pure gambling already, I also not suggest this one and I don’t want to practice this in betting as well, going all in is not my way of betting.

[coin-investor]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

It depends on who the team is fighting and how good is the team and the circumstances of the events, you should not put 100% of your trust because no team or fighter is 100% good, they also suffer from bad breaks and bad plays and they lose, but this is if you're betting, but if it's not you can put 100% of your trust since no money is involved and you just want to show faith and trust to the team, but if there is money involved analysis is a must.
You cannot trust 100%  of your favorite and expect to make money at the same time.

[crzy]

This is not how betting works supposedly because you have to know first the opponent before making any bets with your favorite player or favorite teams because sometimes your decision will also depend to this one. Even if you are betting with the top players there’s still a risk on that and going all in means you are increasing the risk of your bet and this is pure gambling already, I also not suggest this one and I don’t want to practice this in betting as well, going all in is not my way of betting.

Definitely, its too risky to go all in and you favorite player can’t guarantee this one.
There are some bettor who took risk to bet like this, some succeeded while the majority are not because betting can’t work like this always. I also prefer to bet small money only, and diversify my bettings into different sports which I think can give profit to me, this is actually more fun than to go all in.

[blockman]

A bet is a bet and a gamble is a gamble. Even if you say that you're trusting you've staked 100% as you've said, it can still fail.
Nothing will change but only your personal trust and belief in the team or player whom you're betting for. As for me, even if I have confidence in what I'll bet for, still, I don't give that 100% belief in them because anything can happen. And I can think of it as a small gambler, so, how much more those that are gambling a lot and with bigger bets.

[Baofeng]

As others have said, there's no way it will be 100% trust or it will win by that percentage. Gambling doesn't work that way, it's either you have chances to win or not. Maybe the odds is way high that you think you will win already, but there are things we don't know, factors that might affect the result. And we all know that it's inches, it's the split seconds that will make or break a team or individual in any sports that might affect the outcome.

Like this, Gambler Loses 1.4 million USD in a bet with lower than 1.01 odds!.

[seoincorporation]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

That's a complex situation, if something went wrong you would lose all, and that's the main risk about going all in. In some scenarios the risk is so low that we can place this kind of bet without feeling a real list in our money, I mean when you see a pro soccer team vs a newbie one, or things like that... But I don't think this is a wise way to bet, maybe we win most of the bets, but if we lose one then will be a "gg" for us.

[Fatunad]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

I have tried this several times and I have lost it all,trust means nothing in sport betting as I have usually bet on teams in the top of the standings where many people believed that they will win easily and the fact was that they not only did not win but even lost the game at their home.I thought this to be only temporary and was an isolated case but since it happened several times to me,I never do that again,I do not bet 100% of my money no matter how much trust I have on a specific event.I also don't advice anyone to bet 100% of their stake on a single event because while once it may come true,several other times it will hurt those people.

Dont go all in which is always been that a primary rule or golden rule when it comes to gambling.There's no such thing about 100% winning game no matter how good the team/player is when it comes to its stats.
Going back on which it would really be that understandable that upsets could really happen and this is why no matter how slim the chance there's still those probabilities on which it could really give out that
negative result.This is why when you do make out bets then dont really be that fully confident because this could really result out some impulsive decision which it isnt
really that good when you do get involved with gambling.

[ralle14]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

Nope, even though I have to trust the players I bet on that still isn't enough for me to put all of my balance in a single bet because top teams that have good players can still lose. They can still underperform on certain days which is why it's best to limit your betting amount per match. If it was back then i'd probably do it because I used to play for profit but then again that all in strategy is way too costly, you could get away with it maybe a few times but eventually, your losses will catch up unless you'd change your betting style.

[Wexnident]

I once did, yes. Well, it is more like a stake of a braindead fan so I don't think I need to establish the reason since it speaks for itself anyway. Nowadays though I'm a fan of a multitude of teams in eSports, and I decide who I'm going to favor more than the other, after all, I've watched more and know more compared to the me back then. In some cases though, especially in a finals setup match, I usually just go for whichever team I really like since in most cases both teams are almost, if not equally matched already. At that point I just enjoy everything.

[lienfaye]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

Unexpected things can happen no matter how confident we are that this team will win. Thus, no because it is gambling and it's not guaranteed since upsets can happen at anytime.

This is the problem of the gamblers who gave their trust to the particular player/team without doubt and go all in.

The result is uncertain and you'll only realize your mistake once the outcome is not what you expected it to be.

[noorman0]

-snip-
My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

No, there are several risks that are also considered besides assessing team performance. Circumstances may change after passing several matches in a row. In addition, there is no certainty that a match will always be fair or use a winning scenario.
In fact, I can't believe someone said they are 100% sure of the top team but only bet part of the money they have.

[yahoo62278]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

If you place a bet aren't you already giving 100% trust in your bet? You had enough confidence to place the bet, so unless you're just burning money you had to have some confidence/trust in your decision right?

[Coin_trader]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

This is self explanatory. You are betting on a team or player because you are 100% trusting that pick to win or else you are not putting on it if you are doubtful that they will win. Trust is different to guarantee on winning because you are just trusting your a team to established your picks.

Being doubtful on your picks is just gambling recklessly because you are not sure on the capacity of the team that you bet in.

[Chikito]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

Of course, not!
As a bitcoin enthusiasm we never 100% trust on others toward, especially if you play in yourself.
Everything cache can happen especially in football, as remembered in what just happened in the world cup 2022, (Saudi vs Argentina). at that time I was 100% believe Argentina won, but the result was unexpected. So do not believe 100% in what your bet, just make your calculation self and verify all stuff before making a decision.

[ethereumhunter]

Giving 100% on the bet? What does it mean? Does that mean we give 100% of the money to bet on a team? If so, I wouldn't because I'd rather split the money over multiple bets at once.

And if it is about belief in one team or player, I only place or choose one team or player based on the analysis results I did. If my analysis results say, there is no need to place, even though some people still place bets. Knowing the performance of each team or player is very necessary because we will choose one of them. If we don't know which one to choose, won't we only suffer losses later?

[nullama]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

I don't think you have to go with 100%, you can simply calculate the odds or get the odds from betting sites. That includes many factors, and even the best team can always lose, so there's never going to be 100%, ever.

It seems like a more simplistic view, which can of course simplify your bets, but in the end it won't produce a better end result.

No need to do it I think, as we have massive computing capabilities these days.

[libert19]

Yes I would, otherwise it's futile to even bet. Have got person in my area who made killing on fantasy league because he has deep knowledge of cricket.

Without confidence I don't think he would have made such killing, especially when in cricket fantasy you are completing against thousands other players.

Confidence in your own ability is top most in whatever you do. Things are half won by just having confidence in yourself.

[wxa7115]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

I suppose that by this you mean going all-in and if that is the case I would never do that, as you stated those teams have a win rate close to 88%, but 88% is not 100%, meaning that if you went all-in you will have a 12% chance of losing it all.

And if you did this several times then I can say to you that the chances that you will lose your money will grow to the point it will become a certainty, that is why you should never do this, even if you are tempted to do it due to the high win rate you will get by betting on those teams.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I don't think you have to go with 100%, you can simply calculate the odds or get the odds from betting sites. That includes many factors, and even the best team can always lose, so there's never going to be 100%, ever.

Yes, as you say, the problem with the probability we assign is that it is always subjective. If 100% were somehow an objective measure you could bet your entire wealth on the bet. For someone with experience and a history of good sports betting results, his predictions have some subjective component but are closer to objective, so if he is paid 1.6 to 1 for a team to win but he is 85% sure that they will win, it will be profitable for him.

But the fact that sport has a human component, and you don't know if the top scorer is going to get injured at the beginning of the game or things like that, makes giving 100% not seem rational.