Future of play to earn games

[uneng]

The most entertaining, well done and complete Play to Earn games developed so far didn't show any respect and consideration for the community of players, rather their only goal was to milk money from players, without caring about long term goals and survival of the game. They were MIR4 and Ni No Kuni. Bots and toxic players killed the environment. And that is so sad, because the games were really good and promising.

With some adjustments those games could be popular until nowadays, while working as side income for many players. If at some point in the future a studio comes with a similar idea, but propitiating a friendly environment for every players (not only the addicted, wealthy ones) I think it will be a huge success.

[SirLancelot]

What do you think about play to earn blockchain games? Do you think that video game players will one day abandon Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games or Microsoft and Sony will one day be forced to allow play to earn games to run on their gaming devices?

What? LOL I think what you are thinking there is crazy. First of all, there is no way that we can compare the games of those two giant companies from the games that we are seeing here in the crypto/blockchain space because their differences are just a million miles a way. Sony and Microsoft have been making games ever since the world began but crypto/blockchain game developers are most likely new to this industry and as you can see, their games are pretty basic.

Second of all, I don't think owners of those two companies will play crypto/blockchain based games once their games have been beaten up by it. They will only play their own creations because they believe that it was still fun than the rest of the games out there.

[VRExpress]

What do you think about play to earn blockchain games? Do you think that video game players will one day abandon Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games or Microsoft and Sony will one day be forced to allow play to earn games to run on their gaming devices?

What? LOL I think what you are thinking there is crazy. First of all, there is no way that we can compare the games of those two giant companies from the games that we are seeing here in the crypto/blockchain space because their differences are just a million miles a way. Sony and Microsoft have been making games ever since the world began but crypto/blockchain game developers are most likely new to this industry and as you can see, their games are pretty basic.

Second of all, I don't think owners of those two companies will play crypto/blockchain based games once their games have been beaten up by it. They will only play their own creations because they believe that it was still fun than the rest of the games out there.

This was how Nokia used Apple to laugh at launch, you will never know what will happen, blockchain gaming might take over gaming industry some day, Unity and other big giants are already getting to web3 blockchain gaming projects, I believe that play to earn games will make some biggest gains in 2024, let's wait and see.

[bitgolden]

for now play to earn has been abandoned by many people, because it is no longer profitable, but if in the future there are big game companies that make new innovations about play to earn, then maybe play to earn will be of interest to many people again, because for now there is no play to earn that gives profit like axie and metamon (which I have played), so people stop playing and invest in play to earn, but I'm still sure if play to earn can back in existence and booming again in the future (just waiting for the market to recover).

The hype may be lower but I think a lot of people are still playing games like Axie or Splinterlands. The token price of all blockchain based games has dropped a lot but it was also up without any good reason. You can still make some good money with these games if you get in very early and can sell at the right time.

The big drop that happened was not just based on these games but the whole market crashed, so there is a truth in the fact that it will recover and there is nothing wrong with them, it wasn't their fault and it was a market thing.

However, when we are talking about something that is a bit more towards how you could make a profit with these? Then it has to be about the hype, in order for them to grow bigger they need to make the users profit, and they are not doing that right now, which is the issue. If they go back to profitable point then the users will come back and when they come back there will be more buyers and even more profit and the hype will be back again.

[masulum]

-snip- blockchain gaming might take over gaming industry some day, Unity and other big giants are already getting to web3 blockchain gaming projects, I believe that play to earn games will make some biggest gains in 2024, let's wait and see.

Blockchain games are struggling to grow because most players are focused on "profit" rather than fun. The success of traditional games is because they are (players) willing to give their time to play as entertainment. Whereas in the era of blockchain-based games with P2E systems, the hype made this game appear as a phenomenon to get instant profits. This changes the way of thinking in playing., so, when players feel they are not getting any profits anymore, even though they have spent money to buy NFTs (for example), in the end they leave the game. actually, i don't really understand how they are thinking about spending money, because many traditional games nowadays are willing to spend money for in-app items purchase without any chance to resell it.

[xCryptoManiaX]

The most entertaining, well done and complete Play to Earn games developed so far didn't show any respect and consideration for the community of players, rather their only goal was to milk money from players, without caring about long term goals and survival of the game. They were MIR4 and Ni No Kuni. Bots and toxic players killed the environment. And that is so sad, because the games were really good and promising.

With some adjustments those games could be popular until nowadays, while working as side income for many players. If at some point in the future a studio comes with a similar idea, but propitiating a friendly environment for every players (not only the addicted, wealthy ones) I think it will be a huge success.

It would always be a non-stop race - devs versus botters. The botters always find a way. Look at runescape for example - even with all the ban waves, people still bot to this day.
Such game would need to be profitable as a business and have really good funding to be able to fight back botters.

[uneng]

The most entertaining, well done and complete Play to Earn games developed so far didn't show any respect and consideration for the community of players, rather their only goal was to milk money from players, without caring about long term goals and survival of the game. They were MIR4 and Ni No Kuni. Bots and toxic players killed the environment. And that is so sad, because the games were really good and promising.

With some adjustments those games could be popular until nowadays, while working as side income for many players. If at some point in the future a studio comes with a similar idea, but propitiating a friendly environment for every players (not only the addicted, wealthy ones) I think it will be a huge success.

It would always be a non-stop race - devs versus botters. The botters always find a way. Look at runescape for example - even with all the ban waves, people still bot to this day.
Such game would need to be profitable as a business and have really good funding to be able to fight back botters.

If developers manage to keep the environment of the game at Runescape's level it's already a good thing, because as we see, despite bots harming the game for decades already, they aren't able to completely destroy it. Moreover, there are players making income from Runescape, so it's an example of sustainable "play to earn" game, even though it's forbidden to trade gold and items for real money by the rules.

[borovichok]

What do you think about play to earn blockchain games? Do you think that video game players will one day abandon Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games or Microsoft and Sony will one day be forced to allow play to earn games to run on their gaming devices?

The market have been bearish for a lengthy period of time and this condition of the market affected P2E games, but with time, they started to have investors who are voluntarily ready to invest in gigantic figures inother to strive higher profits. Play to earn games will grow rapidly in the space and in the incoming years, they will surpassed Sony and Microsoft games. This is a complex fact to accept but it's just a matter of time. As time goes on, we're open to advance techs and Web 3 Blockchain have been triggered into existence for the development of crypto projects.

[xSkylarx]

Play to earn games right now become slow right now compared before when most of everyone wants to to play those play to earn games. I think there are only couple of games that are play to earn right now but the future of it is that the possibility thay there will be games that coming from thos big companies that wil adopt to it. Right now Microsoft or Sony wont be doing a play to earn game as they are more focused right now in AI

[nazmul30]

The basic concept behind earning from games is not something that has entered our lives.  Indeed, it has been appearing in various forms and names for a time;  One of them is to earn by viewing ads, for example.  However, the rapid shift to Web 3, the new version of the Internet that focuses on decentralization and user ownership, and the growing number of blockchain games are starting to add real meaning to play-to-earn as a term.  So what is earning from the game and how does it work?  Which games can you earn by playing?  You can find answers to these and many more questions in this article.

[Shamm]

What do you think about play to earn blockchain games? Do you think that video game players will one day abandon Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games or Microsoft and Sony will one day be forced to allow play to earn games to run on their gaming devices?

we can not deny the fact that a Play to Earn (P2E) is very recommendable to for some people. It because of the advantages that if you play then you will earn and the other thing is that gamers will be happy if they will get a money while playing. And this is a good way to introduce the blackcahain technology in the world and if this gonna addot to Sony and Microsoft then this will be the great.

[DevFile90]

This will be a game changer if Sony and Microsoft gets into play to earn games, I see some people saying that play to earn games can never be high quality, you are wrong, there are few play to earn games that are running on Unreal Engine 5 and once these type of games completes they will be able to compete with triple A games.

[masulum]

we can not deny the fact that a Play to Earn (P2E) is very recommendable to for some people. It because of the advantages that if you play then you will earn and the other thing is that gamers will be happy if they will get a money while playing. -snip-

Don't get me wrong, most P2E games we plays need an item to start and the value of the investment they have to spend. There are some NFT items for games that need to be purchased for more than 1 ETH ^(example) for good features, with that money you also have to understand how big the potential is for ROI. If the ROI of the game is more than 1 year, it means this game is not worth playing. Sometimes we only look at the "income", but don't pay attention to the money that must be spent to start the game. P2E not offer easy money as the hype.

[Myleschetty]

The future of the play-to-earn games is not certain due to the foul play activities done by some scam P2E project teams and if the P2E projects cant upgrade their services by providing customers experience and earning with innovative ideas i don't see players abandoning Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games

[cryptoknightt]

it all depends on the games themselves and how much money they give players.
to my knowledge so far Sony and Microsoft have invested heavily in blockchain technology, and it is possible that they will expand their traditional gaming model to include play-to-earn blockchain games.
they can integrate blockchain solutions into their existing games to provide new opportunities for players.
will definitely attract traditional games or old school games that can collaborate with trends

[Hispo]

Very unlikely P2E games would be able to compete against giants like Sony and Microsoft.
The best game so far in my opinion was Axie Infinity and it has become unreliable as a way to make money.

even though, I am not much into those kind of projects, lately there has been news of Nintendo seeking to implement NFT technology for their pokemon games. If the news are true (as it seems to be), pokemons in the future could be actually NFTs which may lead to a secondary market where people would commerce their rarest creatures for money, even if that is not the initial plan of Nintendo.

You can check more about here:

The Pokemon Company is hiring an NFT and blockchain expert

Source: https://www.gameshub.com/news/news/pokemon-company-hiring-nft-metaverse-knowledge-2609440/

[woez]

for now play to earn has been abandoned by many people, because it is no longer profitable, but if in the future there are big game companies that make new innovations about play to earn, then maybe play to earn will be of interest to many people again, because for now there is no play to earn that gives profit like axie and metamon (which I have played), so people stop playing and invest in play to earn, but I'm still sure if play to earn can back in existence and booming again in the future (just waiting for the market to recover).

The hype may be lower but I think a lot of people are still playing games like Axie or Splinterlands. The token price of all blockchain based games has dropped a lot but it was also up without any good reason. You can still make some good money with these games if you get in very early and can sell at the right time.

The big drop that happened was not just based on these games but the whole market crashed, so there is a truth in the fact that it will recover and there is nothing wrong with them, it wasn't their fault and it was a market thing.

Play-to-earn games offer opportunities for players to make money, but not everyone has the same access to the technology or skills needed to participate. One more thing about Lack of regulation Play-to-earn games operate in relatively new and unregulated markets, which can lead to fraudulent activity, such as Ponzi schemes, and a lack of consumer protection. I think it's very important to talk about it.

[Huppercase]

The most entertaining, well done and complete Play to Earn games developed so far didn't show any respect and consideration for the community of players, rather their only goal was to milk money from players, without caring about long term goals and survival of the game. They were MIR4 and Ni No Kuni. Bots and toxic players killed the environment. And that is so sad, because the games were really good and promising.

With some adjustments those games could be popular until nowadays, while working as side income for many players. If at some point in the future a studio comes with a similar idea, but propitiating a friendly environment for every players (not only the addicted, wealthy ones) I think it will be a huge success.

It would always be a non-stop race - devs versus botters. The botters always find a way. Look at runescape for example - even with all the ban waves, people still bot to this day.
Such game would need to be profitable as a business and have really good funding to be able to fight back botters.

I think the devs knows the permanen solutions to this bots problems, it is hard to stop bots activities but if the developers doesbn't want bots on their gaming websites, they can do it but I guess they also need it to manipulate the numbers of users, that is what some of them use to show their stats to other gaming competitors, they can announced and bost of having million user but if you check very well, the real users might not be up to 100k playing game and they will be the quick to cry that users are stealing rewards, they want users and bots but afraid of how the rewards are stolen by users.

[goaldigger]

What do you think about play to earn blockchain games? Do you think that video game players will one day abandon Sony and Microsoft companies for play to earn games or Microsoft and Sony will one day be forced to allow play to earn games to run on their gaming devices?

P2E game seems not a threat yet to many game provider, but if they want innovation as well they can choose to have their own P2E game and compete with other crypto project. The future is still bright for P2E games, I can see they will have a good comeback next bull market, already saw some promising projects. If Sony will adopt, this can be a big changes for P2E market.

[soramon]

I have been felt some P2E games and i think its okay. As long as you entry on good time you will get profit. P2E games is not for long run you can see axie or other games that drop so hard after gain so much popularity. Never go all in on P2E