AskAI: List of on chain gambling game.

[AmoreJaz]

-snip-

That's why I told that (It's based on overview article).

Most the time, keywords, review and other aspect for the answer. So, the list is not 100% correct and some of "site-casino" is included. Need to be listed by our self as well, since the data is from internet too.

The data is from the INTERNET only. Not sure what is the algorithm behind fetching those results but definitely it could not be validated just like that. We should really have less dependency on such results or questions which are vaguely answered based on what "others" have written somewhere on a blog site or review site for that matter.

I would not hold my breath on whether people will eventually learn that artificial intelligence can be reliable to substitute an appropriate investigation on ourselves. For example, I already have a friend who is getting used to using AI to ask for questions and information to work with, instead using a browser and search for what he needs manually.

Imagine a scenario someone new to gambling ask the AI about a reputable casino and ends up using 1xbit or any other shady casino because the massive shilling on internet affects what the AI says.  

that would be a disaster if the AI suggested that casino to be on top reputable casinos. as it is collecting info via internet resources, it can very well catch the attention of the AI because there's a lot of ads as well as mention of this casino over the net. well, if you won't do your own due diligence, you will indeed register to such casino. you will only learn the truth once your funds are in possession with them.
you may ask assistance from AI but you should personally investigate if such suggestion is valid. i don't think you can fully trust AIs because they also have limitations, as they are only basing from the database they possess.

[abel1337]

-snip-

That's why I told that (It's based on overview article).

Most the time, keywords, review and other aspect for the answer. So, the list is not 100% correct and some of "site-casino" is included. Need to be listed by our self as well, since the data is from internet too.

The data is from the INTERNET only. Not sure what is the algorithm behind fetching those results but definitely it could not be validated just like that. We should really have less dependency on such results or questions which are vaguely answered based on what "others" have written somewhere on a blog site or review site for that matter.

I would not hold my breath on whether people will eventually learn that artificial intelligence can be reliable to substitute an appropriate investigation on ourselves. For example, I already have a friend who is getting used to using AI to ask for questions and information to work with, instead using a browser and search for what he needs manually.

Imagine a scenario someone new to gambling ask the AI about a reputable casino and ends up using 1xbit or any other shady casino because the massive shilling on internet affects what the AI says. 

Oh yes, I have just did it and it turns out to be a disappointment as I don't see AI tagging 1xbit as a straight scam site. Asking an AI if 1xbit is a legitimate casino and this is the AI answer. I'm using chatGPT-3 and chatGPT-4 which is open to the public. chatGPT-4 is much more better than chatGPT-3 and the results show how better it is. A stronger AI doesn't give a definite answer about legitimacy thus giving advice to the user in making their own research about the casino. I guess that the answers will depend on how strong the AI you are using as better AI do have more power.

chatGPT-3


chatGPT-4

[Hispo]

-snip-

That's why I told that (It's based on overview article).

Most the time, keywords, review and other aspect for the answer. So, the list is not 100% correct and some of "site-casino" is included. Need to be listed by our self as well, since the data is from internet too.

The data is from the INTERNET only. Not sure what is the algorithm behind fetching those results but definitely it could not be validated just like that. We should really have less dependency on such results or questions which are vaguely answered based on what "others" have written somewhere on a blog site or review site for that matter.

I would not hold my breath on whether people will eventually learn that artificial intelligence can be reliable to substitute an appropriate investigation on ourselves. For example, I already have a friend who is getting used to using AI to ask for questions and information to work with, instead using a browser and search for what he needs manually.

Imagine a scenario someone new to gambling ask the AI about a reputable casino and ends up using 1xbit or any other shady casino because the massive shilling on internet affects what the AI says. 

Oh yes, I have just did it and it turns out to be a disappointment as I don't see AI tagging 1xbit as a straight scam site. Asking an AI if 1xbit is a legitimate casino and this is the AI answer. I'm using chatGPT-3 and chatGPT-4 which is open to the public. chatGPT-4 is much more better than chatGPT-3 and the results show how better it is. A stronger AI doesn't give a definite answer about legitimacy thus giving advice to the user in making their own research about the casino. I guess that the answers will depend on how strong the AI you are using as better AI do have more power.

chatGPT-3


chatGPT-4

There you go, that is exactly what I meant.

I believe that because of this and the rest of the things we have discussed in this thread we can reach the conclusion that one should not trust an artificial intelligence to choose a casino. Not only a casino, but rather any kind of online business or provider.

they are vulnerable to the shilling going on internet. 

[ogamibr]

-snip-

That's why I told that (It's based on overview article).

Most the time, keywords, review and other aspect for the answer. So, the list is not 100% correct and some of "site-casino" is included. Need to be listed by our self as well, since the data is from internet too.

The data is from the INTERNET only. Not sure what is the algorithm behind fetching those results but definitely it could not be validated just like that. We should really have less dependency on such results or questions which are vaguely answered based on what "others" have written somewhere on a blog site or review site for that matter.

I would not hold my breath on whether people will eventually learn that artificial intelligence can be reliable to substitute an appropriate investigation on ourselves. For example, I already have a friend who is getting used to using AI to ask for questions and information to work with, instead using a browser and search for what he needs manually.

Imagine a scenario someone new to gambling ask the AI about a reputable casino and ends up using 1xbit or any other shady casino because the massive shilling on internet affects what the AI says. 

Oh yes, I have just did it and it turns out to be a disappointment as I don't see AI tagging 1xbit as a straight scam site. Asking an AI if 1xbit is a legitimate casino and this is the AI answer. I'm using chatGPT-3 and chatGPT-4 which is open to the public. chatGPT-4 is much more better than chatGPT-3 and the results show how better it is. A stronger AI doesn't give a definite answer about legitimacy thus giving advice to the user in making their own research about the casino. I guess that the answers will depend on how strong the AI you are using as better AI do have more power.

chatGPT-3


chatGPT-4

Please remember that the chatgpt 3 database goes up to 2021 (training data) , so the information obtained there may differ. I still haven't had access to version 4.0 so I can't say anything about it.

[aioc]

Ask the same to OpenAI ChatGPT3 and let us know the response that you are getting.

You already did that this is an AI that will give you the same answers because they are not based on human perception, they give what is in the database, AI's are storage of information that we can ask to retract on a given subject, they do commit errors because based on the information it provided like all the other observation many of the sites listed are no on-chain gaming at all.
There's a lot of praise for these AIs but they are not perfect I don't know the average, but it should help other fields but I always doubt if they really help gamblers win a majority of their bet when they cannot give an accurate list of on-chain gambling sites like what you provided.

[piebeyb]

I also ask the same thing and every day the answer is not always the same, try to ask it again on CHatGPT, but the list above is a list of gambling sites that were once active on this forum as well and I have played on several of the sites above.

[Kakmakr]

In my view AI has one flaw.... "Garbage in, garbage out"

The AI has to acquire data from the Internet and then process that to give an answer to the question. The info that are posted on the Internet are done by humans, so it can be flawed.

Until AI can be clever enough to sort the good information from the bad, it will just be as dumb as most humans. This is a typical example of that.... 

See my thread on this subject ==> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5444560.0

[traderethereum]

The presence of AI at this time cannot give us full support in answering something because AI technology is still being developed to make it even better.
And if we try to use ChatGPT to ask something, maybe the answer cannot provide accurate answer because there are still limitations in AI to provide that answer.
That is why many developers are still developing this AI to achieve what they want so that people can use it how they want.
So we have to understand if AI cannot yet be the right solution to help us find answers to questions that might be too complicated for AI.

[TheGreatPython]

Thanks for this, and it just shows that,

1. AI is not really that complete as this stage
2. Still based on us, on how we are going to enrich that AI

So it's good to test it, but don't expect something complete. I know few of the sites that mention there, but there could be more missing in the list, obviously.

There can be two reasons why the list is not complete.
1. ChatGPT's information is only limited until 2021, and it has no knowledge of anything that has happened after that.

2. You will need to specifically mention in your prompt that you need all the available items to be on the list, otherwise, it will just generally pick some of the from the data it has and present them to you.

Overall, you are right that AI is still not as complete as people think it is, and even the information it provides can sometimes be wrong, though presented very rightly. So, it is always better to check the generated information before using them just to avoid problems.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

it's curious that chatgpt didn't mention satoshibones which is one of the most historic games of the genre (among other things I don't understand if it's still active but site is online).
I would not be wrong but also luckybit should no longer be active....

  -     That is probably not included in the chatGPT program that you mentioned. I think what others have said here is also correct that whatever program is entered is the only one that will be answered and provided by chatgpt.

Then I also noticed there on chatgpt that it looks like it is not updated on the latest happenings in cryptocurrency, whether it's casino, trading and so on, I just don't know if others here have noticed it too.

[Daltonik]

it's true what @davis196 said that chatGPT hasn't fully generated the correct answer out of the several replies that have been answered here all have different answers.
~

Yes, there may be different answers received from chatGPT for requests from different users, but I got the same answer to two different questions regarding popular on-chain gambling games, I don't know maybe because I don't have a subscription to chatGPT and in this case there may be limitations on its capabilities otherwise it is difficult to explain.

[tusandii]

I also ask the same thing and every day the answer is not always the same, try to ask it again on CHatGPT, but the list above is a list of gambling sites that were once active on this forum as well and I have played on several of the sites above.

I'm not sure if I ask again on CHatGPT I can get more information because without having to ask on CHatGPT if it's only a casino site like what the OP has informed us we can still get more on this forum.
Maybe it will just be in vain and the answer is the same as before.
But to be able to get all that information we just need to be patient and look more carefully here because there is already a lot of information that we want to know if we really intend to look for it on this bitcointalk forum.

[redsun114]

I am not familiar with all the gambling sites listed, as I have not reviewed them all. However, some sites, such as Bitvest, are not based on blockchain or smart contracts. So, I believe Bitvest is not an on-chain gambling site.

I thought you are not familiar with them? But how do you know that Bitvest is not among the on-chain betting sites? Some of these sites are old and popular in the forum but maybe you missed them since you are only registered in the year of 2019 and then their announcement threads are not that active anymore. I noticed that there are now so many topics like this in the forum, not just limited on the gambling board. It seems that people here are using Chatgpt now like a google to find stuffs but I still think that google is much better or much smarter than this Chatgpt.

~snip~

Some of the sites are fine. The problem is only about you because you don't understand how they work.

[bettercrypto]

There you go, that is exactly what I meant.

I believe that because of this and the rest of the things we have discussed in this thread we can reach the conclusion that one should not trust an artificial intelligence to choose a casino. Not only a casino, but rather any kind of online business or provider.

they are vulnerable to the shilling going on internet. 

Oh my Gosh(OMG), apart from the fact that this AI chatgpt is no longer updated with information about cryptocurrency and bitcoin, it is still scary to believe and trust.

      Because of that kind of thing, it even gives misleading to other communities that will use chatgpt, just like that in 1xbit casino which is popular for scamming gamblers who will gamble on their platform.

[Hispo]

There you go, that is exactly what I meant.

I believe that because of this and the rest of the things we have discussed in this thread we can reach the conclusion that one should not trust an artificial intelligence to choose a casino. Not only a casino, but rather any kind of online business or provider.

they are vulnerable to the shilling going on internet.  

Oh my Gosh(OMG), apart from the fact that this AI chatgpt is no longer updated with information about cryptocurrency and bitcoin, it is still scary to believe and trust.

      Because of that kind of thing, it even gives misleading to other communities that will use chatgpt, just like that in 1xbit casino which is popular for scamming gamblers who will gamble on their platform.

Yes. It may be a vulnerability that developers have not thought about, hows these bots could repeat false information. Granted, they probably took care of the political and medical misinformation, so the AI won't spread even further the usual conspiracy theories, but they did not care about scams.

Also, days ago I recall the Slime Games casino announcing an integration of chatGPT on their chat, for some reason. It would be weird if some novice gambler also started talking about casinos with the AI and this latter recommends a bad casino like 1xbit out of nowhere.

[maydna]

it's curious that chatgpt didn't mention satoshibones which is one of the most historic games of the genre (among other things I don't understand if it's still active but site is online).
I would not be wrong but also luckybit should no longer be active....

  -     That is probably not included in the chatGPT program that you mentioned. I think what others have said here is also correct that whatever program is entered is the only one that will be answered and provided by chatgpt.

Then I also noticed there on chatgpt that it looks like it is not updated on the latest happenings in cryptocurrency, whether it's casino, trading and so on, I just don't know if others here have noticed it too.

Perhaps, the answer from chatGPT needs to be updated again because I think many other casinos might be included in the list, especially if we see many new casinos nowadays. I know a little about Bitvest as this casino has an ANN thread on this forum and once used a signature campaign to promote the casino.

Let's wait for development from the developer, and if he is a gambler, he should have more casino lists

Perhaps, it's little things like that that AI or chatGPT developers still need to develop to provide even better answers.

[Stalker22]

I am not familiar with all the gambling sites listed, as I have not reviewed them all. However, some sites, such as Bitvest, are not based on blockchain or smart contracts. So, I believe Bitvest is not an on-chain gambling site.

I thought you are not familiar with them? But how do you know that Bitvest is not among the on-chain betting sites?

Please read my response once more. To clarify, I said that I am not familiar with ALL the sites listed. However, I am well familiar with Bitvest as I have previously used their services and even promoted them by wearing their signature for a period of time. And no, they are not an on-chain gambling site as far as I know.

[notblox1]

I asked the above to OpenAI ChatGPT3 and got the following response...

This AI failed to mention one of the best casinos that accepts cryptocurrencies and that is Sportsbet.
It's weird because Sportsbet is very active online and in bitcointalk forum, so I expected to see them included in AI list.
Can you ask AI again what he thinks about Sportsbet and why he didn't say about them before?

[Hispo]

I asked the above to OpenAI ChatGPT3 and got the following response...

This AI failed to mention one of the best casinos that accepts cryptocurrencies and that is Sportsbet.
It's weird because Sportsbet is very active online and in bitcointalk forum, so I expected to see them included in AI list.
Can you ask AI again what he thinks about Sportsbet and why he didn't say about them before?

Only God knows from whatever corner of the internet the AI got the information to reply that way.
The fact that it has not even mentioned a reputable and long proved casino as Stake only makes this to look more weird if you ask me.

I mean, I have seen more unknown casinos being mentioned in this thread than those that would be considered to be staples among the average crypto gambler who reads this section. 

Let us just take a look at this insanity: It is almost equaling 1xbit to Stake!   

[ethereumhunter]

Even though I'm curious to try it, I'm still not interested in using ChatGPT. ChatGPT hasn't been able to give a proper answer when a user asks something. At least, that's what I read from many articles or websites that discuss Open AI Chat GPT. They complain that what they want has not satisfied their curiosity and sometimes they get ambiguous answers from what they ask. So I'm not surprised if you are looking for answers using Open AI Chat GPT and this seems to be homework for Open AI developers to improve AI performance. And it still takes time to see the development of Open AI to a better stage than it is now.