gambler has 100% trust in each stake

[robelneo]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

You can trust your favorite team of fighters as long as your analysis tells you that your favorite team of fighters has a chance to win a battle, it's ok to have 100% trust as long as you do analysis, but if there is money involved and in your analysis and your favorite team has little chance to win then you have to do the right thing and don't bet on them to protect your money or better skip betting.
It's ok to be a fanatic in one team or give them 100% of your trust but you don't throw your money your favorite team is the underdog, your money should be more important to you than your loyalty.

[piebeyb]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

sometimes not completely because something can happen in a sporting event, you may also know that sometimes what we believe is not necessarily 100% win, so this also cannot be separated from luck even though our analysis leads to the right thing, but don't be tempted by what we have done, for example, is guessing and betting on something as a whole because sometimes we also need other people's analysis data to become our betting reference, the point is don't be too confident and be too sure 100% so it doesn't hurt too much when you lose.

[QueenVera]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

This is gambling, going all in can’t guarantee anything so if you don’t want to lose everything better to balance your bet and don’t over confident about the player you trust because they can’t always perform the way you expected them to be, there are off days as well. I will not stake 100% to any player even if they are a good player because its too risky for me and I don’t think I can enjoy betting if i go all in.

This is gambling truly and I love the way you presented the whole talk and one thing I've learnt the very hard way is never to go all in I'm gambling, no matter how good it might seem but we're human and there are situations where one has no option than to go all in especially in situations where the gambling capital isn't much.
Gambling is a game and people ought to see it that way rather than letting their emotions play on them and making more of the decisions.

And just at @ yahoo said, before one places a bet I think you're already believing in your bet or is there a way one places a bet with hopes of making any loss?
I'm just asking to know and I know the answer is NO because everytime one places a bet, he's expecting a win and profit in return.

[mindrust]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

I don't. It is impossible to trust a player a team 100%. People fail and sometimes they even cheat. Sometimes, even though that's rare, they just don't want to score a goal or save a goal. They just don't. All of these are human factors. We are not machines. Therefore, there will always be some luck factor in every sports game no matter how much research you do on each player, each team, their coaches, referees... Something might go wrong all the time and you simply cannot calculate every possibility.

[bitbollo]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

You cannot place 100% of your stake in the same team/event. Sometimes happens but is always a mistake.
About the first part of your topic, I think it's an issue having such approach, just because you're evaluating team on "papers" and not the real condition taking in account the complexity of tournament, player condition, opponents and more more...

[kamvreto]

It would be a stupid bet because it entrusts 100% of the bets, even though the winning percentage will not reach 100%. I will choose to use only 50% and the rest I will use as a backup if the bet fails. if the 100% bet fails then all will be lost. No matter how great your favorite team is, they will also lose, they won't always win. Gambling also requires financial management, so you will be safer to gamble and not recklessly put everything you have into bets.

[SOKO-DEKE]

In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.

The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

As a gambler anything I want to bet I always pick does teams in good form and stake on them because of my trust in them, despite I know that bet is  by lucky, I don't stake on teams that I don't see their potential, so i always bet on teams that I think they have high possibilities of winning and forget all about lucky at first and that is seriously helping my winning.But i a hardly stake on players performance because they can carry injuries anytime on pitch or even lose form, so i always see it as big risk to stake on that.

I can never give 100% on any stake with whatever trust I may have on a team and that is why I don't stake with big amount of money.

[stomachgrowls]

It would be a stupid bet because it entrusts 100% of the bets, even though the winning percentage will not reach 100%. I will choose to use only 50% and the rest I will use as a backup if the bet fails. if the 100% bet fails then all will be lost. No matter how great your favorite team is, they will also lose, they won't always win. Gambling also requires financial management, so you will be safer to gamble and not recklessly put everything you have into bets.

When you do want to go all in then you should really be that aware that this would really be your last bet if ever this would ending up on a lose.Its true that there's no such team that does ensure out 100% winning rate.

Even sticking with the favorites it wont really be ensuring that you would really win this is why its really that important when it comes to your capital handling or your bankroll. If you are really that sure or does have that strong feeling then its your choice but of course its really that impossible that you arent aware on what would be the result.

Trust could really be applied or really have that confidence but when dealing with gambling then its better not to have this kind of mindset.

[molsewid]

It would be a stupid bet because it entrusts 100% of the bets, even though the winning percentage will not reach 100%. I will choose to use only 50% and the rest I will use as a backup if the bet fails. if the 100% bet fails then all will be lost. No matter how great your favorite team is, they will also lose, they won't always win. Gambling also requires financial management, so you will be safer to gamble and not recklessly put everything you have into bets.

When you do want to go all in then you should really be that aware that this would really be your last bet if ever this would ending up on a lose.Its true that there's no such team that does ensure out 100% winning rate.

Even sticking with the favorites it wont really be ensuring that you would really win this is why its really that important when it comes to your capital handling or your bankroll. If you are really that sure or does have that strong feeling then its your choice but of course its really that impossible that you arent aware on what would be the result.

Trust could really be applied or really have that confidence but when dealing with gambling then its better not to have this kind of mindset.

For me in terms of sports betting it is not enough that you only have a trust, sports betting is the only kind of gambling game that I am playing now because I want that feeling and I want to make a research or an effort first before betting in anyone of them, we can say that yes my favorite team should be selected among others but there will always be a chance that I will choose other team depending on their stats and performance.

[maydna]

It would be a stupid bet because it entrusts 100% of the bets, even though the winning percentage will not reach 100%. I will choose to use only 50% and the rest I will use as a backup if the bet fails. if the 100% bet fails then all will be lost. No matter how great your favorite team is, they will also lose, they won't always win. Gambling also requires financial management, so you will be safer to gamble and not recklessly put everything you have into bets.

It might be stupid but surely some people do it especially if they want that big win. 100% betting is not recommended because there is a possibility of losing. And to avoid it, we really have to reduce it. Only wise gamblers can determine their attitude when gambling, and they will not waste their money in vain but will calculate the gains and losses for them. They also don't want to spend their money on just one bet, let alone those who want to spend their time playing gambling. But as for those fools, they gamble with their money, and many of them lose all their money.

[YOSHIE]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

No, for me I will not risk and trust 100% to one or two teams in the football club.
I bet really considering the cohesiveness of the team, I took a bad experience with Ronaldo, the team didn't want to share the ball with Ronaldo he couldn't score, before moving to saudi arabia, I definitely don't want to spend my money betting on a team with one person reason, the best is teamwork, the risk of accidents on the field cannot guarantee victory.

I admit that Haaland is the best striker in Man City, the goals he scored surpasses Messi and Ronaldo and also with Saka the best midfielder for Arsenal, but as far as I know the success of Haaland & Saka cannot be separated from the hard work of the club team, if other teams don't work together they can't do much.

Conclusion: 100% trust for a certain club to bet on, for me very much leads to team cohesion on the field, determines absolute success.

[kamvreto]

It might be stupid but surely some people do it especially if they want that big win. 100% betting is not recommended because there is a possibility of losing. And to avoid it, we really have to reduce it. Only wise gamblers can determine their attitude when gambling, and they will not waste their money in vain but will calculate the gains and losses for them. They also don't want to spend their money on just one bet, let alone those who want to spend their time playing gambling. But as for those fools, they gamble with their money, and many of them lose all their money.

Fools who only want big wins will only bring themselves to the brink of loss. There are no big instant wins. Gambling also has its own system, the dealer will always win and he will not give big wins without a sizable deposit. Remember, those wise gamblers are only a few percent, those who gamble greedily only become a source of income for gambling sites. Gambling requires strategy, mental readiness and good management.
Those who are not ready and just gamble because they win big and then lose will be stressed and want to continue gambling, so they will become addicted and this behavior is not good for the long term.

[len01]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

nope. I have had bad experiences in gambling in the past, i would not risk 100% of my money just for confidence in betting.
I don't want to be too greedy when it comes to betting, I just want to enjoy every bet I make. because in gambling anything can happen, especially sports betting.
picking a team that seems to win and lose in the end, it also happens a lot even in world cup matches.

so in conclusion, even though gambling especially sports betting does give you big profits if you win, greed in betting or trusting your own bookmakers and betting 100% of all your money will end badly.

[Woodie]

As much as you might point out teams like Arsenal or Manchester city to be favourites of the game, unfortunately games like football have 3 options which is win, draw ,lose which make it impossible to be always right as each option has a 33.33% of the outcome coming through and believe it or not people lose the most money on such games as they wager more than usual which is why I have tried to avoid such strong teams...

[Zackgeno96]

The moment you make a bet, you are convinced that it is the right bet for you. You don't want to think about the possible consequences that you might lose the bet. But when do you have 100% confidence in your stake? Actually, you should always do that, but that also depends on the type of bet. You cannot possibly have 100% confidence in longshots, you should only have confidence in your system as a whole, not per individual investment you bet on a game.

[minime0105]

It very difficult for bettors to determine the outcome of their bets despite how good you think you are in gamble you most flop, a good gamble set storage on how to win but these stratages fails somany times and keep them wondering, with my knowledge in gambling no good gambler will put 100% trust in a stake no matter how good he thinks the stake is, even when there are lesser odds you don't trust a stake because those odds are permutations of bet companies to make it look easy in other to attract stakers.

[Viscore]

My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?

If you are putting money on a team and think that they can win, then you put 100% on them. But the question is, can they really win the game? what if there are circumstances like injuries during that game that made them lose?

Or even if the odds are high for them to lose, suddenly they play very bad?

So as much money as you put in them, it's not going to be 100% sure that they are going to win.

Sometimes, what you see that is too good to be true seems a failure in the end. In gambling, you cannot expect for the best team or player to be always winning, they are also bound to lose especially if there are sudden circumstances that are not expected to happen. The reason why gamblers should never trust the player 100%, otherwise they will lose all their funds and leave with regrets. However, some gamblers still have this mindset and expect that they will always win because they are betting on the favorite player or team, and when they lose, they eventually realize that gambling is never certain and will always be unpredictable.

[rahmad2nd]

~snip~

I don't. It is impossible to trust a player a team 100%. People fail and sometimes they even cheat. Sometimes, even though that's rare, they just don't want to score a goal or save a goal. They just don't. All of these are human factors. We are not machines. Therefore, there will always be some luck factor in every sports game no matter how much research you do on each player, each team, their coaches, referees... Something might go wrong all the time and you simply cannot calculate every possibility.

yes we agree. in fact, if we are gamblers. there is no word to have to trust 100% in top teams, even though it is our favorite team.

IMO, it's not a matter of trusting a team 100%, especially when it comes to betting. in the world of sports, especially football, anything can happen during a match. Football is not only talking about statistics, data, coaches, players, as well as high team performance. football involves many parties, opposing teams, odds, everything, everything will always be our consideration. everything is included in the research that we do on the two teams that will compete, then make a choice that we have predicted. After that, let the end result decide. because after all, luck will always be involved in everything we have bet.

[nullama]

The moment you make a bet, you are convinced that it is the right bet for you. You don't want to think about the possible consequences that you might lose the bet. But when do you have 100% confidence in your stake? Actually, you should always do that, but that also depends on the type of bet. You cannot possibly have 100% confidence in longshots, you should only have confidence in your system as a whole, not per individual investment you bet on a game.

I reckon you should also consider the probability of not winning the bet. That's also a possibility, and in many cases it can be the most common scenario, depending on the odds.

At the end of the day you need to look at this from an analytical point of view, if you want to have any kind of percentage metrics.

If you just go with your gut, then there's no need to quantify anything, so percentages are irrelevant in that situation.

[harizen]

If you just go with your gut, then there's no need to quantify anything, so percentages are irrelevant in that situation.

It does make sense honestly. Actually, even with only gut, sometimes winning is always nailed.

What are the factors? Nothing really technical but just trusting that the bet made will be hit regardless of the odds.

Sometimes, I'm having a trait like that where I disregards any analysis but just depends on my own view.